Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Clippers Need To Realize That Spurs Are The Anti-Grizzlies

The Panthers Rebuilding Year: It's Here

Whether you like it or not, the 0-5 Panthers are in a rebuilding phase.  If they aren't, then we are much worse off than I can even imagine as the rebuilding phase won't even start until next year.  It is time, then, to assess our situation, position by position, to put together a pro-caliber team that we can take into the next decade.

The good news though, is that we are a young team, one of the youngest (if not the youngest after the preseason) in the league.  The bad news is that I don't actually believe the coaches or the front office thought we were in such a dire situation.  I really think they believe we would be competitive this year with the young players stepping up.  Marty Hurney himself admitted that he though Jimmy Clausen was coming into a great situation here in Caroline.  However, it just hasn't worked out that way.  But in the end, it is what it is and it's time to take a long hard look at our team and start thinking about the future of our franchise.

Star-divide

Coaches\Front Office

Head Coach:  Did you know there was once a time I was a stalwart supporter of John Fox?  It's hard to imagine those days, back in 2008, where I adamantly defended his "hot seat" position to my friends.  Sure, his team is boring to watch and more conservative than Billy Graham, but he always delivered when it mattered most.  That's not the case anymore.  Sometime after the '08 season I think a rift developed between Richardson and Fox that has set up this scenario and if there was a question if Fox would be back next year if we were 4-1, there is no denying that Fox will not be back this season now that we are 0-5.  I don't know who will step into the mantle of head coach next year, but that topic has been much talked about lately.  All I know is that this has got to change...

Defensive Coordinator:  Of our three main coaches, I think Meeks is perhaps the only safe one.  His defense though does not seem to jive well with Fox's philosophies.  "Bend, but don't break" does not help you win the game of field position or time of possession.  To that end, I think that may be part of the reason we're struggling.  It's not that our defense has been bad, but they do seem to struggle to get off the field at times.  However, all that being said, I believe if any coach returns next year, Meeks will be the one.  His players are playing fast, swarming, and hungry and they have forced 9 interceptions (the same number our QBs have given up) and forced 4 fumbles, recovering 3 of them.

Offensive Coordinator:  Seriously?  No, Jeff Davidson will not be back.  He as inept at play calling as he is at dieting.  He's gone, and whoever replaces him can't possibly do any worse.

General Manager:  I will say one thing about Marty Hurney...  He is great at managing the business aspect of the football team.  I truly consider him to be one of the best at contract negotiations and cap space wiggling.  However, I've listened to him twice on radio and twice I have heard him say that the decision about bringing people in, not bringing people in, cutting people, and retaining them are all things that we can place at his doorstep.  To that end, you cannot possibly say that he has set us up for a successful season this year.  You just can't.  We came into this season thinking that Tank Tyler and Louis Leonard would be starting on DT.  We came into this season thinking Duke Robinson would start at RT and that Geoff Schwartz and Mackenzy Bernadeau would be serviceable.  We came into this season thinking that Matt Moore was ready to take over the reigns at QB.  We came into this season thinking that our WR corp would be productive and successful.  None of those gambles have paid off.  And that, my friends, as he said so himself, is something that we can pin on Hurney...  But I still think he stays.

Offense

Quarterback:  Ugh, how much I would love to be able to say that this is not a position of contention.  The only saving grace to Jimmy Clausen's poor performances and inconsistencies is that he's a rookie.  I can only hope that is the problem because I would love nothing more than for this position to be set.  I'll be honest, I don't really know how to judge the performance of a rookie QB.  All rookie QBs struggle when they don't have the veteran support around them.  Look at the supporting class of the Ravens and the Falcons when their two rookies started and then tell me that we have the same talent level here.  I think it's just too early to tell with Clausen.  Success breeds success after all, and we just haven't had any.  That being said, I don't believe Matt Moore makes his return next season.  He is in the final year of his contract and we have already started a rookie QB ahead of him.  Like it or not, that move has kinda sealed his fate.  Clausen's chapter in Panthers history is just beginning and here is hoping that 2011 will be a brighter spot for him than 2010.  If not... I guess we'll be drafting again in 2012

Offensive Line:  Remember when we thought this was going to be our one position of undisputed strength?  I don't blame Hurney for thinking that MacBern and Schwartz would be serviceable.  I really don't.  I thought they would be too.  But they're not.  Jeff Otah has also been perennially hurt, missing 4 games in 2008, 3 games in 2009, and now 5 games in 2010.  Jordan Gross is no spring chicken either.  If Otah can't stay healthy, we'll need to address this position sooner rather than later.  Now I believe would be the perfect time to draft a guy to play Guard and transition into a Tackle later on, depending on how long Gross stays and if Otah can be healthy.  Regardless, Guard is a serious position of need entering next season.

Wide Receiver:  "We’re getting all our depth players off waivers right now… think about that for a second," as James so eloquently put it.  That says a lot about the current talent level and play making skills of the people on our roster.  It should have been a red flag when Wallace Wright, a former Jet, is looking to be our #2 receiver.  David Clowney had better production than Wright did while with the Jets.  I'm not trying to write off Wright, but just trying to put things into perspective here.  I don't quite understand how the staff thought that this group of guys was going to be successful.  Now that we are down Smith, our passing game looks more like something out of the 1950s.  The saving grace here is that, like with Jimmy at quarterback, we have lots of rookies.  Gettis, Edwards, and LaFell have all shown promise at times, but as always is the case with rookies, they are somewhat inconsistent (LaFell being woefully so).  For now, I don't think this is an absolute immediate concern simply because we do have so many rookies, but it is a position nevertheless that we must keep an eye on.

Running back:  Finally, a place to be content with.  As long as we can convince DeAngelo Williams to stay, I believe we are set at running back for at least another 3 years.  Combined with Jonathan Stewart, our dynamic duo will return to form as soon as our passing game shows signs of revival from its comatose.  I'm not the biggest fan of Mike Goodson or Tyrell Sutton (as far as replacing Double Trouble), but they are a serviceable backups never the less.  If we can't keep Williams, then we may want to consider grabbing another guy to complete our 2-back system either next year or the year after.

Tight End/Fullback:  I'm fairly pleased with our Tight Ends for the most part, and while I know that Tony Fiammetta has struggled a little bit, it's not something I'm terribly concerned about yet.  If Fiammetta struggles into next year (assuming we still even rely on our FBs with our new coaches) then that might be something to bring up down the line, but for now this isn't really an area of major concern.  Like all things with our offense, I believe once the passing game is resurrected, our struggles here will dissipate.

Defense

Defensive Line:  I'm actually a little bit on the fence about what to do here.  This is a tough spot.  Our guys are not bad enough to say that this is an area of concern, but neither are they good enough to say that there aren't upgrades out there for them.  We definitely need to get a better pass rush going.  I think Greg Hardy has been the steal of our draft thus far and I can't wait to see him develop in the future.  Charles Johnson and Everette Brown have been doing a good job thus far and our defensive tackles have been playing far better than I expected.  If we were to make a change anywhere on this line I think DT would be the place to do it.  It's a case where we can pick up a guy to add into the rotation who will eventually replace our current starters after he gains some experience.

