GREG HARDY - Dispelling Myths about the DL
This will be a long post, full of raw data, but I've spent many hours grading game film, so that several incorrect assumptions about our DL personnel could be clarified. As I promised, on this thread.
(If my play analysis shows me to be wrong, I’ll admit it freely, BTW.)
But it didn't.
This also answers criticism of Hardy that derived from an earlier thread. I let this early thread go by, without much comment, but when Revshawn was so laudatory in his praise of James, and repeated the myth (about our Run Defense), I started taking a look - because I thought that they were seeing it wrong.
I don't post often about Cap Space, because contracts are so fluid, and I have no idea of management's intentions.
And I similarly avoid much involvement in Mock Drafts, because, as my good friend, Jake Humphrey once said, about college players:
Proper evaluation is an inexact science.
More than that, I have no dog in the fight, from college affiliations, and, again, have no idea of management intentions, as to what they perceive their needs to be. I don't do windows, or FF, and I don't play a GM on TV.
All that said, if it's evaluation of a particular NFL player, with film available to study, I'll put forth the effort to justify an opinion, not just wing it with a cursory, off-the-cuff comment.
All that's preamble. Here we go, from what I gleaned from intensive study of the 2 Panther games I still had on DVR: game 14, at Houston; and game 15, vs Tampa Bay.
They are admittedly only an 1/8th of the last season, but they both came late, and therefore better represent what the future might hold, rather than much earlier games, with rawer talent. And one was a home game, one away. One was against a highly touted Division Winner; the other vs a dog loser with a coach who was a dead man walking.
I have every defensive play individually described, and if anyone wants details, ask. But here's the summary of those 2 games, as to how the reps were divided among our DL, and especially what spots were manned, how often, by Charles Johnson and Greg Hardy. Remember, the main thrust of this whole endeavor is to dispel the myth that Hardy is responsible for only one side of our DL, and it's the side that was ranked 32nd in the NFL.
Game 14, 12/18/11, at Houston, won by Carolina, 28-13.
Our Defense held the Texans to only 10 series, a total of 60 plays.
First, the reps. This will show the DL coaches really get everybody involved, with constant shuttling in subs, which the casual observer probably doesn't notice.
Charles Johnson, 47 plays (21 at LDE, 23 at RDE, 3 at RDT.)
Greg Hardy, 50 plays (21 at LDE, 22 at RDE, 3 at LDT, 4 at RDT.)
Andre Neblett, 40 at DT
Frank Kearse, 23 at DT
Jason Shirley, 23 at DT
Ogemdi Nwagbuo, 14 at DT
Thomas Keiser, 25 plays (16 at LDE, 9 at RDE)
Antwan Applewhite, 18 plays (3 at LDE, 8 at LDT, 1 at RDT, 6 at RDE)
Second, the results, (but only on their 25 rushes, because we're not concerned with pass defense in any of these discussions):
4 runs around their LE gained +6, -1, +2, and +7 yds (the 1st 3 of those were when Hardy was RDE, the last Johnson)
4 runs were off their LT: +1, +8, +5, +15. (the first and last were vs Hardy, the other 2, Johnson)
7 runs off LG gained +1, +9, +5, +5, +4, +1, and +3.
3 off RG netted +4, +22, and +6.
3 off RT went for +4, +18, and +9 (these were on Hardy, then Johnson, then Keiser, playing LDE)
only 1 rush went to their RE, gaining +6, when Hardy was at LDE.
(The others were QB scrambles.)
Random Notes on the Houston game:
7 Runs to the Tackle and End, with Hardy on that side, gained 33 yds, averaging 4.7.
4 Runs to the Tackle and End, with Johnson on that side, gained 38 yds, averaging 8.2 yds.
Johnson and Hardy switched assignments within 7 of the 10 series, and on 2 others, Hardy only played at Tackle, when Keiser and CJ went outside. I didn't specify it, but on many series, the 2 DTs would also switch up.
Despite a rookie QB, Yates, we didn't blitz until the 8th series, halfway through the 3rd quarter, comfortably ahead, 21-3. There were only 3 blitzes in this game, by Senn, Anderson, and Connor.
Hardy was doubled-teamed 3 times, Johnson not at all.
Hardy recorded 1 Sack, 1 QB Hurry and a pass deflection (Q2, 11:40) - these last 2 plays were back to back, leading to 2 incompletions, and a 3-and-out punt by Houston, in their 4th Series.
