Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Nevin Shapiro Vows To Bring Down Miami

Panthers Offseason Position Review - Tight End

With three days to go until training camp, we come to the last of the offseason position reviews. Not much has changed at tight end since I previewed them last year. We have the same players-Jeff King (#47), Dante Rosario (#88), Gary Barnidge (#82)- expected to be on the team and, until I see an official announcement, the depth chart should remain the same. There is also Jamie Petrowoski (#86) on the roster but the I figure the only way he makes the final cut is if someone else get hurt and even then its not a given as the Panthers could choose to keep only two TE or look for another option off the waiver wire. Because of this I wanted to look our tight end stats instead of the normal player profile and predictions. For that read last years post (linked above).

Basically, King blocks well but isn't the best option to get open. He can catch but is slow when heading down field and yards after catch are low. Rosario has promise and had the most receiving yards last year. Finally, many fans are big on Barnidge and many think if he can improve his pass blocking he would become the starter as he has the ability to stretch the middle of the field with his pass catching.

All three TE have been with the Panthers all of their professional careers. The following are their overall stats. I should also mention that King, in 2006, only had 1 rec for a 1 yard touchdown, so most of his stats were accumulated along with Rosario.

Player Age Yr Joined Tm Yrds Rec Yds/Rec TD
King 27 2006 802 93 8.6 7
Rosario 25
2007 630 50 12.6 5
Barnidge 24
2008 242 12 20.2 0

I do find it interesting that despite the opinion of many that Rosario is the better receiver than King, King has a solid advantage in total yards (in keeping in light the 2006 year for King), but on the other hand as expected Rosario has the larger yards per reception stat, of course Barnidge blows them both out away with the 20.2 yds/rec in that regard.

More stats after the break.

Star-divide

This table shows the teams TE stats since 2000 and where the team ranked league wide versus the other TE.

Year Rank TotalYds TotalRec TotalTD # of TE Ave Age
2009 16 755 63 5 3 25
2008 25 404 39 2 3 24
2007 18 553 57 6 3 28
2006 31 317 37 2 4 27
2005 25 357 35 4 3 27
2004 21 480 51 5 3 26
2003 30 314 30 1 4 28
2002 24 445 43 5 4 29
2001 9 573 61 7 4 29
2000 9 691 55 4 4 30

 

In 2000, 2001, and 2002, Wesley Walls was a part of the team. But in Fox's second year of coaching the TE became on afterthought and the TE rank tumbled to 24th. In our superbowl year it didn't seem to matter as our ranking was even lower at 30. We had a slight resurgence last year and they will need to step up again in 2010 as  the secondary receiving option for Matt Moore to have success.

Yet Moore didn't rely on them as much I would have thought. In his five starts last season (31.2% of season) he only had 28.6% of the receptions (18 rec) and 21.9% total yards (165 yrds). This compares to 590 yards thrown by Jake Delhomme on 45 receptions in 11 games (68.8% of season). At this point I just find that interesting and can't say if there is really anything to take from that as Moore could have thrown to his WR instead of needing to use the tight ends as much. I'll have to spend some time breaking it down a bit more.

In the following nine tables is a comparison of the Panthers TE stats each season and to the top and bottom three teams each year going back to 2000.