Linebackers:  If Running back is our strength on offense, this is our strength on defense.  This unit led by Jon Beason has been nothing short of phenomenal.  Beason, James Anderson, and Dan Connor have been playing truly tremendous football.  We might even be overstocked here on talent depending on what happens when Thomas Davis comes back from injury, but either without our star WLB there's just no way that you can say this is an area of concern.

Cornerbacks:  Again, a unit that has performed admirably.  With the style of defense that we play, it's hard to pin the struggles of the CBs (and to the same extent the safeties) on just these guys.  Without a pass rush, their job becomes that much harder.  I know that Richard Marshall had a rough game against the Saints, but as long as we can retain him next year, I believe we will be in good shape for at least a year or two.  We have two stout starters and a serviceable nickle CB in Captain Munnerlyn behind them.  It might be time to consider finding an eventual replacement for Chris Gamble (not convinced yet Munnerlyn can step into that role), but I also believe there are more pressing needs at the moment.

Safeties:  Charles Godfrey leads the league in interceptions.  Last week Jordan Pugh, a rookie from the 6th round, filled in admirably for Sherrod Martin, who has not been bad himself.  This is another situation where we have two stout starters and an up-and-coming talent behind them.  Parting ways with Chris Harris was certainly not something I'm regretting now, even if he was a fan favorite of mine.

Special Teams

Kicker:  John Kasay is the original Panther.  He has been in the league as long as Brett Favre, the last two of their draft class. But we can't keep fooling ourselves into thinking that he will be around forever.  We must eventually find a replacement for him, hopefully one that can handle kickoff duties as well so that we can free up another roster spot.  As far as Rhys Loyd goes, I've not been impressed with him this year, but it's the same place we're at with Kasay.  We should draft someone with a big leg that can eventually replace Kasay as well.

Punt/Kick Returns:  Not complaining about our production here.  Mike Goodson has excelled with KRs and Captain Munnerlyn has done a nice job thus far with PRs, with one or two exceptions.  I think we're in a good place here.

Closing Thoughts...

Change is coming, my friends, of that we are certain.  As dark as things are right now, I believe the future to come is bright and sunny.  With a few exceptions, we have young talent in all the core positions and that gives me hope looking down the road.  I'll admit, I'm not a big college football fan (I blame that on NC's woeful football heritage and the College of Charleston's complete lack of a football program entirely) so I'll leave the discussion to the rest of you on who we should keep our eyes on in the future.  But for now, there is no escaping that the future is what we need to be building toward.

The content of these posts are those of the user/fan making the post only

Comment 98 comments  |  6 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Sorry

Can’t agree on Brown for the price we paid. We could have taken him in second round. I can except maybe second round, but he was not and is not a first round talent. Other than that, good job.

As the great philosopher Yoda said "Try not! Do you must!"

by gdhood on Oct 12, 2010 7:04 AM EDT reply actions  

I'm sorry... .did you get the point of this post?

I never even mentioned whether or not Brown was worth the price we paid for him (I’m inclined to believe we were reaching). What matters is what he’s doing now that he’s here. Is he playing phenomenally? No. Outside of our Linebackers, no one is. The D-Line as a whole may be doing better than expected (than I expected) but they still are lacking consistent pressure on the quarterbacks.

We can moan about the price we paid for Brown all we want, but when it comes down to it, what do you want to do about it? Cut him?

by aceofsween on Oct 12, 2010 7:44 AM EDT up reply actions  

I see it as no different than moaning about the lost pick on Jarrett

I don’t have a problem going after a player you think is an impact player rather than waiting to see who falls to you. Even if we all agree Brown is not 1st round talent you can’t call him a bust. He’s not playing bad, and the defense as a whole is playing well.

Nice post Ace.

Follow Cat Scratch Reader on Twitter and Facebook

by Jaxon on Oct 12, 2010 8:17 AM EDT up reply actions  

Good post.

Ok, so who, in the Panthers organization is looking at the game films and is evaluating the players? It’s supposed to be the coaches right?

The O-line coach Dave Magazu should be all over the O-line reinforcing the fundamentals… he should be working hard with Fox and Hurney and the scouts trying to find replacements for Schwartz and MacBern… someone NEEDS to fill in for Otah when not if he goes down this season. Is the replacement Morris? Is he going to be like Hollis was on run defense was last season? It took about this long into the season before he was signed when Kemo went down in the preseason because the coaches “thought the team was ok without him.”

The D-line coach Brian Baker needs, NEEDS to be breathing down Fox and Meeks’ necks trying to get Hardy in the starting rotation… he’s the only one that’s shown the capability of reaching the QB… and Meeks needs to review the tape of the Giants game where Connor came in on the delayed blitz and got a sack.

by scorpion12 on Oct 12, 2010 8:06 AM EDT reply actions  

Hurney is completely falling on his sword

Yes, he’s making these decisions but they are obviously falling within certain limitations that have been set by Richardson. Remember ‘the budget’ Fox mentioned back after the purge?

I bet Hurney would gladly take the same cap back since it also contained A FLOOR! Because certainly the previous floor is higher than his current limit! Our complete FA strategy was to be picky about who we take off the waiver wire.

Follow Cat Scratch Reader on Twitter and Facebook

by Jaxon on Oct 12, 2010 8:30 AM EDT reply actions  

Also the mis-steps on Leonard and Tyler have to be accounted for

You can’t simply throw away picks in an insanely deep draft because you need help unless you really believe those players will solidify your team for the future.

I hate being a ‘hindsight guy’, but it has to be mentioned who we missed out on by trading the picks for the DTs:

- Cam Thomas (DT- UNC)
- Arthur Jones (DT- Syracuse)
- Chris DeGeare (OT- Wake Forest)
- Mitch Petrus (G- Arkansas)

And the list goes on…

Cat Scratch Reader's resident optimist.

by James Dator on Oct 12, 2010 8:41 AM EDT up reply actions  

I think we had pretty good reason to believe that Tank Tyler was going to be good in our 4-3

I can’t fault Hurney for making that move, especially in the dire situation we were in at the time.

Unofficial Agent for Armanti Edwards, WR #10, Carolina Panthers

by Tater596 on Oct 12, 2010 8:56 AM EDT up reply actions  

Trading was a mistake

However, to everyone’s surprise, DT has been pretty serviceable so far. Having two lunch pail DTs hiding on the roster takes a bit of the sting away.

by patosan on Oct 12, 2010 8:23 PM EDT up reply actions  

Probably mostly about JR

I believe Hurney is trying to take the focus off of JR by attracting attention to himself. JR has been getting a lot of heat for this year’s ‘budget’. Hurney is trying to distract people from the budget by falling on his sword as you say.

by patosan on Oct 12, 2010 8:20 PM EDT up reply actions  

no debate here really

I be reached the conclusion there’s no need to even worry about most of this stuff now. Until we know who the next head coach will be the point is moot. Its going to be an excruciating season. And That’s about all I know. With the lockout looming, who the hell really knows what will happen. One thing I do know is that this Panther fan will always support them.

by blue2 on Oct 12, 2010 9:05 AM EDT via mobile reply actions  

The reason we are in such a bad spot at QB and WR

Is terrible foresight by our management. Seriously… did you really think Matt Moore was the future? Especially during the 2008 draft? or 2009 draft? We should have drafted a QB of the future a long time ago, we could not afford to wait until the shit totally hit the fan, no team can. You need to have a legitimate prospect at QB developing behind your entrenched starter and backup… you don’t just throw a fresh rookie to the dogs. Drafting Clausen in 2010 was to little, to late, and I believe we have hurt his development already. He should have had the benefit of being the 3rd string QB holding a clipboard for awhile instead of being thrown to the wolves.

