Panthers Targeting "Five to Eight" Players with No. 1 Pick
Marty Hurney made a radio appearance on Charlotte's WFNZ last week. Hurney, in his decade as an NFL general manager, has mastered the art of talking without saying anything. He was asked mostly about the draft, naturally, as that is the only event on the 2011 NFL calendar written in ink.
Hurney would not address whether or not the Panthers were interested in specific players with the first overall pick, but instead he said they were going to do more homework on a group of "five to eight" players. We can all recite his go-to line by now: "I think you have to pick an impact player at an impact position."
Since there is not a single player who is considered a 'lock' for the first overall pick, Panther fans will have to spend the next two months doing their best Sherlock Holmes impression, filtering through all the misdirection and subterfuge while trying get inside the minds of the Panthers' brass--all in hopes of identifying, and then separating these five to eight players.
First we need to try and identify these five to eight impact players. We know that in order to make the list, a player has to play an 'impact' position. Marty Hurney may have a different opinion on what constitutes a certain position being impactful, but let's try to eliminate a few positions nonetheless...
Positions deemed most 'impactful' by the author are:
Quarterback, Tailback, Wide Receiver, and Offensive Tackle on offense, and then Defensive Tackle, Defensive End, Rush Linebacker, and Cornerback on defense.
In the spirit of being thorough, let's identify the top two players at each of these positions (based on the author's objective opinion):
Quarterback: Blaine Gabbert, Missouri and Cam Newton, Auburn
Tailback: Mark Ingram, Alabama and Mikel Leshoure, Illinois
Wide Receiver: A.J. Green, Georgia and Julio Jones, Alabama
Offensive Tackle: Nate Solder, Colorado and Gabe Carimi, Wisconsin
Defensive Tackle: Nick Fairley, Auburn and Marcel Dareus, Alabama
Defensive End: Da'Quan Bowers, Clemson and Robert Quinn, North Carolina
Rush LB: Von Miller, Texas A&M and Aldon Smith, Missouri
Cornerback: Patrick Peterson, LSU and Prince Amukamara, Nebraska
We now have a list of 16 players. Let's see if we can cut this list in half with some old fashioned deductive logic, shall we?
Blaine Gabbert:
After the Carolina's favorite architect decided to go back to Palo Alto for at least one more season, The Panthers seemed to change their tune when it came to drafting a quarterback with the first pick. Blaine Gabbert has been climbing up the draft boards lately. While Gabbert has the size and speed that scouts covet, his collegiate statistics (specifically his number of wins) leave something to be desired. While he has a chance to be good, I don't see Gabbert as being the immediate answer to our quarterbacking problems. When you question whether or not he could wrestle away the starting spot from Jimmy Clausen, I think its safe to assume he should not be the first overall pick.
Officially scratch Blaine Gabbert off of the list.
Cam Newton:
Ah, yes. Cam Newton. What more can I say that hasn't already been said? If the kid had a background like Tim Jebow, I'd say he's the front-runner. But we'd have our heads in the sand if we didn't question some of the decisions this young man has made during the last four years. The first pick in the draft has to be someone who you could see being the face of your franchise for the next 10-12 years, all while drawing zero negative attention to himself and the team. While it is entirely possible that Newton plays his best Mother Teresa for his time in the spotlight, it is also entirely possible that he has a three or four year NFL career marred by immaturity and poor decision making. Notice I said nothing about his ability? I don't think there's any question as to whether he has the physical tools and football skills, but that is not what you are gambling on with Newton. And the workout...we did not see anything new, other than some decent footwork while simulating five and seven steps drops...it didn't move him up or down in my book.
I cannot and will not scratch Cam Newton off of the list.
Mark Ingram:
Tailbacks are not picked at the top of the first round anymore. Even Adrian Peterson was the seventh pick four years ago. Even if Ingram was on the same level as AP, our current stable of tailbacks prohibits us from picking one with the first pick of the draft. As a side note, I think Ingram will be a top five tailback in the league as early as next season. But nevertheless...this is one position where need comes into play, and we have no need at tailback, particularly if DeAngelo Williams is resigned.
Officially scratch Mark Ingram off of the list.
Mikel Lashoure:
(see Mark Ingram, but not quite as good)
This kid will be good. Mark it down. But he will be good for someone else. Again, no need.
Officially scratch Mikel Lashoure off of the list.
A.J. Green:
This is where it starts to get spicy. AJ Green is the near unanimous number one receiver in this draft. Personally, I have a couple of reservations with picking Green #1, but neither of them is a reflection of Green as a player. First, I believe our struggles at the quarterback position severely devalue a top-flight receiver like Green. Look at Steve Smith's lack of production last season. How could the Panthers possibly strap-on another great WR and expect to use both of them effectively? Look at how well an all-star pairing of WRs did with sub-par quarterback play in Cincinnati last season...and Palmer even had an 82.4 QB rating last season! Second, we spent three picks (two early) on receivers in last year's draft. I have a problem with making LaFell or Gettis a fourth WR. Our future at this position has never looked so bright. So let's give the LaFell/Gettis combo some time to develop.
Even though I'd pass on Green, there are still those who feel he should be in the conversation, therefore I will not scratch him off the list.
Julio Jones:
This is really nothing more than a technicality. Jones is the second WR on most lists. WR is an impact position. Those facts put him in the article, but there's no way Julio makes the short list.
Officially scratch Julio Jones off of the list.
Nate Solder:
Solder is the long, lean, athletic specimen that all teams look for in a left tackle. With our biggest need on the offensive line being at RG, and with Gross and Otah presumably back in form, we do not have a need at tackle, especially at the top of the first round. This one is easy...if a player is not really close to being the BPA, and the team has little to no need at his position, it is safe to...
Officially scratch Nate Solder off of the list.
Gabe Carimi:
Again, he's not the BPA, and OT is not a dire need. I respect his game immensely, but...
Officially scratch Gabe Carimi off of the list.
Nick Fairley:
The closest thing to a consensus number one prospect. Fairley is probably the front-runner at the moment. We have talked about Fairley's game quite a bit already, so let's just not cross him off the list and move on. The fact that the Panthers' second biggest need is DT gives this potential pick some strength and some backing.
Probable front-runner, obviously he stays on the '5-8' list.
Marcel Dareus:
Marcel is a going to be a pro-bowler in a 3-4 system. The question is: can he be as effective as a three-technique defensive tackle in a 4-3? Either way you are probably going to spend most downs throwing a guard out of the way, so usually a transition from one to the other is successful. The one thing that puts Dareus a few notches below Fairley on my list is his frame. He is listed at 6' 4" and 304lbs. The combine will tell the true story, but I think he is closer to 6'2" and 285lbs. If your under-tackle is that size, more times than not you will try to compensate for his lack of bulk with a massive, space-eating nose tackle...someone who can be very hard to find. Again, I'm very high on Dareus, and see Hawaii in his future, but give me the choice and I'm taking Fairley for his larger frame (which could be added to), and superior athleticism. The one advantage Dareus has is several years of good tape.