2009 Season

Rank

Team

TotalYrds

TotalRec

TotalTD

# of TE

Ave Age

1

IND

1312

121

10

6

26

2

HOU

1282

111

6

5

26

3

DAL

1251

116

2

3

24

16

CAR

755

63

5

3

25

30

CIN

410

43

2

5

27

31

BUF

374

42

1

5

25

32

ARI

245

23

3

4

29

2008 Season

Rank

Team

TotalRec

TotalYrds

TotalTD

Ave Age

# of TE

1

DAL

1267

109

8

3

24

2

NOR

1193

110

3

5

29

3

HOU

1180

100

4

5

27

25

CAR

404

39

2

3

24

30

NWE

302

31

2

4

26

31

ARI

237

25

0

5

28

32

ATL

211

19

2

4

30

2007 Season

Rank

Team

TotalRec

TotalYrds

TotalTD

Ave Age

# of TE

1

DAL

1306

113

11

3

24

2

CLE

1218

95

5

3

28

3

KAN

1181

101

5

2

33

18

CAR

553

57

6

3

28

30

SEA

355

41

5

6

30

31

CIN

333

32

0

4

28

32

DET

262

19

0

5

27

2006 Season

Rank

Team

TotalRec

TotalYrds

TotalTD

Ave Age

# of TE

1

CLE

1138

127

6

3

27

2

NWE

1037

81

6

3

26

3

SDG

1015

85

12

2

26

30

ARI

321

34

1

5

25

31

CAR

317

37

2

4

27

32

BUF

284

31

4

5

26

2005 Season

Rank

Team

TotalRec

TotalYrds

TotalTD

Ave Age

# of TE

1

TEN

1359

149

8

4

25

2

SDG

1139

100

11

3

25

3

BAL

1064

101

8

4

27

25

CAR

357

35

4

3

27

30

STL

195

22

2

5

29

31

BUF

165

23

0

4

27

32

SFO

158

20

0

6

26

2004 Season

Rank

Team

TotalRec

TotalYrds

TotalTD

Ave Age

# of TE

1

KAN

1378

119

10

2

30

2

SDG

1129

96

16

3

24

3

DAL

1012

92

8

6

26

21

CAR

480

51

5

3

26

30

STL

231

22

1

2

27

31

HOU

230

21

1

3

28

32

PIT

188

17

5

5

29

2003 Season

Rank

Team

TotalRec

TotalYrds

TotalTD

Ave Age

# of TE

1

KAN

971

77

13

3

27

2

IND

904

72

4

4

27

3

DEN

857

72

9

4

29

30

CAR

314

30

1

4

28

31

PIT

263

24

2

4

29

32

WAS

183

21

0

4

27

2002 Season

Rank

Team

TotalRec

TotalYrds

TotalTD

Ave Age

# of TE

1

NYG

1094

98

4

6

27

2

BAL

989

85

8

3

24

3

DEN

875

82

4

4

28

24

CAR

445

43

5

4

29

30

WAS

244

20

2

3

27

31

CIN

218

28

2

4

25

32

PIT

133

18

2

6

28

2001 Season

Rank

Team

TotalRec

TotalYrds

TotalTD

Ave Age

# of TE

1

IND

1082

79

9

4

27

2

BAL

1030

91

3

3

27

3

TEN

1008

90

5

5

25

9

CAR

573

61

7

4

29

29

NWE

168

19

4

2

26

30

NYG

164

17

3

3

27

31

ARI

159

19

2

4

29

2000 Season

Rank

Team

TotalRec

TotalYrds

TotalTD

Ave Age

# of TE

1

KAN

1299

103

11

3

27

2

DEN

1124

99

7

4

26

3

IND

977

77

6

4

26

9

CAR

691

55

4

4

30

29

MIA

215

16

1

4

25

30

STL

194

21

3

3

28

31

NYJ

170

22

5

4

27

There a lot of information there but I'm not sure if there's much to take away from it. I did notice that there are good and bad teams intermixed each year amount the top three, but there are hardy any good teams (for each particular year) a part of the bottom three. There are obviously several reasons for the second scenario, but it also tells me that the good teams figure out how to use all their weapons. (What other information do you see there?)

So what is everyone expecting out of the TE position this year? I would like to see the unit combine to reach last years stats. With the running backs taking the pressure off of our passing game, it would be ideal for the TE to reach that production keeping the opposition guessing and hopefully leaving our receivers open for Moore to find.

