Discussing the 7 Keys to the Panthers Success in 2009
First Austin Penny over at the Bleacher Report put up a nice post with slide show detailing his "7 keys the Panthers season in 2009" (See first reference below). Then one of the guys over at Cat Crave (Joseph?) "piggy-backed" on it with his own commentary on the 7 items. So of course I can't resist either but I have to arrange the order of the items presented. First, here's the links to those articles.
Seven Keys to The Carolina Panthers Success in 2009 | Bleacher Report
he Carolina Panthers face a tough journey to another NFC South title in 2009. With the NFC's toughest schedule and a host of coaching changes, the Panthers will need to be clicking on all cylinders come September if they want to improve upon last year's embarrassing playoff exit.A Piggyback Ride on Austin Penny’s "7 Keys to the Carolina Panthers Success in 2009″ | Cat Crave | A Blog For Carolina Panthers Fans
One of our fellow Panther fans, Austin Penny, from www.BleacherReport.com wrote up a nice article detailing what will make or break Carolina in 2009 outlined by 7 key points. The following is a response to those 7 keys to Carolina’s success in 2009…
1. Of the 7 Keys listed my #1 has to be Double Trouble (Penny had it #4).
In 2009 the Panthers have to be able to run the ball just as effectively as last year. If the Panthers should struggle to run the ball consistently then the season could get ugly in a hurry. The Panthers running game helps every other phase of the game, from the passing game to the time the defense spends on the side line to improving field position. If the Panthers can even improve on their running game, which I'm predicting, then they could have an outstanding season. It will allow Jake to use the play-action pass effectively and keep defenses off balance. It will keep our defense from getting worn out over four quarters and hopefully it will help us protect a lead late in a game. It all starts with the run game in 2009.
2. Ron Meeks (Penny had at #3)With only one change to the defensive starting line-up one has to wonder what will be different about the defense in 2009? The difference will have to come from new DC Ron Meeks and his up-tempo defensive scheme. He has to get the defense to buy into his philosophy and get all 11 players on the field flying to the ball. He has to produce schemes that keeps the offense guessing and keep the Panthers from becoming predictable down the stretch as they did last season. The Panthers won't be a team that looks to win scoring fests or come from behind by huge margins so they need a defense that will keep them in the game. This defense has the players to be a top 10 unit if the offense can chew some clock and limits the number of stops the defense has to make on a weekly basis.
3. Jake Delhomme (We both agree he's #3)
In 2009 Jake has to limit his mistakes and not make the poor choices that sunk the '08 season. I believe Jake still commands the huddle and the confidence of the offensive unit so long as the running game holds up. At a young 34 in NFL years Jake can and will lead more 4th quarter wins as long as he remains confident and poised and doesn't try to force the ball into tight situations. His job could even be made easier should a consistent 3rd WR option become available.
4. The Secondary (Penny had at #6)
For all the focus on the pass rush that issue could be mitigated to a degree with an improved secondary. Can I get an amen for a few 'coverage' sacks in 2009? This key will be heavily influenced by #2 above and the schemes employed by Meeks. The Panthers secondary was too predictable down the stretch and rarely if ever deployed man coverage. With Chris Gamble wanting to test his mettle in this regard lets see him earn the 'shutdown corner' moniker. The secondary needs to be able to shut down the opposing #1 WR to prevent the scoring fest we allowed down the stretch. With Gamble. Marshall, Harris and Godfrey the Panthers should have the athletes and experience to improve this unit dramatically.
5. Julius Peppers (Penny had at #1)
I admit to purposely putting Peppers down this far to make a point. As much as I want Pep back in 2009 I don't think he is the #1 key to the season, not even close. Even if he should sit out the season or move to another team this Panther defense could still be a very good unit. With the rookie Everette Brown in the fold the Panthers will at least have some speed coming from the edge from one side and with an improved Charles Johnson on the other side there is still plenty of hope. My hope is that Pep will use the off-season snub as motivation for the entire season to show they were wrong not to deal for him. In that case he could have a huge impact on the 2009 season but I don't think it is necessary to has a successful season.
