Where will the pressure come from?
The NFL has taken great measures to protect the quarterback in recent years in the interest of slinging the ball and running up scores. However, putting good, clean hits on the quarterback could be considered the antidote for the wide-open game the NFL has become. It is a way to stop offenses from posting up a converted Power Forward in the middle of the field while sending two guys who can't be touched after five yards down the sidelines en route to a six-touchdown offensive explosion that gives the folks at ESPN plenty of highlights that are palatable to casual fans, who tend not to have the stomach for the sounds of crunching bones or seeing the number one jersey-seller on their favorite roster carted off the field.
Being able to bring pressure and collapse the pocket could literally mean the difference between, say, stopping a drive on your side of the field or giving up a third and seven that sustains a drive into the end zone. You don't have to do it every time, but you when you need that ace you need to be able to pull it. Last year, the Panthers too often seemed incapable of pulling an ace, unfortunately, and too often left undersized or inexperienced defensive backs on islands to cover for five or more seconds, and the results showed in the win-loss column. The results show in the fanbase's general malaise toward Safety Sherrod Martin perhaps more than anything, but any fair-minded individual will understand that while his tackling was unforgivably poor (he couldn't wrap up one of my daughter's teddy bears if she asked him to tuck her in) - he was also asked to save the day WAY TOO MUCH. (more after the jump)
Quarterbacks too often were allowed to sit-back and diagnose our zone coverages or identify mismatches, glance up at the scoreboard, calculate how many yards they needed for a touchdown, glance up into the boxes and check on their wives and children, make sure their shoes were tied THEN hit their man for a big gain. In the second half of the season finale, it was like Drew Brees was trying to figure out who he had to hit to break what record, bead in on that guy and stand there until he worked his way open. We lost that game.
The team managed a paltry total of 31 sacks last year. That's good for 25th in the league, but not good for a Jim Johnson-inspired defense. Defensive End Charles Johnson was the team leader with 9 sacks - down from his 12 the year before in his breakout, contract-year performance in 2010. This is a respectable number, but no one else on the roster was able to muster more than 4 (both defensive ends Thomas Keiser and Greg Hardy were able to reach this number). Johnson is also credited with a team-leading 27 quarterback pressures, and Hardy with another 17 from the other side. However, Jared Allen had nearly as many sacks as Johnson had pressures. While that didn't help his team into the playoffs, no one would argue it hurt their chances to get there.
Sack totals don't tell the whole story. It's a bit like gaging quarterback performance by passing touchdowns alone. However, a sack is what happens when rushing the passer is done right and our numbers (for lack of a more sophisticated description) sucked. For comparison's sake, opposing teams were able to corral Cam Newton (the elusive, athletic, big and strong SuperCam you and I watch gleefully every Sunday) 39 times. Sacking him once is no small feat.
Even more troubling, the sack totals drastically dropped off after halftime. Throughout the season, the team tallied 21 first half sacks, when the team was keeping it close or even holding a lead the vast majority of the time. However, when the second half rolled around and opposing offenses adjusted their protections and plans of attack - the team managed a mere 10 sacks.
The Panthers also got just as many sacks on first down (10) as they did on third down (11). This is antithetical to drive-killing poundings of the quarterbacks, because they get more downs to recover. The inability to get your third down, get them off-the-field quarterback hit and sack were the one element, aside from plays on the ball in the secondary, that made Carolina a bottom of the league defense and a sub-.500 team more than anything else. To drive the point home further, we had 19 sacks when we were winning, and only 12 when tied or trailing. That gives you an idea of the flow of the game.
There were a plethora of legitimate reasons why the defense was generally incapable of generating and sustaining a formidable pass rush, particularly on third-and-long. Injuries were to blame, certainly. Free agent acquisition Ron Edwards was expected to fill the void that has been the Panthers Defensive Tackle position for sometime now, while bringing along a couple of third round picks who showed promise but weren't necessarily ready for primetime. That was before he went down the first day of training camp, was lost for the entire season, and shoved rookies SIone Fua and Terrell McClain into starting jobs no one hoped they'd inherit that soon. Before the season even started, our "Kracken" Defensive End Greg Hardy (a former sixth round pick who'd emerged on theleft side of the d-line the year before) suffered a motorcycle crash which clearly hampered his ability to get to the quarterback the entire season.