Marcel narrowly stays on the list because of the Panthers' sizable need at DT.
Da'Quan Bowers:
Probably the most physically impressive defensive lineman in the draft. Bowers, like Fairley, really has only one year of good tape. He was consistently good throughout the whole year. There weren't many stretches were he disappeared, which is unusual for any DE. Put on the tape and he keeps popping up, whether its sacks, tackles for loss, pressures, batted balls, etc. Bowers is about 280lbs, and could easily add 10 to 15 more pounds to his frame. There are two flags that I see with this pick...first is, we have a fringe pro-bowler in Charles Johnson who almost certainly will be with the team next season. Having two great DEs is terrific, but if you have nothing on the interior of your defensive line, your DEs can chipped and double teamed at will. Second, having only one year of good tape on a guy who was one of the top high school prospects in the country three years ago is a concern.
Bowers played himself onto the list last season.
Robert Quinn:
Mr Quinn was one of several Tarheels who felt the wrath of the NCAA last season. He is slightly smaller than Bowers, but just as athletic, and probably a bit faster. Quinn was only a Sophomore in his final season (2009) at North Carolina, but he was already a dominant force. He plays the run well, and he is one of the premier pass rushers college football has seen in recent seasons. Rarely, if ever, does an athlete get suspended for an entire year and still end up being picked in the top 10 of the NFL draft. Quinn will. Jerry Richardson will not sign off on such a pick, however. Therefore...
Officially scratch Robert Quinn off of the list.
Von Miller:
Miller is someone to keep an eye on. 3-4 teams looking for a pass-rushing outside linebacker will look at Miller first. He is explosive and very powerful for his size (6'2", 245). One might contend that a rush linebacker is not an impact player, but that I would refute. The one negative I see is his inexperience defending the run coming from the pass-happy Big 12 conference...this is nitpicking, and Miller looks like an exceptional player. But will he be a Panther? In short, no. The fact that Ron Rivera has elected to keep his base defense a 4-3 rules this pick out almost completely.
Officially scratch Von Miller off of the list.
Aldon Smith:
Smith played primarily in a 4-3 at Missouri. He is a freak, but is projected to be a 3-4 OLB in the NFL. If Rivera wanted to use more 3-4 elements then perhaps Smith (and Von Miller) would be in play. But for now...
Officially scratch Aldon Smith off of the list.
Patrick Peterson:
If you could create a cast mold of the perfect cornerback, you would use PP7. He is 6'2" and 215lbs. He is bigger than some Division 1-A linebackers. The kid is fast, quick, and has terrific balls skills. PP7 can cover bigger receivers, he can run with them, and he will make plays in the running game. The negatives you hear about Pat are his less than impressive outings against players like Julio Jones and AJ Green. While these players are first-rounds talents at the WR position, you would like a cornerback who is selected with the first overall pick to be a world-beater. His return ability is elite, and only adds to his value. Oddly enough, PP7 the only player from this article whom the Panthers have met with to this point. Probably just a coincidence since he was the best player (according to the draft boards) at the Senior Bowl.
PP7 stays on the list.
Prince Amukamara:
An intriguing player. Most people will tell you that Prince is better technically than PP7, and I tend to agree. He is almost as big, but not as phycially impressive on the size, speed, and strength metric. Prince may be a better pure corner, but he offers less flexibility to a defense. I see him as more of a mid-first rounder, but since we are keeping one corner....
Let's keep Prince on the list for now.
Ladies and Gentleman. After much ado, one of these seven men will be selected by your Carolina Panthers with the first overall pick in the 2011 NFL Draft: (in alphabetical order)
Prince Amukamara, CB
Da'Quan Bowers, DE
Marcel Dareus, DT
Nick Fairley, DT
A.J. Green, WR
Cam Newton, QB
Patrick Peterson, CB
Discuss...
(But please, no trading down comments)
The content of these posts are those of the user/fan making the post only
109 comments
|
3 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
I think that's a fair assessment of potential targets...
With a good heaping of logic behind the choices; only one I disagree with is Prince…I’m sure he’ll be a great NFL corner, but the biggest reason PP7 is up on the boards is not only because of skills but his athletic talent being so incredible (especially for a CB). Even still, I’d place PP7 as a slim-to-nil chance at going #1, so by that measure I’d take Prince off the list. I think we could probably cross off Dareus as well; I just don’t see them taking a DT first if said prospect isn’t being projected as the best 4-3 DT in the draft (thus why Fairley ultimately gets a boost over him in terms of draft stock).
My two cents? Don’t be surprised when the Carolina Panthers with the first pick in the 2011 NFL draft select….Nick Fairley, DT, Auburn university cue the WOOOOOOOOO!
Nobody fucks with the Jesus! -Big Lebowski
Yeah, trying to make sense of Hurney's "5-8" players comments.
In reality, there are probably two or three guys who are really in contention…Fairley, Bowers, and Newton/Green.
Let me hold about tree-fiddy?
Well of course he's got to cast the "wide net"...
but you’re right, there’s most likely a much smaller list of probable candidates
Nobody fucks with the Jesus! -Big Lebowski
by Tomthehomer on Feb 11, 2011 12:28 PM EST up reply actions
almost, its actually
Patrick
Nick
A.J. &
Daquan
Close but no cigar!
I hope you like prison food. ... And penis!
by ticketholdrsins96 on Feb 11, 2011 1:56 PM EST up reply actions
Thanks
I hope you like prison food. ... And penis!
by ticketholdrsins96 on Feb 11, 2011 2:01 PM EST up reply actions
And an interesting post
I hope you like prison food. ... And penis!
by ticketholdrsins96 on Feb 11, 2011 2:02 PM EST up reply actions
+1
"I think that fits right along with what my vision is, and that is to help build this team into a Super Bowl caliber team, win, and sustain that for a period of time." ~Ron Rivera
Great assessments
Going with Fairly, Newton, or (depending on the defensive philosophy) PP7. We are in a division with elite to insanely good QB’s, but Freeman is only one who I see as a true running threat. If we try to pull a Jets and take away the receivers like in the Pats playoff game, I could see PP7 being our guy.
But I’m not Hurney, so we will probably take Bowers and have the scariest attacking DE’s in the league.
If God came down on Christmas Day/ I know exactly what He'd say/ He'd say "Oi!" to the punks/ and "Oi!" to the skins/ but "Oi!" to the world and everybody wins.