The same goes for wide receiver. You look at your roster and see that your stud #1 WR is approaching 30, and your reliable #2 is ancient. You have one legitimate prospect on the roster, Dwayne Jarrett, but he hasn’t shown any propensity to learning the playbook or putting forth the effort needed to be successful for you. So at best, you have a potential replacement for your possession receiver, but you still have no one you are grooming to be your future #1. We needed to be looking for rookie WRs back in 2008, or at least last year. Instead, we attempted to mask our stupidity by overcompensating and drafting THREE wide receivers this year, and throwing every last one of them into the fire.

Unofficial Agent for Armanti Edwards, WR #10, Carolina Panthers

by Tater596 on Oct 12, 2010 9:17 AM EDT reply actions  

I completely agree... but you can't fault the Panthers for trying

It’s common knowledge now that Carolina had a deal in place with Kansas City that if Matt Ryan was available at #5 of the 2008 NFL draft they were going to move up in a trade and select him; they liked Matt Ryan that much… and honestly, it’s relieving to see a team who does’t take QBs often having what would have been a very successful pick.

They liked Clausen in the same way they liked Ryan, which is why the rumors (if true) that the Panthers were trying to deal with St. Louis for the 32nd pick to take him make me feel good about the pick too.

They should have evaluated both positions better… I completely agree, but looking back at the QBs we really missed on they were (since 2008):
- Joe Flacco (but a whole lot of teams did)
- Chad Henne (I like who we currently have better)

That’s really about it based on where we had draft picks.

Cat Scratch Reader's resident optimist.

by James Dator on Oct 12, 2010 9:42 AM EDT up reply actions  

I'm glad they feel that way about Clausen

And I hope they are right, but its the combination of not building your passing attack for all those years and letting your skill players age that is biting us.

If they didn’t like any of the QBs available, they maybe should have been more diligent in selecting a WR, who by now (in the case of 2008) would have been entering his prime years, and would have really been a boost to both Moore and/or Clausen.

Unofficial Agent for Armanti Edwards, WR #10, Carolina Panthers

by Tater596 on Oct 12, 2010 10:11 AM EDT up reply actions  

I was yelling at my TV.

Steve Smith. They should have gotten Steve Smith.

If Steve Smith was a member of the Carolina Panthers instead of his teammate, Dwayne Jarrett, we would have the best running joke in the NFL as well as a pair of elite options to go to in the passing attack.

Moooooooose!

Hoooooooove!

Steve Smith! Lol! Lol!

"Once again the trousers of evil are yanked down by the mocking hands of justice!"-Revshawn

by Revshawn on Oct 12, 2010 12:48 PM EDT up reply actions  

First, picking a QB in the draft is a crap shoot, other than the absolute elite top picks...

and often times even then. The same can be said about WRs. It’s incredibly difficult to find that 1, maybe 2 in each draft that are real difference makers as rookies.
Most importantly in terms of recent drafts (before this year’s), we had no salary room to work with (and we know why). I still say JR’s sons mortgaged the team to the hilt, and there wasn’t room to get anybody new — whether you’re talking high skill position picks or FAs.
Plus, we weren’t in position in any drafts to get a “sure thing” because, at best, we were picking in the mid-teens. So instead, they went to the philosophy of trading 1st round picks (couldn’t pay them) and trying to hit the value. We had to draft for defense, and it went very well. Offense, not so much. Our current offensive skill players just need a year or two, and we’ll be kicking ass on both sides of the ball.
It’s all second guessing now anyway, and ultimately pointless, to dwell on how we got here.

Where there’s a will… I want to be in it.

by Rick Bates on Oct 13, 2010 6:37 PM EDT up reply actions  

I will say this much...

I am a pretty strong support of Clausen as the future of the franchise, but that is completely overshadowed in my belief that Matt Ryan is the next up and coming elite QB. As long as the Falcons give him a strong supporting cast, he will be a top 5 QB in the years to come, if not top 3.

by aceofsween on Oct 12, 2010 4:10 PM EDT up reply actions  

My biggest grip is the WR position and coaching

I know Delhomme wasn’t everyone’s favorite QB but he did do well through 2008 and with that in mind we had our starting QB. I really feel that the Fox and Hurney believed they could find their next QB the same way they acquired Delhomme and it looked like we found one with Moore. In all the actual game time he received he played well. You can argue about who he was playing against and how much heart they had in the game, but the point still remains he played well. I thought he was going to be at least serviceable. However, how much of that is on the offensive line.

The right side of the O-line is bad right now, yet I truly believed we would be okay entering this season. All of the players on the roster did well when called upon the last few years when needed. I don’t think we would have predicted how bad they would play this year.

However, the WR on the other hand, I completely agree with you. Since Fox has been coaching we have only drafted 5 receivers (tied at 3rd least with WAS. NYJ and IND are behind us with 4 each) before this last draft. While I figured Jarrett would make the team this year, he should not have. Then you are not going to have a great year if you have to start a rookie QB and rookie WR. It’s not a matter of getting the next great receiver through FA or trades its getting an experienced WR during the off season to help with the younger group and to hedge your bets on Smith making it the full year.

Finally the coaching, unlike some I don’t think Fox had given up. I don’t think he’s that type of person to quit on his team. However, I do fault him for not playing to the strengths of his players. Okay we have some great RB and (when the line was good) could run when we needed. However, when you have such inexperienced WR with an young QB you have to have a better game plan and offensive play calling. I could put all the blame on Davidson but I think they share equally in the responsibility. Maybe it’s because Fox doesn’t give much information and a comparison to Rex Ryan is unfair in this regards, but I remember when Sanchez was a rookie Rex taking about fitting the offensive to his strengths and really working him through the progressions when on the field.

These are things I am unsure that Fox can do. You have to build you QB and give him the tools to succeed and Fox/Davidson don’t seem to have that. Not to mentioned how very little faith I have in our QB coach.

If you really want to do something, you will find a way. If you don't, you will find an excuse.

by LittleKing on Oct 12, 2010 10:21 AM EDT up reply actions  

I wonder what direction we'll go next year.

