Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Indy 500: 'Greatest Spectacle In Racing' Set For Sunday

Breaking Down Jake's Five-Spot

After the Panthers' season-opening loss to the Eagles Sunday, coach John Fox said the team wins together and loses together. He refused to place all the blame on quarterback Jake Delhomme, who turned the ball over five times in less than three full quarters.

Fox was right to spread the blame. Teammates and coaches were at least partly at fault for four of Delhomme's turnovers, and the Eagles simply made a great play on the fifth. Here is a look at what caused each of Delhomme's turnovers Sunday:

No. 1 -- Interception

Scenario: The Panthers had a second-and-5 at their own 29, leading 7-0 with about 3 minutes left in the first quarter.

What happened: Delhommed faked a handoff and threw to his left for receiver Steve Smith, who was open. But an Eagles lineman tipped the ball, which then caromed behind Smith, who also tipped it. Eagles cornerback Sheldon Brown corralled the ball just inches from the ground for the pick.

How it happened: Two Eagles defenders made great plays.

Conclusion: This was just a fluky turnover that Delhomme and the Panthers had little control over.

Star-divide

No. 2 -- Fumble

Scenario: Panthers third-and-10 at their own 25, leading 7-3 on the first play of the second quarter.

What happened: The Panthers lined up in the shotgun with 4 receivers and a back. At the snap, the back flared left but was well-covered. Delhomme looked left but, upon seeing his back covered, pulled the ball back. Two Eagles hammered Delhomme, knocking the ball free.

How it happened: The Eagles blitzed and two defenders fired up the middle unblocked. Delhomme did not protect the ball, possibly because he did not see the blitzing defenders until just before he was hit.

Conclusion: A bad play call and poor ball security. Offensive coordinator Jeff Davidson should not have sent 5 players out in passing routes. The Eagles often blitz, especially on third down. Delhomme needed at least a back or tight end to help in pass protection. But Delhomme should know that if he has 5 players running routes, he must get rid of the ball quickly, especially on a third down against a blitzing team. He also needed to hold on to the ball when he was hit. That sounds obvious, but let's reinforce it because Delhomme does not seem to get that point.

No. 3 -- Interception

Scenario: Panthers third-and-7 at their own 33, trailing 17-7 with 10 minutes to play in the second quarter.

What happened: The Panthers lined up in a bunch formation. Delhomme faked a handoff and threw to his left towards Smith. Brown picked it off.

How it happened: Smith was well-covered and Delhomme's throw was late.

Conclusion: Delhomme's third turnover in less than 9 minutes looked to be his fault alone.

No. 4 -- Interception

Scenario: Panthers third-and-18 at their own 27, trailing 31-10 with 8-plus minutes left in the third.

What happened: The Panthers lined up in the shotgun with 3 receivers and 2 backs. Williams, lined up to Delhomme's left, moved left and waited for a screen pass. Eagles linebacker Akeem Jordan covered Williams. Delhomme held the ball to allow the screen to develop, but was hit as he threw. Jordan picked it off.

How it happened: Eagles defensive end Trent Cole lined up on the edge, then stunted towards the middle at the snap. He flew into the backfield, with Panthers left guard Travell Wharton whiffing on a block. Wharton actually hit Eagles defensive end Chris Clemons before realizing -- too late -- that a stunt was on. Left tackle Jordan Gross blocked Clemons, yet Clemons beat Gross, arrived at Delhomme in tandem with Cole, and appeared to be the one who actually hit Delhomme's arm.

Conclusion: Great defense, bad protection and a bad decision by Delhomme. Pressure aside, Delhomme can't throw the ball to a back who was as well-covered as Williams.

No. 5 -- Interception

Scenario: Panthers first-and-10 at their own 24, trailing 38-10 with 7 minutes to play in the third.

What happened: The Panthers lined up in I-formation with a tight end. Delhomme threw deep down the right sidelines for Smith, who drew single-coverage from Eagles corner Asante Samuel. Samuel jumped and picked it off.