-The Vandals
My only issue with Bowers has to do with the labor uncertainty...
because we are in DIRE need of a force in the middle, and with this CBA nonsense going on we might not have even the slightest clue who will be available to help plug up our DT deficiencies. If that stuff is settled though pre-draft and we have some solutions on board for our interior, Bowers could make our DE rotation ridiculous (I mean…Johnson, Bowers, Hardy, and Brown? We’d have two rotations of starters all game!).
Nobody fucks with the Jesus! -Big Lebowski
by Tomthehomer on Feb 11, 2011 12:30 PM EST up reply actions
Oh, Yes.
Johnson, Bowers, and Hardy all have the ability to move inside on passing downs.
Disclaimer: BusyBeingAwesome = Irony. And, on a side note. I miss you, Steve Beuerlein.
by BusyBeingAwesome on Feb 11, 2011 2:59 PM EST up reply actions
now i like this! if no trade-down, then take Bowers at #1 and find a gem in later rounds at DT. someone just posted a FanPost about a DT out of Jersey, and he looks (well, the picture doesn’t work) but he sounds solid…
or, take Newton at #1. I’ve been telling myself these past few weeks that his stock will rise, and people will take to him, but myself…!? he’s an all-around great physical player, so all i’m waiting for is the Wonderlic.
Taylor Yates for #1 pick!!!!!!!!!!!
by scatterbrain on Feb 11, 2011 3:57 PM EST up reply actions
I don't mind Newton
I figure if the coaches and Hurney see a franchise QB in the guy then he’s worth giving a shot. There’s no questioning his measurableas.
The one question mark I have with Bowers would be the fact that a top flight DT would make everyone on the line better, but without one I think the ends wouldn’t be able to get the most out of their ability. But yeah, I like the idea of those ends all rushing the QB on passing downs.
Disclaimer: BusyBeingAwesome = Irony. And, on a side note. I miss you, Steve Beuerlein.
by BusyBeingAwesome on Feb 11, 2011 4:13 PM EST up reply actions
I assume you're talking about Charles Johnson, but...
did anyone see that Rivera said he was “intrigued” by Ed Johnson in the middle?
Yeah I was, and I saw that
I found it curious. I liked that Rivera talked a lot about reenergizing guys. I wounder if he could energize him. It seems like the talent is there if someone can light a fire under his ass.
Disclaimer: BusyBeingAwesome = Irony. And, on a side note. I miss you, Steve Beuerlein.
by BusyBeingAwesome on Feb 11, 2011 4:22 PM EST up reply actions
I did not
Have a link to it, BD?
Follow me on Twitter at @JakeHumphrey91
by Jake Humphrey on Feb 11, 2011 4:23 PM EST up reply actions
I thought the whole article was very telling
http://www.charlotteobserver.com/2011/02/10/2052768/rivera-brings-energy-strong-grip.html
Disclaimer: BusyBeingAwesome = Irony. And, on a side note. I miss you, Steve Beuerlein.
by BusyBeingAwesome on Feb 11, 2011 4:34 PM EST up reply actions
I thought that the article was quite telling, too.
Like everyone else, I did have a “WTF” moment when I saw Ed Johnson’s name mentioned. Although, I am curious to see what he might look like if he lost a little weight and leaned up a bit so he’d be a little faster.
Has anyone else noticed that when Rivera talks DE, he always mentions CJ (of course) and Hardy? I haven’t heard Brayton’s name once.
Also, I’m glad to hear that Rivera sees something in AE – that he reminds him of Cribbs.
If he hadn't also mentioned CJ
I would have been sure he just got their names mixed up.
Disclaimer: BusyBeingAwesome = Irony. And, on a side note. I miss you, Steve Beuerlein.
by BusyBeingAwesome on Feb 11, 2011 4:55 PM EST up reply actions
I for one hope Brayton is let go
after seeing that whole close-lining move he did out of bounds I can’t see the guy being a Panther anymore. To me that was just a classless move and that kind of move doesn’t define the type of guys this franchise goes for.
To Many, Many winning seasons under our new coach Ron Rivera! And may we win a few Super Bowls along the way to becoming a Dynasty!!!
by Panther4Life!!! on Feb 11, 2011 4:56 PM EST up reply actions
And the way the media is reagarding the Panthers
now the entire nation are going to assume that all Panther players are thugs and jerk-offs!
To Many, Many winning seasons under our new coach Ron Rivera! And may we win a few Super Bowls along the way to becoming a Dynasty!!!
by Panther4Life!!! on Feb 11, 2011 5:19 PM EST up reply actions
Might have something
to do with why Rivera does not mention him.
That could be very, very telling
The more ‘intrigued’ Rivera is with someone on the roster the less ‘intrigued’ he could be about investing a draft pick in said position. I would be great if both sides get a CBA done in time to get some OTAs done prior to the draft, but fat chance of that happening.
Follow me on Twitter! @James_Dator
Maybe by intrigued, he meant...
What the hell is this guy doing on my football team?
J/K….it is interesting that he’s intrigued by Ed Johnson, a guy that most of us here had written off as soon as the season ended.
"I think that fits right along with what my vision is, and that is to help build this team into a Super Bowl caliber team, win, and sustain that for a period of time." ~Ron Rivera
Maybe Rivera sees something the rest of us don't
I thought he was a solid pick-up as far as adding depth to the position.
To Many, Many winning seasons under our new coach Ron Rivera! And may we win a few Super Bowls along the way to becoming a Dynasty!!!
by Panther4Life!!! on Feb 11, 2011 4:27 PM EST up reply actions
I'm salivating now.
"I think that fits right along with what my vision is, and that is to help build this team into a Super Bowl caliber team, win, and sustain that for a period of time." ~Ron Rivera
Think I made a fanpost about it a year or two ago
Under a different name. We’d call it the “Big Cat” package. Destruction of offensive lines ensues.
Follow me on Twitter at @JakeHumphrey91
by Jake Humphrey on Feb 11, 2011 3:34 PM EST up reply actions
That's pretty funny. Labor uncertainty.
When you talked about Bowers like that, I was thinking you were talking about his work ethic.
"Once again the trousers of evil are yanked down by the mocking hands of justice!"-Revshawn
haha
I just noticed how it could be interpreted like that
Nobody fucks with the Jesus! -Big Lebowski
I think you just explained...
…why we SHOULDN’T take Bowers. Hardy’s potential is sky-high, Johnson already is 2nd tier elite (just allow me a little artistic license), and we still have Brown and Brayton under contract (capable back-ups). However we have NOTHING to speak of in the middle…no one who can reliably provide a push/pass rush up the middle OR stop the run.
