Cat Scratch Reader: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: MLB Trade Deadline: Where each team stands right now

Disecting Dallas - a Good Example of What's Wrong in Carolina



The Carolina Panthers are 0-3 after suffering defeat to the Dallas Cowboys on Monday Night Football.  It's almost comical how message boards and pundits have reacted.  Those who hate the quarterback blame Jake Delhomme and his two interceptions for the loss.  Those who are disappointed with Ron Meeks blame the defense.  It's easy to point fingers at Julius Peppers, who earned his million dollars with a single tackle.  But what really went wrong?


The first half reflected a game plan to beat the Cowboys.  Carolina ran nine rushing plays and 17 passing, surrendering a sack.  That's not exactly Panther football, but in the end they got a touchdown lead over the Cowboys.  Dallas, incidentally, ran 14 times and passed 20 in the first half in a more balanced attack that was in keeping with their offensive style.

Star-divide

By the end of the game the Panthers had run 14 rushing plays and 38 passing plays.  That means that after the half Carolina attempted just five rushes against 21 passes.  Dallas, on the other hand, finished with 27 designed rushing plays and 40 passing plays.  After the half they ran 13 times and rushed 20.  They stayed consistent with their game plan, while Carolina panicked.

To be fair, 11 of Carolina's passes came after Dallas took a 21-7 lead.  But take those away and from the time the score was 7-0 Panthers through 7-3 and 7-10 and 7-13, Carolina ran five times and passed 10.  That's an unexpected ratio for the Panthers.

Jake Delhomme played well.  Detractors will point to his two interceptions on the stat line, but losing a bomb where your receiver doesn't fight for it and getting picked on a quick slant where the receiver changes his route at the last second doesn't necessarily reflect poorly on the quarterback.  He completed 66% of his passes and made some good decisions out there.  He made bad ones as well, but on balance he played as well as he has in a ton of previous Panther victories against better opponents.

The offensive line did a mediocre job opening holes in the running game, but they did ok in protection.  Given the number of times Carolina passed, Dallas was bound to break through a couple of times and did.  But overall the line did it's job giving Delhomme time to throw.  The Panthers seemed to be ok in run blocking, but they really didn't run enough to find out.

DeAngelo Williams and Jonathan Stewart both played well, both in the running game and in protection.

The wide receivers had a rather poor game, Muhsin Muhammad in particular.  He blocked well, but drew a costly penalty on his touchdown run that was called back.  It can be argued that he allowed the long interception--he was bodied up against the cornerback and could have fought for the ball.  He also let several passes go through his fingers.  Steve Smith had a stupid mistake late on the interception thrown his way, but to be fair he was double-covered the entire game.  That's when you expect the other receiver to step up, and it didn't happen.

Dante Rosario was the only visible tight end in the game, and he was just as noticeable for his poor blocking as his catching.  He also let a few well thrown balls slip through his fingers, notably the first pass attempt of the second half on a short route in the flat.  That led directly to Carolina's first three-and-out situation in the second half.

Dallas had a nice possession that ended in a field goal in their opening series of the second half.  On that drive they mixed up the pass and the run well, and the Panthers did a nice job keeping them out of the end zone.

The next offensive series started with a ten yard sack of Delhomme.  Then Williams ran for a yard before Jake threw an pass to Smitty that got 15 when they needed 19.  The Panthers had another three and out, this time with two passes and one rush.

Then Dallas started the defining drive of the game.  Special Teams gave the Cowboys a short field at their own 42.  Dallas ran five plays, four of them rushing, and they punched it in the end zone on a Tashard Choice run. 

And that was it.  After that score the Panthers simply fell apart on their play calls.  It was 10-7, which is nothing to be ashamed of on the road.  There was plenty of time to come back, and the Panthers had proven able to move the ball.  But from this point forward the game plan changed, and the run was all but abandoned.

On the Panther's next possession, Jake Delhomme threw three times, completing two.  The second completion was a deep route to Muhammad for a touchdown, which got called back because of offensive pass interference.  So the Panthers threw again, completing a 14 yard pass to Kenny Moore when they needed 16.  Once more, Baker had to punt.