6. #3 WR Though not necessarily Dwayne Jarrett (Penny had at #7)
We all hope this is the year Dwayne Jarrett breaks out but more improtantly is that Delhomme establishes some confidence in a 3rd WR option no matter who it is. Players such Ryne Robinson, Mike Goodson or Jason Carter could also emerge as that threat. The Panthers need another option for those games where the opposing secondary is blanketing Smitty and another deep threat is needed to make them pay for that decision.
7. TE play (Penny had at #6)
I thought our TE's played well in 2008 when called upon to contribute in the passing game. The problem is that they were not utilized very much after the SD game. This is a key from the standpoint of utilizing the play action pass to slow down the run blitz and ultimately making the defense pay for playing the run too heavily. The TE needs to be able to release and get open down the middle of the field, something I thought didn't happen quite enough in 2008. If the Panthers can hit the TE in the middle of the field a few times every game it will make the run that more effective and essentially give the Panthers yet another offensive weapon for defenses to game plan against.
So there is my take on the 7 Keys to the Panthers 2009 season as first started by Mr. Penny. Thoughts?
44 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
I will note...
On the whole, we did an exceptional job at shutting down #1 wideouts.
And I think we can do just fine with about 400-4 out of our TEs combined on the year. Sure, it’d be nice to get more, but I just think anything they do beyond the bare minimum of receiving along with good blocking in the run game is gravy.
Remember, kids...don't ever let facts get in the way of your argument.
One the whole
True, just not in the last game of the season when EVERYONE IN THE ENTIRE WORLD knew that all we had to do was shut down Fitz… and we let him run all over the field single covered…
Can the season come quickly and wash away these bad memories!
Yeah, we did...
But then again, they showed they could win with Boldin and Breaston (3-2 when he caught less than 70 yards.)
Remember, kids...don't ever let facts get in the way of your argument.
by MichaelProcton on Jun 20, 2009 12:48 PM EDT up reply actions
I'd rather
take my chances with Boldin and Breaston than Fitzgerald, but I guess hindsight’s always 20/20.
Indeed
I pretty much ranked the 7 keys of success as you did Jaxon. It absolutely all starts with our rushing attack this year. A lot of people (non-panther’s fans) keep telling me that our rushing attack was an aberration in 2008, so it will be really nice to slience the nay-sayers.
Also, it’s important for the defense to be fast, aggressive and fly to the ball as Meeks wants them to. I would love to see more forced turnovers and scoring for our D. The front 4 D-lineman need to produce enough pressure so that our secondary doesn’t have to work so hard to do their job. If Peppers is there, fine…if not, I think we STILL have a solid line with the addition of Brown and of course the further development of Johnson (I’m a huge fan of that guy).
And finally another key is, we need significant improvement from a WR3 and/or TE option. I wholeheartedly agree that if we could get a TE a few catches per game in the middle of the field as well as some WR3 production (outside the hashes in a vertical route would be nice) then everything else opens up. If the opposing D can’t completely blanket Smith because of our other aerial threats — that just draws a huge smile from me. The opposing D then would be hesitant to put an 8th man in the box and well, we’ve already seen our success when they DO, so I can only see improvement when they can’t afford to.
(Yes, I realize I more or less reiterated what whats said in the above post, but I had to put my view in :) Besides, putting a +1 all the time just gets boring, no?)
Another key to this season for all NFC South teams..
will be interior OL play. We get the AFC East this year, which include the best 3-4 defenses in football. These massive NTs will be trying to shove our centers in to the QBs at the snap and disrupt the timing of handoffs. A lot of people don’t realize how this can effect the running game. The handoffs to the go on a rhythm just like the passing game does. Mess with that and those fast 3-4 OLBs will be on you before you know it. We’ll get to find out this year how good our centers and guards really are…BTW, are y’all looking forward to seeing K. Jenkins this year? I know Abraham loves playing the Jets…
I have six locks on my door all in a row. When I go out, I only lock every other one. I figure no matter how long somebody stands there picking the locks, they are always locking three.
Elayne Boosler
All the reports are that Kalil has had a really good offseason, and Wharton should be primed to be even better at OG.