We could throw 4 Pro-Bowl calibre edge rushers at any of the QB’s in our division all game long…and we’d get shredded because it would just cause the “pocket” to naturally form. Hell, it’s actually advantageous for Brees (considering his height) to have 4 of the O/D linemen out of his field of vision to open up passing lanes. In fact any QB would appreciate that other than maybe Flacco, since he’s 6’6" and not exactly fleet of foot.
I don’t deny Bowers’ talent and potential, and were we in any other position with our personnel, I’d say grab him. I’m not immune to the Pavlovian response that comes with Johnson, Hardy, Bowers, and Brown rotating throughout the course of every game; I’m seriously considering popping a chubb as we speak. But I’m a realist, and the reality is we don’t NEED a glut of good to great DE’s…or even more inexperienced (if talented) QB’s on the roster (if Luck was available, I’d change that view). Either would be nice, but we have to consider NEED right now. That suggests 3 players based on the BPA-Need algorithm (yes, I just made that up and have nothing on which to base it): Fairley, Green, and Peterson. I know Prince is technically amazing…but fast and physical is what this defense is going to be under Rivera. In that equation, finesse is a luxury and our only luxuries right now are LB’s and RB’s (and I wouldn’t be averse to leveraging those existing luxuries into more draft picks or a good, veteran QB). Let’s not focus on MORE luxuries until we shore up our weaknesses.
Yeah, I know…I only narrowed it down by one from the 4 (including Bowers) we’ve all been debating since the start of the play-offs…but it’s a smaller number than “5-8.” ;-)
Brayton won't be back, you can count on that...
But more importantly, I don’t think we SHOULD draft bowers, just pointing out what we would have if we do….
I’m personally still on the Fairley bandwagon
Nobody fucks with the Jesus! -Big Lebowski
by Tomthehomer on Feb 12, 2011 12:59 PM EST up reply actions
werd, brother
I still don’t know my opinion on Brayton’s status…he’s solid and has been a good teammate for several years. Does he get sacked (so to speak) for that one sideline bit of insanity/stupidity? I just don’t know. Does he deserve to be? Well, yeah.
I know I’m wanting a defense (and O-Line) with a bit of anger, danger, and an edge in them…but I’m also torn because that WAS a cheap shot of substantial proportions. I suppose I don’t have an opinion of him coming back as of yet. Does anyone know his contract for next year…or if there is guaranteed money involved? That might sway me to have an opinion on the matter.
He was only signed to a one year contract...
the sideline incident aside, Brayton looked lost this year and was clearly outplayed by the other DE’s on the team (despite being the starter). I just don’t envision them resigning him after the season he had this year…
Nobody fucks with the Jesus! -Big Lebowski
Ah...
…didn’t realize he got just a single year.
And I don’t dispute the significant drop-off in production last year (I was screaming for Greg Hardy’s playing time from the 2nd or 3rd game). But he could still be a serviceable backup…especially since he could be had at a song now. Does this mean we should consider the DE position locked up and done? Hell naw! We should look for depth in the mid rounds, I think…but I’d be fine with giving him a crappy contract or dropping him.
Brayton is under contract through 2012
3/17/2010: Signed a three-year, $9 million contract. The deal contains $2 million guaranteed, including a $1 million signing bonus. 2011-2012: $3.5 million, 2013: Free Agent
If they release him, it will count proximately 3.83 million towards the 2011 salary cap.
Official ABC Fan Club President
Anybody But Clausen
no kidding?
Well in that case, I imagine he might be sticking around for depth lol
Nobody fucks with the Jesus! -Big Lebowski
I like this...
BPA-Need algorithm
Someone needs to come up with a mathematical formula. =)
When you have the luxury of having solid starters and capable backups, sure, go with BPA. But when you know that you have specific and immediate needs (or imminent needs within a year or two)…I’m all for an “algorithm.”
I'd say it's between Fairley and Newton...
Depending on whether or not they want to go offense or defense.
I wouldn’t rule out AJ Green though, especially if a Smitty trade is really in the works (which hopefully, it’s not).
"I think that fits right along with what my vision is, and that is to help build this team into a Super Bowl caliber team, win, and sustain that for a period of time." ~Ron Rivera
by BW Smith on Feb 11, 2011 12:17 PM EST reply actions 1 recs
Hurney said the same thing on a Panthers.com interview
I think it’s a good sign that they have narrowed down options, but aren’t yet settled on one guy but rather are keeping the options open.
In my opinion,these guys are definitely on the list:
Patrick Peterson
Nick Fairley
Marcell Dareus
DaQuan Bowers
AJ Green
Von Miller
Cam Newton
Miller is the only one who didn't make the cut from 16 to 7
The other six are still possibilities, in my mind. Instead of Miller I had Prince Amukamara, but either of those guys are probably long-shots.
Let me hold about tree-fiddy?
I don't see Von Miller happening for us...
But man, he’s freaking talented. He had a great day in the Senior Bowl – especially considering he’d only practiced for a week in that 4-3 scheme when he played in a 3-4 at Texas A&M.
A good assessment, but I vehemently disagree with leaving Gabbert off the list. Let me say that I am 98% positive that we won’t take him with the number one overall pick. That being said, he is in many scouts opinions the number one QB available. And QB is our number one position of need. Although I think it would make more sense to draft a QB with higher upside like Cam Newton, I think it would be folly for the Panthers not to even consider Gabbert in their decision making process if he really his the number one rated player in our number one position of need.
You make a good point with sound logic.
The reason I did scratch him off the short list is b/c I believe Gabbert is the result of the media’s need for a QB to be in the discussion. IMO, his college tape (the games I’ve seen) does not warrant a top 10 selection.
Let me hold about tree-fiddy?
IMO there are only 3 candidates.
Marcell Dareus – Wouldn’t take over N.Fairley. You are right, he is better suited for 3-4 DE.
DaQuan Bowers – MONSTER talent, but we have bigger needs. We already have C.Johnson. Greg Hardy, and Everette Brown.
Von Miller – Better fit for 3-4. We are already loaded at lb(assuming T.Davis/J.Anderson are resigned)
Cam Newton – Lot of potential. More similar to VY than most people think…to risky to take #1 overall.
This leaves us with…PP7, Green, and Nick Fairley. I think your assessment for them is good.
Reposting from
It is tempting to go after a DT because that is the big need for the team. Like Hurney said, you want to be sure that the #1 pick contributes and I just don’t feel good about him – he has question marks that will remain on draft day. Can he be great? Maybe. But there are bigger question marks about him.