In Weeks 1 and 2, respectively, the team's two most viable rush linebackers- Jon Beason and Thomas Davis - went down with leg injuries, in turn thrusting other lesser-skilled and experienced linebackers into the crucible, with predictable results and so many injuries down the depth chart it's not expedient to go into it any farther for the purposes of this conversation. I will, however, note that Omar Gaither never appeared to be healthy to me, which could have alleviated some of our woes on the weakside.
Aside from thrusting unproven players into increased roles, the injuries also forced our proven players to increase their responsibilities and play different roles. For example, our sack-leader Charles Johnson was forced to move to the inside at times, to stand up and play rush linebacker at others, and I even recall a couple of plays when he dropped back and looked surprisingly adept in coverage. Hardy was also moved inside often, and James Anderson was forced to step into the "Quarterback of the Defense" role, calling out plays and making pre-snap adjustments.
The injuries also, however, allowed the team to explore different options in different spots, and bring in a couple of players who can contend to be long-time contributors. Defensive End Thomas Keiser, End/Linebacker Antwon Applewhite and defensive tackles Andre Neblett and Jason Shirley may have remained in obscurity at the end of the bench had our big guns not been laid down so early on in the season. Shirley, in particular, proved a godsend to the pass rush in a limited late season role, when he was able to collect 2.5 thrashings of the quarterback.
Perhaps just as important in my mind was the schematic difference of philosophy - I like to think of it as a dissociative divide - between the Ron Meeks, Tampa 2-inspired secondary we ran and the aggressive, exotic blitz scheme Head Coach Ron Rivera and Defensive Coordinator Sean McDermott brought with them to Charlotte in the front seven. On an even deeper, the defense could be thought of as kind of schizophrenic this year, switching its fronts, running around frantically putting out fires all over the field and, above all, giving up far too much yardage in the run and the pass. This is to be expected in the first year of a new program, especially when it's hit so hard with the injury bug in that fledgling, infantile state.
That was last year, though, and next year that will not be a luxury we have or want.The problem has to be fixed, and it will, I believe. My only question is how. Here are several options. Some or all could be deployed to help us stop the opposing team's motor (by this metaphor, I mean their quarterback):
1) Free Agency signings: We know that our current cap situation would be prohibitive to making any significant additions to the defense by whipping out the checkbook once the new league year starts. However, when I've listened to team officials discuss their strategies to improve the team going into next year, ALL of them have mentioned free agency as an avenue that will be utilized to the fullest extent possible, and I am confident that a move-here and a move-there in the front office's grand scheme before March 18 will position us to bring in a couple of bodies into the defensive fold.
These acquisitions may not be as eye-popping or rosterbation-inducing as signing Mario Williams and LaRon Landry, but I expect the team to get at least one viable contributor in the front seven and another in the secondary. How, who or when? I honestly don't know. I just know the why. The why makes it a must.
In my eyes, if Edwards isn't back, we'd have to get a veteran defensive tackle to add to the mix on the line. Too much youth in that very important area of the field. Smart money could also be on bringing in a veteran linebacker to man the weakside when TD isn't set up. We need an insurace policy on him. In the backfield, I'm of the opinion it would be ideal to bring in a strong safety who will play more the sneaking into the box role and sliding Charles Godfrey to the free safety to chase down those back-end free-runners that maimed us so last year. I think he can handle that, and we could use a little muscle in the middle. That's just me, though, and I don't portend to speak for the Panthers franchise.
2) The Draft: The draft we know is coming, and we know we will participate in it. I'm all for Best Player Available, either side of the ball, in the first round. That said, I think we're going to specialize a little with those later picks (that we hopefully haven't finished collecting) and look for specific roles that play to our system. The majority of our draft picks have to address the holes on defense, and that's no secret.
In my mind, should we go o-tackle in the first, as I am starting to believe is more and more likely, one could very well see our second, fourth and fifth round picks likely going toward fortifying our stoppers. A young combo guy who can, with more-or-less equal success, stick his hand in the dirt or stand up and make a mad dash around the edge of the pocket on the way to the quarterback seems to be an absolute must have in the draft to bolster our pass rush through the draft. Cornerback should also be addressed with the utmost priority, but tthat ain't gonna add to our sack totals.
