The Importance of Personal Conduct in Sports
With the Penn State scandal all over the news, the release of Albert Haynesworth from the Patriots, and the dismissal of Carolina LB Lawrence Wilson for a Marijuana related incident, the conduct of players, coaches, and administrators in sports is being brought to the forefront of our minds. While many people are divided on the handling of these issues, one thing is certain, you are better off keeping your nose clean than having cameras and microphones pointed at you demanding answers.
But how deep do the issues stemming from poor personal conduct run? Who is affected? In the long term, is it more important to be talented than behaved? There are plenty of examples to point to, and I will go in depth to see just how much effect conduct has on sports...
after the jump...
The effect on the guilty party
We'll start by looking into the person affected most by poor actions, and that is of course the person themselves.
The most obvious ramifications for the offender are financial. If an employer can't count on you to perform your assigned task at the assigned time, you become very worthless and very quickly. It doesn't really matter how well you do your job "when you show up" if you aren't out there at all. Even worse, if you show up, and serve as a constant distraction that is counter productive to an organizations goals, it would almost be better if you didn't come out at all. With current media saturation at an all time high, even the slightest slip ups can cause a frenzy. These actions distract the entire organization from the top down. How do you expect to field your best product when you are constantly being questioned about your thoughts on the actions of someone else on your team? The only way that organizations can counter the effects of personal misconduct is by making you less of a liability in case your screw up so badly that they are forced to cut ties with you or spend significant amounts of time and money in damage control mode.
Perhaps even more important is a person's legacy.
"The legacy of heroes is the memory of a great name and the inheritance of a great example."
- Benjamin Disraeli
I'm going to throw some names out there, and remember what first comes to your mind.
O.J. Simpson, Pete Rose, Mike Tyson, Barry Bonds, John Daly, Ray Lewis, Tiger Woods
I'm going to go ahead and guess that your answers weren't:
- Legendary running back, Hall of Famer, first person to ever rush for 2,000 yards in a season
- Greatest hitter of all time, innumerable amount of MLB records, one of the best defenders of all time
- Legendary boxer, World Heavyweight Champion, possible greatest KO boxer of all time
- 7 time MVP, 8 time Golden Glove, greatest slugger of all time
- Greatest power hitter of all time, 1991 ROTY and PGA Champion
- 12 time Pro Bowler, 2 time DPOY, Super Bowl Champion and MVP
- 14 time major winner, 10 time POTY, 9 time leading money winner, 9 time Byron Nelson award winner
It is far more likely that you answered murderer, compulsive gambler, rapist, cheater, drunkard, murderer, and adulterer. This really says all that needs to be said about how important it is to stay clean in sports. No matter your accomplishments or talent, you will be remembered for who you were and what you did rather than who you could have been.
The effect on the organization and the fans
The effects of poor conduct are not just limited to the person in question, but rather to everyone connected to them.
Sports organizations put a lot of trust into the hands of their administrators, players, and coaches to do the right thing. When they don't, there are far reaching consequences. The actions of the few have resulted in severe repercussions such as vacated wins and championships, stunting the growth of a franchise, affecting perception and team morale, and alienating a fan base. Some recent examples:
- USC and Reggie Bush - After it was determined that Bush received improper benefits while at USC, USC was forced to vacate the last two wins of the 2004 season (including the Orange Bowl win) and all victories in 2005. Additionally, the university loses 30 scholarships over 3 years, and is banned from postseason play in 2010 and 2011.
- Washington Redskins and Albert Haynesworth- Haynesworth came into Washington with plenty of character issues stemming from his head stomping incident in Tennessee, but the Redskins deemed him worth the risk and signed him to a 7 year, $100m contract. Haynesworth proceeded to play very poorly, serve as a constant distraction, and in general cause locker room problems. Safe to say that Haynesworths large contract during his time affected Washington's ability to field a good team, and they have yet to recover.
- UNC, Marvin Austin and co. - After finding numberous benefit and academic violations in the football program, 13 players are suspended costing UNC it's best chance at a national title in it's history. Additionally, the academic reputation of the university is forever tarnished.
- New England Patriots and Bill Belichick - The infamous "spygate" scandal which found that a Patriots equipment manager had been illegally taping opposing teams defensive signals and practices. While two examples were proven, it is unknown exactly how long this activity had been taking place. Belichick was fined $500,000 dollars, and the Patriots may never escape their "Cheatriots" moniker because of it.
- Major League baseball and "The Steroid Era" - Baseball was truly in it's prime in the 1990s. Attendance was at an all time high, and fans were more raucous and passionate than ever. Records were falling left and right as the games greats were seemingly playing at another level. Later, the Mitchell report brought all that glory down into the cellar, with a list of names featuring prominent players who had used PEDs. The game and its image still has yet to recover, and has had a far reaching effect on all sports at all levels.