So when Hurney is asked about this – he is very careful about what he says. Mac and Jim keep bringing up the #1 pick and I think it is interesting to really go through what exactly was said or not said and what was repeated. I transcribed the relevant portion of the interview:
Jim: Now, this #1 pick….even the national pundits say that it’s Bower or Fairley….I’m 100% certain if you use it for a defensive lineman it’s going to be Fairley and not Bowers…I mean how can anybody not jump to that conclusion because you are kinda happy with your ends right now but the middle of that line needs help so, it would be Fairley over Bowers right?
Marty: I think there is many more names right now. I think, to be honest with you, there’s probably 5 or 6 names. And, I can’t answer that Jim because this is the thing – impact player….at an impact position. The biggest thing is you got to get this right. You got to get a guy who is going to come in and help you right away. Again, I’m not saying this to avoid the question – it is way too early to answer that question right now.
Jim: But if it is defensive line Marty, that you are going to address with the #1 pick, would it not be an interior defensive lineman like Fairley as opposed to defensive end?
Marty: It depends who you think is going to come in and have more of an impact, for you, who is more of an impact player at an impact position. I’m not trying to avoid your question but it’s too early to answer.
Mac: Is Peterson a possibility? If you lose Marshall, Patrick Peterson seems like -
Marty: Again, I think there’s….a long list, there are several corners that are going to be top 10 corners. I think…. there are 2-3 defensive linemen, I think there are a couple of WRs, there are obviously 1 or 2 offensive tackles. You know, going through list and I don’t know whether I’m….trying to think if I’m leaving anybody out. There’s a list of probably anywhere between 5-8 players that I think that we would research thoroughly and evaluate in terms of what we are going to do
.
Of course, we may be taking too much away from this. But I think it is very interesting that Hurney mentions guys in the draft at the following positions – CB,DT,WR and OL that figure in the top 10. He did not mention QB and yet he thought there are "obviously one or two" offensive tackles who would figure in the top ten – I have yet to see a mock draft with even one OT in the top ten. WalterFootball posted a consensus big board using the Kiper, Mcshay, Rob Rang and Scott Wright. The guys have pretty good record and you can check it at The Huddle Report – they know a little about this draft thing.
Do they have two OTs in their top 10 at the moment? I find this really surprising and I would be less inclined to take things that Hurney says that seriously. I think he is a very good GM but I agree with James – we can’t be sure that he is not deliberately trying to be obtuse in an attempt to confuse or mislead other teams.
In addition, how serious is he about considering WRs or CBs in that group, the group that he thinks deserve to be "researched thoroughly". Is WR or CB an impact position? I think most of would agree that impact positions include QB,DE, OT or DT.
It leads me to suggest that they don’t really see the impact player that they would really like at an impact position like QB or DT. He keeps talking about getting it right stressing on "impact player". Hence they are willing to consider an impact player at somewhat lesser positions seriously.
I think Hurney is deflecting and being honest at the same time
We just hired a whole new (-1) coaching staff, and Rivera has only met with half the players. He didn’t even talk to Stewart until they ran into each other at the mall while in Dallas.
I think they have some ideas on who is #1. More than they are letting on. But without Luck the whole thing is a crap shoot until the decide on a few key pieces that they may already have on the team.
If God came down on Christmas Day/ I know exactly what He'd say/ He'd say "Oi!" to the punks/ and "Oi!" to the skins/ but "Oi!" to the world and everybody wins.
-The Vandals
I agree with everything you said...
…except DT being designated an “impact position.” I think it is a relatively new concept, given Suh’s ability/success. Yes, there have been a few DT’s who made an impact…but in the grand scheme of things, it’s relatively rare to find a DT (by himself) who becomes a true impact player.
True, a good DT will impact our present issues more effectively than some of the other traditional impact positions…but I think it’s VERY circumstantial.
Great list and post ERL
Personally, I would strike Dareus and add Gabbert to the list, but that’s just me.
Follow me on Twitter! @James_Dator
Thanks for the FP, James.
And Gabbert over Dareus makes sense since Gabbert is the #1 QB….I guess some of what I want might have reared its ugly head a bit.
Let me hold about tree-fiddy?
Bah... rest got cut off
To me, when evaluating multiple prospects at the same position they need to be very close in terms of skill level.
Peterson and Akukamara are close: Both are in
Newton and Gabbert are close: Both are in
Nobody is close to Bowers as a 4-3 DE: He’s in
Nobody is close to Fairley as a 4-3 DT: He’s in
Nobody is close to Green at WR: He’s in
And there’s my 7.
Gabbert and Newton are really two sides of the same coin. Newton has all the physical attributes, but big questions about his mental ones- whereas Gabbert in lacking a couple of the physical attributes, but has almost no questions about his mental ones.
Both though are ‘upside’ guys. I keep hearing Gabbert’s ceiling being Aaron Rodgers, and Newton being something the NFL has never seen before… of course both have big bust potential too.
Follow me on Twitter! @James_Dator
True Dat
I hope you like prison food. ... And penis!
by ticketholdrsins96 on Feb 11, 2011 1:58 PM EST up reply actions
That is pretty much how I narrowed it down to 7, too.
Well see how much Newton’s ‘show’ helps drive up his value. I imagine that either way, Marty will be almost completely unaffected by it.
Let me hold about tree-fiddy?
Yeah... I should add who I think the '5' would be... and my justification
- Newton
- Gabbert
- Fairley
- Peterson
- Bowers
1. Newton and Gabbert: All they need to prove to the Panthers is that they have the potential to be better than Jimmy Clausen or Tony Pike. This is arguably the easiest thing to prove out of the other positions. QB play has also been said to be a priority, and Rivera wants a franchise QB. You don’t find a franchise QB through free agency, and if you think either Newton or Gabbert has even a slight chance then you keep them in the discussion.
2. Fairley needs to prove he’s worth a #1 pick, and be better than any possible free agents out there. This makes it a tough(er) sell, but still he has the upside to do it.
3. Peterson needs to prove he’s worth the #1 pick, be better than any possible free agents and prove that he’s better than Chris Gamble. I say this because to take Peterson at #1 is to say he’s your #1 corner, either 1st year or at the latest 2nd.
4. Bowers needs to prove he’s worth the #1 pick, be better than any possible free agents and prove he’s better than Charles Johnson, Greg Hardy and Everette Brown. This is the hardest sell of all players, and why I think he’ll get a look… but never seriously considered.
I left AJ Green off my top 5, because while I believe Green could be the best player in this draft at his position it will require him proving he’s the #1 pick, at a position notorious for producing busts, and prove that he’s heir apparent to Smitty while asking the team to forget the three WRs they drafted in 2010. I think it’s near impossible Green is picked unless Smitty is gone before the draft.
Follow me on Twitter! @James_Dator
I could not agree more
I think you’ve applied winning logic to all 5 of these guys, and I agree on AJ.