How it happened: Smith had a step on Samuel, but had to virtually stop because Delhomme underthrew the ball. At this point it was a jump ball. Samuel won the jump over Smith, who did not make a play on the ball.

Conclusion: A bad throw by Delhomme, but Smith could have done more to prevent the pick.

Comment 55 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

As i said Previously

he always either overthrows or underthrows.. first was his fault as well if hes accurate he hit smitty in stride which results in first down but then again if he was accurate he could have atleast prevented 2 ints and could have scored twice and possibly few more first downs but honestly have given up on him b/c hes never been accurate and never will be

by jay23 on Sep 14, 2009 1:55 PM EDT reply actions  

Tip

I’m not defending him by any means but that ball was tipped by the LB thus cause it to go behind Smitty!. Watch the play again you will see.

by dagrimey1 on Sep 15, 2009 11:32 AM EDT up reply actions  

Great post. Thank you

While I don’t agree 100% on the fumble I think this is a fair and balanced analysis of Jake’s turnovers.

I haven’t done it myself, but I’d also like to see a breakdown of Moore’s INT. To get a better idea of whether it’s blocking, the recievers, Moore himself or the QB coach that needs to work on some bad technique.

by James Dator on Sep 14, 2009 1:56 PM EDT reply actions  

what are ur thoughts of possibly picking up john david booty or brain brohm of the practice squad and developing them since we don’t have first round pick next year

by jay23 on Sep 14, 2009 2:00 PM EDT up reply actions  

I think we can get a QB of the future in the 2010 draft without a 1st rounder. The class is so deep and there are only a handful of teams who will be looking QB at the top of the class. I think the only real locks for the 1st round are Sam Bradford and Jevan Snead… from there I would love to see Colt McCoy as a Panther (provided he’s good at the combine).

As for this season, if I had to choose between those two I’d go for Brohm… but if we’re truly looking for a stop gap solution and Jake is indeed ‘done’ then I think we trade for Derek Anderson during the bye week, reunite him with Jeff Davidson (who has a similar playbook) and try to revitalize the offense and hope for a playoff spot.

by James Dator on Sep 14, 2009 2:06 PM EDT up reply actions  

Derek Anderson def might be a nice pick up and upgrade to Jake..I just want us to win b/c if we don’t do something in next few years our window will close and that would be a shame b/c we have some explosive players right now

by jay23 on Sep 14, 2009 2:21 PM EDT up reply actions  

I concur.

I don’t think the window is closing that quickly though.

DeAngelo and Stewart are both very young, most of our O-Line are very young… really the only age we have is at WR with Smitty and Moose.

I agree though, QB definitely needs to be addressed next offseason… I have never though Jake should be our future answer, I’m just not as ready to cut him, not quite yet.

by James Dator on Sep 14, 2009 2:24 PM EDT up reply actions  

there is a difference ...

..in wanting to cut a player and wanting to bench him.

by dudemanhey on Sep 14, 2009 2:30 PM EDT up reply actions  

I understand that

Fair point. I still feel better with Jake starting at Atlanta than Matt Moore though.

by James Dator on Sep 14, 2009 2:32 PM EDT up reply actions  

I disagree

b/c Jake is not accurate at all..when was the last time he hit someone in stride..as far managing the game I feel like Matt Moore can do the same thing..but anyways no need to discuss this b/c fox just announced that Jake is still the starter

by jay23 on Sep 14, 2009 2:37 PM EDT up reply actions  

Jake needs to start that game.

BUT, I’d keep him on a short leash. Fox, needs to pull Jake earlier if he keeps making the mistakes.

Oh, to all the people who say cut him…it won’t do any good. Since he is a veteran, his salary is guaranteed for the season, so there is no cap relief. So we have him for the rest of the year.

by Scrantsj on Sep 14, 2009 3:23 PM EDT up reply actions  

As much as I'm for benching Jake soon

I’d agree with starting him over Moore against Atlanta.