Then Dallas put together a nice drive, mixing short passes with runs, that stalled in field goal range.  The Carolina defense held up, and the Panthers were still within a touchdown.

This time the Panthers tried to run once, sending Jonathan Stewart up the middle.  He was dropped for a loss, and after two more passing attempts with one five yard completion the Panthers had to punt again.  Fortunatly for Carolina, the Panther defense held on the next drive, forcing a Cowboy punt.

Then the Panthers gave the ball to DeAngelo Williams, who got a first down on a 12 yard run.  That was his last rushing attempt of the game.  Jake threw an incomplete pass, then crossed wires with Smith on a slant, and the Cowboys intercepted and ran to the end zone.

After that score the Panthers managed 11 more offensive plays in the game, with every one being a pass.

Carolina likes to promote itself as a running team.  They have a quarterback who's proven time and again to be a capable game manager, but not someone around whom an offense can be built.  Carolina runs a lot of play action with two receiver sets, and generally use the tight ends to block.  It's not a wide open, quarterback-friendly system like a West Coast offense, and most plays don't offer a lot of options for the quarterback like the offenses in Dallas and New Orleans do. 

What the offense does offer is the ability to run or pass out of most sets.  It doesn't give the defenses a lot of clues as to what's coming, and it allows for multiple options on any given play.  It's a good offense, especially for a team that wants to run the ball.

That offense is particularly well suited for a team with running backs of Williams' and Stewart's caliber.  Both of them are capable of turning in hundred yard games with regularity, and each has a style that complements the other.  The Panthers' starting receivers are both strong blockers in the running game, which is good because outside of Steve Smith, Carolina really doesn't have any solid receiving options.

So why would an offense that's so obviously geared up to run instead choose to rely on the arm of an aging game manager quarterback?  In 2008 the Panthers ran an average of 32 times a game and passed 26 times.  That resulted in the league's third best rushing attack and a 12-4 record.  This year the Panthers have passed 36 times a game and only rushed 24 times.  Not only have they flipped their winning formula on it's head, they've actually increased the passing ratio!

It's easy to blame the quarterback or the defense for a loss, but when your team's identity makes such a fundamental shift from one season to the next, there has to be another element at work.  Had these two teams played in 2008, it's likely that the Panthers would have tried to run all over Dallas.  They were averaging 153 yards per game on the ground.  But in 2009, the Panthers are barely getting more than 100 rushing yards per game.  This is despite having all of their 2008 starters back on offense. 

For some reason, Carolina has abandoned their run and at the same time, lost their mojo.

Somewhere in the Carolina locker room a game plan is being drawn up for the Washington Redskins.  Perhaps over the bye week the coaching staff will rediscover the skill they had in calling plays in 2008.  If they do, expect to see a lot more of Williams and Stewart, and hopefully a Panther victory.  If they don't, don't be surprised at an 0-4 start.

And if they continue to put more stock in Jake Delhomme's arm than DeAngelo Williams' legs, it's going to be a long and disappointing season in Carolina.

0 recs  |  Comment 42 comments |

Story-email Email Printer Print

More from Cat Scratch Reader

Are you a Panthers homer?

Jul 2010 by Cyberjag - 38 comments

Panthers Paw Prints: Back on Track

Jul 2010 by bmoyer - 28 comments

Comments

Display:

Great article Cyberjag

I can’t help but feel like for the first time in recent memory John Fox is giving too much control to the coordinators. The result is our team not resembling a John Fox team.

It’s almost as if Jeff Davidson thought he was a genius for turning a mediocre QB (Derek Anderson) into a probowler and wants to do it again, and it’s sad to watch Jake being forced to throw it that much.