Remember, kids...don't ever let facts get in the way of your argument.
by MichaelProcton on Jun 19, 2009 11:41 AM EDT up reply actions
Very good point on facing the 3-4
Running the ball is the Achilles heel of a 3-4 in theory. Fewer big guys to block. No, I’m not looking forward to playing Jenks. Should be a good test for Kalil.
I blog the Carolina Panthers at www.catscratchreader.com
Very good points
I would say the AFC North has better defenses though. Steelers, Ravens, Browns, Bengels Vs Patriots, Jets, Dolphins, Bills
Will Parker
by WillParker81 on Jun 20, 2009 8:46 AM EDT up reply actions
I'm iffy on that...
Steelers-Ravens for sure…but then it’s a long way down to the other two. We haven’t played teams that use the base 3-4 lately. It’s the GT effect. When you play an off or def you don’t see that often, it gives the advantage to them.
I have six locks on my door all in a row. When I go out, I only lock every other one. I figure no matter how long somebody stands there picking the locks, they are always locking three.
Elayne Boosler
The Bengals had a top 15 D last year.
Will Parker
by WillParker81 on Jun 20, 2009 6:34 PM EDT up reply actions
Teams also stopped passing on them after they went up by three scores in the second quarter.
Remember, kids...don't ever let facts get in the way of your argument.
by MichaelProcton on Jun 20, 2009 10:07 PM EDT up reply actions
Well,
They were 12th in the league in yds/game and 14th in pts/game. That sounds like a top 15 D to me.
Will Parker
by WillParker81 on Jun 21, 2009 8:27 AM EDT up reply actions
No, I know that's what the numbers say...
But my point was that teams were able to take their foot off the gas very early because that team was so bad, so they could have probably had way more scored against them.
Remember, kids...don't ever let facts get in the way of your argument.
by MichaelProcton on Jun 21, 2009 11:29 AM EDT up reply actions
So I guess...
…the fact that they are statistically better than 20 teams in yds/game and 18 teams in pts/game.
Remember, kids…don’t ever let facts get in the way of your argument. ;-)
Will Parker
by WillParker81 on Jun 21, 2009 10:39 PM EDT up reply actions
Yes, yes, but sometimes there are underlying FACTS that affect the STATS...
Trust me, I have several frat brothers from Cincy who are big Bengals fans who would just bang their heads against the wall if you tried to run that top 15 argument by them.
Remember, kids...don't ever let facts get in the way of your argument.
by MichaelProcton on Jun 22, 2009 1:06 AM EDT up reply actions
I would say that having a reliable #3 WR would be a big issue, but the thing is: will Delhomme look for him or will he continue to just try and force the ball to Smitty?I wish we had a Ricky Proehl-esque type of guy at the #3 slot, but it all depends on if Delhomme will even bother finding him.
I also agree that the secondary is a question mark as well. With Gamble and Marshall (I guess…) as our two starting corners, I just hope we don’t get burned more. Carolina got passed on waaaaay to much last season (games like the one at GB, the last game at NO, etc.). Marshall did great his first two seasons, but last season looked like he had regressed a little. I just hope the secondary holds up, b/c they now worry me more than the D-line.
Member of Canes Country and the Cat Scratch Reader
Gotta get open to be found.
Everybody knows one of Jarrett’s big issues is getting separation, and he hasn’t exactly been a lock to make the catch when he DOES get the ball thrown to him.
And I, too, share your concerns about the secondary…particularly when the guy we drafted in the second round to shore it up is running behind a former seventh-rounder.
Remember, kids...don't ever let facts get in the way of your argument.
by MichaelProcton on Jun 19, 2009 12:35 PM EDT up reply actions
I’m sure come game 1 in the reg season, Jarrett will be the #3 guy. But I am secretly pulling for Jason Carter to make it there. It’s a long shot, but like I said a while back, the guy could be a true diamond in the rough for us.
Now like you said, if people will just get separation from the D, perhaps Jake will look in their direction. But one of Jake’s biggest problems is getting stuck on throwing to Smitty. Even when Moose gets open, he just can’t fight the urge to hurl it to Smith.
Member of Canes Country and the Cat Scratch Reader
And Robinson has been spoken of as a very legit option at WR if he can stay healthy.
