Is the Probowl Selection Process Really Based on Numbers? Or on "Last Name?" Let's Analize
As I am writing this blog, I am coming fresh off of winning the Yahoo Fantasy Football SB for my league and owe a big thank you to no other than Cam Newton. He (As well as having Megatron, and Shady McCoy) was without a doubt one of the biggest reasons I won the whole thing. I watched him with great admiration and delight as he blossomed as a QB in a league where many of his critics thought he would be the biggest bust since Jamarcus Russell. I can't help but think of Kool Mo Dee's old joint "How you Like Me Now" bumpin through my head when I consider the ridiculous commnents made by the so called "draft analysts" who ironically seem to say the same things about every African American QB who comes out of college. Yet these same "experts" are the same ones who rode the coat tails of then rookie QBs such as Tim Couch, David Carr, Joey Harrington, Ryan Leaf, and a boat load of other "white QBs" who they all thought were going to be the best thing since sliced bread at the next level. We all know how those stories turned out. Which brings me to the subject of the probowl balloting process.
With the release of the NFC's selection, I have to say that I am thoroughly disgusted with the addition of one Eli Manning. I understand that this process is supposed to be based on the production of a player throughout the season as well as the voting of coaches, players, and fans alike, but can't help wondering how many fans voted for the addition of Manning over Newton? In my mind when I look at the season these two men had it's not even a close debate. Eli Manning will never be the QB Peyton is in my mind and as far as I'm concerned the only reason he's mentioned at all in any conversation is due to the fact he is riding off the coat tail of his more famous older brother. Eli is a "good" QB. He's not an "elite" QB. What Cam Newton accomplished this year is unprecedented for a player especially at his position. The man had no training camp whatsoever and took a mediocre offense to the brink of greatness...AS A ROOKIE. Why is this man not in the Probowl? This is just a classic example of how shaky the selection process is for this meaningless game. Newton's snub is not the 1st nor will it be the last, but if I could make a change to the way players are sent to Honolulu, I would add one more category for player consideration: "Excitability factor." I think we can all agree that the prowbowl will never be as big a stage as the SB, but if it had more of the game's exciting players it would be more enjoyable to watch. I have never been a big fan of the Probowl to begin with and most certainly have no desire to watch it now minus Newton.
The content of these posts are those of the user/fan making the post only
12 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
It's a popularity contest
How else do you account for leaving the most dominate DT in a long time Suh off the roster
And really Dwight Freeney I didn’t even know that old guy still played and we played the Colts this year so that tells you all you need to know about him
by mississippisaintsfan on Dec 28, 2011 4:13 PM EST reply actions
he actually hasn't played as well this season
and he had that suspension. plus the fact that he is an asshole probably lost him some votes lol
2 quick things
Newton was 3rd in fan voting the day before the voting closed.
It is most likely that it was the coaches and players votes that put Newton behind Manning.
Even ignoring that he leads the league in personal fouls, his stat line isn’t that great this season.
25 tackles, 1 Pdef, 3 sacks.
Compare to our very own Kraken, Greg Hardy
35 tackles, 11 Pdef, 4 sacks, 1 FF, 1 safety
Hardy isn’t in the pro bowl discussion(and he shouldn’t be). He’s had a good year, but not pro bowl worthy, but by the stat line, he’s outperformed Suh this season.
Yes, I understand that Suh draws double teams and that Hardy plays a DE and sometimes DT, so the comparison isn’t dead on, but Suh wasn’t snubbed, he doesn’t deserve to be there this season.
The Kraken has 11 Pdef !!!
That stat is STILL astonishing! Some (most) of our defensive backs cannot say that!
by criolle johnny on Dec 28, 2011 6:57 PM EST up reply actions
They're tipped balls at the LOS. I think that's how we should defend Brees this week. Just circle him and keep the hands up.
So much to be done, and so few people willing to do it for me.
You cant compare to a DT to a DE
its a completely different position with different traits, style, and objectives
Different objectives?
Both have the objective of sacking and disrupting the QB, and tackling the RB.
I would agree with different styles, but different objectives?
I think his stats speak for themselves. 3 sacks on the year and 1 Pdef. That’s not a pro bowl year at any position.
yes different objective
DEs keep containment and pull the tackles out side, the DTs hold a gap and try to collapse the pockets. It is entirely different.
Patience grasshopper
Cam’s time will come soon enough
You get what you put in and people get what they deserve.
by Disciple of Carolina on Dec 28, 2011 10:58 PM EST reply actions
Three word explanation to you as to why Manning over Newton or Stafford
NEW YORK CITY.
Resume’s in other cities that get you ignored by the media (in all sports) will get you into the HALL OF FAME if you play in New York City.
Unfair? Absolutely.
True? Without a doubt.

by 




















