Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Which Players Will Join The 3,000-Hit Club?

Panthers Trade Ponderings. Submit your grand schemes!

I was sitting down in my chair today, sipping my coke and working on my stupid chemistry. As my mind tends to do, it started to wonder onto other things. I thought about the Panthers and the draft and why teams that acquire multiple 2nd-3rd round picks are so successful. I went about thinking about how the Panthers could get some draft picks, and all of the sudden BAM! It hits me.

Na'il Diggs to the Falcons

The Falcons only have 2 proven starting caliber players right now in MLB Curtis Lofton and the newly signed Mike Peterson from Jacksonville. That final starting spot is completely up in the air. Wire Coy will have the advantage going into training camp, but anyone can pop up and claim this final spot on the team.

Star-divide

Na'il Diggs would be a good fit for the Falcons. He'd plug up one of the holes on their defense and give their linebacker core all capable starters. In return, the Panthers should get a price of 3rd and 5th round draft picks. We're going to be without a 1st round draft pick next year barring a Peppers trade, so it would be wise to stock up on as many picks as we can.

Now, this trade will only be worth it if Dan Conner is ready to start. I don't trust that Landon Johnson has the skills to get the job done on a week to week basis, so it's imperative that Dan Conner shows us that he has the skills to start in this league and do well. If he can impress in training camp, then I say we get younger and execute a trade for the good of the organization.

That's just one idea though. What ideas do you have? Please keep things as realistic as possible, but I want to hear ideas from the fans.

Comment 25 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

I wouldn't expect to see a lot of trading between these two teams...

The Falcons are pretty high on Stephen Nicholas. I don’t think you’d see any movement there. How about Julius Peppers for Champ Bailey and a late round pick?

"We're not maxed out, ... The best is still ahead of us."

Bobby Bowden

by NaGaNole on May 27, 2009 11:43 AM EDT reply actions  

I sincerely doubt...

That they’d be willing to trade a guy under contract for the next two years for one who’s not even under contract at all, particularly given that their Pro Bowler always gives 100% effort.

by MichaelProcton on May 27, 2009 12:52 PM EDT up reply actions  

No ideas, just observations...

From a “what do the Panthers have to trade” perspective, I tend to look at our areas of depth on the team and try and determine who we could package in a trade…because, those are the guys we can afford to let go. The rest, we need to hang onto. So, here’s the most likely areas where I could see Carolina getting creative with a trade:

Linebackers – I agree that Na’il Diggs or some other LB (i.e., maybe Landon Johnson if he’s still got trade value?) makes a lot of sense to trade. Our LB depth is perhaps the strongest in the league. But, Fox loves LBs and likes keeping a lot of them around. He’s also very familiar with Diggs, whom he coached at one point with the Giants, didn’t he? And Fox is so loyal to his veterans, that he’s stuck with Diggs far longer than I ever imagined he would. Landon Johnson had some pretty high value back when we acquired him, but now people are saying his gaudy numbers were the benefit of the system the Bengals ran…and not necessarily any huge talent he possessed. Still, if someone out there has a huge LB need, maybe he’s tradeworthy if we can get something for him?

Tight Ends – I hate to say it, but we’ve got a couple of good-to-really-good, pass-catching TEs (i.e., Dante Rosario and Gary Barnidge) who don’t really fit our run-blocking scheme. Rosario was a flash-in-the-pan last year, but got enough media attention that someone who wants an athletic pass-catching TE might pony up a decent pick for him. Granted, he’s coming off back surgery now, but everyone expects him in camp. So, maybe there’s trade value there? As for Gary Barnidge, I’m disappointed we haven’t had a chance to see more of him. They say he’s bulked up and gotten stronger since joining the team, so maybe that makes him a better run-blocker for us down the road…and he’s already regarded as maybe the better pass-catching TE out of all of them. But, if we’re never going to use him…i.e., he’s never broken out of the third-string and we don’t even put him in on multiple TE sets…then maybe we should dangle him as tradebait? We just signed Jeff King to a contract extension, so it’s not like we’re expecting Barnidge or Rosario to claim the starting role anytime soon. RIght now, they’re both there more as insurance and for including in obvious passing formations.

Julius Peppers – I can’t really say we have any depth at the DE position. But, we do have an obvious superstar in Peppers who wants out of town. He’s the biggest opportunity for a trade that Carolina has going right now. The only question is what can we get for him? Two #1 picks? Unlikely. A #1 and #2? Probably not even that. A #1 and a #3? Now we’re getting more realistic. But throw in a #5 pick with that #3 and #1 and I’d think a deal gets done fairly quickly. The cold reality, however, is that we can’t look for any of that to happen until Peppers and his agent get serious about working a trade…and not just with 4 preferred teams who don’t want to pay him that much money or give up that much compensation. I think any team that’s interested in him right now, is probably waiting for the Panthers to not franchise-tag him again…and then just negotiate with Peppers as a UFA.