But, again, I have confidence in Jake to get the ball to guys who are open and reliable in terms of actually catching the ball. That could be Williams or Stewart or a TE, too, not just the wideout in the slot.
Remember, kids...don't ever let facts get in the way of your argument.
by MichaelProcton on Jun 19, 2009 2:26 PM EDT up reply actions
I would rather our TE be a threat over a 3rd WR
by Heyward is the next crime dog on Jun 19, 2009 8:08 PM EDT reply actions
I can't believe I'm saying this
Even though it’s one of my favorite positions in the sport, I’d put ST play over TE play.
Our O just doesn’t utilize the TE- so like MP said, 400-4 is basically what I’m prepared to get.
When I say ST, I mean all of it- Kasay remaining solid, Lloyd/Baker making sure opposing teams don’t get good starting field position, good coverage, good protection, and last but not least, the emergence of a solid return man.
Now that I think about it, I guess the LS situation could be fairly important as well.
With our conservative style of play, mistakes on ST can be back-breakers.
by the bomb dot com on Jun 20, 2009 2:46 AM EDT reply actions
Very good point
I would have to agree. I am confident that our return game will take a step up also this year with the return of Robinson and the drafting of Goodson.
Will Parker
by WillParker81 on Jun 20, 2009 8:50 AM EDT up reply actions
you say that now
but the “wedge” that used to lead to TDs for special teams will now draw penalties… it will be interesting to see if anybody in the NFL has a return game this coming season.
know what you believe in and why you believe in it
It strikes me that there are other ways to return a kick...
Remember, kids...don't ever let facts get in the way of your argument.
by MichaelProcton on Jun 20, 2009 10:08 PM EDT up reply actions
IMO
1. Double Trouble – The entire teams structure is predicated on running the ball and stopping the run. Jaxon did a good job of explaining this.
2. Ron Meeks – This will still be a John Fox Defense, but it will have added a little flavor from Meeks. Hopefully he is more like Emerill and not like my old college roommate trying to spiff-up some Raman. As I mentioned above, the teams success will come from its ability to run and stop the run. Our Run Defense is really the area that regularly let us down the last 8 games (playoffs not included in this argument). I do not think we are on the level of the Vik’s Williams’ or even the Jag’s a few years ago with Henderson and Stroud, but I personally like our starting DT’s. However, like many, I question our depth. Some think Irvin will end up starting this season and I really do not see it happening. He should be an upgrade over much of what we had last year, but we will have to wait and see. Also who is our 4th DT in the rotation?!? If we have an injury to D-Lew, Kemo and even Irvin then we are in serious trouble. If that does happen, we could salvage the season, but we would be very thankful that we are not in a run heavy division like the AFC North.
3. Jake – I am confident that Jake will bounce back this season in a big way. I have said this before, but Jake has stepped up in the past when challenged. Nobody expected him to be in the running for Super Bowl MVP (03 season), he has made a Pro Bowl (04 – yds=3,886, TD=29, INT 15, QB rating – 87.3), and he looked GREAT in 07 with comp %=64.0, yds=624, TD=8, INT=1 in 2.5 games. Not to mention how many 4th quarter come backs he has had. With his competitive fire, I am expecting him to continue his focused off-season and have his hard work translate onto the field. Now that does not mean it will happen. The games still have to be played.
4. Secondary – With the addition of Brown, the development of Johnson, and hopefully a repeat dominate performance of Pep, our pass rush should be a strength. This will help out our Pass D along with some schematic tweeks, more experience (Godfrey) and an overall sense of need foe redemption after the Cardinal debacle.
5. Pep – He has no options. He will have to show up and show out regularly to ultimately get what he wants . . . next season.
6. 3rd passing option – I believe that Jarrett will get this spot and lock it down. The problem with our 3rd passing option last year was, IMO, that there was no confidence or rhythm in a 3rd option. The 2 DJ’s were going back and forth in training camp and when the season started Smitty was out the first 2 weeks. Shortly after that Hackett was injured which put Jarrett back at #3.
In 2003, Jake came in originally as a backup. I think he had a lot of confidence in Proehl b/c they had a lot of reps together. In the Jacksonville game, Jake hit none other than Mr. Proehl for the game winner.