True Blue Jazz
I'm on Twitter
RIP Nick Adenhart. 4/9/09

by UtesFan89 on Sep 14, 2009 5:54 PM EDT up reply actions  

The 1st INT Jake threw behind Smitty

Smitty had to turn around and reach for it in the opposite direction that he was running. Terrible throw.

I really think Jake is just mentally gone as a QB. He was jittery and making poor throws even when the pass protection was fine. At minimum he needs to sit awhile and watch someone else as a backup

on behalf of tha dirty south: soul food, carolina blue, southern hospitality, and tha queen city

by southtunnel on Sep 14, 2009 2:15 PM EDT via mobile reply actions  

I couldn't agree more

Sitting on the bench for a few might help him get his head straight.

by dudemanhey on Sep 14, 2009 2:20 PM EDT up reply actions  

why cant we just play Matt Moore for one full game and see how he does..def will do better than what Jake has been doing past few games

by jay23 on Sep 14, 2009 2:23 PM EDT up reply actions  

i disagree

it didn’t work for david carr. jake needs to be permanently benched. we could trade him to somebody for something. if we do that, though, let’s be honest, that would mean we’ve given up on the season. i’d rather see jake in their trying, than see us give up with the amount of talent we have on the team. only a seasoned veteran can take over at this point and win games. garcia is a classic west coast offense guy. he doesn’t throw the deep ball. i would love to have him, but i think in our system, he might look like the garcia from his days in cleveland.

by usana_gaines on Sep 14, 2009 2:40 PM EDT up reply actions  

Garcia doesn't fit our system

But he is smart, illusive and can protect the ball. If we keep having pass protection problems then nobody is going to have time to throw down field anyways.

With our talent utilizing Smitty in space and checking down to our TEs and RBs can take us deep into the playoffs.

on behalf of tha dirty south: soul food, carolina blue, southern hospitality, and tha queen city

by southtunnel on Sep 14, 2009 3:58 PM EDT via mobile up reply actions  

I saw them all twice

Once in person and then on Tivo when I got home last night. I never want to watch or talk about that game again ever.

by docnolz on Sep 14, 2009 2:24 PM EDT reply actions  

by your account...

I still see 3 turnovers that are Jake Delhomme’s fault. Not trying to excuse our O-Line who were clearly outplayed and outcoached, but Jake was just flat out inaccurate and having another “Jake Day”

by Tater596 on Sep 14, 2009 2:40 PM EDT reply actions  

Well...

The big picture shows that it was not ONLY Jake’s fault. Before anyone hastily posts anything in response to that initial line – allow me to explain.

The line: Our vaunted O-line did horrible in pass protection. I watched every excruciating moment of that game and I kept seeing missed blocking assignments. How many times did the Eagles do the SAME stunt on their D-line to run untouched by one of our O-line guys? Lots. After the first series, the line didn’t really do all that well in run-blocking either. Anyways, I don’t care how good your QB is – if he doesn’t have time to throw and read his check downs, it’s going to end poorly.

Coaching: This game looked very similar to the playoff loss – we march down the field on the first possession, showing our prowess with the rushing attack and then it disappears the rest of the game. I still don’t know why we strayed from the power rushing plan. Jake is NOT a gunslinger QB – he’s a game manager in a rushing oriented offense, at best. So, it begs the question of why precisely did we lean on an aerial assault so early. Then we have the Eagles running the same 4-5 stunts to penetrate the line and get to the QB – yet there was no adjustment. That made McDermott’s job extremely easy; why change what was working so well for them. Where was the OC’s adjustment to do a little “dink & dunk” pass to TE’s over the middle? (i.e. anyone recall how the Raven’s did precisely that during preseason to neutralize our blitzing?)

The receivers: Despite Jake not having time in the pocket to blink – we also have to look at the receivers not shedding coverage. Steve Smith is a formidable receiver and absolutely demands double coverage – which means, someone is singled by a corner – and that person, whomever it happens to be, isn’t getting open fast enough. We all complain that Jake has tunnel vision concerning Smitty. I agree – he does, but, perhaps it’s due to no other receivers being able to shed blocks. It’s difficult to argue this point because from most camera angles – we aren’t allowed the vantage point away from the ball. I noticed it immediately in a lot of the games I went to last year. Hopefully, with the addition of Kenneth Moore – we can change that.