Comment 24 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Great post. I’ve watched King since he was at Va. Tech. He’s always been a north south runner after the catch. The great thing about Jeff is after the catch, he always goes forward. With Fox/Hurney plays, I think Jeff has done everything asked. Blocked for the most part, but able to catch the ball and move down field as the open receiver.

by gatortail042 on Jul 26, 2010 8:19 AM EDT reply actions  

I think with our new receivers the tight ends will be even less of a factor in the passing game. Barnidge just got drafted by the wrong team. Stinks for him.

stuff 'bout stuff.

by silver82blade on Jul 26, 2010 8:22 AM EDT reply actions  

I like all three. We should use them more.

King – good blocker; great play-action threat inside the 5.
Rosario – good blocker, STer, great hands and can run routes. Clutch!!!
Barnidge – downfield speed and size; great hands in traffic, good STer. This guy is under-utilized in the passing game. He’s an ex-basketball player (a la Gates). They should just consider him another receiver.

Where there’s a will… I want to be in it.

by Rick Bates on Jul 26, 2010 8:39 AM EDT reply actions  

I still have problems with our TE corps

We still have three guys with very distinct roles that too easily telegraphs our offense.

I understand that Fox doesn’t really use them, but regardless when Rosario and Barnidge are on the field it tells the opposing defense “HEY WE’RE THROWING DEEP!”

I like Jeff King’s game… but he’s still Jeff King. I haven’t really seen his game evolve from year to year and while he’s a good blocker I still want there to be one player to fill all the roles rather than 3 guys.

Cat Scratch Reader's resident optimist.

by James Dator on Jul 26, 2010 8:51 AM EDT reply actions  

Interesting point, James. I agree with you to an extent...

but there’s always the trickeration aspect, which is why Jeff King is wide open in the end zone. Rosario is a pretty good blocker, probably the most well rounded of the three. So he really doesn’t give anything away. Barnidge is a good option to have on the field for the 3rd and twenty draw play (lol).

Where there’s a will… I want to be in it.

by Rick Bates on Jul 26, 2010 10:50 AM EDT up reply actions  

You got it.

We are telegraphing the offensive play calls by which TE is in the package. I don’t agree that the best teams always have prolific TE. Great TEs usually indicate a Quaterback being able to make it through the progression and a lack of play makers in the WR position. Who was the Saints TE? Who was the Patroits TE? What role did a TE play in the Steelers superbowl runs? Dallas Clarke had his best years after Harrison left the colts. Witten had a better year in 2008 with a slow TO in the mix instead of Austin. Gates had his best years before the emergence of Vincent Jackson. Where has Todd Heap been since Flacco brought that passing game back to life? Kansas city never had a decent reciever when Gonzales was racking up the yards. Who was the elite reciever when Algea crumpler was going to the probowl? Hey don’t get me wrong, you want great players where you can get them, but often these statistics are inflated by poor options at WR and blown protection.

by Hampton Howle on Jul 26, 2010 1:25 PM EDT up reply actions  

sort of wrong about Shockey.

Shockey was the TE for the Saints and did have a big TD catch to put them ahead. But he only had 3 rec for 15 yards that game and look what happened when he went out on injury for the Giants. They won the Superbowl.

by Hampton Howle on Jul 26, 2010 1:31 PM EDT up reply actions  

It doesn't give much away when we run 2 TE sets

Which happens fairly often for run blocking. What’s more obvious to me is that they are usually only thrown to as a last option, UNLESS one is sprinting down the sideline… Then they almost always get the ball.

on behalf of tha dirty south: soul food, carolina blue, southern hospitality, and tha queen city

by southtunnel on Jul 26, 2010 2:19 PM EDT via mobile up reply actions  

yup

The two-tight set is becoming more popular as a way to counter the 3-4 defense.

"If you ask Jets' CB Darrelle Revis, there is no one who is harder to cover one-on-one than Steve Smith. That has to mean something coming from last year's runner-up for Defensive Player of the Year."

by ERL on Jul 26, 2010 2:30 PM EDT up reply actions  

They all do a good job, but our emphasis is elsewhere, not like Indy or Dallas.

