Accuracy or hyperbole: Is Jimmy Clausen a 'victim' if the Panthers go QB #1
National Football Post's Matt Bowen came out with an article this morning entitled "Clausen could be the next victim of the NFL draft" where he compares Jimmy's possible plight to his own struggles as a DB when the St. Louis Rams drafted Adam Archuleta in 2001. In the end he acknowledges that what the coaching staff have to go on isn't pretty:
"the tape that Rivera and his staff are watching from the 2010 season is all they have in terms of grading his play. He played like a rookie, made poor decisions with the football and needs more time to mature at the position."
It's that last statement, "needs more time to mature" that will ultimately characterize Clausen's career. Can he age like a fine cheese, or become like a corked bottle of wine and leave a bad taste in our mouth? If I'm Ron Rivera and I'm seeing a QB I really like in the 2011 draft it's very difficult if my GM is asking me to take a leap of faith on his leap of faith. Should the Panthers pass on the QB position so Hurney can give Clausen one more chance and he is ultimately just a game manager, then it would likely cost both Marty Hurney and Ron Rivera their jobs. The chances of a head coach surviving a GM chance long term is less likely than a QB enduring a coaching change.
More after the jump...
Looking solely at box scores one could very easily make the argument that Clausen deserves one more chance. However, it's all the superfluous areas that helps fill this storyline and the one area I think Bowen may have missed when he characterized Clausen as a 'victim'.
Maturation is a process that needs to occur not only on the field, but off it- and it's the latter part of this statement that it appears Clausen lost during the 2010 season. Put aside the comments from Darin Gantt regarding Clausen ignoring the coaching staff because he felt he knew better and look to the veterans of this team. We now have three of the biggest stars on the Carolina Panthers all speaking in part about the need to either upgrade the position, draft a new QB or denigrating Clausen to the media; this said by DeAngelo Williams, Jon Beason and Steve Smith respectively.
I don't know how many of you have watched "Any Given Sunday", but if you haven't and you're a football fan then you need to watch it, that's your CSR homework this week. Sure, it's a little exaggerated and overly dramatic- but in a lot of ways Jimmy Clausen mirrors Jamie Foxx's character Willie Beaman. The difference, however, is that Beaman was producing on the field. Losing a locker room is a near impossible thing to win back. Look what happened with Vince Young in Tennessee. For all the comments to the public ultimately Vince Young lost his job because he lost the locker room, and was never able to win it back. Sure, Young produced at times on the field- but there are numerous reports that his teammates didn't feel they could trust him anymore.
None of us know for certain what will happen on the evening of April 28th, let alone what will happen to Jimmy Clausen as a result, but I want to hear from our fanbase. Is Jimmy a victim or circumstance, of is he reaping what he sowed.
92 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Too strong a word
In no way is Clausen is victim. Whether or not Clausen plays for the Panthers, I’m pretty confident he will be successful in the NFL – he may talk a little longer to become produce at a consistent level but that is a different point.
At this point, I’m far more concerned about the Panthers’ drafting a QB in this draft than about Clausen.
I would second that
Clausen isn’t a victim but I do think he was put in a very unfortunate situation that was far worse than any of us or any one in the organization imagined. That being said, the limits of his raw potential were unable to rectify the problem.
I still see a Drew Brees/Philip Rivers situation possible here because whatever QB we draft will need time to adjust.
by aceofsween on Apr 18, 2011 2:52 PM EDT via mobile up reply actions
He will have a chance to prove himself to this coaching staff if not here somewhere else. His NFL future is in his hands. Regardless of who we take. I find it hard to call somebody a Victim when they have full control over there destiny. If he puts in the work and improves he will find a job somewhere in the NFL. Teams aren’t drooling over the 8 or so QB prospects in the draft for no reason. Leauge is starving for young QB prospects he shows he is committed to improving and he will have his day again.
"I have opinions of my own -- strong opinions -- but I don't always agree with them." - George Bush
"I know that you believe you understand what you think I said, but I'm not sure you realize that what you heard is not what I meant." - Robert McCloskey
What's he making? 2Million? 3 Million? Hardly a victim.