Conclusion: Best summed up as “we win as a team and lose as a team.” It’s a team sport – players and coaches, and this loss is due to all of them including Jake. We can point to the inaccurate throws, terrible WR reads and non-mobility of Jake as being part of the loss (and other L’s we’re most likely going to see this year) but all in all – it wasn’t ALL his fault.

by boywonderncsu on Sep 14, 2009 3:37 PM EDT reply actions  

Breaking Down

No 1
TE was wide open. I don’t blame Jake for throwing to Steve, but bad throw.

No. 2
I can’t concieve why the slot reciever wasn’t the hot reciever. On a good college team the slot can look in and read if LBs are coming and change the route to a quick slant. The middle was wide open past the line because everyone was going after Jake. The quarterback had enough time to throw a quick slant. Part of the blame is on the OC, you can’t play a good defense in a third and long and not have a hot reciever and the slot reciever is right there. Jake also had time to eat it and not fumble, they werent coming from the side but right in his face.
The rest are mainly on Jake.

by panthersincethebeginning on Sep 14, 2009 3:39 PM EDT reply actions  

No time to throw - no time to eat it

Kalil missed his block, pure and simple. Jake was in the shotgun, no back to block. All the other linemen picked up their guys; Kalil doubled the DT for no reason. 2 seconds from the snap is no time to react.

by bigdavis on Sep 14, 2009 7:20 PM EDT up reply actions  

trade talks

So yeah I would love to see a conditional (3rd rounder at most ) Jake for Anderson trade. Anderson has looked weak for the past few seasons, but was a pro-bowler when Jeff Davidson was his OC. And Mangini has a hard on for old washed up Vets so it would be a total win win.

by bleed_in_blue on Sep 14, 2009 3:52 PM EDT reply actions  

The thing is they should have done something in the offseason. I’m not saying Anderson, because the Browns weren’t sure of the QB situation. But the Panthers needed to look closer at Delhomme, and get someone to push him more. This team is to committed to him, and that extension helps prove that point.

We don’t have a QB right now that will help us win games. Delhomme is losing it, McCown is injured, and Moore looks rough. Perhaps they should have gone after Vick. Or Cutler, even though he looked bad against Green Bay. Favre? Perhaps, but he could be a train wreck by Week 12. I don’t know, but they should have done something to address this in the offseason or training camp.

Member of Canes Country and the Cat Scratch Reader

by Ivan459 on Sep 14, 2009 4:13 PM EDT up reply actions  

This was overall a piss poor effort from Jake all the way to the coaching staff not preparing the team nor themselves for this game. I have always liked John Fox, but this is in excusable to loose this badly and in the manner we did. I do not think the coaching staff did anything to gameplan for the Eagles.

I saw the play calling on the play where Delhomme fumbled the ball. The fact is this: any SANE person with a hint of football knowledge will know that the Eagles and most teams in the NFL (except us) are going to blitz on third down to get the QB. Now what I want to know is, why did Davidson (or Delhomme or Fox or whoever) call a play where Delhomme is forced to drop back 4 or 5 yards to pass. As outlined above, there was no pass protection AT ALL. Even though it was a long third down, why not just call a simple slant pass or audible one when you can see them crowd the line????

Even if Smitty gets on 7 or 8 of the 11 or 12 yards required, beats the hell out of the result that followed the play. The playcalling yesterday was atrocious. Not only that, but once again Delhomme and the team “picked a bad day to play a bad game”. Sounds familiar huh? It was a damn carbon copy of the Arizona game. They score to get us all fired up, them take a crap on the field and walked out. Delhomme was most of the problem, but this coaching staff did a piss poor job of preparing these guys for this game and for this season. Calling off training camp one week early was probably a big mistake. Injuries or not, this made be a side effect of that missed time.

