Uh-Oh Marshall Misses Workout
Maybe our 2nd round tender has upset Marshall? He was not present at the start of the offseason conditioning program. I hope that changes...
almost 2 years ago
SouthernPanther
10 comments
0 recs |
Email
PrintComments
As do I.
Losing Marshall would do damage. Gamble didn’t live up to the hype last year coverage wise.
How do you figure?
He helped anchor a secondary that was one of the best in the NFL in limiting WR production.
Advance apologies if the contents of this sports-based post offended you. I'm just aiming to educate the masses. My law professor says they're asses.
Panthers '010: Save the Richardson family coffers! We'll take the winning if we stumble into it.
by MichaelProcton on Mar 16, 2010 3:27 AM EDT up reply actions
Well neither of them was asked to play man all game long, so some of their success
should be contributed to the other components of our pass defense.
Do or do not. There is no try.
Jon Beason, #20 MLB in the NFL.
Count me unimpressed with their “ratings.”
Advance apologies if the contents of this sports-based post offended you. I'm just aiming to educate the masses. My law professor says they're asses.
Panthers '010: Save the Richardson family coffers! We'll take the winning if we stumble into it.
by MichaelProcton on Mar 16, 2010 6:56 PM EDT up reply actions
No, you're right.
Beason’s a scrub and shouldn’t sniff the Pro Bowl, much less the All-Pro teams he’s been on in each of the last two years.
Advance apologies if the contents of this sports-based post offended you. I'm just aiming to educate the masses. My law professor says they're asses.
Panthers '010: Save the Richardson family coffers! We'll take the winning if we stumble into it.
by MichaelProcton on Mar 17, 2010 5:25 AM EDT up reply actions
Glad to know I'm right..
About something I never even partially hinted at.
So, lets see why Beason gets knocked down to #20.. They rank his pass rushing very, very lowly, 48 of 54. Dansby was rock bottom as far as that goes. Coverage wise, 21 guys rank ahead of Beason. I love Beason but I could believe that, in the entire NFL, 21 other guys performed better in coverage than he. Against the run, he ranked 15th. One penalty also slightly drops his over-all.
So, despite the fact that my fandom and I would love to call Beason the best line backer in the NFL, I can see why he ranked behind 19 other guys. With some improved pass rushing, he’d likely rise to the top 10 pretty quickly.
Check out their OLB’s on all snaps and you’ll see that Thomas Davis ranked 6th with his limited snaps. While no system developed by human beings will ever be perfect, I don’t believe they have any particular reason to slight us.
I never said they did.
I said it’s a crappy system. Beason at #20 is proof enough for me.
Advance apologies if the contents of this sports-based post offended you. I'm just aiming to educate the masses. My law professor says they're asses.
Panthers '010: Save the Richardson family coffers! We'll take the winning if we stumble into it.
by MichaelProcton on Mar 22, 2010 2:07 AM EDT up reply actions
Just to point out
They actually like Jake Delhomme. According to their system he’s not an awful QB.
Jake Delhomme, QB Carolina Panthers, 2003-2009.
120 TDs+16000+ passing yards=Good
89 INT's+27 lost fumbles=Bad
Most comeback wins since 2003=Priceless
by Flowing Willow on Mar 22, 2010 3:07 AM EDT up reply actions
Comments For This Post Are Closed
Secondary Sidebar
User Tools
FanPosts
Community blog posts and discussion.
Certain photos copyright © 2012 by Associated Press or Getty Images. Any commercial use or distribution without the express written consent of Associated Press and Getty Images is strictly prohibited.
