Panthers 2010 - The Fall into the Abyss
Oh what a season it was. Dreams dashed, fans clashed, coaches/FO bashed, players slashed, and money stashed. I'm going to try to make sense of what elements came together to create this perfect shitstorm of a season. Don't expect any miraculous revelations, as all of this is common knowledge. But I present to you my reflections on the myriad of bad assumptions, bad decisions, and lots of bad luck. My hope is that we can, as fans, come to a general consensus (lol) that there was just a cumulative, seemingly non-stop, series of factors that, when piled together created an insurmountable barrier to success. If this post is well received, I'm hoping to follow it up with another titled: Panthers 2011 - Rise from the Abyss. (By well-received, I mean generating replies, not agreement with me).
We have to start at the beginning: 8-8 in 2009, winners of 4 of last 5 against sturdy competition with Matt Moore showing steady improvement. The running game, even sans D'Lo, was churning. The defense was getting stops and lots of takeaways. It all came too late, but there was plenty of reason for optimism.
Piece #1: The CBA was allowed to expire, forcing the no-cap year in 2010. The potential for a lockout in 2011 was (and still is) very real. Our fearless leader was convinced to lead the ownership committee in negotiations with the players. Richardson and Hurney recognized that we could clear a tremendous amount of cap room by taking advantage of the no-cap provision, while still keeping our core young talent in place. Peppers bolted for his own reasons. Delhomme was a $12 potential hit in '11, and his play offered no justification for keeping him. Others let go included fan faves like Muhammad, Hoover, and Chris Harris; and others like K. Vincent, D. Lewis, H. Thomas, N. Diggs. Rhys-Lloyd. To paraphrase, "It was time to let the young guys have their chance."
In addition, Fox wasn't offered an extension. Truth is, if Fox had been extended, he would be paid even if there was a lockout. So even if he wanted to extend Fox, JR would be sending a message loud and clear that he didn't really think a lockout would happen. But, between the non-extension, veteran purge, and who knows what, it seems the relationship between Fox and JR soured irreparably.
My opinion: None of these moves played a part in terms of talent on the field, but definitely impacted leadership in the locker room. But, I can understand the cost/benefit of the decision(s), especially relative to the long-term future of the franchise.
Piece #2: Free Agency was utilized to shore up our seemingly biggest deficiency -- special teams -- thru the addition of Wright, Hudson, Francisco, Witherspoon, and Smoothie. Wright was also considered a good pickup for the WR corps, especially if Jarrett still didn't get it. Well, he didn't, as we know, and Wright was lost to injury along with Charley Martin. We also picked up Big Ed Johnson to help the interior DL. Many felt this area remained as the most vulnerable component of the D, and they were right. Still Big Ed has played okay, and despite no help from the FAs, special teams coach Rodgers managed to take a terrible unit and make it respectable.
Lots of folks wanted to see Boldin or Housh brought in, but Boldin wanted a multi-year deal (and cost the Ravens 3 picks), and Housh had been on the decline. Plus, neither was in keeping with the "youth" movement. Others wanted a veteran QB, just in case Moore couldn't continue his successful run. But the FO stayed away, showing full confidence in Moore.
My Opinion: Hindsight being 20/20, we should have signed a vet QB to a one-year deal, and we over-estimated the young talent at DT.
Piece #3: Our 2010 draft has been hotly debated, from the Clausen pick to the trade up for AE. I think overall the draft was successful, landing us Lafell, Gettis, Hardy, Pugh, and yes, Clausen and Pike. The word from the FO and coaches was that we were going to strengthen our passing offense to complement our much revered running attack. We further bolstered the STs with Norwood, McClain.
My Opinion: Diamonds and duds, future stars at WR and DE, but you don't win with rookies.
Piece #4: Camp injuries to Thomas Davis and a weird "scope" to Otah's knee were serious blows on both sides of the ball. Beason had to move outside, Connor got his chance, and Schwartz became our answer at RT. Then Duke shows up totally out of shape and stinks it up. Enter MacBern as the RG. Other early injuries to Martin and Wright depleted our WR corps. The preseason proved prophetic for our offense, although the D was Dyn-o-mite.
My Opinion: The O-line was lost before the season even started. With MacBern and Schwartz playing well in 2009, we just didn't know yet how bad it would be.
Piece #5: Moore was Less than we all hoped. Lots of well-documented reasons for his struggles have been noted, including in this post. The O-line was rag tag on the right side, Jarrett failed, leaving us with Smitty and the rooks. We couldn't get the running game going with zero passing threat and the aforementioned RG/RT combo. The offense that stunk in preseason, putrified early in the regular season. The Defense began the season-long struggle of playing most of the game and trying to clean up after the offense. Actually, they played pretty well, especially in the red zone, but why oh why couldn't we contain the left side (Brayton crashes down, blockers get on the LBs, total chaos ensues).