I will continue to support this team, but as of now I expect nothing but a 6-10 record if we are lucky. We made the Eagles look like Super Bowl contenders, when we literally handed them the game on a turf platter. The games only get tougher from here on out. The time for preparation is over. This team showed us what they are capable of on Sunday. This is the hand we are dealt, and I doubt Fox and Company are going to trade Delhomme, because the “sky isn’t falling”.

Guess what: IT ALREADY HAS. Fan support is little now, the team is demoralized, and they have to play on the road now for two weeks against ATL and DAL?? Sorry guys, but nothing good will come of this season. No trade will fix the fact that Fox and this staff haven’t prepared this team for this season.

Member of Canes Country and the Cat Scratch Reader

by Ivan459 on Sep 14, 2009 3:57 PM EDT reply actions  

I agree with some about the 1st INT.

Jake Delhomme threw behind his intended receiver, Steve Smith. He tried to make a play on the ball, but it didn’t work and tipped the ball into the air for the INT.

What really made me worry about this team was the emotional breakdown of our offense that happened when the score was at 17-7. Everyone just seemed to give up and make mistakes. Missed blocks, not competing for the pass, poor throws, the mistakes were all around us. It’s tough to point the finger at the defense when the offense turns the ball over so many times.

Lack of leadership. Plain and simple.

"Once again the trowsers of evil are yanked down by the mocking hands of justice!"-Revshawn

by Revshawn on Sep 14, 2009 4:16 PM EDT reply actions  

The first one was really bad luck. I’ll give Jake that. Any other time, that ball would have: A) hit the ground and been dead, or B)Sheldon Brown would have dropped it. It was a bad play for us on a very bad day.

Member of Canes Country and the Cat Scratch Reader

by Ivan459 on Sep 14, 2009 4:21 PM EDT up reply actions  

Bad luck made him throw it 3 feet behind his target?

on behalf of tha dirty south: soul food, carolina blue, southern hospitality, and tha queen city

by southtunnel on Sep 14, 2009 6:48 PM EDT up reply actions  

I outlined the reason why it was bad luck. How many times does a low tipped pass get intercepted like that? Was a bad throw, but also a lucky INT.

Member of Canes Country and the Cat Scratch Reader

by Ivan459 on Sep 14, 2009 7:12 PM EDT up reply actions  

Very bad luck that it was an INT

ball was less than an inch from touching the ground — DB made a great play to avoid that.

But no excuse that the ball was thrown behind the WR – as I’ve said, Jake more often than not fails to lead his receivers properly — when they’re hit in stride, they can do wonderful things; when they have to reach behind themselves to try to make the catch, bad breaks happen.

by bigdavis on Sep 14, 2009 7:16 PM EDT up reply actions  

Ball behind Smith......

… was because the Strong Safety got a hand on it, just enough to tip the trajectory. I am in no way a strong supporter of Delhomme, but his pass got tipped over the center. Not blaming Jake on this one as far as accuracy. Maybe timing, and height of the throw , or deciding to pass it over a defender… but hey, that’s football. Stuff happens.

I’ll give him the 1st INT. They just seemed to come undone, mentally.

by 12th_Man_Fan on Sep 16, 2009 9:41 AM EDT up reply actions  

This move

shows me there is more confidence in Matt at this time since Josh could have healed up within a month.

by Davejinxer on Sep 14, 2009 4:28 PM EDT reply actions  

Josh is done as a Panther, I'd imagine.

Good or bad, I don’t know… though I know which way I’m leaning.

True Blue Jazz
I'm on Twitter
RIP Nick Adenhart. 4/9/09

by UtesFan89 on Sep 14, 2009 5:55 PM EDT up reply actions  

That last interception

as I saw it (which, I’ll admit, was a slowed down, replay version), Smitty did all he could. Like you mention, he had to stop and wait, and the ball pretty much went straight to the CB. Sure, maybe Smith could’ve hit him hard and tried to jar it loose, but it seemed like Smith was in an awkward position to try that.

