Cat Scratch Reader: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: MLB Trade Deadline: Phils, Astros complete Roy Oswalt deal

Panthers RFA Tenders Slowly Surface

Per Darin Gantt, the Panthers tendered both LB Thomas Davis and QB Matt Moore at the highest level, a 1st and 3rd draft if they sign elsewhere. The high tender on Davis was expected but Moore's was not assured. It sends a strong message that the Panthers think highly of the 3rd year signal caller that ended last season with a 4-1 record.

The most curious (and risky) tender was the 2nd rounder to CB Richard Marshall:

Cornerback Richard Marshall received the second-round level tender per an ESPN report. That means a one-year, $1.759 million offer from the Panthers. He can still shop for another offer, and the Panthers would have seven days to match. If they don’t, they’d get a second-round pick as compensation.

The Panthers chose Marshall in the second round of the 2006 draft, and he played well last year in his first season as a full-time starter, tied for the team lead with four interceptions and second on the team with 81 tackles.

I wouldn't be surprised to see another team to make a run at Marshall. The Panthers better hope there are no poison pills int here either. Another thought, does this lower than expected tender mean the Panthers are high on 2nd year CB Captain Munnerlyn?

More RFA news after the jump...

Star-divide

 

Panthers put original-round tenders on LB James Anderson (3rd), DT Tank Tyler (3rd) and CB C.J. Wilson (7th), none on Teal, Petitti, Lloyd.

They also put 2nd round tenders on TE Jeff King and DT Louis Leonard. I guess that gives us a hint as to Leonard's anticipated contribution next season. The Panthers also addressed their ERFA's:

Panthers also put tenders on their four exclusive-rights free agentsL WRs Kenny Moore and Charly Martin, DT Nick Hayden and LB Jordan Senn.

Overall it seems like pretty shrewd maneuvering on the Panthers part. Even if another team goes after Marshall the Panthers could still match the offer essentially letting the market set Marshall's price.

What do you think?

Poll
Which Panthers RFA tender do you disagree with the most?
None, good decisions top to bottom
107 votes
Top tender to QB Matt Moore
22 votes
2nd round tender to CB Richard Marshall
135 votes
No tender to K Rhys Lloyd
55 votes
2nd round tender to DT Louis Leonard
9 votes
No tender to OT Rob Petiti
1 votes
7th round tender to CB CJ Wilson
11 votes
No tender to S Quinton Teal
31 votes
Other
5 votes

376 votes | Poll has closed

0 recs  |  Comment 116 comments |

Story-email Email Printer Print

More from Cat Scratch Reader

Homers vs. Haters: Offseason Edition

Jul 2010 by Jaxon - 48 comments

Panthers Paw Prints: Back on Track

Jul 2010 by bmoyer - 28 comments

Comments

Display:

Marshall's tender is scary

I wouldn’t be surprised if Pittsburgh made a run at him for that price.

Obviously the front office has faith in their depth. It makes me wonder if they don’t secretly hope he’s picked up and the 2nd round tender is dangling a carrot.

Cat Scratch Reader's resident optimist.
I also blog the Panthers at www.realbitsofpanthers.com

by James The Aussie on Mar 3, 2010 7:12 PM EST reply actions  

very scary

I was really hoping we would go with the 1st round tender here. I guess we are just gonna hope for the best and match anything that comes in…

by SouthernPanther on Mar 3, 2010 10:59 PM EST up reply actions  

+1

Losing Marshall would do damage.

by D-Ranged1 on Mar 4, 2010 1:23 AM EST up reply actions  

It's an interesting question.

It will be interesting to see what kind of action RFAs get in this season’s market.

Advance apologies if the contents of this sports-based post offended you. I'm just aiming to educate the masses. My law professor says they're asses.

by MichaelProcton on Mar 4, 2010 2:55 AM EST up reply actions  

Yeah I don't really see why the 2nd rounder and not the 1st

Is the difference in money really that big of a deal? It isn’t that much is it? I think Marshall certainly played well enough that we should play it safe and put some degree of insurance on him. At least more so than we did.

by Tater596 on Mar 4, 2010 9:07 AM EST up reply actions  

Kind of a gamble (haha)

I, too, thought they’d use a 1st. Somebody will want him, and be willing to give up a #2, which is what he was to begin with, and now has experience, and some success.

by bigdavis on Mar 4, 2010 10:56 AM EST up reply actions  

On the other hand, it indicates a lot of confidence in Captain Munnerlin's future.

I noticed many times last year, when we faced 3 wide-outs, the Captain would take on the WR, and Marshall line up against the slot man. I guess they think Marshall, like Lloyd, Anderson, Tyler, and Hayden, is expendable and replaceable.

by bigdavis on Mar 4, 2010 11:02 AM EST up reply actions  

Here is food for thought

I agree that they are dangling a carrot for Marshall here. I also believe that here could be a plausible scenario that could happen.
Marshall is picked up by another team and we get their second round pick.
Charles Godfry is moved back to his more natural position at CB. Sherrod Martin is inserted as the starter as FS. The Captain is playing nickel.
Marlin Jackson…a former Meeks trainee will be signed since Colts will probably let him walk.
Panthers then draft a WR and DE in the second round. Pickup a CB in the 3rd such as Trevard Lindley or Devin McCourty. Also, they might be willing to pickup a sleeper type pick such as Walter Thurmond, CB out of Oregon…his season was cut short by injury.
Meeks is a master at developing CB’s. So drafting a new one and developing him is not something to get worked up over. I think Marshall is a star ready to break out so I wouldn’t let him go, but that’s me.
Or, the Panthers could be dangling this carrot hoping that the offer to sign him comes in at a low amount and then they could match it.
As far as those two second round picks we would have…maybe Mardy Gilyard of Cinci and Corey Wooton of Northwestern.

by jdough on Mar 4, 2010 4:17 PM EST up reply actions  

Perhaps someone smarter than I can answer this. Since we are not tendering Lloyd, does this mean we are not going to keep him. Sorry if it is a dumb question, just that this RFA stuff has always confused me.