Cat Scratch Reader's resident optimist.

by James The Aussie on Sep 29, 2009 12:38 PM EDT reply actions  

I think this is exactly Fox ball

The old Fox used to get a lead, then play defense, field position and run the ball to chew up time. But I can’t ever remember Fox not turning to his passing game once he fell behind.

on behalf of tha dirty south: soul food, carolina blue, southern hospitality, and tha queen city

by southtunnel on Sep 29, 2009 12:59 PM EDT up reply actions  

We had the lead at halftime though, then again after the field goal

We didn’t run at all, and continued to throw. We kept throwing with the lead and that is not John Fox football, exactly what you said.

Cat Scratch Reader's resident optimist.

by James The Aussie on Sep 29, 2009 1:01 PM EDT up reply actions  

That's my other point

2/3s of Fox’s formula (defense and field position) failed, and he didn’t know what else to do.

I guess you are right. He stopped running too early. However even if he had kept at it, they had gotten comfortable against our power run… I don’t think Fox would have been creative enough to do anything effectively.

on behalf of tha dirty south: soul food, carolina blue, southern hospitality, and tha queen city

by southtunnel on Sep 29, 2009 1:11 PM EDT up reply actions  

I see what you’re saying, but at least 70% of our passes were off the play action. If we kept running it would have sold the PA more and we could have had some big gains.

Cat Scratch Reader's resident optimist.

by James The Aussie on Sep 29, 2009 1:13 PM EDT up reply actions  

Reinactment of John Fox's half time adjustments

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=56Ue0SOTwpA

on behalf of tha dirty south: soul food, carolina blue, southern hospitality, and tha queen city

by southtunnel on Sep 29, 2009 12:46 PM EDT reply actions  

Why have the Panthers abandoned the run for no reason?

That is the question I’ve been asking myself for a while Cyberjag. Thanks for beating me to an article like this. I would have torn our coaches apart. Haha.

"Once again the trousers of evil are yanked down by the mocking hands of justice!"-Revshawn

by Revshawn on Sep 29, 2009 12:54 PM EDT reply actions  

Very calm, well-reasoned and accurate

Of course, the run/pass ratios always get a little skewed by the game situations, which lend itself to more runs when a team’s nursing a lead, and passing more when behind — hence the last 11 plays called as passes.

But that’s too easy a defense, should the coaches want to make one.

I agree we now tend to abandon the run-it-down-their-throats approach at the first instant of being behind, whereas our OL is constructed to run block, not pass protect. On obvious passing downs, like 3rd and long, DLmen find it all too easy to get around Jeff Otah, whereas in play action situations, he’s more than adequate.

Hard to figure why Davidson would abandon his bread and butter plays. They threw the same number of passes we did, and that despite their OLmen outweighing our DL by about 30 lbs on average. You’d think they’d have Romo pass fewer times, too. But it worked for them, and not for us.

The outcome of the game really turned on that GD pick-6, though. I bet Smitty’s really regretting cutting off his slant route.

by bigdavis on Sep 29, 2009 1:06 PM EDT reply actions  

I want to analyse that play more, you're right bigdavis the game came down to that play.

I want to believe it was a WR option route and the two players didn’t sync up, but typically WR options routes aren’t used on a 3 step drop, they normally come off a 5 step so the QB can recognize the route before making the pass.

Ultimately, I think it’s on Smitty though… sadly.

Cat Scratch Reader's resident optimist.

by James The Aussie on Sep 29, 2009 1:15 PM EDT up reply actions  

I pointed it out early

Even without those last 11 plays, our second half play calling was two to one in favor of the pass. Just not what this team is built to do, IMHO.

by Cyberjag on Sep 29, 2009 2:11 PM EDT up reply actions  

Absolutely

With the play calling in the second half, you would have thought the Panthers were down by two or three touchdowns. Maybe the success of that touchdown drive right before the half made Davidson think the Cowboys defense was susceptible to the pass…Don’t know. Maybe they’ll figure it out by the time Washington comes to town…Oh yeah, I don’t blame Jake for the last interception, Smitty should stuck with his route. But I can’t blame Moose for not batting down a ball that was underthrown…

by DEEZEY on Sep 29, 2009 2:50 PM EDT up reply actions  

Totally agree

Our little 2 min drill before the half definitly changed the game plan. Our running game wasnt really producing huge gains and we were deep in our own territory starting every possession Davidson figured pass pass pass, but we dont have enough quality recievers for that. Double Smitty and Moose and then your are gambling with the others who havent really proven themselves just yet. Hoover missing hurt a lot in the running game.

by kenyatta on Sep 29, 2009 10:35 PM EDT up reply actions  

He admitted that it was.