We’ll have all of this young talent that has progressed a year, and we’ll have a ton of cap room, but what do we do with it? It wouldn’t make sense to bring in veterans who are going to stunt the growth of the team, but it’s also not going to sit well with me having to go through multiple years of rebuilding when this team should already be competitive. I think almost ALL of this team’s problems revolve around the play calling and the passing game. I think our defense has been one of the top 5 in the league. Statistics may not show it, but I’ve never seen a defense have to stay on the field for so long. They are partly to blame, because of the inability to make stops on 3rd down, but I blame the offense more. I think everything we are seeing from Clausen is expected from a rookie. Flashes of brilliance here and there, mistake prone in a lot of other areas. But to turn him into a franchise player that he CAN be, we are going to have to get him more reliable recievers and a better line to protect him. Lafell, Gettis, and Edwards aren’t starter caliber in the league. They are all 3rd string recievers, but I think Edwards’ spot is the slot. We’re going to war with people starting that should only be around to fill out the roster.

by Charlotte Bobcat on Oct 12, 2010 11:00 AM EDT reply actions  

Passing Game

I firmly believe the reason we sit at 0-5 is soley because of our passing game. We don’t have one.

Our defense has played good (doesn’t matter where we think they rank or where they do rank) they have kept us in all but the first game. We know we have two good running backs but they can’t do anything if we can’t free them with our passing game. If the passing game you fix the offense. But that’s easier said than done with a rookie QB and rookie WR. You can have a rookie QB with decent vet WR and be okay or rookie WR (not all of them mind you) with a good vet QB and be okay. What we have just won’t cut it.

If you really want to do something, you will find a way. If you don't, you will find an excuse.

by LittleKing on Oct 12, 2010 11:06 AM EDT up reply actions  

+1

Passing game has been straight up suckish.

by Charlotte Bobcat on Oct 12, 2010 11:08 AM EDT up reply actions  

Fix the OL and the QB and WRs will look better

Since Clausen will have more time to make reads and receivers will have more time to get open.

by patosan on Oct 12, 2010 8:30 PM EDT up reply actions  

They aren't starter caliber YET.

They are rookie WRs, they need time to develop. The point I made earlier is that our front office deserves the blame for not addressing this sooner, and giving them time to develop.

Unofficial Agent for Armanti Edwards, WR #10, Carolina Panthers

by Tater596 on Oct 12, 2010 11:49 AM EDT up reply actions  

Yeah. That's what I was meaning to say.

They all should be developing as slot recievers. They all have the skills to be starters in the league (almost every athlete does), but they need that time to learn under veterans. They are just like our young QB, being thrown to the wolves. It’s a route that could make or break a man. I guess our guys are just going to have to learn the hard way this year.

by Charlotte Bobcat on Oct 12, 2010 11:57 AM EDT up reply actions  

Great Post

I pretty much completely agree.

Maybe it’s just that I don’t fully understand football, but for the life of me, I don’t understand why there even has to be a rebuilding year in the first place. Why tear down an entire structure when you can simply rennovate? I guess the economic situation freaked JR out and he thought he had to suddenly slash salaries to nothing. But it didn’t have to happen this way. As players age, or show susceptibility to injury, or show interest in wanting to go somewhere else, why not slowly bring in newer and younger players gradually while the others gradually leave?

I’m torn as to what I think the foremost need is – HC/OC/QB/WR coach replacements, or new guys for the O-line. I really think it’s a tie. As to HC/OC, the plays are ridiculously simple and predictable at least 90% of the time. As to the QB and WR coaches, do I even need to say anything? All of those need improvements. But at the same time, an O-line should be able to protect and give time for the QB and make holes for the RBs no matter what the call.

I’ve said it before, but we HAVE to have more depth and better talent on the O-line. Even if they thought the O-line would play well, they had to have known they would need more depth. Players get hurt – you have to have back-ups. Without a good O-line, not even the most talented QB available can buy enough time to allow the the receivers to separate themselves and finish their routes (especially the deep routes), and not even the most talented/powerful RBs can run the ball through the middle – as evidenced by the shut out of D-Will and J-Stew. Someone on here posted a video of Jonathan Stewart highlights from 2008. Even with the tiniest of holes, he rammed his way through the middle and gained serious yardage. The only way that we can possibly get anything done without serious improvements in the O-line would be to find a QB like Vick (who was interested in Carolina) or Denardo Robinson who is currently at Michigan. Each of them is practically capable of being a one-man offense. They just need a guy to snap the ball to them, and they can run it to the endzone. Obviously that’s a hyperbole, but hopefully you get my point.

That being said, I know we have major issues with the passing game between QBs and WRs.

I don’t even now where to begin with what to do at this point with the QB situation. And before I get started, please, let’s not turn this into a Moore versus Clausen war. That’s been done enough on this blog already. I’m just trying to give the most objective analysis that I can. Anyway – QB – it’s just a disaster. I think that the organization really thought they’d be okay with the QB position for this season because Moore truly did do a good job when he took over last year (4-1, with what, only 2 or so starts in the years before that). Was he Peyton Manning or Drew Brees? No. But he was good. And they managed to snag Clausen, thinking that Moore would be able to handle a season, and that Clausen would have more time to develop. Obviously that hasn’t worked out, and you can’t place ALL of the blame on the QBs in light of the O-line’s meltdown. We’re pretty much in a Catch-22 at the moment. Clausen’s statistics suggest that he looks slightly better than Moore at the moment, but I’m afraid of Clausen getting shell-shocked and regressing in development. Moore has played well in the past, but he’s struggled, too. As of now, we’re just stuck. I’m afraid that we’re still going to be rebuilding in that department into the next season.

I think we need to worry about other things first before we take any more action with the WRs. I know that Moose was getting incredibly old for a WR, that he wasn’t as fast or reliable as he once was, but he was still serviceable. The team should have been phasing in new WRs over the past several years and letting them learn under Moose. I think Moose would have been a good mentor for them, because we all know that Smitty’s just not a mentor. Having said that, we have enough capability for the moment between Smith, Gettis, Clowney, and eventually Edwards (I thought he looked pretty good considering it was his first time getting a jersey, and he was able to catch and hold onto well-placed throws). Now the team’s also added Thomas. And beyond the WRs, D-Will, J-Stew, Goodson, King, and Rosario are all capable of making catches. As far as pure physicality, I think LaFell has potential – he just needs to work a little more on the mental aspects of the WR position, and he needs some one-on-one attention with coaches on getting a better grip on the ball. He’s a fantastic blocker, and he’s had two fantastic catches – one being the one-handed catch while falling during the Titans preseason game (I was there, it was a great catch), and the other obviously being the 40+ yard catch near the end of the Bengals game. So, point being, the team needs to cool down with the WR acquisitions. I think we have other priorities to take care of first before taking further action in acquiring WRs.

Special teams has performed beyond my expectations, and I’m really not too concerned with that side of the ball. Although, as has already been mentioned, we need a single kicker who can take over the roles of Kasay and Lloyd. But Kasay still has it at the moment, and I’m not ready to replace him yet. But inevitably, he will need a replacement…so the team needs to start looking for one now.