He had plenty of starts to show something, and other than eking out a game manager win over the hapless Cards, he did nothing.
If anybody’s a QB “victim,” it’s the guy who suffered a concussion and torn labrum.
(You keep bringing up Clausen, I’ll keep reminding you of Moore’s superiority. Fast forward 2 years, and Clausen’s warming somebody else’s bench. If he’d have had IT, he’d have shown IT. Ain’t got IT.)
To me, this is just another variation on the Why Are People Giving Up On Clausen post of 2 weeks ago. The emu has reached dead horse status.
Took the words right out of my mouth bigdavis...
If anyone’s a victim here, it’s Moore, not Clausen.
One cries because one is sad. For example: I cry because others are stupid, and it makes me sad.
I voted yes.
solely because if we draft a QB 1st overall there will be a lot of pressure to make sure that pick was a wise one, and Clausen’s chance of this being his team will be gone barring some unlikely circumstances (like god forbid a serious injury to the QB we draft). Same for Drew Brees in San Diego, when Rivers was drafted Brees’ chance of being the guy there was gone because they just picked up a high 1st round QB. But on that note, Brees’ talent led him to ultimately a better situation where he was able to win a SB where Rivers still hasn’t. So I guess it’s yes and no, Clausen’s chance with the Panthers will most likely be gone, but Clausen’s future in the NFL is still very much in his hands.
But in the end, when the most prominent players on the team are indicating they’re not happy with the QB situation, there isn’t much choice but make a change. So Clausen’s inability to win over the locker room or show enough promise to convince the coaching staff he has what it takes falls squarely on his shoulders. The fact that if we draft a QB 1st overall his chance here is pretty much done is something he has no control over. So yes and no.
Rules and Regulations of the Game: 89, Bottom Line
Again:
Play better. Then we wouldn’t have to spend another early pick on a QB. He had plenty of opportunity to show flashes/promise, but he failed to show any improvement from start one to start ten.
"Man coverage? I'm eatin' his ass up! Nom nom! Pac Man, baby!"
~#89
yeah but that gets into the whole
was he in an unfair situation starting before he should, with lame duck staff, and bad oline and had no chance to succed vs. he had 10 starts, showed next to no promise and actually looked worse as the season went on argument that has been beaten to death, and I’m still not sure which it is. I think only time will tell.
Rules and Regulations of the Game: 89, Bottom Line
by John Chilton on Apr 18, 2011 10:13 AM EDT up reply actions
Fine, but Matt Moore can get in there and throw for 300 yards in the same situation.
Jimmy struggled to get to 150 yards. His highs in completions and yardage was 18/195 (on 34 attempts).
He went six straight starts without a TD pass. Why do we coddle him so? He was absolutely atrociously awful.
"Man coverage? I'm eatin' his ass up! Nom nom! Pac Man, baby!"
~#89
by ERL on Apr 18, 2011 10:20 AM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
Because it wasn't his fault ERL. Haven't you learned anything?
It’s everyone else’s fault that Jimmeh sucked out loud last year.
Geez, get it through your thick skull already.
/sarcasm /kidding /donthatemeimjustmessingwithyou
One cries because one is sad. For example: I cry because others are stupid, and it makes me sad.
Excepting the defense...
Everyone on that team sucked last year. From the front office to the ballboys. It was a comedy of errors. It almost reminds me of what David Carr had handed to him in Houston, and I remember the mess he was when he got here.
Still, he has his chance coming if they ever get on the field.
I'm not getting into the whole Clausen v. Moore debate.
I’ll just say if you go back and listen to some of the interviews Rivera gave, he’s said some of these same things: that he was put into a bad situation, that he thinks he is a kid with some talent and some athletic ability, but at the same time finding a franchise QB is priority number one. (meaning he’s not willing to risk it on Clausen based on what he has seen.)
Rules and Regulations of the Game: 89, Bottom Line
by John Chilton on Apr 18, 2011 10:24 AM EDT up reply actions
Damn that toe, anyway.