What went on in his mind, to be “creative” in the middle of a very scripted play, we’ll never know. But if you look at Jake’s reaction — immediately after it’s picked off — it’s WTF, Smitty!!!???

He threw it where Smitty should have been, and it’s gotta get out before Smith makes his break.

I can only guess, but I think Smith had just had enough frustration, and got it into his head to improvise.

by bigdavis on Sep 29, 2009 1:33 PM EDT reply actions  

My assumption is that Smith wanted to make ‘the big play’. If he ran the slant he’d get 6-8 yards and be tackled, by running a post to the sideline which was uncovered he could have busted it for a TD.

I think his ‘creativity’ was little more than a desperate desire by a playmaker to make a play. If it worked he and Jake would look like geniuses, unfortunately, it didn’t.

Cat Scratch Reader's resident optimist.

by James The Aussie on Sep 29, 2009 1:46 PM EDT up reply actions  

Nice post Cyberjag

You show very clearly that the offense has changed its philosophy, whether intended or not.

I blog the Carolina Panthers at www.catscratchreader.com

by Jaxon on Sep 29, 2009 1:41 PM EDT reply actions  

We must vacate these coaching spots. I would constantly argue with my father over Fox. I have always believed in him as a coach, and would always defend him after a loss, but not anymore. I believe that these losses are not necessarily the players faults, more so the coaching staff not preparing this team or preparing a logical gameplan.

After watching the game last night I believe this team has lost faith in Fox and the coaching staff. They all seemed disinterested, lethargic, and downright uncaring about how they were playing last night. Steve Smith showed the worse signs of it, especially on the pick 6, as he barely even got back to Newman to tackle him in the endzone. These guys have given up on this coaching staff. These coaches have broken away from what makes the Panthers the Panthers. They have no creativity on offense at all, calling the same BS plays over and over again, or calling a predictable play pattern.

Another issue here is that the team is becoming accustomed to losing now. This is 8 straight now, counting last year and preseason. Don’t think that means anything? Ask the Detroit Lions, would mind you are doing better than we are this season.

I agree that Davidson needs to go. He is presiding over an offense that has only scored 37 points through 3 games so far, and that is a piss poor job he is doing. He no more deserves a paycheck than Peppers does. And to get back to my original point, I believe Fox needs to be let go. He is becoming an uninspiring coach, who can’t seem to get anything more out of this team, and has not done an adequate job of preparing this team for this season (which I still think goes back to ending training camp early). I believe the time is now to bring in Cower or Shanahan. If any of you think this is a team that still has a chance, you need a big reality check. The sky has fallen for this defeated team, and they need a new approach and attitude starting at the coaching position. Perhaps even Hurney can take his papers to, but that is a discussion for another day.

I feel sorry for the players, because some, like Williams, Beason, Davis, and Stewart have tried their hardest out there and have gotten nothing in return. They deserve better, and we as fans deserve better. I hope Jerry Richardson understands that.

Member of Canes Country and the Cat Scratch Reader

by Ivan459 on Sep 29, 2009 1:49 PM EDT reply actions  

Should say Cowher. Sorry for the other spelling mistakes. Hard to type right when venting frustrations.

Member of Canes Country and the Cat Scratch Reader

by Ivan459 on Sep 29, 2009 1:51 PM EDT up reply actions  

Nice substantive breakdown and analysis.

by paydirt16 on Sep 29, 2009 2:51 PM EDT reply actions  

Grudens name has been thrown around lately

What do you all think of him as the next head coach? I never really liked him much personally. But he did take a good Tony Dungy team that couldn’t get over the hump, and win a Superbowl. Maybe he could do the same here???