True Blue Jazz
I'm on Twitter
RIP Nick Adenhart. 4/9/09

by UtesFan89 on Sep 14, 2009 5:57 PM EDT reply actions  

Over throwing the reciever on a deep ball is understandable

Under throwing it will almost always wind up intercepted. Jake did this a lot last year too, and I got ripped in the off season for mentioning it. Even the throw to Smitty against the Saints last year, that led to a game winning field goal, was badly under thrown… We can’t assume Steve is going to go up and grab every ball thrown withing 10 feet of him. Jake just can’t get it out there anymore like he use to… I wish he’d admit it.

on behalf of tha dirty south: soul food, carolina blue, southern hospitality, and tha queen city

by southtunnel on Sep 14, 2009 6:55 PM EDT up reply actions  

QB situation

 Hey, Falcon Fan here. I can totally understand everyone’s displeasure with Jake Delhomme. I really thought he’d do better to redeem himself sunday, I’m not sure what his issue is with the frequent INTs. I feel bad for the guy, because he seems like a nice guy. But I did see some highlights and the two backups didn’t do much better or did worse. So as much as it is Delhomme’s fault you may need to really blame the offensive line. Despite the rushing touchdown by williams did the panthers get much in the running game. Did Delhomme get decent protection? Despite being put in bad situations did the Panthers defense make any plays to even the score? It’s a team sport and I do agree with others about the coaching was also bad too (although it’s noble of Fox to stick up for Delhomme). But it’s really the team’s and coaches fault as well. Because Delhomme’s thrown the INT in which he was compelled to do, he will get most of the blame.
But my real reason for this post, how about young Tyler Thigpen if things don’t work out for Delhomme anymore. Would he be a good fit with a spread offense in Carolina?

by brotherbrown on Sep 14, 2009 6:43 PM EDT reply actions  

You can't rely on your defense to score

They only allowed 1 TD drive, outside of the ones on short field due to turnovers.

on behalf of tha dirty south: soul food, carolina blue, southern hospitality, and tha queen city

by southtunnel on Sep 14, 2009 6:50 PM EDT up reply actions  

well yeah, but...

the defense doesn’t have to score like the ravens or bears or Monte Kiffen’s Bucs, but make stops, force turnovers, punts, or at the very least a field goal try.

by brotherbrown on Sep 14, 2009 10:56 PM EDT up reply actions  

But our back-ups

are horrible.

As for Thigpen, I’m not quite sure. He seems to be on the outs in KC though, he’d be worth a look if we could get him cheap.

True Blue Jazz
I'm on Twitter
RIP Nick Adenhart. 4/9/09

by UtesFan89 on Sep 14, 2009 6:55 PM EDT up reply actions  

I could argue all 5 were mostly Jakes' fault

1st (INT): He threw the ball 2 ft behind Smitty.
2nd (fumble for TD): The rush came straight up the middle at Jake. He looked to his left and pulled the ball up but hesitated and was late bringing it down which is why it flew 15 yards down the field. He should threw the ball on first thought even if it was out of bounds over the RB head. You have to give an assist though to the offensive line for allowing the rushers to come free.
3rd INT: He under threw Smitty’s out route. If that pass is anything it has to be overthrown, Delhomme knows that. This was the mirror image of the INT DRC had for the Cardinals last January.
4th (INT): Again with a pash rush in his grill Delhomme rather than throwing the ball away tries to complete a screen pass that instead gets jumped by the LB Jordan. I give an assist to Davidson here as well for calling such a predicable play.
5th (INT): Either Jake threw the ball late or he under threw it, take your pick. You have to give an assist to OC Jeff Davidson for calling that play, even if it was single coverage. Delhomme was obviously having a bad day and thinking he could make that play against a PB CB was just stubbornness. I should also mention Smitty did him no favors by not challenging Samuel or even committing a penalty to prevent the catch.