Game 15, 12/24/11, vs Tampa Bay, won by Carolina, 48-16.
Because we scored so often, and often quickly, and because they turned it over 4 times, (and twice more on downs), they had more series (12) than Houston, and ran 68 plays - only 19 were rushes, gaining only 59 yds.
First, the reps:
Charles Johnson, 21 plays (14 at LDE, 7 at RDE) He was dinged twice in the game, and the game was out of hand, anyway. He only saw 4 plays in the second half.
Greg Hardy, 59 plays (30 at LDE, 21 at RDE, 5 at LDT, 3 at RDT)
Andre Neblett, 35 plays at DT.
Frank Kearse, 35 at DT.
Jason Shirley, 20 at DT.
Ogemdi Nwagbuo, 33 at DT.
Thomas Keiser, 42 plays (13 at LDE, 29 at RDE)
Antwan Applewhite, 26 plays (11 at LDE, 2 at LDT, 4 at RDT, 9 at RDE)
Second, the results:
1 rush around their LE lost 2 yds (TFL by Hardy, when at RDE)
2 off their LT gained +8 and +8, vs Johnson and Hardy
6 off their LG resulted in: a Forced Fumble (1st play), +9, +2, +2, 0, and +1.
5 off their RG went for +4, 0, +3, +3, and +4.
3 off RT gained 0 (CJ), +7 (CJ), and +3 (Keiser)
2 off RDE got -2 (TFL by Anderson) and +4 (Hardy)
Random Notes on the Tampa Bay game:
Our platoon of DTs pretty much stuffed the middle all day, allowing 28 yds on 11 carries, average of 2.5 yds. I think this speaks well of the job Neblett, Kearse, Shirley, and Nwagbuo are starting to do. They were gouged in the last game against N.O., I know, but that's a vastly superior OL.
Neblett was hurt in this game, colliding with CJ in the 3rd quarter, and used sparingly after that, allowing Nwagbuo and Kearse more reps.
The workhorse, on the field for 59 of the 68 plays on defense, Hardy acquitted himself well, with a TFL of 2 yds on a running play, 2 QB hits, 2 other Hurries (one of which came on a nice spin move, seldom used by him, in the 11th series), and a Forced Fumble, denying a 2-point conversion pass play, also in that series. This would have been a Sack, because he tackled Freeman 7 yds in the backfield, but those aren't counted on conversion tries. He was doubled 5 times.
Both Johnson and Hardy were guilty of Offsides Penalties on the 2nd series, but not thereafter, as they adjusted to Josh Freeman's snap count.
3 runs to the End or Tackle , with Hardy on that side, gained 10 yds, a 3.3 average.
3 runs to the End or Tackle, with Johnson on that side, gained 15, a 5 yd average.
So what conclusions can be drawn from all this?
Here's what James had to say in his "What Went Wrong" post:
It will take a few more weeks for the advanced statisticians to get us detailed metrics on each player on the defensive line, but what we know already is where the glaring weakness is in stopping the run. As it stands we have run defense stats based on where our opponents got their gains, courtesy of Football Outsiders.
Left end (ROLB reponsibility): 3.93 YPC, 10th in the NFL
Left tackle (Charles Johnson responsibility): 3.96 YPC, 13th in the NFL
Mid/Guard (NT/DT responsibility): 4.53 YPC, 31st in the NFL
Right tackle (Greg Hardy responsibility): 5.62 YPC, 32nd in the NFL
Right end (James Anderson responsibility): 5.63 YPC, 32nd in the NFL
Am I that advanced statistician? For these 2 games, I think I am.
I also think I've proven that Football Outsiders might have their numbers right, so far as the TEAM goes, but whether it was they, or James, who assigned those "responsibility" labels to our individual players (ESPECIALLY WHEN IT COMES TO GREG HARDY), it was patently wrong. He is as good (better?) than CJ in run defense, IMO.
I've detailed the work of 8 Panther DLmen in 2 of our last 3 games, and it should be apparent that the coaches are shuffling, rearranging, and evaluating which of them will play a part in the team of 2012. Personally, I didn't see a weak link in any of the 8.
Lastly, I wish to take the liberty of repeating a post I made in Revshawn's post (linked above), which, (because of all the Front Page articles coming on recently, only stayed there for 3 days) might have gotten overlooked by some:
There is a general misconception that Hardy is a RDE, and that all rushes to that side are his responsibility, and therefore that all successful rushes to our right side are his fault.I would remind all that Hardy and Johnson switched sides numerous times last year, often in the same series, and that Hardy was assigned to rush from DT in many sets, too, when Applewhite and/or Keiser would come in on 3rd down passing situations.