Member of Canes Country and the Cat Scratch Reader

by Ivan459 on Mar 3, 2010 7:15 PM EST reply actions  

We will keep him, just for a lower amount

If I could kick like him I’d do it for $750k!

I blog the Carolina Panthers at www.catscratchreader.com

by Jaxon on Mar 3, 2010 8:18 PM EST up reply actions  

Ok, thanks Jaxon.

Member of Canes Country and the Cat Scratch Reader

by Ivan459 on Mar 3, 2010 10:39 PM EST up reply actions  

Gantt thinks they will sign him for around his $ amount last season of $540k

okay…I’d do it for that too!

I blog the Carolina Panthers at www.catscratchreader.com

by Jaxon on Mar 4, 2010 11:26 AM EST up reply actions  

Some think

we can find another kickoff specialist for half the cost.

Will Parker

by WillParker81 on Mar 3, 2010 11:37 PM EST up reply actions  

It just means that he probably won't make the tender amount even if he's an unrestricted FA.

Maybe some team thinks he has a chance to be a fulltime kicker, but nobody’s going to spend $1 mil-plus on a KOS.

Advance apologies if the contents of this sports-based post offended you. I'm just aiming to educate the masses. My law professor says they're asses.

by MichaelProcton on Mar 4, 2010 2:56 AM EST up reply actions  

Well

As i said in the earlier post on RFA, i didn’t think they would tender Teal and am surprised they put such a low tender on C.J. Wilson. Also the high tender ofn Leonard, does this mean they might cut Maake and not pick up his option bonus?

by panthertillidrop on Mar 3, 2010 7:52 PM EST reply actions  

It could mean Kemo might get cut later after the draft

just like Keyshawn did

I blog the Carolina Panthers at www.catscratchreader.com

by Jaxon on Mar 3, 2010 8:19 PM EST up reply actions  

Wilson’s expendable. But you might as well put the low tender on him in case somebody is interested. We can take the 7th and get the same kind of project to fill in on ST and the dime package in the draft or cheaper in FA. The #2 tender on Leonard is both because the DT market is so thin (just five UFAs under 30) and because they liked what they saw from him a lot, even in just a short time.

Advance apologies if the contents of this sports-based post offended you. I'm just aiming to educate the masses. My law professor says they're asses.

by MichaelProcton on Mar 4, 2010 2:57 AM EST up reply actions  

and i really do think the panthers would draft a kicker and let Kasay retire a panther

they would probably select Brett Swenson, Michigan State. Or probably let Kasay play one more season and retire him.

by panthertillidrop on Mar 3, 2010 7:55 PM EST reply actions  

It's a bad year for kickers...

only one to three worth drafting

I blog the Carolina Panthers at www.catscratchreader.com

by Jaxon on Mar 3, 2010 8:19 PM EST up reply actions  

I doubt it.

When they signed him through 2012, I doubt they intended on cutting him loose this early. Outside of a few games (read: Buffalo), he was as reliable as ever.

Advance apologies if the contents of this sports-based post offended you. I'm just aiming to educate the masses. My law professor says they're asses.

by MichaelProcton on Mar 4, 2010 2:58 AM EST up reply actions  

i like most of what they have done with the tenders but it leaves questions

why a second round tender on mashall? what are we going to do about our kicker situation? how big a role do the expect leonard to play next year?

by pantherpride on Mar 3, 2010 8:10 PM EST reply actions  

You've nailed the top 3 questions in my mind

I blog the Carolina Panthers at www.catscratchreader.com

by Jaxon on Mar 3, 2010 8:20 PM EST up reply actions  

My guesses:
  • They think Marshall has limited upside because of his size. He played well, but they needed to put him in situations where he could succeed, which in turn limited their playcalling and put a big load on guys like Munnerlyn and Wilson at times. You’d prefer not to have to gameplan around your own #2 CB.
  • Baker and Kasay are both here to stay (each is signed through 2012), but neither can kick off. However, retaining Lloyd at $1 mil-plus (even if he’s the best KOS in the league) is a bit steep for a guy with his limited contributions. They’ll try to sign Lloyd or another young kicker to a deal at $750K or lower.
  • I think they fully expect him to compete to start. Kemoeatu is a guy we won’t know much about for a while, so I’d frankly say you bring him to camp, but cut him if he can’t win his job back. Lewis is one guarantee to start, but I think Leonard, Tyler, Johnson, or even Irvin could wrest the job from Kemoeatu if he doesn’t show up right at 100% for TC, particularly with his higher cost.

Advance apologies if the contents of this sports-based post offended you. I'm just aiming to educate the masses. My law professor says they're asses.

by MichaelProcton on Mar 4, 2010 3:02 AM EST up reply actions  

Johnson?

I’m sorry, we signed so many replacement DT’s that inevitably got hurt that I can’t think of what Johnson you’re referring to.

by pancanbra on Mar 4, 2010 7:40 AM EST up reply actions  

I didn't realize this until Gantt said it this morning, but a decision on Kemo might come next week

He’s got a 1.7mil bonus due March 9, which I doubt he sees. RT @panther1gb89 When is Kemo’s bonus money due, or did that date already pass?