I am still all for Cowher. From what I hear he has all the connections in place to put together a really strong staff. His fiery attitude could motivate these guys. And we know he’s willing to draft a early round QB… Similar style as Fox, but with some very welcome changes.

on behalf of tha dirty south: soul food, carolina blue, southern hospitality, and tha queen city

by southtunnel on Sep 29, 2009 3:01 PM EDT reply actions  

About Gruden:

MNF has proved to me just how high his football IQ is, however, he seems to be a little too frenetic as a head coach for me.

If there is a loss he’ll pull the QB, just for the sake of it, he’ll switch out the RB if one is averaging 4 ypc, and more. That whole debacle with Jeff Garcia and Brian Griese last season was enough to put the ‘do not want dog’ on him for me.

We need someone with a 2,5 and 10 year plan. A long term coach who can clearly define the football culture in Carolina. That guy doesn’t just walk in off the street, it will take some serious searching.

The first thing that jumps to mind is Bill Parcells being the head of football operations. He has a history of leaving a team after 2-3 years, so perhaps he would be willing to come to Carolina and audit the organization. Look at John Fox and determine if he has what it takes, have Parcells analyse every position we have to determine our weaknesses. If nothing else he’ll make sure all 53 players want to play. Considering what he turned Miami and Dallas into in a couple of years it would be amazing to see what he could do with the talent we already have.

If we made a move like that it could avoid alot of the headaches of finding coaches and personel while the fans are reassured we have a proven commodity who can help shape the franchise.

Cat Scratch Reader's resident optimist.

by James The Aussie on Sep 29, 2009 3:20 PM EDT up reply actions  

"If there is a loss he’ll pull the QB"

Isn’t that what 1/2 the people here have been screaming about — Fox’s loyalty to Delhomme?

As for Parcells, he has exhibited great ability to evaluate talent, to motivate, and to turn around floundering teams. We could only hope.

by bigdavis on Sep 29, 2009 4:46 PM EDT up reply actions  

Yeah, I know that’s what people have been saying… but the difference is Jon Gruden would have pulled Jake after week one, started Matt Moore. The if Moore lost in Atlanta he’d go back to Jake etc. That doesn’t instill team unity.

With all the coaching hulabaloo flying around I keep thinking Bill Parcells would be a dream come true, and more realistic than Cowher dropping retirement, time with his family and a sweet TV gig to coach the Panthers.

Cat Scratch Reader's resident optimist.

by James The Aussie on Sep 29, 2009 4:49 PM EDT up reply actions  

The whole point of Cowher being mentioned

Is that he could coach and still be close to his family, because the Panthers are just right down the road. He’s only 51. That’s too early for an NFL coach to completely retire. Parcells on the other hand is almost 70. I can’t see him coaching again anywhere.

on behalf of tha dirty south: soul food, carolina blue, southern hospitality, and tha queen city

by southtunnel on Sep 29, 2009 8:20 PM EDT up reply actions  

What floundering teams?

Didn’t he win a Superbowl off of the team Dungy built, and then gradually go down hill from there?

on behalf of tha dirty south: soul food, carolina blue, southern hospitality, and tha queen city

by southtunnel on Sep 29, 2009 8:15 PM EDT up reply actions  

Gruden talk

Gruden really didnt show me that much in TB. They had a sick defense remember on a team that pretty much fell into his lap thanks to Dungy.

by kenyatta on Sep 29, 2009 10:46 PM EDT up reply actions  

If Gruden comes with Kiffen, then maybe

Otherwise, pull out that old do-not-want dog for me… :)

by Cyberjag on Sep 29, 2009 3:13 PM EDT reply actions  

Same thing with Cowher..

Dick Lebeau has to be part of that deal.

by Scrantsj on Sep 30, 2009 3:49 PM EDT up reply actions  

Now, would Peppers take plays off

If he saw this staring at him on the sidelines? http://tiny.cc/p7G2J

on behalf of tha dirty south: soul food, carolina blue, southern hospitality, and tha queen city

by southtunnel on Sep 29, 2009 8:24 PM EDT reply actions  

+1

I highly doubt it.