And there could be some improvements on the defense (as Charlotte Bobcat said, we do need to work on third downs), but we still have some outstanding, smart, and hardworking players on that side of the ball. The overwhelming majority of the defense is playing on all cylinders every second it’s on the field. The Giants game was rough, and I really was worried after that first game. It looked like Marshall and Gamble weren’t even attempting to tackle. It looked more like they were trying to hug the players they were supposed to be defending against. But since then, I’ve been pleased with the LB trio, the corners, and the safeties. Pugh looked great for his first start. And really – how often does a player get an interception in his debut as a starter? I don’t know the statistics on that, but I can’t imagine that it happens that often. The D-line is serviceable (faaaaar more so than the O-line), but as has already been said, put Hardy in as a starter ASAP. I think he shows more flash and tenacity than any other player on the line.

I think the “rebuilding” process really should have been just a phasing in of new/young players over the years so that they could learn from and grow under their predecessors. That didn’t happen, so to quote dear ole Fox, “We are what we are.” But as of this moment, the “rebuilding” has to focus on a new HC, a new OC, and new coaches for the offensive skills positions. Meeks needs to stay, even if he isn’t promoted to interim or permanent HC. You cannot deny that his defense (with the help of special teams) is carrying the entire weight of this team. And it has to say something about his motivational abilities that he is able to continue to get the kind of production out of his players that he does. Because with the state of the team as a whole, it would be so easy just to give up knowing that any turnovers you take probably won’t be capitalized on (except the redemptive Kasay will probably be able to get a field goal if the offense can manage to move the ball far enough).

by jamiedk on Oct 12, 2010 11:11 AM EDT reply actions  

Although Robinson is a beast.....

Cam newton is even better :) that boy is going to be beastly when he gets to the NFL!

by Tomthehomer on Oct 12, 2010 11:55 AM EDT up reply actions  

Newton is Tebow 2.0

Robinson however went against a good defense and was contained then forced to throw to show his weakness as a passer.

But not many option QBs make it in the NFL they usually transition to WR, even from High School to College some triple option QBs become WR, RB, or TE.

by RjTheMetalhead on Oct 12, 2010 8:27 PM EDT up reply actions  

Newton looks like a good passer when he does throw

He’s got great zip and good accuracy….just the fact that Auburn’s strength is their running game right now takes away from that (no use making him pass if no one can stop the run)!

by Tomthehomer on Oct 12, 2010 9:00 PM EDT up reply actions  

Only seen replays of him but reminds me of Josh Freeman.

6’6 towering cannons who can run well, but Newtons got Freeman beat on speed and pure freakish athleticism.

Taylor Martinez is another QB I’ve been hearing/watched a lot of lately, but he gets his 1st real test against Texas this week.

by RjTheMetalhead on Oct 12, 2010 10:00 PM EDT up reply actions  

Although Newton, Martinez, and many other spread QBs are doing great in college, it by no means indicates that they'll be "beasts" in the NFL

Cam Newton and Taylor Martinez, are great, however, they aren’t in the NFL. They are in college, and right now, if you don’t already know, college football offenses are (mostly all) going spread and with fast mobile QBs. Many of them simply aren’t going to translate to the NFL because of the dominance of the spread offense in college football right now. Going spread to pro offense can be be pretty demanding. So, I won’t say that any of these spread QBs are going to be “beasts” in the NFL. Hey, everyone thought JaMarcus Russell was going to dominate the NFL, and look at him now…

by jkp1516 on Oct 13, 2010 4:35 PM EDT up reply actions  

Newton optimism

You’re spot on about the abundance of “college level” offenses (like you said…mostly centered around the spread) making it much harder to really tell if a QB will translate to the NFL game. But from I’ve seen out of Newton, he definitely has the skils (not too mention prototypical build) to be a very good NFL QB. The Freeman comparison seems about right, but he seems far more mobile than Freeman.

by Tomthehomer on Oct 13, 2010 7:55 PM EDT up reply actions  

The spread offense has been dominant for a long time.

And its in the NFL, Arizona, New England and Saints are all teams that run the spread.

And the Wildcat is the spread option without risking your QB to injury.

by RjTheMetalhead on Oct 13, 2010 8:32 PM EDT up reply actions  

even at the NFL level....

they have to balance out their playbooks somewhat….I mean, you’ve seen the florida games this year right? their OL don’t know how to block out of anything except the shotgun anymore because for four years they didn’t have any other formation to run on offense…..

by Tomthehomer on Oct 13, 2010 9:54 PM EDT up reply actions  

Meyer has been running the spread since 2001.

I’m not surprised by Florida problems in general, this year is a throwaway while Trey Burton(I think that’s his name) becomes heir to the Offense next year.

But those teams in the NFL don’t run it much usually in 3 and long situations, and actually Max Hall’s best plays last week were in 4-5 Receiver sets.

There is a lot of other things besides what offense they ran in college that shows if a QB will translate to the NFL, the mental aspect being a very good indicator (see Ryan Leaf).

Kevin Kolb has adjusted well to the NFL IMO from a spread offense, there was a lot of doubt about him from some.

by RjTheMetalhead on Oct 13, 2010 10:25 PM EDT up reply actions  

We told you it was a rebuilding year 5 months ago

Now maybe you understand my point better about realism vs blind loyalty? Or hoping we’ll be good vs swearing we will be? Maybe? Maybe not.

on behalf of tha dirty south: soul food, carolina blue, southern hospitality, and tha queen city

by southtunnel on Oct 12, 2010 11:50 AM EDT reply actions  

link?

Follow Cat Scratch Reader on Twitter and Facebook

by Jaxon on Oct 14, 2010 2:46 PM EDT up reply actions  

I'm so glad short-term memory has gone out the window these days....

Out of allllllllllll the QB’s over the past 5 years who started or received significant playing time in their first years, how many were ACTUALLY successful? you can count it on one hand realldy (Flacco, Ryan, Roethlisberger), and I refuse to include Sanchez because his team went 9-7 despite his play (or has everyone forgot his 5 int debacle against buffalo last year). I feel just as aggravated as everyone else over the fact that a 5 year old with down syndrome could call a better offensive gameplan than Jeff “I was let go by the BROWNS” Davidson, but the fact is that even with a decent OC in place, we’d still be going through some growing pains (definitely not as many but still apparent). Clausen has all the tools to be a franchise QB for us, and you know what? We got him for practically nothing! Think about it: St. Louis and Detroit are on the hook for almost 40 million GUARANTEED to their no.1 picks, no matter how they perform…..meanwhile we’re paying Clausen a mere pittance, and in exchange could finally have a QB prospect who actually works out for us (Delhomme wasn’t really a prospect, just never had a real opportunity; and despite Collins having a decent 2nd year, he was garbage here). Throw on top of the fact that we have 5 young WR’s to develop (one of whom, the 6th rounder of all people, is developing exponentially well), who are growing up with Clausen….learning from the same mistakes and building good chemistry for the coming years!