He is NOT a static player, with only one responsibility, and even drops in pass coverage from time to time.
I made it a point to check the changing defensive lineups that McDermott employed, and the switches of positions were far more than most teams employ.
Hardy is a versatile defensive lineman, who lines up anywhere, is many times doubled, often held, and in general, under-appreciated. The stats shown minimize his effectiveness, with their stress on Sacks, and don’t show the many pressures and hurries he got, as well.
by bigdavis on Feb 17, 2012 1:35 PM EST reply actions 6 recs
The content of these posts are those of the user/fan making the post only
68 comments
|
9 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Hey BW...saw you were working on this one too so I saved and backed out...carry on!
Never knew the platform would give you that kind of warning! too cool!
by Jaxon on Feb 21, 2012 3:36 PM EST reply actions 1 recs
LOL I backed out when I saw you were working on it.
That was neat though.
The truth will set you free, but not until it is finished with you. ~David Foster Wallace
I may not always be right, but even a blind nut finds a squirrel every once in a while.
by BW Smith on Feb 21, 2012 3:47 PM EST up reply actions 1 recs
BigD..nice analysis but...
when its just two games its hard to say you’ve debunked any myths…sample size too small. But your point is well made as far as how can anyone say Hardy was responsible for one side of the line and Johnson the other when they switch back and forth so often. Just the fact they were 50/50 in these two games would lead to an assumption the Panthers rotated in similar fashion in the other 14 games.
Thanks for the post…good stuff!
by Jaxon on Feb 21, 2012 3:43 PM EST reply actions 1 recs
Thank you, sir.
If anyone has the other 14 games recorded, and wants to do what I did, on them, have at it.
My main point was that is NO LDE and RDE on the Panthers.
by bigdavis on Feb 21, 2012 3:53 PM EST up reply actions 1 recs
The is a LDE and RDE
They rotated heavily in these game because it was during the time Johnson was fighting through aggravations of his shoulder injury sustained in the Detroit game. In fact, they did rotate as you said throughout the Houston and Tampa games with Johnson missing the final game of the season as a precaution due to the injury.
It’s unfortunate that these are the only games you have stored, because they were outliers due to Big Money’s injury, not representative of the season as a whole.
I am open to being shown wrong.
Easy to dismiss it. Harder to disprove it.
Somebody here has access to earlier games. Let him/her do the same work.
Sounds to me like my post didn’t pass your “smell test.”
Vs Houston, you’ re then trying to tell me that Johnson played 47 snaps, 23 at RE, 21 at LE, because his shoulder found that easier than just one side? (Sniff, sniff…)
by bigdavis on Feb 21, 2012 5:01 PM EST up reply actions 1 recs
No need to get so defensive about it...
I have access to the earlier games, because I subscribe to NFL rewind during the off-season.
Whether you think Football Outsider’s comparison of run defense by field side is flawed, then what about the stats from PFF jcbouche describes below? Second worse on the team in run defense, second only to McClain; that’s pretty damning.
So we can either give him effusive praise and view Hardy as a flawless player, or we can look at ratings/metrics from two sites now that show he’s a gifted pass rusher, but abysmal against the run.
I always thought when you presented a theory...
…that was your it was your responsibility to back it up?
There’s plenty of evidence (as jcbouche pointed to below) that tracks individual player stats. While he’s correct that you cannot make a direct comparison between Hardy and the FO stat that James stated, there is definitely a correlation between the two.
Trying to downplay the (legitimate) criticisms don’t really add anything to your case. But when it comes to contrary evidence, it’s…
Easy to dismiss it. Harder to disprove it.
Rather cryptic. Are you replying to James, as posted, or to me?
I feel easily dismissed, by him. To disprove what I said, one could prove it by analyzing more games than the 2 I had recorded.
It wasn't meant to be cryptic.
I was replying to James about you.
You looked at 2 games, and James said that you didn’t look at enough to really make generalizations about them. He then provided some info as to why (CJ being injured) and then mentioned the stats jcbouche brought up. The conclusion being that you didn’t look at enough games. You responded by saying he’s welcome to “disprove” your theory by looking into those games.
My whole point was that you are doing exactly to James what you say that he’s doing to you.