It’s all the toe’s fault.
The Clausen v Moore debate is used as an example.
Moore was able to come in the SF game and tear it up. He had the same OL, WR, and RBs that Jimmy had.
Jimmy had 10 chances to show us he belongs, but he failed to do that.
Yes there was adversity. Yes he was on a bad offense, but Jake Delhomme and Matt Moore (even 43 year old Vinny Testeverde) have taken similar John Fox offenses and won 7, 8 games with them.
He stumbled into one win against ARZ, going 13 of 19 for 143 (essentially ‘not screwing it up’), and had a big part in 9 of his losses.
I don’t want anyone calling him a victim. I’d have an easier time asserting that he victimized the team…Had he had JUST ONE game like Moore’s game against SF…maybe we could use the first overall pick on someone to protect him or someone to go out and get him the ball back.
"Man coverage? I'm eatin' his ass up! Nom nom! Pac Man, baby!"
~#89
the same oline that got Matt concussed in the 1st game of the year
and later landed him on IR. Also Matt had several years learning the NFL system and opportunities to fill in when Jake was injured without the pressure of being the starter on the bench behind a great veteran in Jake, Clausen had like 4 games to adapt to the speed of the NFL. And yes Matt had a great game against SF. And yes Clausen didn’t show much of any promise, something I stated in my comment. Again I’m not interested in debating Clausen v. Moore so I’ll leave it at that.
Rules and Regulations of the Game: 89, Bottom Line
by John Chilton on Apr 18, 2011 10:38 AM EDT up reply actions
I'm not either.
But you’d better not close the door to that debate. Could be a fight for a roster spot at some point.
"Man coverage? I'm eatin' his ass up! Nom nom! Pac Man, baby!"
~#89
I hope so, we need all the options we can get.
I like Moore and I hope he’s able to come back from his injury to get another chance.
Rules and Regulations of the Game: 89, Bottom Line
by John Chilton on Apr 18, 2011 10:43 AM EDT up reply actions
To put it simply:
We wouldn’t be picking at the top of the 1st round if Clausen didn’t play like ass in the latter half of the 2010 season. He’s a victim of his own lack of performance, if anything.
That's a good thing to keep in mind.
He heard all the talk about Andrew Luck the last month of the season. He had plenty of incentive to beat back that groundswell by his play, and winning games.
And he puked it up. That’s reaping what you sow.
I think that’s what Beason, and Smith, and later DWill, were referring to. No leadership qualities. No willing a team to win.
and I admitted as much in my comment:
So Clausen’s inability to win over the locker room or show enough promise to convince the coaching staff he has what it takes falls squarely on his shoulders.
But like I said in my comment above, Rivera has said himself in several interviews that he thinks Jimmy is a kid with some talent and some athleticism and was in a tough situation last year. If that assessment is good enough for our head coach, it’s good enough for me.
Rules and Regulations of the Game: 89, Bottom Line
by John Chilton on Apr 18, 2011 10:41 AM EDT up reply actions
He really said athleticism and Clausen in the same sentence?
Wow, he must be a worse talent evaluator than John Gruden.
Official ABC Fan Club President
Anybody But Clausen
by Jelly Wedge on Apr 18, 2011 10:46 AM EDT up reply actions
yeah, athleticism isn't the first trait that comes to mind when
you think about Clausen.
Rules and Regulations of the Game: 89, Bottom Line
by John Chilton on Apr 18, 2011 10:48 AM EDT up reply actions
I don't know...
He’s got that slide for a 5 yard gain down pretty pat.
(Except he usually uses it on 3rd and 18.)
But maybe he’s just another Newton – all athleticism, and little mental agility.
(Sounds like he missed a spot last time he mowed your yard).
"Man coverage? I'm eatin' his ass up! Nom nom! Pac Man, baby!"
~#89
(I’m sure it was the yard’s fault.)
One cries because one is sad. For example: I cry because others are stupid, and it makes me sad.
by BW Smith on Apr 18, 2011 11:12 AM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
Or... I am the picker; he is the low hanging fruit.