I blog the Carolina Panthers at www.catscratchreader.com

by Jaxon on Mar 4, 2010 11:30 AM EST up reply actions  

Opps.. meant to quote block the above statement

I blog the Carolina Panthers at www.catscratchreader.com

by Jaxon on Mar 4, 2010 11:30 AM EST up reply actions  

The thing I don't understand is this:

John Kasay is John Kasay… we know who he is, we know how he kicks… he know everything there is to know about the man.

Yet he still kicks during the preseason.

Why in the world don’t the Panthers let Lloyd kick during the preseason? We could have a heir apparent sitting on the roster and not even know it. I’m sure there’s a good reason, and I know they must see him in camp… but regardless.

Cat Scratch Reader's resident optimist.
I also blog the Panthers at www.realbitsofpanthers.com

by James The Aussie on Mar 3, 2010 8:58 PM EST reply actions  

You know, I've always wondered that myself

It’s not like Kasay needs the extra work. It would be the perfect opportunity to see if Lloyd has the ability to kick FGs or if he is just a KOS.

Maybe they will do that this season, who knows?

Draft Gilyard!

by bwsmith25 on Mar 3, 2010 10:35 PM EST up reply actions  

Wouldn’t hold my breath on that one…

Member of Canes Country and the Cat Scratch Reader

by Ivan459 on Mar 3, 2010 10:40 PM EST up reply actions  

Gantt has talked about this.

They haven’t been particularly impressed with his work on the practice field, and they don’t want to risk throwing off the rhythm and timing of the primary snapper-holder-kicker group. This was particularly important last year while we were establishing and then breaking in a new LS.

Advance apologies if the contents of this sports-based post offended you. I'm just aiming to educate the masses. My law professor says they're asses.

by MichaelProcton on Mar 4, 2010 3:03 AM EST up reply actions  

Thanks. I figured there was a reason.

Cat Scratch Reader's resident optimist.
I also blog the Panthers at www.realbitsofpanthers.com

by James The Aussie on Mar 4, 2010 7:01 AM EST up reply actions  

Watch out for Rex!

I wouldn’t be surprised to see the Jets make a run at Marshall. A Revis and Marshall CB combo would be scary. What a disappointing move…Just sign one of the top three(ie Moore, Davis, Marshall) ..use the top tenders on the other two, and then we are set.

by bhwells29 on Mar 3, 2010 10:35 PM EST reply actions  

i agree with you

your point is real simple, and i don’t see why it hasn’t been done. my only theory (based on no evidence at all) is that we may be going after somebody as well, so we don’t want to tie up too much money long-term. Maybe we’re going after Kampman, Dunta Robinson and Karlos Dansby.

by usana_gaines on Mar 4, 2010 5:04 AM EST up reply actions  

Very pleased that they didn't want to take a chance on losing Matt Moore.

A 1st and a 3rd show he’s very much in their plans for the future.

by bigdavis on Mar 3, 2010 10:38 PM EST reply actions  

Absolutely

The Vikings are still a dark horse if Favre doesn’t return. I could definitely see them giving up the picks.

Cat Scratch Reader's resident optimist.
I also blog the Panthers at www.realbitsofpanthers.com

by James The Aussie on Mar 3, 2010 10:39 PM EST up reply actions  

Wonder how high Hurney would be willing to go to keep Moore. If the viks make a run at him…. idk on that one.

Member of Canes Country and the Cat Scratch Reader

by Ivan459 on Mar 3, 2010 10:41 PM EST up reply actions  

I don’t know if it’s Hurney or Richardson at that point.

Big Cat wont overpay and look like a hypocrite.

I’ve tried more searching and can’t find anything. Does anyone know if the NFL banned building poison pill provisions into RFA offers? I seem to remember the league banning it after the Burleson signing, but I can’t seem to find anything.

Cat Scratch Reader's resident optimist.
I also blog the Panthers at www.realbitsofpanthers.com

by James The Aussie on Mar 3, 2010 10:43 PM EST up reply actions  

I don't know that it's been banned...

But it’s generally frowned upon and causes bad blood between organizations. The Burleson deal happened only because the Vikings did the same thing with Hutchinson first. I asked Darin about it, and he said that it hasn’t really been a problem since, even without a specific rule.

Advance apologies if the contents of this sports-based post offended you. I'm just aiming to educate the masses. My law professor says they're asses.

by MichaelProcton on Mar 4, 2010 3:05 AM EST up reply actions  

I don't think so....

I read an article about this just yesterday (trying to find the link) but it stated that the NFL looks down upon the poison pill, since the Seattle, Minn deal, but it did not say that it was banned. I’ll provide the link if I can find it.

by Lawboy987 on Mar 4, 2010 12:14 PM EST up reply actions  

They supposedly still believe in Tarvaris.

I’d be surprised to see them pay Moore starting QB money and give up two high picks for a guy who’s shown so little.

Advance apologies if the contents of this sports-based post offended you. I'm just aiming to educate the masses. My law professor says they're asses.

by MichaelProcton on Mar 4, 2010 3:04 AM EST up reply actions  

He kicked their ass.

The early bird catches the worm, but the second mouse gets the cheese.

by Flowing Willow on Mar 4, 2010 3:21 AM EST up reply actions  

As did Jay Cutler, who was one of the worst QBs in the league last year.

Advance apologies if the contents of this sports-based post offended you. I'm just aiming to educate the masses. My law professor says they're asses.

by MichaelProcton on Mar 4, 2010 3:25 AM EST up reply actions  

Playing with one of the worst supporting casts.

Try again.