3) Natural Progression: To a certain degree, regardless if we don't pick anything up on the market or bring in any pieces that pan out next year through the draft - the argument could still be made that our pass rush should be MUCH better this season after the staff has had a year to install its system, find the right positional coaches and coordinators to institute the system and one has to imagine we'll get a little luckier next year at keeping guys on the field to contribute. This also allows the Big Moneys of the world to do what they do best. What we need them to do.
4) Increased Usage of "Hybrid" Looks: I've taken some heat on here before for outlining my vision for the defense, where ends could stand up and rush from the outside on passing down looks, or move inside to make way for an extra linebacker to make his way into the game and rush the quarterback. I see us being able to use increased 3-4 looks to help disguise pressures, and basically fool the quarterback into staying there until we get to him. I don't think I have to explain how valuable unpredictability is in getting to the quarterback, and switching up our looks in the front seven, as well as adding a strong safety piece that could be better utilized in the blitz package, is an excellent way to confuse a Wonderlic Wonder genius qb.
41 comments
|
5 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Mixed feelings...
Our defensive line is a collection of question marks. We know Big Money is holding down one spot very well but…
Can Greg step and become a quality starter? He has the potential and the ability, but last season Greg was kind of a JAG. We certainly can’t compare to the giant’s pass rush, and stastically Greg was the worst against the run, do we replace him? Can Keiser grow and become Jared Allen type end? Physically okay, but a work ethic and motor that dominates?
DT is a huuuge question mark. Last season was all about growth. Neblett, Shirley(BIG BODY!!), McClain, Suh and vet Ron Edwards all have potential to take big steps forward this year or possibly regress. It’s just one big question mark that leaves me alittle on easy
agreed.
well-spoken. i tend to be a wait-and-see guy, and wonder how much the wreck did to the kracken, and youth did to the dt’s, but yeah.you said it well.
i didn't catch that, haha.
that would def change my draft strategy if he was here, lol. trying to figure out who he meant. kearse? his name is spoon. maybe…
by bylinebrown on Feb 16, 2012 10:07 AM EST up reply actions
It was posted at near 4:39 in the morning.
I thought I had missed a heck of a trade for a minute.
early poll results...
i’m surprised the rookie 3-technique is out to an early lead. i don’t see that being the most immediate upgrade to the pass rush (especially if it’s a 20yo with one year collegiate playing time) and also don’t see still or brockers as proven dynamic pass rushers. thoughts, anyone? i like some of the second round options better (ta’amu, poe, thompson to name a few)
I just feel like Brockers is being mocked to us by everyone almost as a default
as there are no sure-fire top 10 or top 15 DT’s in this draft. This is obviously just my opinion, but drafting someone at 8/9 mostly on “upside” makes me a little nervous.
You mention your affinity for a hybrid outside player and how that could be a nice addition. The general consensus around CSR is that we all love Antwan Applewhite, which gets me wondering what a more athletic/faster player in the same mold could bring to our defense. I am friends with 49er fans and after watching their games this year sometimes dream what a guy like Aldon Smith could do in our scheme as a hybrid.
Just curious, but how would you feel if we were to take a guy like Courtney Upshaw with our first pick?
upshaw, i could see.
i didn’t have as much faith in him to do the hand-planted half of that equation until the senior bowl. he blew me away playing end. i could really see it. i could. that said, melvin ingram’s kind of my dream baby for that. i think a lot like you on applewhite. what if we had a top-shelf talent to do that. thanx for the read and response:)
On Ingram
I’m ashamed to say I haven’t watched enough of him yet, but does he have the ability to play in space. I know his first step is being touted as above average- elite by gurus.
i watched the gamecocks right much, so...
i’m a heels fan but the sec is sooo fun to watch. i thought out your upshaw poroposition one step further, and i like it A LOT. he’s a winner. i thought about cam’s interview about anybody on the team having won something relevant. we know he’s well-coached. he’s even with ingram in my mind for that reason. thanx for making me think, haha. no small feat.
I agree......