Like I said before though….Our playcalling is nothing short of hair pulling aggravating to watch (what happened to the sweep?! D-Will is the king of the sweep runs, but I have yet to see ONE designed outside run all year); on top of which it seems like Davidson has cut down the passing section of the playbook to about 10 plays (out of 3 formations lol), which is certainly not aiding us at all. But keep faith panther nation….once the offense cleans house on the coaching staff, we’ll be in far better shape than the rest of the conference in the post lockout years (Any Canes fans on here will tell you…we looked like SHIT right before the lockout, and what did we do the first year back? Oh nothing much….just a Stanley cup :p)!

by Tomthehomer on Oct 12, 2010 11:52 AM EDT reply actions  

Here's what the NFL rumor section had to say about our next HC today..........

ESPN NFC South blogger Pat Yasinskas has been fielding a lot of questions on the status of Carolina Panthers head coach John Fox. The general feeling is that this is a lame duck season for Fox, and that the two sides will part ways in an amicable divorce at the conclusion of the 2010 season.

As for the next head coach, Yasinskas has some ideas. “First, there’s an old adage that if you fire a skinny coach, you hire a fat one. In other words, you move in a different direction. So, if [team owner Jerry] Richardson buys into that and he might after years of watching a boring offense, he’d bring in someone with an offensive background.”

“Second, current situation aside, there’s no doubt Richardson is a smart man and he learns from his mistakes. Look at his history. He’s hired two head coaches who were ‘hot’ coordinators (Fox and Dom Capers) and he hired one big-name coach who had been out of the league for a bit and paid him huge money (George Seifert). It didn’t end well for Capers and it’s not going to end well for Fox. But each of those guys had some success. Seifert was a total disaster and Richardson knows that. I’m guessing he doesn’t bring in some big-name coach who’s been out of the league for a few years and commands a high salary. I think he’s more likely to look for an energetic rising star and it will probably be someone fairly young because this team needs someone that’s willing to go through a building process that might take some time.”

Based on those remarks, it seems that Bill Cowher won’t be a consideration. Instead, consideration will be given to rising offensive coordinators — Jason Garrett of the Dallas Cowboys and Brian Schottenheimer of the New York Jets come to mind. Of course, all of this speculation will ramp up as the season moves along.

by Charlotte Bobcat on Oct 12, 2010 12:04 PM EDT reply actions  

We better not hire Jason Garrett

That’s all I hear from Cowboys fans is how much they hate Garrett. They hate him as much as we hate Forrest Gump. However, we’ll probably give them Steve Smith and a 2nd pick for Garrett.

by Deuceklinco on Oct 12, 2010 12:15 PM EDT up reply actions  

Based on those remarks, I hope Cowher is not a consideration

An inexperienced HC is risky. But we’ve already risked everything. Despite the risk, the idea of a young offensive mind sounds really good right now.

on behalf of tha dirty south: soul food, carolina blue, southern hospitality, and tha queen city

by southtunnel on Oct 12, 2010 12:49 PM EDT up reply actions  

It does.

I was actually a big supporter of “Cower to Carolina” last year when we were first showing signs of bottoming out. But now that I think about it, IDK how good it would be to bring in an old coach with all this young talent. I think it’d be best for us to go the Sean Payton route and find a young GOOD offensive coordinator (the word good exlcudes Garrett) and let Meeks continue to do his thing with the defense.

by Charlotte Bobcat on Oct 12, 2010 1:01 PM EDT up reply actions  

This is a Great Discussion

I’m just as disappointed this year as many are. I’m starting to turn on Hurney because I think his drafts are starting to suck. Not all the picks but the way in which he drafts. Even though some of the guys are producing, it’s been mentioned that we should have addressed needs that we presently have in earlier drafts. He needs to stay one step ahead, yet he didn’t. Now we have a 0-5 team with loads of potenntial but we have yet to see most of it. I agree with most that everett brown is not a bust but what we paid for him is a bust. I agree with the decision that they made when they made it but the year after they did a complete 180. If they would have known that, then they should have never given up that pick. I agree with the same thing about AE. He might turn out to be the best player in this draft (probably not though) but when you’re trying to rebuild, you don’t give up draft picks. Look at how the Patriots handled Moss, they got a pick for him. We should have done this with Pep and maybe even more players. All I’m saying is that we have lost a 1st, 2nd, 4th, and 5th round picks (another 2nd if you add DJ) for what? I know we have more players on our rosters from the draft than other teams but what do we have to show for it?

by Deuceklinco on Oct 12, 2010 12:14 PM EDT reply actions  

+1

As I was telling some guys on the site a few days ago, Hurney has no excuse for some of the moves he’s made. Sure, we have a nice core with Beason, Davis, Connor, Godfrey, Martin, Marshall, Smith, Williams, Stewart, Otah, Clauen and Gross, but we are still an 0-5 team. Teams like the Patriots and Eagles retool year after year so they don’t have to go through a complete overhaul. Even though I think it was a calculated risk by Hurney letting his roster get to this, I think there is a much better way we could have gone about doing it.

by Charlotte Bobcat on Oct 12, 2010 12:19 PM EDT up reply actions  

Drafting

I’m still not convinced we paid a huge price for Brown….I mean, who were we going to draft with what the 14th pick in the draft this year? If they were this high on clausen, I’m thinking we would’ve taken him anyways (but for far more money)! Also, the 2008 decision was pretty good (in my eyes at least) because not only did we nab Stewart (who, as much as I love D-Will, is our future starter) and Otah who we all know is a BEAST on the right side!

I mean before hurney, how many draft picks did we have that actually stuck with the team? I can think of one….Moose lol

by Tomthehomer on Oct 12, 2010 12:47 PM EDT up reply actions  

That's true. He's been a decent drafter.

Only a few drafts have turned out to be terrible. I’m not really that mad about the drafts really. It just upsets me how we approach free agency and how we handled the Peppers and Delhomme situations, which I think are the two primary reasons we’ve been thrust into this rebuilding mode.

by Charlotte Bobcat on Oct 12, 2010 1:04 PM EDT up reply actions  

Mistakes were made

But the Moss trade was simply not a good one for the Pats. They received a 3rd rounder, which is exactly what we will get as compensation for Peppers. I think the one big mistake is not getting a quality WR in via free agency. Preferably someone with at least 4-5 years in the league who would be a willing mentor for our young WRs. Boldin would have been a very good choice. We would have fared better without Smitty with a quality guy like Boldin on the team.

by patosan on Oct 12, 2010 9:01 PM EDT up reply actions  

Part of the reason for that is our BPA draft strategy.

Sometimes a need gets put on the back burner for a superior talent, like with Dan Connor a few years back.

by Flowing Willow on Oct 13, 2010 9:08 PM EDT up reply actions  

I think I might lobby to become the OC

To JR
Look, I’m a Wofford grad just like you. I know there is potential that we have not tapped into. Once we get Otah back we should more time in the passing game. And hey, I can’t do any worse.

by Deuceklinco on Oct 12, 2010 12:25 PM EDT reply actions  

At this point...

I’d even support a chimp lobbying for OC. =) I mean, even a chimp could flip through more pages of the playbook.

by jamiedk on Oct 12, 2010 12:29 PM EDT up reply actions  

I cans call zee playz coach....