The early bird catches the worm, but the second mouse gets the cheese.

by Flowing Willow on Mar 4, 2010 3:30 AM EST up reply actions  

Favre will play next season

And that means Jackson gets another year to sit, watch and learn. Maybe they think 2 years behind Favre will turn him into an Aaron Rodgers. If not, I think they’ll go for McNabb. If you were another team not named the Panthers, would you rather go after Kevin Kolb or Matt Moore?

by usana_gaines on Mar 4, 2010 5:07 AM EST up reply actions  

Assuming Kevin Kolb is even obtainable…you go after him. I really like him alot. I would not be surprised to see the Eagles get rid of McNabb before the season starts.

by pancanbra on Mar 4, 2010 7:49 AM EST up reply actions  

You go for Kolb...

But the Eagles wont let him go.

Cat Scratch Reader's resident optimist.
I also blog the Panthers at www.realbitsofpanthers.com

by James The Aussie on Mar 4, 2010 8:10 AM EST up reply actions  

He did have a terrible supporting cast but...

He also had one of the best sets of receivers when he was with Denver. He had Royal, Marshall, Stokely, their TE whom I can’t remember off the top of my head this early…Barnidge? Anywho, I absolutely called Cutler having a terrible season in Chicago and bet my friend that Orton would have a better season. Turns out I was right.

Cutler may not be as terrible as we saw last season, because they really don’t have a decent WR, but he’s not as great as everyone thinks he is, and Denver certainly got the better end of that trade I believe. He has a strong arm but makes WAY too many bad throws. He’s like the not-in-his-prime version of Brett Favre but without the winning pedigree.

He’s got plenty of talent and room to improve though.

by pancanbra on Mar 4, 2010 7:48 AM EST up reply actions  

There it is. Thanks. Didn’t have my cup of coffee yet.

by pancanbra on Mar 4, 2010 9:46 AM EST up reply actions  

Barnidge is on our team. Duh.

by pancanbra on Mar 4, 2010 9:47 AM EST up reply actions  

My Thoughts:

TD: Very happy with the tender
MM: Very happy with the tender, makes me believe that we aren’t going to go back to Jake next year!!
Marshall: …I would have given him the 1st rounder.
Louis Leonard: VERY HAPPY about this tender, I loved what I saw out of him and I think he is gonna play spectacularly for us next year. (Maybe a sign that Kemo will be gone??)
Lloyd: Dropped off last year I feel like in terms of touchbacks…idk…i think in the end we will keep him.

by SouthernPanther on Mar 3, 2010 11:02 PM EST reply actions  

Couldn't Agree With Ya More Southern Panther...

Liked all of the tenders, minus the Marshall tender. Marshall played great last year and earned a starting cornerback slot on any defense. With a mere 2nd round tender, I have to think that this is almost BAIT for other teams. A lot of teams looking for a good experienced and still young CB may look at Marshall now that his price isn’t too high. I think it is very possible we lose him…

If we just had spent a few more pennies on him (and yes this is Chicken fee compared to what we paid Peppers), we could have possibly gotten a team to give up a 1st and gotten us back into the 1st round. Although he started only 1 yr, our secondary was great, and he was worth a 1st round pick in my opinion…

by jkp1516 on Mar 3, 2010 11:34 PM EST up reply actions  

yup

exactly my thinking, I’ve really been questioning some of the moves that we have made recently. I can’t imagine we let Marshall get away…

by SouthernPanther on Mar 4, 2010 12:41 AM EST up reply actions  

Lloyd's TBs didn't fall off that much.

He had 21 on 72 kickoffs this year (29.2%) and 30 on 88 last year (34.1%.) However, when Panthers.com ran his end zone percentages, he was right on his numbers from ‘08. So the drop in TBs had far more to do with the other team not being afraid to return it than Lloyd’s skills or performance diminishing much.

Advance apologies if the contents of this sports-based post offended you. I'm just aiming to educate the masses. My law professor says they're asses.

by MichaelProcton on Mar 4, 2010 3:08 AM EST up reply actions  

Yeah

I wouldn’t be afraid to take it out of the EZ against the panthers return team of last year either!

by ClaytonFire on Mar 4, 2010 10:36 AM EST up reply actions  

I will take another second rounder for Marshall.

Marshall is a good corner and notice I say good but really he is not ideal for R. Meeks secondary. Basically Marshall plays more like a safety then a cornerback; he is always looking for the big hit, and never really trying to get INT’s unlike Gamble and Munnerlyn has great potiental as well. I trust Meeks with our defense more than any other coordinator we have had to this point in Carolina. R. Meeks knows how to run, and get the right players to play in his Tampa 2 system and he doesn’t break the bank to do it.

Marshall could one day be a good if not great cornerback in the NFL but if he returns in 2010 for the Cats he needs to prove to that he can get the “so-called” big picks or make the impact plays for us.

We will be taking a CB in this draft for sure, more than likely in the 4th round. Maybe D’Quan Thompson or T. Lewis type.

I seriously doubt any team is going to give up a second rounder for Marshall and if they do then we can and more than likely will match it. As stated in the above post here the Market is going to determine Marshall’s worth.

The Booming Brit didn’t get a tender hmmm, well not offense to the man but seriously you only had one job and that was to get TB’s and didn’t get to many last year. You can find a kicker to boom the ball out of the back of the endzone so Kasay doesn’t have to. That I am not worried about at all, more than likely we will sign a UDFA or another free agent type similar to Lloyd but one that could be groomed to take over for Kasay and have some accuracy unlike Lloyd who has none what so ever.

I am happy with every tender here expect for a 7th round tender for CJ Wilson; give me a freaking break here. CJ Wilson is garbage and I have never liked him, the guy sucks but Fox has always loved him which is why he got a tender, maybe a team like Texans will take him and we can get another 7th round pick for him. I hope so, we should have given Lloyd the 7th round tender and let Wilson walk.

Go Panthers.

by Holty_Panthers_Fan on Mar 3, 2010 11:28 PM EST reply actions  

plus

hey…we are pretty dang good at drafting in the 7th round…Munnerlyn in the 7th, what a steal!

by SouthernPanther on Mar 4, 2010 12:43 AM EST up reply actions  

Yes we are!