With that said, I think Jarrett will earn this role b/c he will get plenty of opportunity combined with the extrinsic motivation Jarrett must be feeling entering his 3rd season.
7. Special Teams – We NEED a perfect long snapper, no more missed blocking assignments on punts, to continue to develop Lloyd as a complete kicker, develop new younger gunners on punt coverage, figure out who is athletic and stout enough to block on kick returns, and find a reliable and dangerous return man in the punt and lick game. That’s all.
Will Parker
The primary options for #4 DT are Hayden and Favorite...
But Brayton could see more time inside this year with the addition of Brown, so that couudl increase our depth at the position to a degree.
Remember, kids...don't ever let facts get in the way of your argument.
by MichaelProcton on Jun 20, 2009 10:10 PM EDT up reply actions
If we’re talking about keys to winning a Super Bowl, then I would have to say Jake is number one. Obviously the running game takes more importance in our offense, but if any of the past Super Bowls have proved anything, when playing in a Super Bowl, the QB is going to have to win it for his team. By then the teams are going to be usually pretty evenly matched thus putting the game in the hands of your leader. At some point in the playoffs, Jake is going to have win the game for us. Not just keep from losing it. Actually win it. However, if its just the keys to success in the season, then yes, those rankings are accurate.
Dwayne Jarret’s success is a huge key to our success for this year AND beyond. Moose is getting old and Smitty isn’t getting any younger. We will soon NEED a guy to step into the # 2 role. Not to mention having a bust in the second round is a tough pill to swallow for the organization.
I feel like our DT’s should be mentioned in this. We desperately need good depth at that position and I feel we were too lax on stopping the run last year.
I’d say a legitimate pass rush from people other than our front 4 is more important than the secondary. Most interceptions are caused from good pressure and there were many times last season that our secondary was hung out to dry by a non-existant pass rush sending only 4 rushers. Yet we always blame our secondary in these cases, not the DC. But people who know football will tell you that the WR always has the advantage because they know the route they are going to run. And if you give them enough time they will ALWAYS be able to escape from a DB and find room.
I'm not entirely sure what your point is...
Jake had excellent games in playoff wins against Chicago, Dallas, and St. Louis, and he played one of the best Super Bowls in history against the Patriots. That loss was hardly his fault.
Also, I think the root of the DT issues comes down to the bad trade we made of Kris Jenkins. First, we shouldn’t have traded him in the first place, but if we were going to, we certainly needed to get more for a three-time Pro Bowler and a two-time All-Pro who’s still among the best at his position in the league than a 3 and a 5.
Finally, Ron Meeks is not the guy you’re going to see back seven pressure from.
Remember, kids...don't ever let facts get in the way of your argument.
by MichaelProcton on Jun 21, 2009 9:13 PM EDT up reply actions
We better have back seven pressure with Ron Meeks.
He did excellent things with Dwight Freeney and his cohort, but that’s not going to help him in Carolina. We need to get pressure, and with our DT’s the way they are they’re not going to stop the run more often than not. We need to have aggressive playcalling, and if Meeks doesn’t call it then we’re going to lose games and the fans will be calling for his head.
Rightfully so.
"Once again the trowsers of evil are yanked down by the mocking hands of justice!"-Revshawn
I'm not saying your idea is wrong...
Just that history hasn’t borne it out. Meeks got multi-sack seasons from something like three players during his time in Indy. Not terribly impressive.
Remember, kids...don't ever let facts get in the way of your argument.
by MichaelProcton on Jun 22, 2009 1:07 AM EDT up reply actions
I once thought Jake was the best QB in the playoffs but I still can’t get over last season’s awful showing. He can be a good QB at times, but other times, like against Oakland and Arizona, he can be downright awful, and no team can afford performances like that in the playoffs. I used to think Jake found a way to avoid those meltdowns once it really mattered, but now I’m not so sure. I know what he did 5 years ago but that was 5 years ago. I hope you’re right, I really do. I want us to win a Super Bowl and I would love for Jake to be the one to do it for us, but you could be wrong. Perhaps the game against Arizona is less of a fluke and the beginning of a trend. Hopefully we’ll see.