I gave evidence from the only 2 games I have access to, which serve to contradict the notion that Hardy is responsible for one side of the DL, and the side that surrenders too many rushing yds, at that.
I gave hard evidence, not summary opinions.
It’s not the same thing. I’m not going to belabor it any longer. I said if somebody wants to review other games, as I did these, I’d be happy to hear about them.
What he’s “doing to me” is dismissing my opinion, and the evidence that supports it, as not passing his “sniff test,” which I find …ah, WTH, it’s not worth getting into a pissing contest over. Y’all have it your way.
by bigdavis on Feb 22, 2012 5:03 PM EST up reply actions 1 recs
What about this?
We can’t have our cake and eat it too… there are two absolute truths based on objective third parties:
1. The Panthers were abysmal against the run targeted at the left side of the field, according to Football Outsiders
2. Greg Hardy was the second worst run stopper on the Panthers in 2011, according to Pro Football Focus.
Take your assertion and mine aside and let’s focus just on those two truths, and we can decide which of the following is more plausible.
- The second worst run stopper on the team is largely responsible for that lack of run defense,
or
- He’s really amazing and it’s James Anderson who sucked at let the team down.
Personally, I saw nothing on film that showed Anderson to be lacking in 2011, so I choose to believe the former. Especially given that 2010 charting stats had Hardy ranked 79th in the NFL among DEs at yards allowed per run directed at him, while Anderson ranked 29th among outside linebackers in the same stat in 2010.
Stats don’t lie. The two games you broke down (very nicely done, btw) don’t tell the whole story. PFF does the legwork and watches every play for every game for the basis of their ratings. I don’t know if they account for any DE position switching or not, but the fact that they have statistically backed up the facts that a) our run defense struggled, and b) Hardy is one of the worst run defenders on our team should be sufficient to prove that Hardy is best suited as a pass-rushing specialist.
The truth will set you free, but not until it is finished with you. ~David Foster Wallace
I may not always be right, but even a blind nut finds a squirrel every once in a while.
You failed to respond to the question I asked of you.
Vs Houston, you’ re then trying to tell me that Johnson played 47 snaps, 23 at RE, 21 at LE, because his shoulder found that easier than just one side?
See comment below with time stamp...
Feb 22, 2012 1:26 PM EST
"Puttin' DB's to sleep since '86-'87."
I'm no trainer
But it seems plausible that when your DE has injured his left shoulder (the primary arm used for a rip move when coming off the right edge) that you would move him around the ensure that injured shoulder wasn’t getting over-worked. That’s just my theory though, we’ll have to call McDermott to confirm.
We can’t have our cake and eat it too… there are two absolute truths based on objective third parties:
1. The Panthers were abysmal against the run targeted at the left side of the field, according to Football Outsiders
2. Greg Hardy was the second worst run stopper on the Panthers in 2011, according to Pro Football Focus.
Take your assertion and mine aside and let’s focus just on those two truths, and we can decide which of the following is more plausible.
- The second worst run stopper on the team is largely responsible for that lack of run defense,
or
- He’s really amazing and it’s James Anderson who sucked at let the team down.
Personally, I saw nothing on film that showed Anderson to be lacking in 2011, so I choose to believe the former. Especially given that 2010 charting stats had Hardy ranked 79th in the NFL among DEs at yards allowed per run directed at him, while Anderson ranked 29th among outside linebackers in the same stat in 2010.
False choice
- The second worst run stopper on the team is largely responsible for that lack of run defense,
or
- He’s really amazing and it’s James Anderson who sucked at let the team down.
Hardy played fewer than 50% of his snaps at RDE according to bigd’s break down. This confirms what I noticed while watching games, our DC lined up Hardy all over the place. Making the choice between Hardy and Anderson isn’t supported by the evidence we have so far.
So whose to blame?
I don’t mean to be facetious, and it did the Panthers as a team simple decide one entire side of the field was overrated and not worth covering?
If we are deciding there’s no accountability at all, fine… But if rather find answers why something happened than shrug my shoulders.
by James Dator on Feb 23, 2012 8:20 PM EST via Android app up reply actions
You know, this discussion started because you assigned that accountability to Hardy alone.
Rather than shrug MY shoulders, I indicated, with some evidence, that it should be a Shared accountability, as he quite obviously does NOT play one side only.
Isn’t that trying to find answers why something is happening?
You’ve devalued what might have been derived from what I uncovered, by the derogatory “small sample size.”
