Stephen Hill is the next WR slated to be selected in the 1st round who has a visit planned with the Carolina Panthers. (Photo courtesy of the National Football Post)
While vacationing in Australia earlier this year I went to the zoo and got to witness the subtlety of a ten-ton elephant first hand. ***Spoilers: They're not very graceful***
So too have the Carolina Panthers been trying to tiptoe around the issue of the WR corps, being very complimentary of the current group, while quietly looking like an organization scrambling to find an upgrade at the position. If you hate the idea of taking a WR early then so be it. You probably also thought this line by Marty Hurney a year ago was 'smokescreen' too:
"You look at the history of rookie quarterbacks, and it's really unfair to expect a quarterback to go in and have a lot of success as a rookie,"
It wasn't too unfair, however, to work out Cam Newton, vet him, and replace Clausen post-haste; it was the right move. What is unfair is to lump Brandon LaFell and the rest of the receivers in with Jimmy Clausen, but the organization making no bones about ensuring they've looked at every top receiver in this draft. Could it be 'due diligence'? Perhaps, though it's funny this fastidiousness applies to the WR position, and not the one where you have two starters recovering from ACL tears (LB).
More after the jump
Yesterday Tony Pauline dropped another Panthers' visit on us:
Stephen Hill/WR/Georgia Tech visiting the Carolina Panthers next week....
— Tony Pauline (@TonyPauline) April 13, 2012
Come on down Mr. Hill, you're the next 1st round WR to be scouted by the Panthers!
Okay, that was a little on the nose- but it's really pretty uncanny how much work Carolina are putting into the position given how much they're telling the world they love their talent. Here are the top 10 WR's matched up against the top 10 DT's (a position most fans think is dire). Information is what I have found/gathered regarding interest.
| Name | Position | Visited Charlotte | Interviewed at combine | Position coaches attended pro-day |
| Justin Blackmon | WR | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Michael Brockers | DT | Yes | Yes | No |
| Michael Floyd | WR | Yes | Yes | No |
| Fletcher Cox | DT | Yes | No | No |
| Kendall Wright | WR | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Dontari Poe | DT | Yes | No | No |
| Stephen Hill | WR | Yes | No | Yes |
| Devon Still | DT | No | No | No |
| Mohamad Sanu | WR | No | Yes | No |
| Jerel Worthy | DT | Yes | Yes | No |
| Devon Wylie | WR | No | Yes | Yes |
| Brandon Thompson | DT | No | No | Yes |
| Joe Adams | WR | No | No | Yes |
| Kendall Reyes | DT | No | No | No |
| Jarius Wright | WR | No | No | No |
| Alameda Ta'amu | DT | No | Yes | No |
| Marvin Jones | WR | No | Yes | No |
| Jared Crick | DT | No | No | Yes |
| Reuben Randle | WR | Yes | Yes | No |
| Mike Martin | DT | No | No | No |
Take it for what you will, but here's the final tally:
WRs: 5 team visits, 7 interviews in Indianapolis, 5 significant position coaches at combine
DTs: 4 team visits, 3 interviews in Indianapolis, 2 significant position coaches at combine
It's important to distinguish that some of these WRs like Joe Adams and Devon Wylie are almost certainly being looked at for special teams roles, rather than as starting WRs. However, I think you'll agree it's interesting nonetheless.
The organization are ensuring they have every possible based covered for every scenario at WR, something we haven't seen at any other position. Sure, there's a cautionary tale about buying too heavily into draft rumors- but based on current stock here are the Panthers options at the WR position:
- If Blackmon slips to #9, they have him scouted.
- If Blackmon is gone, but Floyd is available, they have him scouted.
- If they trade back into the teens they have Kendall Wright scouted.
- If they trade back into the mid-twenties (or trade back up from the 2nd round) they have Stephen Hill and Reuben Randle scouted.
- If they wait to take a WR at the top of round two they have Joe Adams scouted.
They've essentially blanketed the WR position for every conceivable early outcome, in a way few positions have been evaluated. Personally, I'm still not enamored with the idea of taking a receiver early. This seems like a very deep draft at the position, with a lack of truly standout players. That being said, I can't deny that the organization are showing a lot of interest in receivers, with little reason to promulgate this much smoke screen. Odd interest here or there? Sure, I'll buy subterfuge; scout the entire freakin' class? Not so much.
I'm just glad this will all be explained in twelve days/


There are 235 Comments. Load Now.
Shortcuts to mastering the comment thread. Use wisely.
C - Next Comment
X - Mark as Read
R - Reply
Z - Mark Read & Next
Shift + C - Previous
Shift + A - Mark All Read
Comment Settings
Live comment alert: Hide it!
Comments for this post are closed.