- The developing scandal at Penn State involving former Defensive Coordinator Jerry Sandusky, that has already caused the arrest of two administrators, the retirement of legendary coach Joe Paterno as of the end of the season, and most importantly their negligence has led to the harm of an unknown amount of young boys due to Sandusky's sexual crimes. The effects on the University and program are currently unknown, but are sure to be far reaching.
I could go on with many many more bullet points about all the things that have happened due to the selfish actions of the few, and that is what is sad about all of this. There are so many examples of players, coaches, teams, entire schools, or even entire sports falling victim to scandals of all levels. No team wants to be the focus of it, no player wants to be wrapped up in it, and no fan wants to cheer for a team known for it. Yet despite all of this, individuals will continue to misbehave, organizations will continue to cover for them, and fans will continue to accept players with obvious character issues in the name of "giving them a better chance to win."
In the end...
Who really has the best chance to win? The team that runs a tight ship, keeps their roster full of good natured players, and immediately takes action on those who break from that mold... or the team that values talent over character, fills their roster with troubled individuals, and plays russian roulette with their future? Let the tales told above be a constant lesson and warning to fans and organizations who want to trade their teams souls for some short term success. For every story of redemption where a troubled player finds new life and a new attitude, there are three stories where it's the same old crap on a different day. The whole point of this article was to find just how important personal conduct is to sports, but now it is probably more prudent to ask "What could possibly be more important?"
The content of these posts are those of the user/fan making the post only
40 comments
|
7 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Good stuff Tater.
I’ll be honest, my first thought about Pete Rose and Mike Tyson were the examples you gave as what most people wouldn’t think of first, but the other ones my first thoughts were murderer, etc.
The truth will set you free, but not until it is finished with you. ~David Foster Wallace
I may not always be right, but even a blind nut finds a squirrel every once in a while.
Pete Rose is probably the most common one that you may get people going either way, i would think
Actually, for me, when I think Tiger Woods my mind goes to golf first still, even after the whole whoring it up thing.
This comment section has officially been Tater'd.
Dropping Tater Bombs on Twitter Too! Follow me if you dare...
Yeah I'm 50/50 on Tiger Woods...
The truth will set you free, but not until it is finished with you. ~David Foster Wallace
I may not always be right, but even a blind nut finds a squirrel every once in a while.
Hah, no less than 30 minutes after I post this, the Bucs sign Haynesworth
They are becoming the new Cincinnati Bengals when it comes to taking on troublemakers.
I know I would not want Talib and Haynesworth in the same locker room.
This comment section has officially been Tater'd.
Dropping Tater Bombs on Twitter Too! Follow me if you dare...
what about tanard jackson
He’s their starting safety who just got reinstated after a one year suspension for substance abuse, and i think they gave him a contract extension.
by usana_gaines on Nov 10, 2011 11:04 PM EST up reply actions
Nice post Tater!
I’m a big believer in distinguishing behavior that harms others vs. behavior that harms oneself. Harming others is a no-no.
Great point about teams just cutting their losses to avoid the time and energy to deal with it. These are young men, not children.
So,
did Lawrence Wilson harm others? Not saying that’s what you’re implying just asking. I understand but don’t agree with the fact that we (as a society) generally treat people ages 18-21 as “adults”. At 18 you can join the army and 21 you can drink. Hell, in most states under certain circumstances at 14 years old you can be tried in court as an adult.
Not really sure what direction I was heading in with this post; I just think it’s important to be reflective and ask ourselves are some of these young men that we’ve placed on this pedestal really young men at all or are they just big kids still learning, developing and figuring everything out.
Most of these more serious examples were committed several years after college and I totally agree that stuffs messed up – no pass there. A few of the perpetrators were pretty young though (Marvin Austin, Reggie Bush, Lawrence Wilson)
"One step at a time"
Lawrence Wilson did have the ability to harm others
Driving while high can be just as bad as driving drunk. Different people react to it different ways.
I am very much in favor of legalizing marijuana, but this is one of the issues… how do you measure how high someone is when it comes to driving?
This comment section has officially been Tater'd.
Dropping Tater Bombs on Twitter Too! Follow me if you dare...