My Opinion: The coaches thought we could pull it together offensively without modifying the basic offense. They were wrong. Changes should have been made early to allow Moore to use short drops and quick reads. Defensively, Beason played okay (which isn't Beastly), but was clearly out of position. Connor and Anderson showed they could play very well. Meeks couldn't fix the run D or generate consistent pressure on QBs.
Piece #6: Moore gets concussed, and with no veteran backup, Clausen gets his shot and fares no better. Moore comes back, plays well against the 49ers for the 1st win. But it was a short lived moment. The QB carousel begins with Moore to IR, Clausen concussed, and Pike just not ready. Bring in BSP for a game. OMG.
My Opinion: A still viable veteran QB may have been modestly successful. The young WRs were showing promise, Smitty was trying too hard (could his drops have anything to do with the twice broken arm?). Defense begins to show promise, but way too late.
Piece #7: More injuries (Connor/IR, Wharton/IR, D'Lo/IR and on and on it went). But one thing positive came back. We started running the ball, and when Stewie got back he was Stewie again. Joy oh joy, with the running attack back, opposing Ds will have to honor the run and take pressure off of Clausen. But while the run blocking gelled, the pass blocking did not, and the passing game remained the turd in the toilet. But hey, we got another win at AZ, making us 2-2 against the NFC West.
My Final Opinion: There is no smoking gun. There just isn't. If I had to choose the most egregious "offense," I would go back to the failure to modify the offensive plan / playbook during and after preseason, when it was apparent that the injuries limited what we would be able to do.
I'm sure I made some mistakes and left out other key pieces, which I hope my friends here will point out. I wanted to take a look at where we've been, in hopes it helps us get to a better place for seasons to come. So what say you, CSR?
The content of these posts are those of the user/fan making the post only
15 comments
|
10 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
I think that although they made sense from a financial standpoint.
the move of cutting all the vets (Hoover and Delhomme specifically) really hurt us more than they helped us. Those guys were the leaders that held the team together apparently. We have a lot of young guys with talent, but not necessarily any leaders among them. Or if we do, then they haven’t come out yet. Very few rookies come in and are instant leaders like Beast. They need an example to follow. Without any leadership, our young core had no one kicking them in the butt to get better, which means they underperformed, along with making the mistakes that come with inexperience. So while there really isn’t any one smoking gun, I think that particular move doomed us the most. The others perhaps could have been minimized if we had some veteran leadership on offense.
Reader's Digest Condensed Version
Panthers suck.
Coaches suck.
Front Office sucks
Talent level of rookies overestimated
Panthers FAIL.
Ok to be fair
Here’s a positive spin
Panthers will have a new head coach and probably new coaching staff
Panthers will h ave the first round pick and may get Luck
Panthers should have a new OC that can tie his own shoes and use players to their best abilties
Panthers rookies have 1 year of experience
AE should be on the field next year (assuming he’s still on the team)
Thanks, Rick, for the summation of a shitstorm.
As of now, 13 voters said “rec’d, rec’d, rec’d”, but I’m the only one who actually did Rec it.
A comment I don’t think has been made, about the early season play calling:
Remember the optimism from Matt Moore, back in the preseason, talking about the changes in the passing game that were being made? There was a lot of work done in converting to a more wide-open passing game, with a lot of 3 and 4-WR sets. Well, for various reasons (blocking, drops, INTs, timing issues), that didn’t work out too well, and now we’re back to bunch sets, 2 TEs, 2 RBs, and 1 or 2 WRs split out wide.
Maybe the personnel was responsible for the failure of the intended change, maybe the coaching, maybe the injuries, maybe all three.
But I hope players recovering from injuries, a year’s experience (and maybe a fresh face at QB?) can resurrect that idea of 3-4 WR sets, which is more in keeping with the game today, and harder to defend. It used to be that the running game set up the passing game – now it’s just the opposite in the NFL. You need to spread the defense to fully open the running lanes. When our passing game soured, our runners suffered big time, and we had to fight 8-9 men fronts all the time.
Good point, BigD and thanks for the rec. I think they should have stayed with the original
concept of using 3 or 4 WRs more often, but adjusted the plays so the QB gets the ball out in under 3 seconds. You can’t wait for a receiver to get open in this league. The windows are just too tight.
I was thinking that I was drinking too much....so I quit thinking
I rec'd too. =) And actually clicked "rec" this morning.
I kinda voted last night. The “perfect shitstorm” was a lovely way of summing up the season, Rick.
Anyway, I really like 4 WR sets. If we had TEs who were more reliable receivers (Witten from DAL, or pretty much any TE from NO), then maybe go with 3 WRs and another TE.