Mackenzy Bernadeau and Geoff Schwartz were also 7th rounders. They played well as backups last year when their number’s were called.

by jdough on Mar 4, 2010 4:43 PM EST up reply actions  

Lloyd "didn't get to (sic) many" TBs?

He was 4th in the league in touchbacks despite ranking 15th in kickoffs. I am confused, however, as to how you’re aware of Lloyd’s “nonexistent” accuracy. Do you catch the balls behind the uprights at practice?

Finally, there was no 7th-round tender for Lloyd. He wasn’t drafted. The low tender on Wilson gets us a 7th if he signs elsewhere because that’s where we drafted him.

Advance apologies if the contents of this sports-based post offended you. I'm just aiming to educate the masses. My law professor says they're asses.

by MichaelProcton on Mar 4, 2010 3:21 AM EST up reply actions  

15th in kickoffs

how do you determine that he was 15th? i’ve heard of that stat before, but I don’t know what it means. Is it based on distance, total number, etc?

by usana_gaines on Mar 4, 2010 5:11 AM EST up reply actions  

I believe he’s referring to total of kickoffs taken.

by pancanbra on Mar 4, 2010 7:51 AM EST up reply actions  

The "booming Brit" lost a little last year, and that's not worth a tenderwhen you only do one thing, and then slack off on it.

http://www.profootballfocus.com/by_player.php?tab=by_player&season=2009&surn=Lloyd&playerid=2699&group=9

Compare the relevant stats for Lloyd for 2009, vs 2008, and see what I mean.

Opponents’ average stating position on KOs in ’09 was their 27.5 yard line, vs the 24.6 in ’08.
Touchback % dropped from 33.7% in ’08 to 29.6% in ’09.
% of KOs returned went up from 67.1% in ’08 to 71.8 in ’09.

True, maybe some of that’s on teams’ decision to run more back from the goal line, vs our poor tackling STers, but I recall many more KOs in ’08 where he put it half way back in the EZ, which tends to discourage that kind of thing.

by bigdavis on Mar 4, 2010 11:23 AM EST up reply actions  

However...

The 71.8% of KOs returned was still 5th in the league.

Only Prater, Koenen, Mare, and Buehler had a smaller %.

http://www.profootballfocus.com/by_position.php?tab=by_position&season=2009&pos=K&stype=r&runpass=&teamid=-1&numsnaps=25&numgames=1

by bigdavis on Mar 4, 2010 11:26 AM EST up reply actions  

I agree with most....
I trust Meeks with our defense more than any other coordinator we have had to this point in Carolina.

Trgo was a pretty dang good DC….not sure I trust Meeks more yet, with only 1 year on the team and really only the second half of the season that looked really good.

by Lawboy987 on Mar 4, 2010 12:26 PM EST up reply actions  

...

Trgo was so good that he dropped from a DC to a positional coach…

by SouthernPanther on Mar 4, 2010 2:00 PM EST up reply actions  

A quick question about...

“he is always looking for the big hit, and never really trying to get INT’s unlike Gamble”

Is that why Marshall got just as many INT’s as Gamble this year and then out-performed him in nearly every other statistical category?

Compare the stats and you’ll likely agree that Marshall was our best corner this year. A 2nd round tender is quite sickening, to me.

by D-Ranged1 on Mar 4, 2010 1:33 AM EST reply actions  

I'd probably say Marshall should have had at least as many picks as Gamble.

If their numbers are to be believed, 4 INTs on 91 targets to go with just 4 PDs (4.4% INT rate, 4.4% PD rate, 8.8% total PBU rate) is not as impressive as Gamble’s 4 INTs and 7 PDs on 75 targets (5.3%, 9.3%, 14.7%.) Do you really believe Munnerlyn had a better season than Gamble?

Advance apologies if the contents of this sports-based post offended you. I'm just aiming to educate the masses. My law professor says they're asses.

by MichaelProcton on Mar 4, 2010 3:16 AM EST up reply actions  

what about getting burned

how many TDs did either guy give up? I know that’s a stat that can be hard to measure because you can see a guy get beat on a play and not realize that the safety was out of position, etc. Also, when you compare CBs, you have to compare total tackles. If Gamble has 3 more PDs on 16 fewer targets, but has 10 fewer tackles and got burned 3 or 4 more times, then I’d say Marshall had a better year. I’m just giving an example because I don’t know those stats for those guys. Marshall had a lot of tackles, but I don’t know about the whole package. How many TDs did each guy give up?

by usana_gaines on Mar 4, 2010 5:14 AM EST up reply actions  

And if you look at the actual completions...

You’ll see Marshall gave up only 10 more completions despite being targeted 16 more times for less yardage, less YAC, fewer scores, and only got burned for 40 yards.

Statistically, I’d say Munnerlyn had a worse season than Gamble. I’m not sure about their ratings. Had he had equivalent snaps, his numbers would’ve exceeded both of them in a bad way.

by D-Ranged1 on Mar 4, 2010 9:19 AM EST up reply actions  

That's just the way our scheme works

We’ll give up yards, but no scores. Only 3 passing TD’s given up on our corners all year, that’s pretty good.

The early bird catches the worm, but the second mouse gets the cheese.

by Flowing Willow on Mar 5, 2010 1:57 AM EST up reply actions  

Firstly

the vote for Petiti should have been for Leonard. I know the FO likes him, but we could have gotten away with a third round tender given we only gave up a sixth or seventh to get him. I am excited to see our DT corps in camp though, we have a lot of youth and flexibility.