I don't know Tater
Agree to disagree I guess. When I’m walking down one of the many roads here in Boone that are sidewalkless I’d rather have someone high driving a car towards me than someone drunk or someone under no influence. Because 100% of the time someone drunk is going to be a bad driver, 70% of the time someone under no influence is going to be a bad driver & probably 99% of the time someone high is going to be extra cautious and worried that I’m an undercover cop
"One step at a time"
Without any more details on L. Wilson
I would argue that he didn’t harm another. Marijuana seems to be insignificant in the majority of cases and would fall under harming oneself. There is no proof that it harms oneself medically anyways, so that might be stretching it too far as well. I really just meant in my earlier post that situations where others are directly harmed are not to be taken lightly.
I don’t find Austin or Wilson’s situations to be all that bad, assuming I have heard the situation correctly.
I do find Belicheck’s actions of cheating to be horrible. Our Panthers would have won a Superbowl had he not cheated. The guy cheats and he can still only win by a game ending field goal. ;) That was harmful!
Wilson's case turned out to be without harm
I’m just saying, everyone reacts differently to marijuana, some may become better drivers, others worse. Seems logical that it would probably slow your reaction time.
This comment section has officially been Tater'd.
Dropping Tater Bombs on Twitter Too! Follow me if you dare...
All statistics are 100%
fabricated. Please do not attempt your own experiment of said situations at home as the person who fabricated these statistics tested them in a safe & totally fictional environment
"One step at a time"
what statistics exactly?
Marijuana, like other drugs, affects people in different ways.
I know plenty of people who can consume a lot of alcohol and their driving is unaffected, that doesn’t mean its okay for them to drive drunk.
This comment section has officially been Tater'd.
Dropping Tater Bombs on Twitter Too! Follow me if you dare...
Nah
I was talking about my statics yo (of peoples driving abilities as it relates to their drug of choice). And for the record i don’t use any substances legal or illegal
"One step at a time"
The Cat Scratch Reader Bureau of Investigation is looking into your claims
This comment section has officially been Tater'd.
Dropping Tater Bombs on Twitter Too! Follow me if you dare...
Hopefully their more efficient than the Cat Scratch accounts
who have yet to notice I as well have paid no dues

"One step at a time"
by mcdonaldwr on Nov 10, 2011 4:52 PM EST up reply actions 1 recs
What about Walter Payton?
It came out recently that he was abusing drugs and talked of suicide during his career. How does he fit into this mold? I think this is a great post Tater, and I agree with you for the most part, and I’m curious as to your opinion on “Sweetness.”
"If I know that you like Pancakes on Tuesdays, I might as well bring you the syrup" -Cam Newton
Sounds like Walter Payton was a cry for help
Remember, in his time athletes were not being tested (or at least not so heavily) for these sorts of substances. I’m no expert on NFL rules during his time, but it is safe to say if there was a policy at all it was very laxly enforced. Hell, Terry Bradshaw has talked at length about how it was normal to take steroids during his time, but at that point the dangers and effects were not known.
In the modern NFL with information readily available and constant awareness campaigns, there is no excuse for an athlete to not know what he is doing when he commits certain acts.
Sad to hear about Walter Payton, though.
This comment section has officially been Tater'd.
Dropping Tater Bombs on Twitter Too! Follow me if you dare...
Let us keep the great dialogue going!
Check out the beginning of the documentary “Cocaine Cowboys”. It talks of the entire Steelers “Steel Curtain” D-line using cocaine and such. Also, certain Dolphins players like Mercury Morris.
While I don’t advocate the use of steroids, I must say that they have never had any official studies to prove that they are actually harmful. I know this is hard to believe, but when they were banned by Congress, there was actually no evidence of their use being harmful (anabolic steroids that it). Because of their being banned by Congress, they were never studied because such a study would be considered irresponsible. Kind of a catch-22 I suppose.
Interesting... I'll check that out
I thought a positive link between steroids and heart attacks was found?
The truth is that most drugs are outlawed because people on them get a free excuse to lose control of themselves then blame whatever substance they were on when they are being held accountable. These types of people ruin the fun for the rest of us. Look at how many people blame booze for their stupid actions.
Beat my wife? It wasn’t ME beating her, it was THE STEROIDS.
Robbed a bank? Clearly that was the Cocaine.
Broke into a grocery store and ate all the pizza rolls? Weed’s fault.
This comment section has officially been Tater'd.
Dropping Tater Bombs on Twitter Too! Follow me if you dare...
I would make the argument that people blame those substances because...
our society through the legal process has allowed those claims to made and then ruled in their favor as being the “reason” for the act, not the man/woman. Personal responsibility was allowed to be abandoned in favor of the “devil made me do it” attitude. If anything, it suggests something about our society as a whole that we must help those that don’t help themselves.
I agree
And that is what is screwed up. Ultimately… it is your fault that you took the substance and could not control yourself.
This comment section has officially been Tater'd.
Dropping Tater Bombs on Twitter Too! Follow me if you dare...