Are there any vet WRs who will be FAs who still are crazy-fast and reliable with their hands? If Smitty leaves (which unfortunately looks like a good possibility), I really would love to see that vet, Gettis, LaFell, and maybe one of the better rookies coming out (and I freaking want to see what Armanti Edwards can do). I don’t have a clue what would happen with the #1 pick if Andrew Luck stays in school, and I don’t think we could trade out of it. And a WR hasn’t been drafted as a #1 pick since 1996 (Keyshawn Jackson), so it’s unlikely that we’d go for A.J. Green in that case, and he’ll definitely be drafted well before our next pick. And I think we need O-linemen or a DT before a WR.
ANYWAY, I think Gettis and LaFell should both be significantly better and more consistent by next season (especially if we have more stable/reliable QB play and better playcalling). It has to be rough with rookies trying to get their timing in sync with a QB considering how many QBs we’ve gone through. With those 2, we should have a good young core at WR, and we’d just need to fill in with a good supporting cast. I definitely want to see more of a passing game under a new coach. I love our run game, but it’s crazy to have 70%-80% run plays and expect to consistently win games. I think putting good 3-4 WR sets out there would help us out a lot.
And maybe a new OC would realize that you can run out of passing formations, and you can pass out of what looks like a running formation. Just imagine what a non-inept OC could do with an excellent group of RBs and an excellent receiving corps (not just in WRs, but with the RBs on screens, and with TEs who might be able to catch the ball sometimes).
i could have sworn I hit the rec button....
Ah well, hit it now. :)
by Flowing Willow on Dec 29, 2010 2:05 PM EST up reply actions
One of the keys to this horrendous season, in my opinion, goes all the way back to pre-season
The carousel of WR’s that the Panthers ran in and out of the preseason games, while trying to find a legit #2 receiver completely hindered the offense from finding any kind of cohesion. Also, locking Matt Moore onto receivers so the coaches could evaluate the WR’s took a huge toll on his progressions. Also, defensive linemen were able to just pin their ears back and rush on every down, which caused the Olinemen to lose confidence because it’s hard to consistently stop D linemen who have no doubt you wont be running the ball. All that carried over into the season and the offense never got on track.
Official ABC Fan Club President
Anybody But Clausen
Yeah, that was really strange, telling the QB to throw one to Gettis, then Jarrett, then Lafell, etc.
That doesn’t help the QB or the o-line get in rhythm. Strange start to a strange year.
I was thinking that I was drinking too much....so I quit thinking
Sad, but I never even thought of it that way.
That could very well be why Moore looked so different this year (preseason and regular season) than he did last year. And starting out in the preseason like that may have set Clausen back, too.
From trying to evaluate receivers, it makes sense. But for a young QB like Moore who hasn’t really had to do that before, and then to switch back to normal play, I can see how that could set you back.
Not saying that's the only reason Moore struggled.
It may not have had anything to do with it. But I can’t see how that could help.
Nice article, Rick
I’m looking forward to your next one. I agree with most of your opinions. Although, I don’t think the team was as optimistic as it portrayed itself in the preseason. The lack of a single Touchdown in the preseason should have been a big indicator of how the season was going to go. The lack of adjustments to suit the young team was almost criminal in my opinion. As young as this team was, the HC/OC should have installed some confidence building plays instead of the same ol’ same ol’ offensive scheme. Anyways, nice work and keep em coming.
Dear Santa, please bring me a winning team next year!
by Tarheel Soldier on Dec 29, 2010 3:42 PM EST reply actions
Enjoyed it too
Pains me to admit how wrong I was about this season. I was one of the overly optimistic homers who thought we would go no worse than 10-6. It was my assumption that Moore would continue on his path and win 3 out of 4 games and maybe we loose 2 games on a fluke, easy 10-6 with our schedule. The O-line was a road grading machine even if we had the youngest QB’s in the league. I though we had a good draft and would finally answer the question with the # 2 receiver and Smith won’t be triple covered anymore. Then the preseason happened and I was making excuses for the QB’s the receivers and the O-Line, hell the Defense was out of no where and these group of youngsters were going to carry our offense… besides our running game was going to take over starting the regular season. We weren’t wasting our stars on preseason; we were working on our passing game. Then by half time of the New York game I was still feeling good but since that time it has pretty much been down hill. The two bumps in the flat line are obviously the wins against equally shitty NFC West teams that traveled a long way to loose to us. I am just as sure I will be overly optimistic for next year and the one after that… and here’s to hoping we get Luck with the pick, he sounds like a good one and hopefully he comes out.
I'm sure you will all understand if I wait until after Jan. 15th for the sequel (lol)
I was thinking that I was drinking too much....so I quit thinking
Nice article Rick
Dashed, clashed, bashed, slashed and stashed. Sounds like the new Hash Browns menu at Waffle House.
Panthers 2011 – Rise from the Abyss needs to wait til after Jan 15th. If he does declare, we still have to sit through the agony of wondering if Hurney will trade him away for picks and/or players.
Official ABC Fan Club President
Anybody But Clausen

by 





