I’ve never denied that runs to one side of our defense yielded more yards than to the other. But I have argued, in opposition to the common conception, promulgated by you, that Hardy be the scapegoat for that. Maybe it’s the scheme, the coaching, the gap assignments, the LB coverage, or all of it, but I don’t agree that Hardy is any more a slouch at run defense than is Johnson, PFF and their admittedly wholly subjective grades notwithstanding.
by bigdavis on Feb 23, 2012 11:24 PM EST up reply actions 2 recs
Sorry that you find 'small sample size' derogatory
I think it’s a completely valid argument. How would you react if someone wrote a post titled “Dispelling the myth Cam Newton is an elite QB” and then did a detailed breakdown of his two game stretch against Tennessee and Detroit where he threw 5 INTs to only 1 TD and didn’t post a QB rating over 62.0?
Are PFF’s stats subjective? Sure. Obviously someone is sitting there watching tape and making a value judgement on what is a good play and what is a bad play. However, as they do this for every player in the NFL it carries a degree of gravitas and objectivity.
Just walk away James
It’s not worth the effort at this point. You aren’t going to convince him and he’s not going to realize that two games don’t make the case.
Nor I, him.
It was never my intent, or assumption, that I could represent a season’s tendencies with just 2 games of analysis.
They are admittedly only an 1/8th of the last season, but they both came late, and therefore better represent what the future might hold, rather than much earlier games, with rawer talent.
There is so much more to be gleaned from the stats supplied, than just the Hardy debate (though I titled it around that), e.g., the diversity of reps by the DTs, or the fluidity with which all the DL guys swap sides. But that’s been ignored/overlooked because of the stalemate of opinions that James and I have over Hardy’s abiilities.
James possesses an enormity of fine qualities as a writer, and an abundance of skill at breaking down contract/cap room possibilities – and, no doubt, fine administrative talents. But insofar as individual player evaluations are concerned, I feel free to question his infallibility.
And everyone else feels free to question your questioning. :-)
The truth will set you free, but not until it is finished with you. ~David Foster Wallace
I may not always be right, but even a blind nut finds a squirrel every once in a while.
Hey, that's what this is all about, isn't it?
We’re sharing opinions, having to do with the interpretation of facts.
That’s what analysis is.
Just because there are some strong egos represented here doesn’t detract, for me, from the fun.
I try to contribute, but be as tolerant as the next guy. My apologies for those times when I appear not to be.
I don't think James is infallible
And I’ll admit, my eye for individual talent is not great. That is why I defer to metrics of people who have those talents, with the understanding that I am essentially putting a blind trust in their methods.
Some methods, I don’t care for. I wasn’t particularly impressed by James’s stats on Hardy’s run-stopping abilities when they are solely based on the stats supplied by Football Outsiders (for reasons talked about this entire thread). They are somewhat flawed, but the idea was never to pin something exactly. It was to get an idea of what happened.
I have several other thoughts on the topic. For starters, how quickly did the LB close down on the RB? James Anderson led the team in tackles, but that doesn’t necessarily mean he was effective at stopping the run game. How quickly did he (or whichever LB was responsible) close down on the RB? There are more, but you get the idea.
As to your in-dept looks, they simply aren’t deep enough. That was pretty much the only criticism leveled against you. You say you admit that as a detractor, but then claim that as a defense against “dismissing” what you present instead of “disproving” what you present.
The problem is you never proved anything. You can’t look at these two games and say they are indicative of the rest of the season. The very best you can claim is that Hardy seemed to perform as good as CJ in these two games. And I don’t think anyone has dismissed that.
What’s being dismissed, is the inference from that statement (that Hardy was better than CJ overall this year).
We should let this go now.
I’ll accept everything you just said…except the last sentence.
The purpose (and I know I said it before this) of my post wasn’t to claim that Hardy was BETTER than Johnson — though that may have been what you inferred, and therefore dismissed me for.
It was that Hardy wasn’t WORSE than Johnson, specifically at stopping the run – and more specifically, that the inferior results from one side of our DL was synonymous with Hardy.
I demonstrated that for the 2 games I had recorded. I asked anybody else to show different for any other games, and nobody did.
Oh, and I WAS in depth, but not broad enough.
Go, Panthers!
TWSS ... had to, bigd
Oh, and I WAS in depth, but not broad enough.