Interesting that our TE receptions and yardage, on TE catches, were the highest in a decade. I didn’t know that, and would doubt anyone of us did, either.

It averaged to about 4 catches a game, enough to keep defenses aware we might throw there. In the red zone they become much more of a factor, with most of our throws to TEs there coming off of faked run blocks.

I see Barnidge as more threat going for a deep seam catch than the others, and still think he has more of an upside, if used properly. Problem is he’s not in on every play, though he often lines up as a 3rd WR.

I’m satisfied with their play, and think they complement the rushing game well. If we ever establish a viable 2nd WR (my guess is we will this year), they’ll blossom into an even more effective threat for Moore. If that happens (2nd WR coming into his own), we could have one of the best balanced offenses in the league, with no easy defensive alignment to contain it. Then it comes down to creative and off-balance play-calling by the OC.

by bigdavis on Jul 26, 2010 10:35 AM EDT reply actions  

I was surprised by that as well

The Panthers seem content with these three guys, nice mix of skills. Barnidge obviously has the most upside as he could be the whole package. I’d love to see Rosario used more like Colston, he has mad receiving skills

Follow Cat Scratch Reader on Twitter and Facebook

by Jaxon on Jul 26, 2010 10:49 AM EDT up reply actions  

I've said before...

Rosario should be a WR3 guy, and Barnidge should be our main TE and find seams down the middle of the field. King is a blocker and goal line target, but that’s about it. If I had to get rid of one, it would be King because I see Rosario and Barnidge as better options in the passing game. (One of my favorite plays from last year was the catch and run Barnidge had against the Vikes where he took 2-3 guys with him about 25 yards before they finally brought him down.)

If Barnidge can learn to block like King, he will be the 2nd coming of Wesley Walls, IMO.

"The truth will set you free. But not until it is finished with you." ~ David Foster Wallace

My Panthers Blog | My Twitter Page

by BW Smith on Jul 26, 2010 10:58 AM EDT via mobile reply actions  

That was a GREAT play - one of the Panther hilights of the year.

They looked like little boys, trying to bring down their daddy in the back yard.

I’ve said before that Barnidge could develop into another Todd Christensen (late bloomer)

http://www.nfl.com/players/toddchristensen/profile?id=CHR290703

by bigdavis on Jul 26, 2010 11:36 AM EDT up reply actions  

What I noticed

Most of the top teams, when it came to TE receiving yards, had the leagues top TE’s (at least most of them). So when we talk about yards it comes down to having a pass catching TE who can also block pretty well, and I feel Rosario is the closest thing we have to that type of TE right now. King is a red zone and blocking threat more than anything and Barnidge is a pure receiving threat as of now. I really think the Panthers will use the TE’s even more than last year (where TEs got the most receiving yards) and Barnidge will finally develop into a TE who can block and catch while adding to our receiving threats.

"All generalizations are false, including this one." - Mark Twain

by ThePanthers! on Jul 26, 2010 11:56 AM EDT reply actions  

I’ve always liked Rosario the most. Like someone said above, I think he’s athletic enough to play some wide reciever. And he has great hands, runs good routes.

+1 for Matt Moore

by Smitty89 on Jul 26, 2010 12:33 PM EDT reply actions  

King is still the starter, and will probably remain so until one of the other two shows they can not be a liability when we run the ball.

King isn’t as explosive a receiver as the other two, but he is reliable. He had 47 catches in 07, only his second year in the league. Rosario is a great receiver, but his blocking is not up to par. And on a John Fox team, that is the most important attribute for a TE. Which is why for now King’s grip on the starting spot is iron strong. He is a good blocker, and enough of a receiver to make a few good catches a game. Until one of the other two can develop their blocking skills, we’ll see the same rotation.

Ready for 2010 football already!!!

by Flowing Willow on Jul 26, 2010 1:32 PM EDT reply actions  

I'm pro-Rosario, eventhough I can't back it up with numbers

The impression I get is that he is more athletic and has more of a nose for the ball. I think his numbers could be a lot higher if we targeted him more often. And his blocking seems to be improving as well.