"The truth will set you free. But not until it is finished with you." ~ David Foster Wallace

My Panthers Blog | My Twitter Page

by BW Smith on Oct 12, 2010 12:32 PM EDT up reply actions  

I wish, just as a wasted season kind of thing,

for the last quarter of the last game, we could really let this chimp call plays. I bet you it would look anything better than Davidson’s got, especially if they are reading through the same playbook.

by Charlotte Bobcat on Oct 12, 2010 12:36 PM EDT up reply actions  

that would be awesome

"The truth will set you free. But not until it is finished with you." ~ David Foster Wallace

My Panthers Blog | My Twitter Page

by BW Smith on Oct 12, 2010 12:38 PM EDT up reply actions  

I absolutely...

Love that picture! It certainly spices up the page, and gives a great visual.

by jamiedk on Oct 12, 2010 1:00 PM EDT reply actions  

And I'll add a caption.

This is Jeff Davidson telling himself he has to tone down his play calling after calling an actual passing play on 3rd and 8.

 “Whew, that was almost an interception. I should’ve called a draw play.”

by Charlotte Bobcat on Oct 12, 2010 1:06 PM EDT up reply actions  

LMAO!!!!

"The truth will set you free. But not until it is finished with you." ~ David Foster Wallace

My Panthers Blog | My Twitter Page

by BW Smith on Oct 12, 2010 1:09 PM EDT up reply actions  

Is it just me...

Or is Davidson’s pose eerily (and disgustingly) suggestive?

Cat Scratch Reader's resident optimist.

by James Dator on Oct 12, 2010 1:14 PM EDT up reply actions  

It's not just you...

"The truth will set you free. But not until it is finished with you." ~ David Foster Wallace

My Panthers Blog | My Twitter Page

by BW Smith on Oct 12, 2010 1:27 PM EDT up reply actions  

It's pretty obvious

That he is bending over this years offense and having his way with it.

by Foxism on Oct 12, 2010 2:31 PM EDT up reply actions  

lol

"The truth will set you free. But not until it is finished with you." ~ David Foster Wallace

My Panthers Blog | My Twitter Page

by BW Smith on Oct 12, 2010 2:33 PM EDT up reply actions  

LOL

then maybe we really can charge him with a crime for his actions.

Unofficial Agent for Armanti Edwards, WR #10, Carolina Panthers

by Tater596 on Oct 12, 2010 3:06 PM EDT up reply actions  

looks to me

like he’s passing gas and hoping to stop the run

by PantherPaddy on Oct 12, 2010 3:35 PM EDT up reply actions  

Good article!

Very well written.

"Once again the trousers of evil are yanked down by the mocking hands of justice!"-Revshawn

by Revshawn on Oct 12, 2010 1:00 PM EDT reply actions  

New OC - maybe even HC

You guys are kicking around various prospects at either, or both positions. How about the coach that got “canned” at Texas Tech last year? Talk about an offense minded coach that uses the talent he’s got to its full potential – this guys teams gives you all they’ve got, and are fun to watch. Just a thought.

Jim

by goofygolfer on Oct 12, 2010 3:02 PM EDT reply actions  

Mike Leach is two walnuts short of a fruit cake

Perhaps a Texas Tech fan can enlighten us, but my understanding is he took the whole ‘Red Raider’ thing way too far and started to honestly believe he was some sort of pirate captain.

I agree they had a great college offense, but it was a one read spread system with no running game. It simply wont translate to the NFL.

Cat Scratch Reader's resident optimist.

by James Dator on Oct 12, 2010 3:08 PM EDT up reply actions  

Fruit cake ????

Was he a fruit cake, or maybe a good motivator? He was able to get his teams to play beyond their potential.
No running game you say – again he took the talent he had and designed an offense around them instead of trying to take a “balanced” offense and trying to force his players into that conventional “mold”.
Talk to some TT fans – they loved the guy because he gave them an exciting team – and a WINNING team.
We could sure use some offensive “excitement”. Couldn’t we ?

Jim

by goofygolfer on Oct 12, 2010 3:38 PM EDT up reply actions  

I'd give some thought to bringing him in as a coordinator

but I wouldn’t trust him to be the head coach of my NFL team until I could evaluate his style a little more.

by Charlotte Bobcat on Oct 12, 2010 3:55 PM EDT up reply actions  

Jim - About Leach...

He really was a fruitcake. I promise you. =) But he also was all about offense – and Wes Welker and Michael Crabtree came out from Tech under Leach. I actually might be kind of interested to see him as an OC – I hadn’t thought about that. But he’s definitely too out there to be a head coach in the NFL.

by jamiedk on Oct 12, 2010 5:55 PM EDT up reply actions  

I kind of loved Leach...

But James is right – the dude’s crazy. He’s one of those eccentric geniuses. In 2008, he had a fantastic year (11-1, 11-2 if you include the bowl game). But the year after that, the team just went 8-4 (9-4 if you include the bowl game). Granted, he did lose some of his best offensive weapons.

Anyway, he’s just not disciplined enough to be a head coach in the NFL. My understanding was that there was a growing friction between Leach and the players because he’d often be late to his own meetings, but he was rather strict in making them adhere to his rules.

Besides, he’s going to be wrapped up in court proceedings over the wrongful termination suit stemming from his alleged mistreatment of Adam James (Craig James’s son) for the next several years most likely.

Also – James is on the money again about the uber-pass-happy spread offense.

by jamiedk on Oct 12, 2010 3:20 PM EDT up reply actions  

Question

I was curious how the draft situation works if we don’t have a season next year? I know there will be a draft in April ’11 but will there be one for ’12? And if so, what is the order of the draft at that point? The same as the previous year? Hopefully someone know the answers to these questions and can shed some light for me. Thanks guys!!

by Onyxsphere on Oct 12, 2010 4:25 PM EDT reply actions  

The only way I think it could be fair...

is if they do a combined draft rating that culminates the finishes for every team since the division realignment. Other than that I honestly have no idea how such a situation would be handled. You can’t carbon copy the previous draft though.

by aceofsween on Oct 12, 2010 4:33 PM EDT up reply actions  

There will be a 2012 draft regardless

There is nothing in place right now to determine how it would be handled, but one thing I read was a possibility of two random drawings. One for playoffs teams from 2010 and one from non playoffs teams in 2010 that could determine it.

Cat Scratch Reader's resident optimist.

by James Dator on Oct 12, 2010 4:36 PM EDT up reply actions  

From my understanding

there will be a draft in 2011 and 2012 regardless of the lockout.

I’ve also read online that it’s likely the NFL would use a similar draft system in 2012 as the NHL did after their lockout year which was a weighted draft order.

from wikipedia: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2004%E2%80%9305_NHL_lockout

Resolution
The loss of the 2004–05 season meant that there were no results on which to base the order of the 2005 entry draft. The league settled on a lottery system in which all teams had a weighted chance at the first pick, expected to be Sidney Crosby. The lottery was tilted so teams with fewer playoff appearances over the last three seasons and fewer number one overall picks over the last four seasons had a better chance of landing higher picks. The complete order was determined by the lottery, and the 2005 draft was conducted in a “snake” style, meaning in even rounds, the draft order was reversed. This system was an attempt to compromise between those who felt all teams should have had an equal chance at the first pick and those who felt only the weaker teams should have been in the running.
To ease the transition to the salary cap, teams were allowed one week to buy out players at two-thirds the cost of their remaining contract, which would not count against the salary cap. Bought out players could not re-sign with the same team.