Have You Ever Heard Of Roid Rage?
I believe anabolic steriods have also been linked to brain cancer (Broncos great DE Lyle Alzado died from brain cancer).
by PanthersRoar on Nov 14, 2011 4:38 PM EST up reply actions
What you believe has never been proven
There are no studies proving anything about anabolic steroids. Anything you believe is purely myth/rumor/propaganda. Roid Rage has never been proven to be factual. An asshole is quite possibly just a bigger asshole after some anabolic use. Cancer has never been linked to anabolic roids either, the reason they haven’t been linked is because there have been no studies to link them.
Yeah, It's a bummer.
Policies were for sure not as enforced now as they were then.
"If I know that you like Pancakes on Tuesdays, I might as well bring you the syrup" -Cam Newton
by Son of a Newton on Nov 10, 2011 3:43 PM EST up reply actions
it's all about the money
I don’t really care about what they do off the field. I agree with just about everything in this article (except that I think Mike Tyson was overrated), but athletes are no more than entertainers. Why do we expect them to be more honest and sober than Lindsay Lohan? I think we should appreciate the ones who are, and not be concerned with the ones who aren’t.
I think Haynesworth is an example of how it’s all about talent and money. If he played at an all-pro level in NE, they would’ve kept him. His prior issues are irrelevant. He got paid in Washington, and it doesn’t matter what he does now. JaMarcus Russell made $39 million. I don’t know the details of his contract, but he got paid that much before being cut. He is meaningless now, but sports illustrated just interviewed him again so they could sell magazines and make money.
Lastly, if Goodell was the commish in the 80s and 90s, Lawrence Taylor and Michael Irvin wouldn’t be in the HoF. LT was a bonafide crackhead, and Parcells knew it. He had great games when he was high and sober. Irvin didn’t do as much crack because he was saving time for marijuana and prostitutes. People still regard those bums as heroes because of talent.
It really was different back in Taylor and Irvin's time
As I touched on above with Walter Payton, the rules were lax and the enforcement was even more so. You also didn’t have the media saturation that we do today with 24 hour news networks and of course the almighty internet. Yeah… magazines like Sports Illustrated and the like probably wrote articles about the drug addictions of the stars, but who read those? Sports fans. Wives and mothers didn’t read them, and kids couldn’t just stumble upon these stories of their favorite stars using drugs and acting a fool. Now, people of all ages and interest levels are spoon fed this news whether they care about the topic or not.
The game and the expectations of it have changed. Athletes are expected to be more than just players, they are expected to be role models. For the amount of money they are making, I don’t consider it to be an unreasonable expectation.
This comment section has officially been Tater'd.
Dropping Tater Bombs on Twitter Too! Follow me if you dare...
"Don't make me bite you!"
The truth will set you free, but not until it is finished with you. ~David Foster Wallace
I may not always be right, but even a blind nut finds a squirrel every once in a while.
by BW Smith on Nov 10, 2011 12:31 PM EST up reply actions 2 recs
Love the write-up, very appropriate given current events
Being rich, famous, and gifted as an athelete or entertainer does not necessarily equate to having good common sense, nor will it give common sense to someone who lacked it to begin with. I would argue that that fame and wealth for some has also created a sense of entitlement for to think that the rules for life conduct are different for them.
I liked you bringing up the Tyson situation out from the memory banks though. Truly a unique character. In his defense though, I always say that any young lady that goes up to a hotel room by herself with a man at 1 AM should understand that it’s not just to watch TV or play cards. Even so, Iron Mike did give us my personal favorite rant of all time:
My style is impetuous, my defense is impregnable, and I’m just ferocious. I want his heart! I want to eat his children! Praise be to Allah!" -Mike Tyson
by carolinapillpusher on Nov 10, 2011 2:26 PM EST reply actions
Zing.
This comment section has officially been Tater'd.
Dropping Tater Bombs on Twitter Too! Follow me if you dare...
I agree on the false sense of entitlement
When will people learn that the laws of society are meant for everyone?
Sure… back in the day it was easy to use money and power to but yourself immunity from such things, but in today’s world, again with our current media saturation, you would NEVER get away with it.
This comment section has officially been Tater'd.
Dropping Tater Bombs on Twitter Too! Follow me if you dare...
should’ve thrown in Ray Caruth for us old Panther fans!
Dear Baby Jesus in your golden diaper..thank you for making the number 89. Amen.
Not a great enough athlete to be in that company.
He had no legacy to tarnish.
Exactly.
This comment section has officially been Tater'd.
Dropping Tater Bombs on Twitter Too! Follow me if you dare...

by 