We often run plays with 2 TEs, so I like having both King and Rosario on the field often. Barnidge on the other hand I’m yet to be impressed by.

on behalf of tha dirty south: soul food, carolina blue, southern hospitality, and tha queen city

by southtunnel on Jul 26, 2010 2:12 PM EDT via mobile reply actions  

I'm definitely with you there.

Rosario seems more natural, while Barnidge is more athletic. Maybe we could flip Barnidge for a pick, or in a package deal.

Ready for 2010 football already!!!

by Flowing Willow on Jul 27, 2010 11:09 PM EDT up reply actions  

Let's not forget how crucial they are to our running game

King starts because to Fox a TE run blocking is far more important than being a receiver. 1st and 2nd down are typical running downs for us, and therefore whoever run blocks best starts.

I don’t see Rosario or Barnidge jumping Kimg as a blocker. And since Fox is not likely to often target TEs as receivers (even with 2 on the field) then it’s also not likely to see much change.

on behalf of tha dirty south: soul food, carolina blue, southern hospitality, and tha queen city

by southtunnel on Jul 26, 2010 2:27 PM EDT via mobile reply actions  

Don't you mean Rosario Dawson hahah

I remember after he caught the GW TD a couple years ago first week of the season vs SD and the commentators said the player of the game was Rosario Dawson.

by KaiserBromley on Jul 26, 2010 2:28 PM EDT reply actions  

She's always the player of my game.

Saw Sin City again recently….wow.

"If you ask Jets' CB Darrelle Revis, there is no one who is harder to cover one-on-one than Steve Smith. That has to mean something coming from last year's runner-up for Defensive Player of the Year."

by ERL on Jul 26, 2010 2:31 PM EDT up reply actions  

+1

"The truth will set you free. But not until it is finished with you." ~ David Foster Wallace

My Panthers Blog | My Twitter Page

by BW Smith on Jul 26, 2010 2:46 PM EDT via mobile up reply actions  

It's 2010, it's time to move the Panthers offense into the 21st century.

The entire passing game needs sn overhaul, but getting the TE’s more involved is a must. Barnidge is a solid blocking TE and has the best overall skills as a receiver. It’s time to get him on the field more on run downs to quit telegraphing when a pass is coming.

Knee jerk reaction - adj. 1. an immediate unthinking emotional reaction produced by an event or statement to which the reacting person is highly sensitive. 2. a facilitator of long threads on Cat Scratch Reader and similar blogs.

by Sniff on Jul 27, 2010 5:06 AM EDT reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Listen to Cat Scratch Radio Tuesdays 10pm EST

Media Requests email: CatScratchReader89@yahoo.com

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Pj_small
Inside the Play: Newton's First NFL TD
Desmond_pics467_small
The Carolina Panthers: One Fan's Journey
Gunnyhartman_small
CSR OT Open Thread, Vol. 8
Sir_purr_small
Decisions Galore for Panthers Front Office
Desmond_pics467_small
Why Not The Panthers?

Recent FanPosts

Small
2012 Draft's 10 Most Overated Players
Small
Updated Draft Board with Interesting Article
Desmond_pics467_small
Hips Don't Lie: A Complicated Tale Of Verticals, Forties, And Other Fascinating Numbers
Small
A Possible New Free Agent DT Target?
1285514838068_small
Newton change to #2?
Small
Another Possibility for Cam’s Backup
Cam_smith_small
How Injury Has Plagued Our Draft Board
Small
Second Attempt at the 2012 Offseason and Draft

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Managers

Catscratchreader_m_small Jaxon

091311101554_small James Dator

Editors

N1523447507_30151367_6579_small Cyberjag

Img_0764_small LittleKing

Gunnyhartman_small BW Smith

Authors

Unnamed_small Revshawn

Mphg_small Rick Bates

Img_0050_small BrandonBecker

Social Media

Small TLong