If you really want to do something, you will find a way. If you don't, you will find an excuse.

by LittleKing on Oct 12, 2010 4:37 PM EDT up reply actions  

Lafell

I hadn’t seen the game from Sunday but was watching it tonight. Lafell in a word is bad. Until now it was not as evident as he wasn’t starting but he has a long way to go before he can seriously be a starter. I won’t be surprised when after the bye if either Clowney or Thomas are the starters opposite Gettis. Lafell just doesn’t seem to be aware of what is happening on the field. Not aware of his feet or his hands.

On the other hand, Gettis is making plays, picks the ball from the air, runs back to the QB, and is generally smart. Sure he has learning to do but he is way ahead of Lafell. It’s sad that Lafell an earlier pick just doesn’t get it. I know it’s really really early and Jarrett’s situation is fresh, but I’m getting the feeling that Lafell doesn’t care and isn’t putting his all into his development.

If you really want to do something, you will find a way. If you don't, you will find an excuse.

by LittleKing on Oct 12, 2010 9:38 PM EDT reply actions  

Clausen

Also watching Clausen in this game, I have to say something is up with Clausen’s hands. He can’t hold onto the football to save his lift. I no longer believe that the majority of the preseason snap issues were the fault of the centers but mainly Clausen (sure they played a role, but not completely).

Don’t get me wrong I still think Clausen can be our future, but he better get his ball control issues fixed.

If you really want to do something, you will find a way. If you don't, you will find an excuse.

by LittleKing on Oct 12, 2010 9:46 PM EDT reply actions  

Yeah, wonder what's up with this...

Does anyone know if he had snap problems in ND?

by aceofsween on Oct 13, 2010 3:38 AM EDT up reply actions  

Good news (if you can call it that) is that if Clausen isn’t the future (and the future looks pretty bleak right now, concerning Clausen), we’re only out a 2nd rounder, with fairly minimal guaranteed money…not a first with a humongous contract.

by maelstrom on Oct 12, 2010 11:41 PM EDT reply actions  

Hers something to think about

How about this what if situation. Davis comes back at linebacker and we do some switching from 4-3 to 3-4. Not all the time but could you image Conner and Beason in the middleand Anderson and Davis on the outside. We could blitz from any of the LB positons and really shake things up. Just an idea.

"I drank what?" - Socrates

by Billmania on Oct 13, 2010 2:04 PM EDT reply actions  

That would...

Rock my world. I don’t know how it would actually pound out – I’m not that familiar with Davis since I only recently started following the Panthers. But everyone seems to think he’s pretty awesome. I’m all for returning awesomeness, but I also don’t want to see Connor back on the sidelines. It sounds like something the team should definitely consider and try out. I like having my cake and eating it too.

by jamiedk on Oct 13, 2010 2:54 PM EDT up reply actions  

Our defensive line would get eaten alive if they switched to a 3-4.

by SlayerGhaleon on Oct 14, 2010 6:42 PM EDT up reply actions  

Love davis and our LB depth....

but am not sold on the 3-4….so many teams are switching to it, but really…how many are actually GOOD at it? Green Bay’s taking a step back (Dom Capers…good at surprising people, awful at adjustments though as we all know), Buffalo doesn’t even really have a defense anymore (not so much that you’d notice), the Redskins are already abandoning their blitz heavy scheme cause they were getting burned left and right…you get the point. We lack the personnel to pull a 3-4 (Johnson would be a mediocre NT), but we’ve got the pieces in place to have a very good 4-3.

by Tomthehomer on Oct 13, 2010 8:03 PM EDT reply actions  

Although I like Meeks a lot

I’m not exactly a fan of the tampa 2 either though….I miss Del rio’s old schemes lol he could time a blitz like none other when he was (briefly) with us.

by Tomthehomer on Oct 13, 2010 8:04 PM EDT up reply actions  

Meeks system works... but...

It’s at odds with John Fox’s offensive philosophy. That’s something else I’ve been mulling around in my head for a while and I wanted to bring it up in last night’s CSRadio show, but I didn’t get around to it.

Think about it… John Fox likes to run the football, dominate time of possession, and play field position. How does bend, don’t break fit into that scenario?

by aceofsween on Oct 13, 2010 8:29 PM EDT up reply actions  

very good point....

that is something I’ve never really looked into before, but it makes sense….Meeks coaches for Indy, gets used to providing a counterpart to the fast paced indy system, and now has the exact opposite offensive philosophy to provide a counterpart too…..does kinda help explain why when he switched to a heavy cover 1 scheme last year our team as a whole seemed to play a lot more to style.

that really is something that needs to be expanded upon…I hadn’t heard anyone point it out before but it makes a good deal of sense!

by Tomthehomer on Oct 13, 2010 9:59 PM EDT up reply actions  

It is a similar philosophy

Keep everything in front of you, limit big gains, and rely on your DLs and LBs to make elite plays..

by patosan on Oct 13, 2010 11:35 PM EDT up reply actions  

I disagree.

Fox’s defenses make stops, get off the field, and win a war of attrition with field position.

Meeks system doesn’t really do that because it favors stopping the big plays at the expense of being more susceptible to smaller gains.

by aceofsween on Oct 14, 2010 12:08 AM EDT up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Listen to Cat Scratch Radio Tuesdays 10pm EST

Media Requests email: CatScratchReader89@yahoo.com

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Test_drive_small
Can David Gettis Successfully Return from His ACL Injury?
The-dude_small
Burying CSR's Dead Horses
The-dude_small
CSR OT Open Thread, Vol. 12
Dsc01271_small
Are the Carolina Panthers Sifting for Diamonds?
89_small
The Big Cat Getting Started

Recent FanPosts

Small
2013 is the year to draft a NT, 9 of the top 22 DT's are NT's
Small
2013 Draft's Freak Athletes
Small
53 Man Roster Predictions
Small
Will Panthers or Bobcats have more wins this season?
Small
Panthers 21st In 2012 Power Rankings
Small
Panthers cut MLB Phillip Dillard
82090664_small
Black Helmets *Picture proof*

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Managers

Catscratchreader_m_small Jaxon

091311101554_small James Dator

Editors

N1523447507_30151367_6579_small Cyberjag

Img_0764_small LittleKing

The-dude_small BW Smith

Yoda-smoking-weed_small Rick Bates

Authors

Unnamed_small Revshawn

Img_8872v1_small ERL

Desmond_pics467_small Derek Leazer

Nibbs__small Son of a Newton

000_0006_small bylinebrown

Chris_harris_jon_beason_new_orleans_saints_gsq4g8vnnjjl_small Cam2SmittyAllDay

Img_0050_small BrandonBecker

Social Media

Dsc_0082_small TLong