"Sharks are as tough as those football fans who take their shirts off during games in Chicago in January, only more intelligent." - Dave Barry
"Actually, it only takes one drink to get me loaded. Trouble is, I can't remember if it's the thirteenth or fourteenth" -- George Burns
"Football is easy if you're crazy as hell" - Bo Jackson
I will try to pay extra attention to it as I'm re-watching games during the offseason.
Clearly the left side of our defense was more susceptible to the run. That much is fairly inarguable, you would agree?
The question remains, however…Who, if anyone, spent the significant majority of their snaps on the left side of the defense?
From a broader perspective, one would need to prove that it was not Hardy. I think that’s essentially the bane of your argument. But again, I’ll try to take notice so we can address it more broadly, as you’ve requested.
"Hell, they might put my momma out there now. And I’m ’a beat her like a drum, too."
~The Real, the Only Steve Smith, #89.
That's all I ask. Thanks.
It was intended to be the CRUX of my argument – but may have ended up being the ‘bane’, too :-)
Definitely good points about them switching sides
they do it quite a bit, but I certainly don’t agree that Hardy is as good or better than CJ against the run. I’ll admit thats just how I feel from watching the season, but the folks at ProFootballFocus.com have done what you did to every play all year. I trust their gradings, although I’m sure there are flaws. Point is, they have CJ graded +3.9 on the season in run D (second only to Connor & with many more snaps) and Hardy was graded at -4.9 for the year. The only player on our D rated worse than Hardy against the run was McClain. Don’t get me wrong, I like Hardy. He’s a hell of a pass rusher sometimes, but he just isn’t as good of an all-around DE as Johnson.
link to how PFF grades:
http://www.profootballfocus.com/about/grading/
No way Fua was rated higher against the run than McClain & Hardy?!?
"One step at a time"
by mcdonaldwr on Feb 21, 2012 9:11 PM EST up reply actions 1 recs
The link you supplied states HOW they grade. I knew that.
Since you stated the actual grades that Hardy and Johnson got, for the year, is there a way you can share the details with us?
Since the great majority of their (PFF’s) Negative grades are for -0.5 and -1.0, a net result of -4.9 would indicate there were many more Negative plays for Hardy than there were Positive ones. In addition, since we’re talking here about Rushing Defense for a DL man, it would have to be missed tackles to get a Negative, wouldn’t it. Obviously, if a DE is blocked, as the OL opponent is paid to do, they’d assign a 0 grade.
You’ll notice in my recap, I wasn’t “grading” with individual point scores, but rather amassing data that showed, in sum, where our DLmen played their reps, and how many yds were gained by the opponents, vs which defenders were in their way, at the point of attack. So my method of presentation wasn’t subjective, as they readily admit theirs was.
The readership can take from it what they want to. I think it easily showed what I suspected to be the case, i.e., that (in the games to which I had access) Hardy was NOT “Responsible” for any one side of our defense ranking #32 in the league.
James can call ME defensive all he wants, but it’s HE that refuses to concede that he assigned blame where it’s not warranted. Terms like “abysmal” and “outlier”, and “it doesn’t pass my smell test” and the like are easily bandied about, but not worthy of an objective analyst, seeking the truth without bias.
James, if you’ve got the access to old games, as you say you do, I challenge you to break them down, as I did, and demonstrate how many reps Hardy and Johnson tallied at each position, and how many yds accrued against them. Only then, and not by flip dismissals, can you convince me of the validity of your “Responsibilities.” Were I on trial, I’d hate for you to be on my jury.
But of course, you won’t, because you’re far too “busy” to spend your time on such grunt work, just to satisfy the whim of a stranger like me, who happens to disagree with you from time to time, and isn’t afraid to say it. I understand. At least my work got posted. Next year, maybe more readers will keep a closer eye on Hardy, and judge for themselves.
I don't know anything about their grades that isn't explained on that page
but I’ll share Hardy’s weekly summaries for the season. The way I understand it, if a D end is blocked but not moved off his landmark, both he and the O lineman would get a 0 grade. A slightly negative grade might not be a missed tackle, it could be that he gets pushed off the line.
Once again, my only point is that he isn’t nearly as good against the run as CJ, not that he’s a bad player. In fact, if you look at their overall ratings (not just against the run) Hardy is graded out pretty well (+5.8 for the year, good for third on the team behind CJ and Gamble)

note: I know it assigns them as DRE or DLE but that’s just wherever they start, PFF accounts for where they line up, not just assigning responsibilities to each side.
I think looking at CJs sheet, it's evident that he was playing injured against Houston and TB.