I do not, however start any of these threads. Just an interested respondent.
Of course it was
There was a lame-duck gopher digging trenches all over the place, knowing full well Carl the Groundskeeper was going to blow him up with an explosive shaped like a squirrel. And the next door neighbor was an amateur horticulturist who keep yelling bad advice over the fence. Not to mention the Snapper had a rusty blade and the seat was wet and moldy. And there’s that whole section in the back yard under the pecan tree that just got overseeded and hasn’t even come in good yet. And let’s not forget, it was the first time Jimmy ever mowed a yard.
Official ABC Fan Club President
Anybody But Clausen
by Jelly Wedge on Apr 18, 2011 12:48 PM EDT up reply actions 4 recs
Seriously
http://twitter.com/#!/TheeSteveJohns
https://www.facebook.com/TheeSteveJohnson
by Thee Steve Johnson on Apr 19, 2011 9:24 PM EDT up reply actions
The real victim
The true victim was the Panther season as soon as Jimmy was picked. Would that he had played his senior year, I believe Kiper could sell someone else on how he must be the 2011 #1 pick. I don’t know whether McCoy is a better player, but I do know he didn’t go into the game gun-shy before he took a hike.
I think that's only because of the ambiguity of the word "victim'
I voted “Yes” because I think he’ll drop on the depth chart, because of our having the #1 pick, and therefore victimized by it.
I almost voted “No” because I don’t think he’s a victim, but is in that spot because of his own poor play and lack of leadership with his teammates.
If Clausen showed ANYTHING last year the debate for a QB at #1 wouldn’t even be there. Newton and Gabbert both are rated 15-20 on the big board. Players who fit Position of need are there for the taking. So in short if we draft a QB Clausen made himself a victim
"I have opinions of my own -- strong opinions -- but I don't always agree with them." - George Bush
"I know that you believe you understand what you think I said, but I'm not sure you realize that what you heard is not what I meant." - Robert McCloskey
by MMA_PITBULL on Apr 18, 2011 12:17 PM EDT up reply actions
Forget Clausen being the victim
I felt like my family and I were the victims last year. We had to watch every second of the awful QB play, while playing a nice and hearty 83 dollars a ticket for it. I mean, to shell out 332 dollars a game to watch Clausen throw balls out of bounds, into the D-lines head, or maybe 2 yards down the field was hard to stomach. The guy was down right awful and honestly he should not see the field for atleast 2 years if ever again. Hey, just my thoughts on the situation
by passthedamnchipsdavidson on Apr 18, 2011 11:28 AM EDT reply actions
Is our talented PR/WR from App. "pigeon-holed"?
I’m not an Armanti Edwards fan outright- but as poorly as Clausen played last year- what did we have to lose by trying him @ QB? Umm…. lets see… another embarrassing loss,… uh …we would have to replace a 2nd/ 3rd string PR/WR,… OH YEAH.. Hurney & Fox would have the proverbial egg to wipe off their collective faces!
by Scruffy loser on Apr 18, 2011 11:32 AM EDT reply actions 1 recs
Poll Question Clarity
Will Clausen be a victim in whose eyes? His, his fan/fans, or everyone elses?
Yard Mowing
How much does he charge? My son misses spots on ours all the time.
For Bigdavis, its free. Jimmeh is simply looking for acceptance.
But bigd is a tough nut to crack.
"Man coverage? I'm eatin' his ass up! Nom nom! Pac Man, baby!"
~#89
Ah, a thread to bash Clausen. Sweet.
I’m aware of the article, James, but you know EXACTLY what is going to be discussed in here. People will fall out again. Very strange front page choice.
"Nah, you look like Elijah Wood." - danmerqury
James didn't write the article.
Should we not discuss it just because Clausen is the focus? Are you operating under the “if you don’t have anything nice to say,” Clausen M.O.?
"Man coverage? I'm eatin' his ass up! Nom nom! Pac Man, baby!"
~#89
I'm saying that everyone has drawn their line in the sand on this issue.