But Gabbert just reeks of a fabricated “token early first round QB.”
Let me hold about tree-fiddy?
I still have no clue what to make of Blaine Gabbert.
I stand firm in my assessment that he looks like Kyle Boller 2.0, the player who everyone loved coming out of Cal based on his arm strength, quick feet and good head but he was inaccurate and didn’t make the best decisions. Despite these inadequacies there was the feeling that Boller would ‘grow into the NFL’ and a good QB coach could turn him into a beast.
Despite having that hanging over him I just can’t shake the little birdy on my shoulder who keeps tweeting “look at McShay” Todd McShay is terrible at evaluating lineman, and brilliant at evaluating QBs (Kiper is traditionally the opposite) so while it defies logic there’s part of me willing to give him a chance just because McShay is so sold on him.
Follow me on Twitter! @James_Dator
cut gambe save 6.24 mill
Pick Peterson and sign Asomugha via free agency. This draft is deep with DT’s an OL’s, so i think we can pick up one in the later rounds. Then go get Voleck.
Cutting Gamble will not save money.
It will go against the cap, assuming there is football next year and actually prevent us from signing a guy like Asomugha.
We didn't lose the game; we just ran out of time. ~ Vince Lombardi
by ThePanthers! on Feb 11, 2011 7:26 PM EST up reply actions
+1
I believe this too. Quinn unfortunately has the conduct issue and the fact that he did not play last year. Makes it a little more difficult for scouts.
I just like the fact....
…you could field an entire defensive line from Alabama and the Carolinas (in this draft) and potentially have all 4 in the Pro-Bowl within 5 years.
Nice writeup
However, IMO I would scratch off Amukamara right now.
I wouldn’t scratch off Quinn yet. I would keep him on the list. I don’t believe they would cross him off the list because of not playing last year and being suspended. The suspension was a big joke anyways. If that is the case then scratch Cam Newton off the list for his different answers about who (him or his dad) decided that he went to Auburn.
In Hurney's defense I'd like to say I understand why he uses GM-ese
The fact of the matter is he can’t openly say who he’s primarily interested in. That would make as much sense as playing poker with your cards face up. I know I’d like to have more info on the direction he’s leaning but I’m actually glad he isn’t giving us a lot. It means to me that he is doing his job.
For the few that want more transparency from the front office, I think you are in for disappointment as that just isn’t a smart way to do business. Kudos to Hurney.
Maturity is knowing you were an idiot in the past. Wisdom is knowing you will be an idiot in the future and common sense is knowing you should try not to be an idiot now. - J. Jacques
by Vagus on Feb 11, 2011 2:29 PM EST reply actions 1 recs
+1000
Disclaimer: BusyBeingAwesome = Irony. And, on a side note. I miss you, Steve Beuerlein.
by BusyBeingAwesome on Feb 11, 2011 2:44 PM EST up reply actions
I don't want him to come out and tell us who they like most right now.
I’d like a little honesty from time to time. “I’m not going to answer that,” for example.
Let me hold about tree-fiddy?
I still think we may be more into the PP7 (love the nickname btw) market than is being let on right now.
It may not exactly be something that happens often, but don’t think for one second that if the Panthers consider PP7 to be the BPA in the draft that they wouldn’t jump on him just because of some sort of established precedent. They may try and trade back because they know he would be there in 3 picks or so, but if they think he is there guy, I don’t think they would have a problem drafting him just because there is some preconceived notion about not drafting a DB so highly.
I will tell you this. Had Eric Berry decided to return to UT for his senior season and become a part of this draft, I think we would DEFINITELY be considering him the BPA, and I also think there is a great chance we would take him, or trade our pick to another team that would immediately take him. The only reason he went 3rd overall last year was two-fold… the presence of a franchise QB in the draft, and the presence of a once-in-a-generation DT in the same draft. Eric Berry is probably a once-in-a-generation player at safety, and I feel strongly that the same could be said about Peterson at CB. The same cannot be said about Fairley, Bowers, or Green.
Unofficial Agent for Armanti Edwards, WR #10, Carolina Panthers
This is a possibility for sure.
Personally, Peterson scares me for myriad reasons… but I really see the appeal. If that is the case then I really hope Carolina finds a way of moving back to say Buffalo at #3 (if they like Newton) and take Peterson there and get a pick out of it rather than straight taking him at #1.
I completely agree the Panthers will have no problem taking who they have rated at the top of the draft with the #1 overall pick, but if it is Peterson I’d rather them try and move back a couple of picks and take him there.
The fun/nerve wracking thing is that there is no reason to negotiate with the #1 pick before draft day, no CBA = no rush… this means we could be sitting and having no clue what is going on all the way until Goodell walks to the podium, and we haven’t seen that in a long time at #1.
Follow me on Twitter! @James_Dator
To me that is very exciting.
So many times in recent years have teams declared their intentions with their #1 pick, or even gone so far as to go ahead and negotiate contract terms. I don’t see why you would do that. It turns the #1 pick from a special moment into a mere formality. It also probably turns away a lot of viewers. If you hold the #1 pick and tell the world who it’s gonna be beforehand, your fans don’t have much reason to watch that first day. Give them a sense of anticipation and mystery, and you will have them glued to their TV sets.
Unofficial Agent for Armanti Edwards, WR #10, Carolina Panthers
It is exciting, but as James eluded...
It can be a bit unsettling. Normally we would pick up a few starters in free agency and then draft later to fill in the rest. This year we have to make all our picks and then whenever free agency rolls around, we have to hope that enough quality starters are available at the positions we opted against in the draft.
With the possibility that we could have gaping holes left even after “free agency” (whatever that is this year), the importance of getting this and the rest of our picks right is paramount (not telling you guys anything you don’t know here), and I’m sure this ass backwards stuff is making life hell for all NFL front offices.
Let me hold about tree-fiddy?
No free agency, no trades
It sucks all around. Imagine how Carson Palmer feels right now.
Follow me on Twitter at @JakeHumphrey91
by Jake Humphrey on Feb 11, 2011 3:07 PM EST up reply actions
I firmly believe that with the passing game becoming so dominant in the league, it changes
the impact level of certain positions. That is to say, we have seen over the past few years that CB is an impact position. All of the rules changes that protect the QB and prevent touching the WR beyond 5 yards requires that CBs be extreme athletes. And taking away an opponents top WR weapon with single coverage opens up a lot of things for the defense. I’m still on PP7 as the most impactful player at an impact position, and he would definitely contribute right away.
I’m really looking forward to the combine. Anyone that “boycotts” the combine due to labor issues may be cutting off their nose….
Do not argue with an idiot. He will drag you down to his level and beat you
with experience.