Secondly, Lloyd. His TB’s were down last season, but his endzone pct was as high as ever. Teams just weren’t scared of our coverage units, so booming it five yards deep in the endzone didn’t necessarily mean they wouldn’t come out with it. We’ll probably look to re-sign him for 500-750k, see if he can be our kicker of the future.

Thirdly, Richard Marshall. I have to say, I would have given him the first, however I understand this move. This is an incredibly deep class of corners. Brandon Ghee, Kyle Wilson, Devin McCourty, Patrick Robinson, Donovan Warren, Perrish Cox, Kareem Jackson, all are guys who will likely be available in the second or third rounds. And they are great talents. I don’t expect Marshall to leave, but if Detroit comes calling, expect us to accept.

The early bird catches the worm, but the second mouse gets the cheese.

by Flowing Willow on Mar 4, 2010 1:34 AM EST reply actions  

Captain, Akwasi, and Hitman

We’d have the coolest secondary in the league. :D

The early bird catches the worm, but the second mouse gets the cheese.

by Flowing Willow on Mar 4, 2010 2:57 AM EST up reply actions  

If we lose Marshall

I’d love to get Akwasi Owhat what he has great upside the only reason he isn’t considered a 1st rounder is the conference he played in.

One of South Africa's only Carolina Panthers and fans.

by chinchillas sword on Mar 4, 2010 6:02 AM EST up reply actions  

...and still more on AOA, and I'll let it go

http://www.cbssports.com/nfl/draft/players/archive/1675324?tag=pageRow;pageContainer

When have we heard this said about a CB/return man ?

``He told us that if we got him the ball, he’d score. And he did. He held up his end of the bargain because he’s a big-time player.’’ (10/11/09 comment from above link)

by bigdavis on Mar 4, 2010 11:59 AM EST up reply actions  

I think Leonard would have gotten more interest than you'd think.

DT is among the weakest positions in this year’s FA class, if not ever. Between the modified RFA rules and the franchising of several at the position, there are just five UFA DTs who are under the age of 30. Combine that with the fact that Leonard played his best football ever with very little acclimation to our system (albeit in a very limited sample), and his value’s certainly gone up from late summer last year.

Good catch on the Lloyd numbers, though. People sometimes don’t look at the big picture.

Advance apologies if the contents of this sports-based post offended you. I'm just aiming to educate the masses. My law professor says they're asses.

by MichaelProcton on Mar 4, 2010 3:18 AM EST up reply actions  

I think Marshall's tender was just right.

I also think the fact that we didn’t offer a first was more of a vote of confidence in Munnerlyn than a burn on Marshall. Munnerlyn is really a steal for where we got him in the draft and he has tons of athletic potential. I really liked what I saw out of him last year and he was being put in some big spots. And every thing you saw from him you have to take with the grain of salt that it was only his rookie year. So, he should only improve, and IMO will probably beat out Marshall for our second DB this year anyway.

Marshall did a decent job but wasn’t spectacular and if someone else wants him the Panthers will probably not even match the offer. They’ll take the second round pick and add depth in the draft.

Speaking of DB’s…anyone have an educated guess as to whether Martin or Godfrey will be our starting FS? And would either one possibly be moved to corner and/or nickle?

The Thomas Davis and Matt Moore tenders were musts and I really don’t see any teams trying to make a run at them. Louis Leonard on the other hand could generate some interest. Good, young DT’s are so hard to find that some team may be willing to spend a 2nd on him if they deem him starter caliber. Hopefully we keep him though because, despite his short sample size, I thought he looked great and will fit in Meek’s defensive scheme a lot better than Kemo. And actually, I fully expect, like some have speculated above, that Kemo is cut during the preseason.

by pancanbra on Mar 4, 2010 8:05 AM EST reply actions  

Honestly, I expect Godfrey will remain at FS. While Martin may be the future of the position he needs to improve his coverage. That’s not to say Charles Godfrey is the epitome of excellent coverage, but he’s still better than Martin at this point.

While Ron Meeks uses Chris Harris in that rover position in the cover one we need to have a FS who’s excels in coverage… and for now Godfrey fits the bill.

Cat Scratch Reader's resident optimist.
I also blog the Panthers at www.realbitsofpanthers.com

by James The Aussie on Mar 4, 2010 8:17 AM EST up reply actions  

Godfrey came up with some big hits, forcing fumbles late in the season.

He stepped up his play quite a bit after coming back from injury.

by bigdavis on Mar 4, 2010 12:03 PM EST up reply actions  

Care to elaborate on why you believe Munnerlyn will beat out Marshall this year? I still believe Marshall was our best CB this year judging the stats but getting another perspective on things is always great.

by D-Ranged1 on Mar 4, 2010 9:25 AM EST up reply actions  

Well, I’m of the opinion that Marshall looked a bit better than he actually performed. First of all, he was targeted more than Gamble was, so like MP has pointed out above, his numbers can look inflated. Secondly, Gamble was consistently covering each team’s best wide receiver, so even if he did get burnt a few more times than Marshall, he’s covering the receiver that’s more likely to burn you. Gamble, physically, is just more talented than Marshall is, and I think his performance last year was uncharacteristically poor because of the defense’s overall struggles and it’s transition to Meek’s system.

Munnerlyn, although not as consistent as Marshall, showed flashes of brilliance superior to his 7th round status. He’s young, raw, and has a lot more upside than Marshall does. Consistency and technique will come the longer he is in the league. The fact that he was often on outside coverage while Marshall played nickel even though he’s a 7th round rookie really speaks to Munnerlyn’s capabilities as he further progresses.

by pancanbra on Mar 4, 2010 10:26 AM EST up reply actions  

That's what I saw, too, with Marshall taking the nickel position.