Member of Canes Country and the Cat Scratch Reader

by Ivan459 on Sep 29, 2009 9:13 PM EDT up reply actions  

coaching change needs to happen but...

Gruden killed the bucs playing musical QB, The Tuna’s team is 0-3 too, Cowher makes good money explaining how we get roflstomped while Foxy does his best to impersonate him, Shanahan’s defense was his downfall (although our offense would shine under him IMHO), Holmgren was only as good as Hassleback(look at seahawks vs pats after QB goes down that’s coaching), and on it goes.

We need someone with fresh ideas, not washed up dreams of other teams’ glory days.

Personnel fixes: trade Peppers to NE for conditional pick (like 2nd rounder if he signs and 1st rounder if he signs and is productive), cut Jarrett, sign or draft a No. 1 quality WR (can’t double team both with our run game), sign or draft a real QB contender and open the spot to competition, and let the CBs play man coverage once in a while.

I love this team and will root for them every game as I have since they started, but a change should be coming if they don’t pull atleast 8-8.

by bleed_in_blue on Sep 30, 2009 1:08 AM EDT reply actions  

You are definitely not going to get any "fresh ideas" with Fox

I still say Cowher. The guy was just too consistent. And he would was known to shed high price tag players like Pep… And he drafted Roethlisberger. He always seemed to easily replace players he let go too.

on behalf of tha dirty south: soul food, carolina blue, southern hospitality, and tha queen city

by southtunnel on Sep 30, 2009 6:48 AM EDT via mobile up reply actions  

And he drafted Roethlisberger.

Yeah, this was after he floundered through a whole host of mediocre QBs for the majority of his tenure.

by SlayerGhaleon on Sep 30, 2009 7:54 PM EDT up reply actions  

"And he drafted Roethlisberger"

Let me just play devil’s advocate for a second (because I agree it was a good pick)

He also passed on Drew Brees in 2001.

Furthermore in his 14 years as head coach Bill Cowher had a 1st round pick become a pro-bowler 6 times, or 42% of the time.

In the 6 years (not including 09, obviously) John Fox has had a 1st round pick become a pro-bowler 4 times. or 67% of the time.

So, tell me who can evalutate talent better?

Just playing devil’s advocate. Interestingly enough though, Fox’s percentage of picking probowlers 1st round is the highest amount active coaches with at least 5 drafts.

Cat Scratch Reader's resident optimist.

by James The Aussie on Sep 30, 2009 8:08 PM EDT up reply actions  

I would be interested in seeing...

The percentages from the later round picks. Good teams find talent in rounds 4-7.

by Scrantsj on Oct 1, 2009 9:04 AM EDT up reply actions  

Alright, I have an answer for you!

This is the number of Pro-Bowlers from rookies draft round 3-7, or undrafted from the superbowl championship teams since Fox’s tenure began (I also included the Eagles).

Carolina Panthers: 0
New England Patriots: 3
Pittsburgh Steelers: 3
Indianapolis Colts: 3
New York Giants: 3
Philadelphia Eagles: 2

This does paint a very interesting picture in evaluating late round talent. Now, the real question would be researching all these picks since 2002 and find out which team drafted the highest number of current NFL starters, or players still in the league. Perhaps I will work on this long term, but right now it’s a massive undertaking.

Cat Scratch Reader's resident optimist.

by James The Aussie on Oct 1, 2009 9:39 AM EDT up reply actions  

Wow...

My question was more of me wondering than looking for an actual answer. One of the things I always hear during draft time is the first round draft pick will help get a win, but the later rounds create dynasties.

I won’t pin those stats on any head coach, these say more about the GM. He is the one who organizes the scouting departments to evaluate talent.

by Scrantsj on Oct 1, 2009 10:37 AM EDT up reply actions  

We need someone with fresh ideas, not washed up dreams of other teams’ glory days.

I doubt Richardson goes for any of those guys for that exact reason. He got burned once already with George Seifert. He won’t wanna try that again. Best bet is probably a rising coordinator.

by SlayerGhaleon on Sep 30, 2009 7:57 PM EDT up reply actions  

FOX AN JAKE MUST GO !!!