Some still love Moore, some think Clausen is the future, plenty think Cam Newton is the saviour.
Needless to say all articles like this do is cause tension amongst the community. It seems like very few people can step away and say “Ok, we disagree on that topic, so let’s move on.” Instead it turns into test of wills and just gets tiresome.
"Nah, you look like Elijah Wood." - danmerqury
by OldhamA on Apr 18, 2011 12:04 PM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
Okay
I like this explanation. Thank you for elaborating.
With that said, I think we should openly discuss any and all Panthers news. If it rehashes tired arguments, shame on us.
"Man coverage? I'm eatin' his ass up! Nom nom! Pac Man, baby!"
~#89
QB’s are like Politics and Religion things are going to get tense at times because so many people have such strong views in one direction or the other. In the end we all pull for the same team and will continue to do so but passion and frustration gets the best of us at times.
"I have opinions of my own -- strong opinions -- but I don't always agree with them." - George Bush
"I know that you believe you understand what you think I said, but I'm not sure you realize that what you heard is not what I meant." - Robert McCloskey
by MMA_PITBULL on Apr 18, 2011 12:19 PM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
It's a situation I struggled with for a while.
Do we just fail to address elements of the organization, or discuss national articles about the team because they’re going to ruffle feathers or create discord?
In the end the biggest mistake this blog could make is pander to our current commenters and not have a broader focus that includes the thousands of people who read each day but never comment. As it stands the ‘lurkers’ out number the commenters about 75:1, and we need to keep everyone in mind when writing.
Now more than ever for fans of this franchise there’s a chance we’ll be getting more and more fluff from our beat writers and less in depth critiquing for the organization now Gantt’s off the beat. We’ll do our best to fill that void.
Honestly, has anyone else noticed how bad the coverage of this team has been from the beat writers in the last week? Going to the Panthers page on the observer here are the stories and I’m not joking:
- Front page story about Geoff Schwartz coaching a high school baseball team
- Front page story from the AP about underclassmen declaring for the draft
- A story about Steve Young trying to get a permit for a cabin in Utah
- A story about how Jerry Richardson is in mediation
- A mock draft
It may not be easy to talk about… but I think we’re covering the team better right now than any other single outlet. All we can do is relay any and all pertinent information and moderate the comments from there.
by James Dator on Apr 18, 2011 12:40 PM EDT up reply actions
but I think we’re covering the team better right now than any other single outlet.
Agree completely…even if it sounds like ass-kissing.
"Man coverage? I'm eatin' his ass up! Nom nom! Pac Man, baby!"
~#89
Conspiracy Theory
Maybe Gantt was too close to the team and revealing confidential information- I just hope we don’t find his body in a 55 gallon barrel somewhere.
by Scruffy loser on Apr 18, 2011 12:50 PM EDT up reply actions
It's okay... Sorensen is on the case! His latest 'story'
Ran into Chicago Bears safety, and former Carolina Panther, Chris Harris. Asked him what he thought the Panthers would do in the draft. He said what every other Panther and every former Panther I’ve talked to and heard interviewed has said.
Cam Newton.
Smart guy, Chris Harris.
And yes, his formatting is kept intact
by James Dator on Apr 18, 2011 12:51 PM EDT up reply actions
Wow. So glad we've got him on the beat.
(I think the sarcasm is implied.)
One cries because one is sad. For example: I cry because others are stupid, and it makes me sad.
Um...
Did Sorensen actually go to school for journalism? Or did he win the opportunity by being the 9th caller?
by boywonderncsu on Apr 19, 2011 1:12 AM EDT up reply actions
(It does sound like ass-kissing, but keep up the good work.)
One cries because one is sad. For example: I cry because others are stupid, and it makes me sad.
lol
One cries because one is sad. For example: I cry because others are stupid, and it makes me sad.