That’s how I can read it if I want to apply Pro QB expectations

I blog the Carolina Panthers at www.catscratchreader.com

by Jaxon on Sep 14, 2009 10:39 PM EDT reply actions  

:)

Yeah, hasn’t Jake ever heard of – throwing the ball away? Obviously he’s fluent with “give the game away” but – seriously though. Good QBs know that sometimes, you just have to chunk the ball towards the fans. There is no shame in that.

But you’re right Jaxon, the offensive line gets some assists in that poor play by Jake.

by boywonderncsu on Sep 15, 2009 11:04 AM EDT up reply actions  

Why no changes in scheme?

I still ask why they didn’t move the pocket? Why no sprint out/rollout? The QBs were sitting ducks every down. How many gut blitzes before the coaching staff makes an adjustment to protect up the middle?

Jake was bad, no denying that. But how about adjusting your scheme to take advantage of not only your opponent’s vulnerability but YOUr weaknesses?

by adamwanderer on Sep 15, 2009 9:26 AM EDT reply actions  

Exactly

you have to wonder how braindead the coaches are.
Did they not see this happening?

True Blue Jazz
I'm on Twitter
RIP Nick Adenhart. 4/9/09

by UtesFan89 on Sep 15, 2009 8:43 PM EDT up reply actions  

Here's how I see his 5...

I enjoy a little footage analysis so I rewound and slo-mo’d the 5 plays, and here’s what I’m seeing:

1st – INT – Not Jake’s fault
Reason: SS over the middle got a glancing glove on the ball and tipped it’s flight. The ball starts to wobble and winds up behind Smitty. Smitty tips it as well and it lands in a defenders hands, literally. Stuff happens… it’s football… shake it off….

2nd – Sack & Fumble
Sack: Right side of O-Line – why they pulled right and opened the gap, rather than pull left to seal the gap, is beyond me.Allowing the D to get through so easily doesn’t help.
Fumble: This is all Jake. – He had the ball tucked down and could’ve just taken the sack or rolled out with it secured, but he tried to make a play instead. As he brings his arm up, the ball gets knocked out. Should’ve kept it tucked under “in your face” pressure.

3rd – INT – Jake’s Fault
He had PLENTY of protection. He chose to throw into Zone coverage with 5 defenders in the area, took too long doing it, and the pass was a slow, wobbling lob ball that was WAY underthrown. All Jake.

4th – INT – Left Side of O-Line allowed this to happen
LG: Just flat out let his man through. In fact, he actually tucks his right shoulder down to accomodate getting around the defender. A little “bump” off his route and the defender doesn’t get there so easily.
LT: Got manhandled. He allowed the defender to turn him around and blow by him. This is the same defender who tipped the pass, causing it to go off course.

At this point, the CB on D’Will jumps the route and intercepts. Of course, it didn’t help that the LG took way too long crossing over to block the CB and basically ended up chasing him.

  1. - INT – Jake’s Fault
    This is all Jake. He had PLENTY of protection. He threw another underthrown lob ball that took way too long getting there. I don’t blame smitty on this. I do question the play call: Throw a deep ball to a Pro-Bowl cornerback knowing the kind of day your QB is having.

Matt Moore’s INT was inexperience, plain and simple. He broadcast who he was throwing to and the SS read it and jumped the route. This can be coached. Otherwise, his passes were far more accurate, tighter, and faster than Delhomme’s.

I agree with starting Delhomme against ATL & DAL and pull him after his 2nd turnover, if & when that happens. Put in Moore at that time and see how he fares. It can’t be worse than what we’re already getting with Delhomme. Expect more of the same this weekend with Atlanta’s defense. They’re already aggressive and after having viewed the Eagles footage, I’ve no doubt they’re going to want to have a field day. I hope Fox is gameplanning for another aggressive defense. Just because he doesn’t like them, doesn’t mean he can ignore them.

by 12th_Man_Fan on Sep 16, 2009 10:20 AM EDT reply actions  

What we can expect......