Munnerlyn’s tendency to get called for penalties is something he can improve on — but his physicality and aggressiveness are what you like about the kid.

by bigdavis on Mar 4, 2010 12:05 PM EST up reply actions  

agreed

a lot of those penalties were terrible calls too…i feel like 50% of his pass breakups he got called for interference even though he is just good about getting his body around and knocking the ball down.

by SouthernPanther on Mar 4, 2010 2:03 PM EST up reply actions  

Great breakdown, I get what you’re saying. The only parts I’d disagree with is…

A) I don’t believe Gamble ever shadowed a receiver, though I may be wrong. Most of the coverage breakdowns I reviewed over the course of the season had a pretty even distribution between Gamble & Marshall and the opposing teams receivers. I never really seen Gamble stuck on one receiver, though I’d be lying if I said I’d looked at them all.

B) Yes, Marshall was targeted more often but he still allowed a lower completion % than Gamble. For the season, every QB that targeted a receiver being covered by Marshall averaged a rating of 71 (JaMarcus Russel averaged a 77 in 2008). Meanwhile, when targeting a receiver Gamble was covering, they averaged an 81.4 (Slightly below Delhomme’s career avg, slightly above his 2003 rating).

I don’t deny that Gamble may have more of a presence on game day but looking at the stats, I just find it hard to discount Marshall.

by D-Ranged1 on Mar 4, 2010 2:39 PM EST up reply actions  

I disagreed

w/ the TD 1/3 round tender but didn’t see that as on option so I picked other…

by ClaytonFire on Mar 4, 2010 10:31 AM EST reply actions  

You don’t think the Panthers should work that hard to retain him?

Cat Scratch Reader's resident optimist.
I also blog the Panthers at www.realbitsofpanthers.com

by James The Aussie on Mar 4, 2010 10:58 AM EST up reply actions  

Not to speak for Clay

but he probably would have liked to see a long-term deal? I’m in agreement with all of the tenders, even the Marshall tender.

I think with Captain, CJ, and Godfrey all able to play in our nickel, and Martin able to come in so Godfrey can bump down to corner, etc. etc.—the depth is solid enough. We always have the option to “match” any offer made to Marshall as well.

Do or do not. There is no try.

by ERL on Mar 4, 2010 11:05 AM EST up reply actions  

I doubt we will match any offer for Marshall. I think we’d let him walk and take the draft pick. Because like you said, we have some good depth and I think they have confidence in Captain. The only reason why he wasn’t truly expendable and was tendered at all was because of how cheap that tender is for a DB these days, and you always want the possibility of getting a high round draft pick.

by pancanbra on Mar 4, 2010 11:10 AM EST up reply actions  

I dont think we would match it either, regardless of the number

having two second and two third rounders this year would be pretty kick-ass considering the depth of this draft in the top 100 players, especially.

Do or do not. There is no try.

by ERL on Mar 4, 2010 11:15 AM EST up reply actions  

I disagree

I’m pretty sure Marshall is a long term thing for Carolina and I think they are planning on matching an offer that comes in. I think they are doing the 2nd round hoping that no one makes an offer…

by SouthernPanther on Mar 4, 2010 11:31 AM EST up reply actions  

I would think it's because

Marshall is asking for more than the Panthers are willing to pay so they are letting the market set the price. The only worry is the whole poison pill thing.

I blog the Carolina Panthers at www.catscratchreader.com

by Jaxon on Mar 4, 2010 11:50 AM EST up reply actions  

ESPN columnist Pat Yasinskis:

On being asked why the Panthers decided to tender Marshall like they did:

“Yeah, I was a little surprised by that, too. But, basically, I think it’s a calculated gamble. The Panthers would like to keep Marshall, but they’re taking a chance that nobody’s going to come in and give him an offer they can’t match. Like I’ve said repeatedly, I think owners around the league are going to be very hesitant to spend big money this year. "

I hope he is right, because I’d rather have Marshall than another 2nd rounder because Marshall is proven.

Do or do not. There is no try.

by ERL on Mar 4, 2010 2:03 PM EST reply actions  

I've thought about it more, and here's my theory:

The Panthers want to keep Marshall long term, but they can’t be the ones to offer a long term extension. If they were to come out and sign him to a multi-year deal it undermines Jerry Richardson’s position fighting increasing player contracts, and makes him look weak willed.

If they tender him for a 1st rounder, no team offers him a deal at all.

By tendering him at the 2nd round position the league sets Marshall’s value. If the Panthers match it then Richardson can still look like he’s fighting player salaries, after all he didn’t set the value. The Panthers can match the deal while another team looks like the ‘bad guy’.

Is it a gamble that a team might include a poison pill? Absolutely. But it strikes me that the Panthers are the kind of organization where Richardson carries enough clout amongst the owners that they wont intentionally try and screw his organization over.

Marshall changed agents to Drew Rosenhaus because Jon Beason told him how easy negotiations were between Rosenhaus and the Panthers. The front office has always worked well with him. This indicated that Marshall wants to stay, now it’s up to the league to set Marshall’s value. In this economy, in this year I think it would be surprising to see Marshall garner a mega offer, especially with Dunta Robinson, Antrel Rolle and other DBs well ahead of him in desirability.

This could be a shrewd move by the Panthers to have a team offer Marshall a lower contract than they might be willing to and match the offer at a lower price, taking advantage of the down economy. Marshall’s value is highest to the Carolina Panthers, because we know his ability… around the league he may not be looked upon being as desirable.

Cat Scratch Reader's resident optimist.
I also blog the Panthers at www.realbitsofpanthers.com

by James The Aussie on Mar 4, 2010 2:17 PM EST up reply actions  

with that said

I fully expect Marshall to play for the tendered amount this coming season.