This
…is where I come for my Panther’s coverage. Though I do lurk more than I comment. I always appreciate the posts of this nature. It’s only a select few that beat the proverbial dead horse with their own opinions and arguments turning most of the comment sections into a “oh yeah, we’ll you’re dumb…nuh uh, YOU’RE dumb!” debacle.
by boywonderncsu on Apr 19, 2011 1:09 AM EDT up reply actions
QB options
I’m glad someone brought up Matt Moore as a possible option while looking @ QBs. Did Edwards ever get a chance @ QB other than the wildcat formation? A lot of people wrote him off as a 2nd round bust because they were trying to make him into something that will take time to adjust to, while all the time we may have had Mike Vick 2.0 without the bagage.
No Armanti didn’t get that chance nor will he ever. He either pans out as a WR/PR or he washes out of the NFL entirely. 32 teams had him as a WR convert. Thats what he will be or fail trying.
"I have opinions of my own -- strong opinions -- but I don't always agree with them." - George Bush
"I know that you believe you understand what you think I said, but I'm not sure you realize that what you heard is not what I meant." - Robert McCloskey
by MMA_PITBULL on Apr 18, 2011 12:28 PM EDT up reply actions
To quote the great George Carlin -
"I’m also tired of hearing about innocent victims; this is an outmoded idea. There are no innocent victims. If you’re born on this world you’re guilt, period, f*ck you, end of report, next case. Your birth certificate is proof of guilt."
Man I miss that guy.
Maturity is knowing you were an idiot in the past. Wisdom is knowing you will be an idiot in the future and common sense is knowing you should try not to be an idiot now. - J. Jacques
Classic Carlin...
One of the best comedians ever. RIP George.
One cries because one is sad. For example: I cry because others are stupid, and it makes me sad.
by BW Smith on Apr 18, 2011 12:55 PM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
Him and Pryor were the best IMO
Some good ones out there, but they aren’t on the same level as those guys.
Maturity is knowing you were an idiot in the past. Wisdom is knowing you will be an idiot in the future and common sense is knowing you should try not to be an idiot now. - J. Jacques
Agreed
Also very high on Sam Kinison and Rodney Dangerfield. You just don’t find comedians like that anymore.
One cries because one is sad. For example: I cry because others are stupid, and it makes me sad.
The world is too sound bite and PC happy nowadays
It’s dangerous for performers to have sound bites floating around for the media to grab onto and sling out to the public absent of context.
Maturity is knowing you were an idiot in the past. Wisdom is knowing you will be an idiot in the future and common sense is knowing you should try not to be an idiot now. - J. Jacques
by Vagus on Apr 18, 2011 2:01 PM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
Carlin and Pryor did have that great rivalry going...
“Richard had a heart attack, so I had a heart attack. Then, Richard had another heart attack, so I had another heart attack. Then Richard burned himself up…I said, fuck that, I’m gonna have another heart attack.”
I often wish I could sell my brain to someone else. They'd be smarter, but I wouldn't give a crap, plus I could buy a new car.
Speaking of Pryor...
I got some “In Living Color” seasons on DVD for Christmas a while back. This skit is one of the best. If you’ve seen some of his movies—its spot on.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nm3HROoEbfU
"I only brought it bowling, I didn't rent it shoes, I'm not buying it a f@cking beer, he's not taking your f@cking turn, Dude."
~Walter Sobchak
by ERL on Apr 18, 2011 3:17 PM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
“Here’s another question I have. How come when it’s us, it’s an abortion. But when it’s a chicken, it’s an omelet?”
by SlayerGhaleon on Apr 18, 2011 12:57 PM EDT up reply actions
Things you never hear and things you never see
Should be required reading.
http://www.iceboxman.com/carlin/pael.php
Maturity is knowing you were an idiot in the past. Wisdom is knowing you will be an idiot in the future and common sense is knowing you should try not to be an idiot now. - J. Jacques
Worst case Clausen will stick around a few years here
and move on to somewhere else as a backup and because of his pedigree and ability will probably stay in the league 10-12 year and walk away a multi-millionaire.