I would be totally shocked if Carolina picked a DT first round, unless we trade back in late first round. We are really set at the DT position; we could add a few gems for depth, but what everybody fails to realize the front 7 as a unit played horrible last year. Brockers will not help us immediately-sorry.
IMO a DE/LB rush specialist makes more sense for this defensive scheme to be effective. I like Upshaw; I hope he can showcase his talents well at the combine. I watch the SEC a lot, and I tell you one thing Upshaw was one of the players who could bring Cam down easily during the 2010 season. Ingram and Coples both have amazing pressure skills.
we need some hitmen:)
i like the way you think. ’nuff said, like stan lee used to write, haha
by bylinebrown on Feb 16, 2012 10:06 AM EST up reply actions
We need a big heavy to clog the middle....
"What up? We're three cool guys looking for other cool guys who wanna hang out in our party mansion. Nothing sexual. Dudes in good shape encouraged. If you're fat, you should be able to find humor in the little things." Again, NOTHING SEXUAL
"I'd rather jerk off a tiger in a phone booth than draft Cam"
-Mel Kiper, Jr.
you guys are like a bunch of pirahnas
by chop goes da weazel on Mar 31, 2011 12:32 PM PDT
by MikeTrain on Feb 16, 2012 10:44 AM EST via mobile up reply actions
no argument there...
that would free us up to blitz up the middle, which a lot of people say is brees’s weakness. i think you still need more talent around that dude to take advantage of any free space he creates… i also question if that guy is there and makes sense in the first. it’s reachy to me. you like poe? i love his physical attributes anyway. got anybody you favor for that role?
by bylinebrown on Feb 16, 2012 10:49 AM EST up reply actions
unlessof course young guys comealong, that is.
i’m keeping the faith on them. was impressed by our depth when they got on the field, and didn’t expect much from rookies, to be honest, except to acclimate to the game.
by bylinebrown on Feb 16, 2012 10:52 AM EST up reply actions
true that!
i’m thinking combo in the draft, strong safety no matter where he comes from and veteran weakside linebacker could fix the rush. cornerback in draft also seems a necessity. i should’ve made some comination options, right?
Man, if you're auditioning with this article, for a writer's gig here, learn to capitalize and spell correctly.
And WTH is a “veteram wealsode linebacker” anyway?
Kinda takes the concentration of the reader off the points you’re attempting to make, doesn’t it?
thanks for the criticism.
i wrote in the bed on the laptop, and fingers got screwed up a couple of times. should read “veteran weakside linebacker”. much apologies. hope you got some amount of pleasure from reading the story though.
by bylinebrown on Feb 16, 2012 11:13 AM EST up reply actions
Think I worked that out for you.
Let me know if anything else really gets on your nerves. I aim to please:)
by bylinebrown on Feb 16, 2012 11:24 AM EST up reply actions
better be careful saying stuff like that. his nickname is big d for a reason lol.
"Don't tell me about the pain, just bring me the baby" Cam Newton
by braves&panthers4ever on Feb 16, 2012 12:50 PM EST via Android app up reply actions
i hope that was the only fault to find, lol.
shiiiiit, i actually proofread half of this. that’s better than i do for $10 an hour at the paper while i’m trying to get finished and read more about my team, haha
by bylinebrown on Feb 16, 2012 12:56 PM EST up reply actions
I really think upgrading the pass rush is a must
And maybe a new defensive coordinator if we are still bottom of the league next year.
Hurney has a tendency to over draft certain positions like rb. I am hoping he grabs 3 or more defensive lineman in this draft. I think at this point Hardy is better as a backup, so we need a full time DE beast or two. A DT or NT would be nice as well, but I agree its less necessary once Shirley and Neblett seemed to gel. We got better at DT when are starters went out injured, LOL.
I agree that safty is a must. I would prefer to get a smart hard hitting veteran from FA so that the game has already slowed down for him and he will make less rookie mistakes. This is one position that I would pay big bucks for.
by Panthster on Feb 16, 2012 11:11 AM EST via mobile reply actions
something i deleted because it was getting off-subject
was actually going to predict him doubling up on cornerbacks in this draft, but decided not to get into that b/c i was already meandering a little bit off subject. he loves to do that, and i think he’ll probably go that way, though i could really appreciate several impact-ful d-linemen to step in there for us at any moment, haha
by bylinebrown on Feb 16, 2012 11:17 AM EST up reply actions
Hurney definately sticks to that bpa...