It could be explained that Houston just did a better job on the oline than other teams, but to be rated a 3.5 against TB on the road and then dropping to 0.0 at home indicates that Johnson was playing hurt.
That said, Hardy was a 2nd year player with no offseason and a new coaching staff, his first year was with a lame duck coach and a purged roster. I don’t think it’s fair to say he can’t turn into an every down end at this point in his career.
I also don’t think it’s safe to assume he’s going to be our answer at DE either. I think he has potential to be a beast of a DE, but we’ll have to see how he develops.
I agree CJ was playing hurt against Houston, as reflected in the grades...
He wasn’t active in the the Tampa Bay game, as reflected in the grades.
"Sharks are as tough as those football fans who take their shirts off during games in Chicago in January, only more intelligent." - Dave Barry
"Actually, it only takes one drink to get me loaded. Trouble is, I can't remember if it's the thirteenth or fourteenth" -- George Burns
"Football is easy if you're crazy as hell" - Bo Jackson
I disagree
Houston has one of THE best O-line’s in football and I think CJ just got handled. I even remember the announcers in that game talking about how great the Texans O-line has been this year. And did you not read above where he says how, with the game firmly in hand they rested CJ? I mean look at the grade sheet RIGHT ABOVE Johnson’s. Seeing as how they are nearly identical are you going to also claim that Hardy wasn’t active? C’mon man.
It is more that Johnsons stats went from 3.5 down to 0 when playing Tampa Bay more than the Houston game
that I made the inference that he was injured(well, along with actually knowing he was playing hurt as he was questionable after the ATL game).
Johnson was active in the Tampa Bay game as evidenced that he had 2 QB pressures
He just wasn’t effective in the Tampa Bay game.
From the game description above:
First, the reps:
Charles Johnson, 21 plays (14 at LDE, 7 at RDE) He was dinged twice in the game, and the game was out of hand, anyway. He only saw 4 plays in the second half.
Oops. I made an error. My wife gave me Makers Mark for my Birthday yesterday, and it obviously did its job.
"Sharks are as tough as those football fans who take their shirts off during games in Chicago in January, only more intelligent." - Dave Barry
"Actually, it only takes one drink to get me loaded. Trouble is, I can't remember if it's the thirteenth or fourteenth" -- George Burns
"Football is easy if you're crazy as hell" - Bo Jackson
Your wife is a smart lady.
Even if she is married to you. ;-)
The truth will set you free, but not until it is finished with you. ~David Foster Wallace
I may not always be right, but even a blind nut finds a squirrel every once in a while.
While we're on the analogy of court.
The burden of proof is on you, you didn’t meet it with only two games. Asking the jury to go study for themselves what you should have shown them won’t win you the case.
Yes I'm a dude.
by Flowing Willow on Feb 22, 2012 6:20 PM EST up reply actions 2 recs
You can't "Study for yourself" if you don't have the material. His evidence is more formal and explained than PFF's, though obviously they have the reputation. But reputation don't always mean shit
The title of his post was "Dispelling the Myths about the DL"
After reading that post i think the title was a little misleading.
Yes I'm a dude.
by Flowing Willow on Feb 23, 2012 9:39 PM EST up reply actions
Then you are a myth believer, and entitled to your beliefs.
by bigdavis on Feb 23, 2012 11:29 PM EST up reply actions 1 recs
As you jump on, and supply it, relentlessly :-)
Have a good day. Let’s co-exist, shall we, ace?
by bigdavis on Feb 24, 2012 11:04 AM EST up reply actions 1 recs
Great write up.
Do you guys think Hardy was hampered this year due to the crash? I have been a fan of his, and hope he can reach the potential Charles Johnson spoke about earlier in the year.
by got6792 on Feb 21, 2012 4:41 PM EST reply actions 1 recs
Well he still played a lot of downs
But after the season he said that he had been playing through a foot injury all year. I also recall one game where Ron Rivera was mic’ed up that he went and talked to Greg Hardy on the sidelines… It was tough to hear exactly what they said but you could tell Hardy was hurting and had been previously beat on a play when Ron Rivera said to him “just give us whatever you can, that’s all I ask” (or something like that). After hearing that he was playing hurt it kind of made more sense
"One step at a time"
BigD...there is a method to the madness.