Maturity is knowing you were an idiot in the past. Wisdom is knowing you will be an idiot in the future and common sense is knowing you should try not to be an idiot now. - J. Jacques
Hardly a victim
Maturity is knowing you were an idiot in the past. Wisdom is knowing you will be an idiot in the future and common sense is knowing you should try not to be an idiot now. - J. Jacques
(mostly a lurker, sometime speaker) I hope thats the worst case
but think about this. say the panthers take newton at #1, and moore is injured, tony pike wont rise up (i think) so we have new guy #1, clausen, and pike (maybe moore, but doubt it). this means you have a few years of sorting out weather new guy or clausen is your leader at QB. I think thats worst case, the turtle slow development battle for a few years. I dont want to sit thru 4-5 years of “figuring it out”. say the pick is newton who cant read a playbook and then you have clausen and all his “abilities”. thats one hard matchup to look forward to.
by the way if clausen is a victim then so am I for having to sit and watching him.
"..and we have scott may coming back this season.." bob johnson quote before the start of 07-08 season, when he didnt even know his own players name.
by bobcatsbrendan on Apr 19, 2011 4:34 PM EDT up reply actions
I don't consider someone who will make millions of dollars...
…To sit front row at an NFL game a victim of any kind. I don’t believe if we do draft Cam Newton or (preferrably) Blaine Gabbert, Clausen’s done, as far as his career in the Carolinas goes. The coaching staff should give everyone an equal opportunity to prove that they’ve got ‘the stuff’ to make an impact on this team, especially considerign we’re starting with a clean slate, essentially. Jimmy does clearly need to show better judgement in his choices and try to correct the relationships with his teammates he seems to have broken.
He also needs to get his face fixed. He just looks like a dick.
by Ol' Uncle Munnerlyn on Apr 18, 2011 1:36 PM EDT reply actions
C'mon now Unk
Let’s not make fun of things that people don’t choose /sarcasm.
"Man coverage? I'm eatin' his ass up! Nom nom! Pac Man, baby!"
~#89
You left out the part
where he got to spend some time hanging out at the Playboy Mansion.
by panthersnbraves on Apr 18, 2011 1:52 PM EDT up reply actions
Ugh...
Honestly, I am stuck on this one.
There’s the reasoning (most here, I think, would call it excuses) that Clausen was in a bad situation that he never should have been in to begin with. That the O-Line was for crap. The receivers were rookies. That Davidson’s idea of a playbook was a single page because the rest of them were all fused together with doughnut glazing. That the Fox/Davidson facepalm was actually a play call… okay, that last one, I just completely made up out of the blue.
By contrast, there’s the flip side of the coin: there was zero improvement on the field (if anything, it was regression). There was no will to win, no drive to succeed, even when it seemed all but a foregone conclusion that Andrew Luck would have his starting job come training camp. He was playing scared and the entire league knew it. There was the disregard for the coaching staff (lame duck or no, it’s still not cool). There’s several of the big-name current players, and several former Panthers, all saying to pick a new QB and move on. There’s his loss of respect from his teammates and the loss of the locker room to contend with.
When all is said and done, the answer is still a tough one to call. In some ways, yes: Clausen is a victim of his own mediocrity as a rookie, and his complete inability to hold his head up high and push on. He stuck his head in the sand, and it showed. In other ways, no: I have very little sympathy for someone who can still wind up walking away with millions (assuming he doesn’t paycheck-to-paycheck like a number of NFL players do), and wasn’t willing to do everything it took to try and keep up the spirits of his team and listen to his coaches (no matter how lame-duck or pathetic they were, in most cases).
Right now, Clausen has a lot to prove. I can’t help, at this point, but to lump him in as our version of David Carr — and until he can prove otherwise, that’s where he’ll remain. He may prove to be better, but right now I can honestly say that I’ll believe it when I see it.
That's the problem.
With the steamy loaf he pinched out there last season, they can’t possibly give him the benefit of the doubt. Worse, many of the respected veteran players on that team feel like we should draft a QB with our first pick, and they are not fancy in the way they go about expressing that opinion.
He is running out of supporters. At least Kiper still believes. ’Cause his opinion matters.
/sarcasm
"I only brought it bowling, I didn't rent it shoes, I'm not buying it a f@cking beer, he's not taking your f@cking turn, Dude."