This is what I have said about the Jets Pats game
The Jets didn’t stop Brady by a quick blitz and rushing him out of the pocket. They took out his receivers and stuffed the run. The guys on defense said Rex came in with plays they had never seen before.
Was it the next evolution of the game? Maybe.
The Jets lost the next week to the Steelers, but Roethlisberger is a monster to take down. But that may be the new mold of super QB that we will be seeing.
All these guys are getting more athletic. To quote Daft Punk: Bigger, stronger, faster, harder.
The extreme CB might be the next necessary piece in a shutdown defense where the QB is six and a half feet tall and built like a linebacker.
If God came down on Christmas Day/ I know exactly what He'd say/ He'd say "Oi!" to the punks/ and "Oi!" to the skins/ but "Oi!" to the world and everybody wins.
-The Vandals
so that brings up a big question: Newton or Peterson? your Roethlisberger-like QB or your shut-out CB? we have two great players, but I would have to go with Newton (that is, according to his wonderlic). a QB is much more priceless than a CB (if he pans out to be worthy).
i hate "if"s.
Steve Smith will not play for the Panthers this season... he will be taking his talent to the Toronto Argonauts!!!!!!!!
by scatterbrain on Feb 11, 2011 10:36 PM EST up reply actions
Nice article
I agree about Newton, but I feel that’s a gamble you take. He will win you games, that’s all that matters at the end. Great assessment on having a QB first then getting a top flight WR. I feel they should not draft Green for the very reason. If Fairley is anything like or better than Jenkins, I’m all for it. He will command double teams and open up lanes for LB’s. I still like Newton though, wish we could get them both some way.
"You run plays to get open. If you're open, and you don't shoot, what's the point of running the play?" - Coach Paul Silas of the Charlotte Bobcats
If I'm guessing what the Panthers do:
75% Fairley
20% Bowers – Rivera might just think he needs a 3 down DE on both sides of the line and decides he has no one outside of Johnson
5% Newton – If Newton should alleviate all the off-the field concerns and the Panthers fall in love they
agreed, to an extent
let me tweak this, sort of my own “survey”:
65% Fairley
15% Bowers
15% Newton
5% Trade down in the top 10
Bowers and Newton are tied, in my mind, and Newton has the most to gain. Fairley should be the pick “right now”, but lots can change in the next month (Newton and Trade-wise)
Steve Smith will not play for the Panthers this season... he will be taking his talent to the Toronto Argonauts!!!!!!!!
by scatterbrain on Feb 11, 2011 6:32 PM EST up reply actions
My guess:
50% Patrick Peterson
40% Marcell Dareus
5% Nick Fairley
4 % Trade Down
<1% Bowers
<1 % Cam Newton
I really put it between Peterson and Dareus. PP7 is the one prospect that you really can’t miss and IMO Dareus is the best and safest interior D-lineman with a high ceiling that fills a need. Fairley is just too much of a gamble for me, one year and character concerns (motivation and lazyness not to mention other stuff). Trade down is a possibility, however I don’t think it’s likely. If we’re trading down for anyone, I’d think it’d be over Cam Newton being that many teams have him as the top prospect.
I'm still clinging on to the Green bandwagon.
Right now he’s one of two guys who I think have the potential to be great players. PP7 is the other, but given our need on offense I think Green makes more sense. I understand the need for Fairley, and I won’t complain if we get him, he’s going to be a good player. But not as good as Green, imo.
"Sometimes the journey is better than the destiny."-John Fox
"Ever noticed that you can say "it is what it is" after anything? It’s the perfect cop-out. Sorry man, I didn’t mean to hit on your girl… But it is what it is!"-Southtunnel (previously El Bacon)
I'd advocate drafting Green
If Smith were traded, but as it stands now I think we’re too stacked at WR.
To Many, Many winning seasons under our new coach Ron Rivera! And may we win a few Super Bowls along the way to becoming a Dynasty!!!
by Panther4Life!!! on Feb 11, 2011 4:54 PM EST up reply actions
I definitely like Green the best
I think Peterson has huge upside but I think that guys like Jimmy Smith are just as good corners.
I think quite a few players have potential to be great players
not only Green and PP7…
Steve Smith will not play for the Panthers this season... he will be taking his talent to the Toronto Argonauts!!!!!!!!
by scatterbrain on Feb 11, 2011 6:33 PM EST up reply actions
They are the most likely.
I can easily see both of them making it into the HOF once their careers are over.
"Sometimes the journey is better than the destiny."-John Fox
"Ever noticed that you can say "it is what it is" after anything? It’s the perfect cop-out. Sorry man, I didn’t mean to hit on your girl… But it is what it is!"-Southtunnel (previously El Bacon)
by Flowing Willow on Feb 12, 2011 8:42 AM EST up reply actions
just a thought
i say pick Peterson and sign asomugha via free agency. This draft is deep with DT’s an OL’s, so i think we can pick up one in the later rounds. Then go get Voleck.
many directions for the Panthers to go this draft
and this would be one that i’m too upset with, if asomugha agrees
Steve Smith will not play for the Panthers this season... he will be taking his talent to the Toronto Argonauts!!!!!!!!
by scatterbrain on Feb 11, 2011 6:35 PM EST up reply actions
not too upset with*
Steve Smith will not play for the Panthers this season... he will be taking his talent to the Toronto Argonauts!!!!!!!!
by scatterbrain on Feb 11, 2011 6:38 PM EST up reply actions
Well although I think what Cam did in college was a stupid mistake
at least he didn’t do things like this in college…
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6LxzMVrwW8s
To Many, Many winning seasons under our new coach Ron Rivera! And may we win a few Super Bowls along the way to becoming a Dynasty!!!
by Panther4Life!!! on Feb 11, 2011 5:38 PM EST reply actions
LOL that's funny
"I think that fits right along with what my vision is, and that is to help build this team into a Super Bowl caliber team, win, and sustain that for a period of time." ~Ron Rivera
Now we just have to make sure any of our players end up having a TD celebration like this...
Or they might even just get ejected from the game instead of the excessive celebration penalty…
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VyC9tNUB7ho
To Many, Many winning seasons under our new coach Ron Rivera! And may we win a few Super Bowls along the way to becoming a Dynasty!!!
by Panther4Life!!! on Feb 11, 2011 5:52 PM EST up reply actions
Correction
none of our players
To Many, Many winning seasons under our new coach Ron Rivera! And may we win a few Super Bowls along the way to becoming a Dynasty!!!
by Panther4Life!!! on Feb 11, 2011 5:54 PM EST up reply actions
OK...a question to guys who know more than I do about this...