Even if it means we grab like 3 RBs, cbs, lbs or whatever. I’m just hoping he does it where we really need it this year…. Hint, hint defensive line.
by Panthster on Feb 16, 2012 4:27 PM EST via mobile up reply actions
This is a little off topic, but I though it was interesting
“According to Pro Football Focus, quarterbacks completed 73.8 percent of their passes throwing toward Munnerlyn last season – the worst percentage of any NFL corner.”
I knew Captain got burned a lot last year, but I didn’t realize it was that bad.
sadly, i kind ofdid.
i think he’s out of position matched up on those big dudes… not a lost cause, though. he was my fave gunner on punt coverage in the league until i watched consecutive niners games in the playoffs. that castonzo kid looked awesome getting down there.
by bylinebrown on Feb 16, 2012 12:22 PM EST up reply actions
I know we all love Gamble on here
but I feel like that is part of the reason why his stats were so good. Munnerlyn was so bad that QBs just threw to his side all the time. Gamble is an excellent corner but I don’t think you’ll see those “shutdown” stats if we get a decent corner in the draft or FA.
by Atlantapanther on Feb 16, 2012 12:50 PM EST up reply actions
i secondthatmotion.
wish i’d realized that first, haha
by bylinebrown on Feb 16, 2012 12:52 PM EST up reply actions
I considered that
However, Gambles stats are 2nd best in the NFL when he’s thrown at, it’s not just that he’s not targeted much.
Yeah it's when he's thrown at
But with more times he’s thrown at, the more chances he’ll give up a big play.
by Atlantapanther on Feb 16, 2012 8:54 PM EST up reply actions
Or the more times he makes an INT.
You can’t just decide that because he locks his man down, he won’t succeed when he’s thrown at.
There’s a good reason he’s not thrown at.
I could be on the Couples bandwagon this week if he makes it to us...
Shirley, Kearse, Neblett, and McClain can hold down the DT spots well enough. A rotation of Couples, Johnson, Hardy, and Applewhite would be nice at the DE spots. A lack of subs really killed our pash rush at the end of last year, and being able to rotate makes Hardy and Johnson better. Plus a third down package of Hardy, Johnson, and Couples sounds really sexy, ala NY Giants style. Hello Mr. Brees and Mr. Ryan…
"You know the new iPhone? It’s faster, more powerful and smarter. It’s revolutionary. Why can’t the quarterback be like that? Why can’t you be a big, tall, fast, quick, strong, smart, mobile quarterback who’s unstoppable?"
-Cam Newton
by carolinapillpusher on Feb 16, 2012 3:31 PM EST reply actions
Shirley almost had 2 more in the Falcons game, chasing Ryan 10-15 yds deep in the backfield, and forcing him to throw OOB both times.
Those “hurries” or “pressures” don’t show up in the overhyped Sacks stat line, but are just as valuable, in forcing 3 and outs, and sometimes INTs.
This guy is the real deal, and I’m wagering the Panthers don’t go for a NT, because of what they (and I) saw in him.
If they don't upgrade DT because of four games from Shirley
Well let’s just say I won’t be enthused.
Follow me on Twitter at @JakeHumphrey91
by Jake Humphrey on Feb 16, 2012 5:37 PM EST via Android app up reply actions
Nice article BB. This is a tough nut to crack, for sure.
The two biggest keys I believe will be getting Beason and (maybe) Davis back, along with a strong in the box Safety.
The Upshaw idea is intriguing as well. He’s so much bigger than was originally thought, and so has the size, speed, athleticism to excel as a rush LB/DE. If the top OTs (Kalil, Martin, Reiff) are off the board, Upshaw could be a viable pick.
Like many here, I really like Iloka as the Strong Safety, but we also need to add depth, as Martin should be released.
I agree with BAMF that DT isn’t that big of a need, as shown in the latter part of the year. Ron Edwards’ return will bolster what is becoming a strong young rotation there.
"Love is like a booger. You keep picking at it until you get it, then wonder what to do with it." : Author Unknown
