~Walter Sobchak
And yet...
Even Kiper thinks now that Carolina will take Newton #1, even though he qualifies it as a mistake on Carolina’s part. Clausen-supporter or no (in which case, he can join Marty Hurney as pretty much the only other Clausen supporter), it must still be some crow he’s having to eat by admitting even that much.
He has refused to admit that he was mistaken about Jimmeh.
I guess its because if he does, he’s admitting that he failed at his job. So I guess he is going to continue to blow Jimmy smoke up our asses.
"I only brought it bowling, I didn't rent it shoes, I'm not buying it a f@cking beer, he's not taking your f@cking turn, Dude."
~Walter Sobchak
He's not admitted he was wrong about Jimmy by saying it outright, I agree...
…but the fact that he’s following the trend that has everyone pointing at QB for us and the #1 pick is likely the closest he’ll get to it. Maybe if Clausen does wind up ultimately released from the Panthers and makes an impact elsewhere, then he can be all revisionist-history and say “told you so”, but it won’t matter as far as it goes here in Panther-land.
No, he's not a victim. Yes, he was put in before he was ready.
For Clausen, the best thing would be a change of scenery. My only problem is how many draft picks we’d have to give up to get somebody else to take him.
I often wish I could sell my brain to someone else. They'd be smarter, but I wouldn't give a crap, plus I could buy a new car.
Haha
That’s one of those: “How ’bout I take you out back, kick you in the nuts, take your wallet and we call it even?”
"I only brought it bowling, I didn't rent it shoes, I'm not buying it a f@cking beer, he's not taking your f@cking turn, Dude."
~Walter Sobchak
Nice Vegas Vacation reference...
One cries because one is sad. For example: I cry because others are stupid, and it makes me sad.
kidding, right?
victim?? come on, this is the NFL, not junior high. Produce, or you’ll be replaced. Clausen has “had promise” since the publicity machine at notre dame handed him to the NFL. Cream rises to the top, and sh!t settles to the bottom.
Victim is probably too strong of a word.
I typed it in the dictionary.com thesaurus, and these results popped up.
Main Entry: victim
Part of Speech: noun
Definition: someone or something sacrificed, preyed upon
Synonyms: babe in woods, butt, casualty, clown, dupe, easy make, easy mark, fatality, fool, gambit, gopher, gudgeon, gull, hireling, hunted, immolation, injured party, innocent, mark, martyr, patsy, pawn, pigeon, prey, pushover, quarry, sacrifice, scapegoat, sitting duck, sitting target, soft touch, stooge, sucker, sufferer, underdog, wretch
Antonyms: criminal, culprit
A couple things jumped right out at me. Obviously Jimmy has been scapegoated to some extent for this season, as evidenced by the multitude of us (including me) who believe our problems will be solved with a franchise QB. The QB is always an easy mark when your team is struggling. However culprit popped up as an antonym, and of course Clausen has been marked as such. So really it’s not as simple as “Is Clausen the victim here?”. I think he may have been “victimized”, which one of the definitions listed says to slay as or like a sacrificial victim/. And I think Clausen is definitely paying the price for this season. Not saying it’s not his fault, he certainly shoulders some of the blame, but he wasn’t in a favorable situation. He’s partially a victim, but he certainly could have done more to allay our concerns.
Yes I'm a dude.
If thats the definition for "victim"
Then the 2010 Carolina Panthers were all victims.
by Pantherclawed on Apr 18, 2011 10:45 PM EDT up reply actions
I have to add
that isnt the true nature of perserverance all about being placed in a no win situation, at which time you can call youself a victim or even afterwards call yourself a victim, but RISE ABOVE or at the very least combat said elements of the no win situation to gain respect of those who battled whith you.
clausen pickel battled, but showed no abilities to rise above or gain any respect from those who battled with him.
"..and we have scott may coming back this season.." bob johnson quote before the start of 07-08 season, when he didnt even know his own players name.

by 