What’s the possibility of trading back enough to get a few first round picks for next year…and play the Luck lottery….Is that something they would do?..and if not ..then we can put ourselves in the position that New England is in..with a lot of fire power in the draft to do with as we please..I know there was a post a month back or so about trading back for more picks this year…but .Weighing the option of having one first round player this year..against being able to go out and get who ever we see fit ..without worrying about losing a whole round the next year..always playing from behind…do you think MH is smart enough to pull that off?…
Now where's my REAL fans at?!
I think the reason they are saying 5-8 players are being evaluated is because of a trade possibility.
I don’t see them completely trading out of the first round for a future first round pick. First, the Panthers Front Office has said they are going to be aggressive in making the team better, so trading out of the first round would be counter-intuitive. Second, the future picks value range could be anywhere from a #1 pick to a #32 pick…hard to have a true trading value to work with.
Hurney has actually shown himself to be decent in working out trade deals, you just have to wonder about some of the outcomes (AE?).
Another thing to remember about the 5-8 players is the upcoming NFL Combine.
Things will to start to sort out then for all except for maybe the QBs.
I don't know who was doing the drafting last year.
But if it was Fox and Hurney they broke a lot of traditions from the last 8-9 years. They had never taken a QB 1st. Never drafted an offensive skill player from the SEC. In those years offensive players usually were drafted from the Pac-10, Big 12, and the Big East; defensive players from the Big 10 and SEC with the ACC being targeted equally on both sides of the ball. And small school players were all over the field. Hurney is still the GM though and he at least influenced a lot of the past year’s picks as I believe he did last year and will this year. I don’t think the 1st three picks from last year Fox had any input into selecting. I do think though that Riveria will have a big influence in this year’s draft.
From JR past actions and Riveria’s words and upbringing I think we can narrow that list by a lot.
I think with JR,Hurney, and Riveria character and disclipline will determine who and what that impact position is. If you remember Hurney has said on numerous times that ,“we have a plan in place…”
Before I go on lets define disclipline and character first. From wikipedia disclipline is,“…systematic instruction…” That sounds a whole lot like Riveria and his military upbringing to me. From character counts. org the six pillars of character are; " Trustworthiness, Respect, Responsibility, Fairness, Caring, Citizenship." That sounds a whole lot like JR to me.
If we are assuming no trading down and having to take someone at 1st then to me there are really only three-four player we look at. Marcell Darius, PP, Prince, or Gabbert based on character and disclipline. You could add Ingram and Green but either player creates a log jam.
by Robert Woodring on Feb 12, 2011 2:09 PM EST reply actions
Many compare Cam Newton to VY
as a bad thing…. apart from being a headcase…. on the field he wins games and if Cam newton is VY without being a headcase we are set… but I think Newton is better than VY.
But as everyone knows by now I want Newton at #1.
I don’t see bowers being on that list for the simple reason that we have Greg Hardy, E. Brown and CJ….. If they went D it would be PP7 or Nick Fairley. On Offense Cam newton, Blaine gabbert, and AJ Green.
So I think the list is (in no particular order)
Cam Newton
Blaine gabbert
AJ Green
Nick Fairley
PP7
With Gabbert most likely to be the first to fall off the list. If the FO wants Nnamdi or Joseph and feels they can get one of them PP7 falls off
I just hope my PP7 never falls off (lol)
Do not argue with an idiot. He will drag you down to his level and beat you
with experience.
Nice article...............................
I think at this stage, it’s good to look at 5-8. But I see it as a 3-man race between Fairly, Peterson, and Bowers. If Fairley wasn’t there, then I would take peterson in a heartbeat, but unless we find some negatives on Fairley, I don’t see how we pass on him.
Good Read
I have a feeling that Carolina has only two players heading there board, but of course they won’t tip their hat to let you know what’s going on.
The two players are Patrick Peterson on defense and Cameron Newton on offense as mentioned above in a previous post by someone.
Why PP7???
Patrick Peterson and a reenergized Chris Gamble along with Martin, Godfrey, and Munnerlyn make for an Elite Secondary unit, to go with an Elite (blitzing) Line backers, would improve the defensive line effectiveness putting Rivera’s stamp on the defense in his first year.
Why C-New???
Newton upside is enormus and could be that franchise Quarterback this organization has been looking for. He’s definately built and has the skill to play at the next level and not to mention the size. We have a good offensive coordinator who can play o his strengths, and a good QB coach to point him in the right direction.
My pick (which everyone on here knows I favor Newton) is to see who grades the best out of the combine.
Lastly – I feel the pick will be Patrick Peterson because he’s the safest pick for the overall selection, and no one has anything negative to put out about him.
Fairley – Good burst, sort of small to require double teams in the NFL.
Green – Stacked at the position.
Bowers – Stacked at the position.
Gabbert – Really… Bigger risk then CAM
Carolina Draft order…
1. Patrick Peterson
2. Cameron Newton
3. Nick Fairley
4. A. J. Green
5. Bowers
But anything can happen…
by Caro2daheart... on Feb 13, 2011 8:25 PM EST reply actions
Good article
Hey guys, I have enjoyed reading your work for a while now and finally decided to joing to action. I love both fairley and bowers and both would be fantastic additions to our team and can make strong arguments for drafting either one of them. But for some reason (man crush maybe?) Im leaning towards PP7 as long as he has an awesome combine, especially on the cone drill. If we look at what Rivera was able to accomplish with the chargers defense last year it is truely quite remarkable. Other than Louis Castillo, the rest of the dline was guys off the street. Shaun Phillips was the only true stud on that defense (Although Eric Wedle, Jammer, and Castillo are good players in their own right). With all of the blitzing we will be doing next year it is important to have good corners on the outside. This is what leads me to believe that we would be fine without drafting a stud dlineman number 1 overall. Furthermore, I believe that there will be more dtackles in the 2nd (if we chose to move up past teams like Indy and the Saints) and 3rd round like Marvin Austin, Muhammad Wilkerson(who I really think we should target), Drake Nevis, etc. that can come in and contribute as rookies. Also, I believe it is more realistic that a free agent dt signing will happen over signing one of the corners (lets be honest, nnamdi wont come here but man its nice to dream…). I think Jon Joseph was the only shot since he is a South Carolina man but it doesnt look like he is leaving the Bengals. So there is my argument for PP7 but keep in mind that this is not the only way I think we can go in the draft. I do not believe in a single, simplistic notion that is the only was to approach this offseason. I am all for Bowers, Fariely or even Green as long as measures are made to address the other areas of need on our team. And again, good article ERL.
Welcome to the blog son.
Another lurker comes out of hiding! :D
"Once again the trousers of evil are yanked down by the mocking hands of justice!"-Revshawn






