Do or do not. There is no try.

by ERL on Mar 4, 2010 2:43 PM EST up reply actions  

also

If we believe the ESPN report that they offered Peppers 13-14 Million recently, then the Richardson setting a good example of lower player salaries theory looks less likely.

Do or do not. There is no try.

by ERL on Mar 4, 2010 2:47 PM EST up reply actions  

Not neccesarily. Given that the league high was set with Washington and Haynesworth at $100 million a (roughly) $65 million deal seems appropriate, not overblown.

Cat Scratch Reader's resident optimist.
I also blog the Panthers at www.realbitsofpanthers.com

by James The Aussie on Mar 4, 2010 3:58 PM EST up reply actions  

Why bother

Why bother putting a 2nd round tender on Jeff King? He’s like a yellow flag magnet. Every time I turn around there’s another one sailing his way. I know Rosario pulls them as well, but at least he’s a receiving threat.

by hunt! on Mar 4, 2010 5:07 PM EST reply actions  

King is a major benefit in the running game. He’s far and away the best blocking TE the Panthers have.

John Fox has never really needed a true pass catching TE to flourish. For a run first team like the Panthers King plays like at extra tackle is on the field. He doesn’t make flashy catches like Rosario, but he’s reliable for those 6-8 yard plays.

Cat Scratch Reader's resident optimist.
I also blog the Panthers at www.realbitsofpanthers.com

by James The Aussie on Mar 4, 2010 6:39 PM EST up reply actions  

I’m doubtful that he’s been a “major” benefit to the running game. If you say so. I’ve read that he is the best blocking TE, but watching the games I do not notice it. I do notice the false start penalties. He had at least 4 last year and I’m still po’d about several away from the action holds. I wish I could find a stats site that keeps penalties. Anyway, where’s the benefit if you’re just bringing the plays back?

I’m not sure what you are referring to as flashy. Maybe his game winner in SD the year before last. Regardless, yes, King has a big body. Yes, he can catch a 6-8 yard. And yes, our QB most of last year, having a horrendous year, could usually hit a stationary target 6-8 yds past the LOS. If that’s all the team wants from a TE. Fine, let him block be the occasional outlet. But please do something about the penalties.

And, totally off-subject, if the Panthers are such a run first team (of course they are) why is everyone so up on using a high draft choice on a receiver? Why is the rookie going to be so much further along than every other rookie receiver that we’ve ever drafted? There will be very little in the way of opportunities other than on special teams. Just look at throws the younger guys got last year. If I’m reading this right, Martin was thrown to twice, Moore 12 times, Barnidge 21, Jarrett 31 times. It looks like Smith got 10 targets his rookie year.

by hunt! on Mar 4, 2010 11:34 PM EST reply actions  

ProFootballFocus.com..

King was the recipient of 5 penalties, none offset.

And getting another receiving threat would take pressure off of Smith. Making a team respect the deep ball (or pass in general) with Williams or Stewart in the backfield would be lethal. If you’re one dimensional, you’re probably going to have a tough time winning. Last year, we were forced to be one dimensional.

by D-Ranged1 on Mar 5, 2010 12:44 AM EST up reply actions  

I understand the concept

I’m just saying get a FA receiver that you’ll use right away… and hope he isn’t Roy Williams. Or find someone you really like late in the draft, and hope he is a Marques Colston. Or start using your young guys more. Hard to say how good they can be if you do not throw to them. Someone you throw to 10 times during the year is not taking anything off Smith.

Haha, with all that’s been going on recently it’s adding a bit of excitement to the off-season.

by hunt! on Mar 5, 2010 8:09 PM EST up reply actions  

been beating that drum myself , hunt

I’m not in favor of the 2nd round receiver, or these Double Trouble trade scenarios bringing Lynn Swann here, or whoever. Doesn’t seem to register.

Do or do not. There is no try.

by ERL on Mar 5, 2010 10:24 AM EST up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the SB Nation blog focused on the NFL's Carolina Panthers.

Site Code of Conduct

Start posting about the Panthers »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

Connect_with_facebook

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Cheerleader-38_small
Suggested Panther Playbook for Utilizing Armanti Edwards

Recent FanPosts

14650_1190840130500_1213260240_30614180_3739670_n_small
No nickname for Clausen...
Docnolz-panthers55-100x100_small
Question about Observer coverage of Panthers
Jon_beason_by_2wo6ix_small
Which Panthers would you protect?
Catscratchreader_m_small
SBN is Looking for an Intern
Small
Training Camp
Panther_small
#3 Doubters Listen up
Currentflag_small
I'm sorry Mr. King... you said we're what?
Small
Cardiac Cats...dead?
Dbc92c5112a9b23c_small
Mike Goodson or Tyrell Sutton?

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Latest NFL Headlines from SB Nation

SBNation.com Recent Stories

Washington Redskins defensive tackle Albert Haynesworth signs autographs during the NFL football team's training camp and fan appreciation day, Saturday, Aug. 8, 2009, at Redskins Park in Ashburn, Va. (AP Photo/Nick Wass) +3 updates

NFL Training Camps News: Albert Haynesworth Fails Conditioning Test

Photo +8 updates

Free Agent OT Flozell Adams Has Four Standing Offers, Seeking $4 Million

Photo

2010 NFL Preview, Buffalo Bills: Chan Gailey Takes The Reins

More from SBNation.com >


Managers

Catscratchreader_m_small Jaxon

Editors

N1523447507_30151367_6579_small Cyberjag

Img_0764_small LittleKing

Currentflag_small James The Aussie

Authors

Dbc92c5112a9b23c_small Revshawn

Panthers_logo_lead_203x152_small bwsmith25

Bmoyer_small bmoyer