As far as all the switching from the LE to RE and back…
Hardy is bigger than CJ. That’s why, if you had to assign him to one of the two spots, it would be LDE. The LDE is on the RT. More often than not, the RT is accompanied by a TE. So the LDE has to fight through more trash. That makes it harder to be as effective on that side (enter James’ numbers that were 32nd in the league, etc.).
The reason they switch is because they are reacting to the offense. If the offense goes strong right, then the TE is on the right, and Hardy stays at LDE. If they go strong left, Hardy will often move over to RDE, essentially following the TE. This also frees-up our best pass rusher (CJ) to rush without having to worry about a TE. With the injury, they did this even more because CJ just couldn’t hold up against double-teams.
DTs do the same thing. You’ll often see them do it after getting down in their stance, too. They are switching so the NT can be in the right position, which, in a 4-3, is typically in either ‘A’ gap. Anyway, that’s the reason they do all the flipping and what not. So, no, they don’t have designations on LDE or RDE, they are Strong and Weak, much like linebackers and safetys.
"Puttin' DB's to sleep since '86-'87."
by ERL on Feb 22, 2012 1:26 PM EST reply actions 3 recs
Very reasonable explanation. Thanks, ERL.
I’ll accept that as the prime reason for switching sides, not just to confuse the blocking of the OL.
But it actually bolsters my argument that Hardy is NOT to be given a designation of the RDE, or the LDE. This claim, made by James, was the instigation of my entire research. When Jake, IIRC, mentioned stats supplied by AdvancedNFLStats, and they didn’t sound right to James, he discounted them out of hand with the “didn’t pass the stink test” statement. But now, when he sees numbers from PFF, which agree more with his ‘observations,’ he accepts them as gospel.
Just an observation.
Extended discussions on differing opinions rarely get anywhere on this blog, as hardly anyone can man up and say he was mistaken, or misguided. About the best result that can come of such a stalemate is the agreement to disagree. I take that view now. Thanks, all, for the consideration of my small sample of work.
by bigdavis on Feb 22, 2012 7:12 PM EST up reply actions 1 recs
My email address can be found at the bottom of the page
This seems to have become more of a personal problem than a football one… and that’s a shame
by James Dator on Feb 22, 2012 8:39 PM EST up reply actions 1 recs
Yep...
hardly anyone can man up and say he was mistaken
Especially that James guy. I hear he like Blaine Gabbert over Newton.
When is he EVER going to start admitting he was wrong?
Kind of ridiculous to me
I often get irritated by these additional stat monsters like Pro football focus, football outsiders, blah blah blah. If you look at the tape without your notebook, you can see that our run defense sucked, but imrpoved as the season went on. You can figure that out by watching the games and not keeping stats. You also know that Beason was out, and that it took many defenses in the league several weeks to get adjusted. But for our DL, I think CJ was the most experienced, and none of those guys really knew the system. Lastly, you can expect rookies to run out of gas or simply get lost at times (unless they are named CAM). So in the end, we need a little more help at DT, and a full offseason, and fewer injuries, and our DL will be much improved. I’m not concerned about these specific stats. I want DL who get sacks, QB hits, and tackles for loss on run plays, and to do those things on 3rd down would be ideal. Until then, I’m not gonna argue about Hardy. He will get better next year, and our defense as a whole, IMO, could be a top 10 just from better coaching, better conditioning, a full offseason, and fewer injuries; however, that’s not an excuse to pass up a solid DT in the draft if one is available. That’s right, I’m turning this post into another Draft-a-DT-in-the-top-10 argument.
Pretty impressive
I can tell you put a lot of work into this. In the end, this just strengthens the fact that we need to get a stud on the Dline whether that be by magically signing Mario Williams or by drafting a penetrating defensive tackle or an all around defensive end. Hardy is pretty much on the same playing level as CJ agaisnt the run but no where near as good as a rusher, yet.
by Martin LatinFire Gonzalez on Feb 26, 2012 5:08 PM EST reply actions 1 recs
Excellent observation my friend
CAM: "...Nice catch." Smitty: "Hey, you make it easy."
by daviddemont on Mar 12, 2012 11:46 PM EDT up reply actions
Thank you sir
I want to go down as a winner- Kevin Durant
That's the type of person that I am. I'm that lion. The house that I'm in is somewhat of a tarnished house where losing is accepted. But I'm trying to change that. - Cameron Jerrell Newton
by Martin LatinFire Gonzalez on Mar 19, 2012 10:23 AM EDT up reply actions

by 




