It amazes me how Panthers fans have not really called of the release of FOX OR DELHOMME !!! They have both been below average at the best for the past three years !! I hate everytime when Jake makes a mistake he trys to explain to the coach why he did what he did !!! Jake has a reason for every mistake he makes !!! Next time he throws a interception watch him on the sideline !!! He needs to accept responsibility for all of his mistakes and move on and learn from them !!!

Garcia is better than Jake why not pick him up ?? If Jake were playing in any city with hardcore fans he would have been gone along time ago !! The panther fans are to laid back !!! Look at this blog as bad as Jake has played game after game after game he still is the starting QB ? This would not stand in alot of places !! But since Panthers Fans sit by and make very little noise he will be around until his bad arm falls of !!!

The only way to get rid of Jake is for "THE PANTHER NATION " to get in a uproar about it make your voices be heard !!! (blog ,radio, media, etc )

Garcia is on the market pick him up !!!

by LETJASONPASS on Sep 30, 2009 2:24 PM EDT reply actions  

Jake has a reason for every mistake he makes !!! He needs to accept responsibility for all of his mistakes and move on and learn from them

There is no quarterback in the NFL who not only takes full responsibility for all of his mistakes, but tries to take responsibility for the mistakes of others (see Steve Smith on Monday night) more than Jake Delhomme.

Jake’s guilty of alot of things, but passing the buck sure isn’t one of them.

Cat Scratch Reader's resident optimist.

by James The Aussie on Sep 30, 2009 3:00 PM EDT up reply actions  

Garcia is a WCO quarterback

We don’t run it here. The last time he was in a non-WCO system he stunk worse than Jeff Lewis on a bad day.

by Cyberjag on Sep 30, 2009 3:49 PM EDT up reply actions  

Fox won't be let go in the middle of the season.

Richardson doesn’t make decisions that rashly. At the end of the season, possibly, BUT not now.

Garcia is not a better option. As Cyberjag mentioned, he is a West Coast offense guy. Besides, there is no cap room for him, unless he signs for Veteran’s minimum and we release Feeley. I doubt he’ll play for the minimum.

by Scrantsj on Sep 30, 2009 4:10 PM EDT up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the SB Nation blog focused on the NFL's Carolina Panthers.

Site Code of Conduct

Start posting about the Panthers »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

Connect_with_facebook

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Cheerleader-38_small
Suggested Panther Playbook for Utilizing Armanti Edwards

Recent FanPosts

14650_1190840130500_1213260240_30614180_3739670_n_small
No nickname for Clausen...
Docnolz-panthers55-100x100_small
Question about Observer coverage of Panthers
Jon_beason_by_2wo6ix_small
Which Panthers would you protect?
Catscratchreader_m_small
SBN is Looking for an Intern
Small
Training Camp
Panther_small
#3 Doubters Listen up
Currentflag_small
I'm sorry Mr. King... you said we're what?
Small
Cardiac Cats...dead?
Dbc92c5112a9b23c_small
Mike Goodson or Tyrell Sutton?

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Latest NFL Headlines from SB Nation

SBNation.com Recent Stories

Washington Redskins defensive tackle Albert Haynesworth signs autographs during the NFL football team's training camp and fan appreciation day, Saturday, Aug. 8, 2009, at Redskins Park in Ashburn, Va. (AP Photo/Nick Wass) +3 updates

NFL Training Camps News: Albert Haynesworth Fails Conditioning Test

Photo +8 updates

Free Agent OT Flozell Adams Has Four Standing Offers, Seeking $4 Million

Photo

2010 NFL Preview, Buffalo Bills: Chan Gailey Takes The Reins

More from SBNation.com >


Managers

Catscratchreader_m_small Jaxon

Editors

N1523447507_30151367_6579_small Cyberjag

Img_0764_small LittleKing

Currentflag_small James The Aussie

Authors

Dbc92c5112a9b23c_small Revshawn

Panthers_logo_lead_203x152_small bwsmith25

Bmoyer_small bmoyer