1. The Draw Play – ALOT
John Fox is going to revert to his staple, (or should I say “patented draw play” to quote him.), on 3rd and long. Watch for it. Expect it. Gameplan for it. It’s as sure as Delhomme starting. I don’t understand the mentality of running a play which might work once in 100 attempts in such a situation, but trust me, we will probably see 100 attempts. It’s like giving up on 3rd down. Positioning your kicker. Go figure.

2. Delhomme to start in ATL & DAL
I kinda agree with this and here’s why: I like Matt Moore. I think Delhomme’s “HeyDey” is in the rearview. If you at least give Delhomme a chance or 2 at redemption, you have more than enough justification to sit him when he implodes, provided you pull him before he does too much damage. Give him the first 3 games and make adjustments during the BYE week. I’d like to see them start Matt Moore and coach him through, but the Feeley signing makes that look doubtful.

3. ATL’s DEFENSE
If we don’t fix the O-Line and playcalling, this is going to be a 1hr highlight reel for ATL’s defense.

I feel like we’re probably going to go 0-3 heading into the bye week. I can accept the losses as long as the shortcomings are addressed coming out of the bye week. This all should really have been addressed during thepre-season, but performance tuning was obviously not part of our priorities. Fine. Do it now, get to the BYE week, and come out of it fully tuned and ready to roll. Becasue as we stand now, Sunday’s performance against the Eagles was nothing but chaos in an undisciplined, poorly coached, mind-numbingly inept showing.

Just my thoughts. I believe in criticism where criticism is due.

by 12th_Man_Fan on Sep 16, 2009 10:42 AM EDT reply actions  

About the "Draw Play"

When Fox said he wished they’d gone to their “patented draw play,” I think he was being sarcastic.

I know, there’s no history of his being clever in interviews — but he’s got to be fully aware of the years long criticism in the media, and by fans, of running draws on 3rd down.

I think he may have been throwing that out there for a laugh. But he’s so deadpan, nobody caught it.

Aggressive defenses aren’t beaten by draws — what would work better are screens, rollouts, reverses, and quick releases to TE’s or RB’s curling to the middle.

by bigdavis on Sep 16, 2009 5:32 PM EDT up reply actions  

He was probably referring to the screen play which was picked

I honestly wish we had done draws, with a back like D-Will it’s not the same as hoping Foster just gets four.

by Flowing Willow on Sep 17, 2009 7:55 AM EDT up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Listen to Cat Scratch Radio Tuesdays 10pm EST

Media Requests email: CatScratchReader89@yahoo.com

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Small
Carolina Panthers 2012 Position Preview: CSR Managers, Editors and Authors
The-dude_small
CSR OT Open Thread, Vol. 14
335894_10150380137586555_563421554_9035931_1799653683_o_small
CSR, I LOVE THIS SITE!
189863_1835554819100_1547357212_1925822_7711741_a_small
A PantherTrain confession.
Panthers_small
First Look: Camp Battles in the Making

Recent FanPosts

189863_1835554819100_1547357212_1925822_7711741_a_small
Why 11 wins might not be good enough.
Small
The Panthers' Biggest Weakness: #2 WR
Vs_pic_small
Dear Big Cat, Hurney, & BAMF
Steve_smith_small
The Schedule's Out, Now Which Game Are You Most Excited For?
Small
A Few Random Thoughts.
189863_1835554819100_1547357212_1925822_7711741_a_small
Evidence Ron Rivera doesn't care for Brandon Lafell?

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Managers

Catscratchreader_m_small Jaxon

091311101554_small James Dator

Editors

N1523447507_30151367_6579_small Cyberjag

Img_0764_small LittleKing

The-dude_small BW Smith

Yoda-smoking-weed_small Rick Bates

Authors

Unnamed_small Revshawn

Img_8872v1_small ERL

Desmond_pics467_small Derek Leazer

Nibbs__small Son of a Newton

000_0006_small bylinebrown

Dsc_0082_small TLong

Chris_harris_jon_beason_new_orleans_saints_gsq4g8vnnjjl_small Cam2SmittyAllDay

Img_0050_small BrandonBecker