But my point was, no matter how he performs in his next playoff outing, Jake’s performance is going to be more important than our running game or Ron Meeks (not saying that they wont be important). At some point Jake is going to have to step up like Eli did and Ben has done (two QB’s that were primarily asked to just keep the team in it) and actually win the game with his arm.
Give the man his chance...
Last year was the first time since ‘03 we got to the end of the season relatively healthy, and after a fantastic regular season, he (along with the rest of the team) blew a great shot. Still, I think this team is constructed to win, and he can get us there. And I think Jake’s “blowups” are blown out of proportion too. Every QB has them, even the best ones:
Roethlisberger: Week 9@WAS: 5-17, 50 yds, 1 INT; Week 8 vs. NYG: 13-29, 189 yds, 1 TD, 4 INT; Week 3@PHI: 13-25, 131 yds, 1 INT
E. Manning: Week 15@DAL: 18-35, 191, 2 INT; Week 6@CLE: 18-28, 1 TD, 3 INT
P. Manning: Week 7@GB: 24-42, 229, 2 INT; Week 13@CLE: 15-21, 125, 2 INT
So hey, some weeks, no matter who it is, guys are gonna have bad—or even awful—games. Doesn’t make them bad (and certainly not awful) quarterbacks.
Remember, kids...don't ever let facts get in the way of your argument.
by MichaelProcton on Jun 22, 2009 1:18 AM EDT up reply actions
Yup
I think you hit the nail on the head there MP. All the ‘greats’ out there (most notably the QBs you mentioned have SB rings) have bad games during the season. Jake has his share as well – but I expect him to play well this year. Carolina showed confidence in him by giving him the contract extension (which also helped our cap numbers) so I think that will translate on the field for him.
What I want to see out of Jake this year, other than less turnovers, is more looks to the WR2 and WR3 as well as some throws in the middle passing lanes to a TE. The run is our bread and butter, no doubt, but it just seems to me historically he doesn’t read/react well past his WR1.
All in all — I expect the QB coaching change, the contract extension, the disappointing playoff game AND another year removed from the TJ surgery to help Jake have a more positive showing this year.
by boywonderncsu on Jun 22, 2009 2:14 PM EDT up reply actions
I understand that every athlete will have an off day. But the great ones tend to avoid them during the playoffs. I thought Jake could avoid his blowups during the playoffs, but now I’m unsure.
As for Roethlisberger, I truly believe he is a mediocre QB who is incredibly clutch when it counts. He’s a winner, but he’s not a prolific QB. Alot like Bradshaw who won 3 Super Bowls behind the Steel Curtain, Ben has been able to suck because of his defense and then is able to turn it on at the end of the game when they’re close. Based on some of the paltry offensive numbers they put up that year, they would be hard pressed to get past .500 without their D.
Eli Manning is similar to Ben in being a winner but not a prolific QB. Instead of getting by on a prolific defense, he’s been getting by on a terrific running game, alot like Jake did this year. Yet somehow Eli may sign the richest contract in the NFL. He is pretty overrated.
Didn't Roethlisberger throw like 30 TD's a year ago
Give him some decent protection and he’ll be a solid starting QB, instead of a mediocre one.
32 in '07...
But then again, how much of that had to do with their shoddy run game (9 TDs, 22nd in the league)?
Remember, kids...don't ever let facts get in the way of your argument.
by MichaelProcton on Jun 23, 2009 8:54 AM EDT up reply actions
That just means he didn't have a run game to rely on
He showed he could carry the team with protection and a chance to air it out.
Yeah, but I think his numbers were still a bit inflated because of that.
If our backs weren’t as good, Jake certainly would have had more opportunities inside the 10 last year.
Remember, kids...don't ever let facts get in the way of your argument.
by MichaelProcton on Jun 24, 2009 8:51 AM EDT up reply actions
Turn those two rushing TD;s into passes
then we might not be looking at such horrible numbers. : ) As for Big Ben, we’ll 4 would have been sapped. Those are still impressive numbers.

by 
