Other than those three areas, I don’t see a lot of trade opportunities looming. And I’m not even sure I see any of these coming to fruition. The Panthers haven’t pulled off much trading since Fox and Hurney took the reins. So I’d actually be a little surprised to see them do much now. I think they have a tendency to just release whomever they’re not interested in signing again…keeping their core nucleus together for those they can afford…tapping the occasional veteran free agent at bargain prices to fill holes here and there…and mostly using the draft to pick guys they hope will become a part of their core nucleus down the road. That just seems to be their philosophy so far. And they seem intent on riding it out until they win a Superbowl or someone gives them their walking papers.

But that’s just my two-cents,
—Neil

by NSpicer on May 27, 2009 12:20 PM EDT reply actions  

Diggs never played for the Giants.

Fourth round pick of the Packers in 2000, released in 2006 and signed with us. And I don’t think Landon Johnson would have taken a drastic pay cut this off-season if he felt there was any market at all for his services. That says to me that he’s got no trade value. I think the only way to get anything for either of these two guys is to wait for camp injuries to devastate some team’s LB corps, then swoop in with one of them for a 4th rounder, maybe even a third if they’re desperate.

You’re right about Rosario having some potential value, though. You know who would make a lot of sense as a trading partner? San Diego. The same team he torched with 7 receptions for 96 yards and that game-winning TD might be inclined to get that guy on their team, especially if something awful happens to Antonio Gates. He’s young, he’s got potential, he’s clutch (as far as they know), and in the right situation we could really get a lot for him. That trade would still leave us with King starting and Barnidge to develop. Not too shabby.

by r3 on May 27, 2009 12:39 PM EDT up reply actions  

Maybe Neil was thinking of...

Micheal Barrow, who played here in ’99 and then got brought back in ’04 (?)

by MichaelProcton on May 27, 2009 12:54 PM EDT up reply actions  

I'm not sure...

…I thought I remembered reading somewhere that Fox and Diggs have a past connection somehow. Maybe not. Regardless, he’s extremely loyal to the guy as a veteran LB.

by NSpicer on May 27, 2009 4:15 PM EDT up reply actions  

Agreed! You're dead on when it comes to the time to make a trade.

I’ll disagree in the 4th rounder though. My view has always been that the best part of the NFL Draft to trade into would be the 2nd and 3rd rounds. You don’t have to pay that much to a rookie, and if you do your homework you get a quality starter that will be a big help on your team for years to come. He may not start right away, but that’s alright since you don’t have to pay him the oodles of money you pay for 1st round players.

Trading for draft value is an opportunity business. When a team starts losing players to injuries, naturally that makes every other player in the league in that position suddenly have more value. I remember during last year when the Lions robbed the Cowboys by trading them Roy Williams for a 1st rounder and something else. Story after story on Owens and their passing offense were taking their toll, and they panicked.

Of course that’s a once in a decade trade and I don’t see that happening to us, but I’m illustrating that when teams get desperate enough they’ll be willing to trade for players with compensation far above their value. We have the depth at LB and TE to get a good trade done. All it takes is a couple of starters from some team being taken out for the season, and the Panthers pouncing opportunity.

"Once again the trowsers of evil are yanked down by the mocking hands of justice!"-Revshawn

by Revshawn on May 27, 2009 2:23 PM EDT up reply actions  

And there was also the Seattle WR fiasco...

Which led to Keary Colbert actually netting somebody a 5th (!)

by MichaelProcton on May 27, 2009 2:33 PM EDT up reply actions  

I heard about that. Poor saps.

If I remember correctly, the Broncos actually made an April Fools joke about him.

And here it is! From the Vault!

http://blogs.charlotte.com/panthers/2008/04/shanahan-compar.html

"Once again the trowsers of evil are yanked down by the mocking hands of justice!"-Revshawn

by Revshawn on May 27, 2009 2:38 PM EDT up reply actions  

What happened to him was sad...

I think he played more hurt with his ankle issues than anybody ever really let on, and by the time he was recovered, he had lost what little separation ability he ever had.

by MichaelProcton on May 27, 2009 2:47 PM EDT up reply actions  

Agreed.

Colbert flashed ability that one season. Then, poof! Never the same again.

by NSpicer on May 27, 2009 4:17 PM EDT up reply actions  

Dunno if Johnson's value was THAT high...

3/$10 mil is hardly a great contract for a vet who had started (and put up pretty good numbers) since he came in the league.

Also, it’s hard to say that either Rosario or Barnidge is “good-to-really-good.” Neither has really shown anything, and teams pay for production in trades, not really potential. Also, King wasn’t signed to an extension. He just signed his one-year RFA deal and he’ll probably be allowed to hit FA next summer.

At this point, I just doubt Pep will garner a 1st at all. Maybe 2nds in consecutive years, or a 2 & 3 from the same year, but teams know he’s not worth the price in contract and picks.

Finally, though we haven’t traded much, we’ve come out pretty well when we have:
Gave up Jay Williams (10.5 sacks, 1 start in three seasons w/MIA) for Al Wallace (17 sacks, 9 starts in five seasons here) and a 4th that turned into

by MichaelProcton on May 27, 2009 1:02 PM EDT up reply actions  

whoops...continued

Colin Branch, who probably could have started at least three years if he never got hurt.

8 starts in 3 productive years from Todd Fordham for a 7th-round pick (Shaun Nua, 0 career games)

Jason Baker AND a 7th-rounder (Stanley McClover) for malcontent Todd Sauerbrun, who flamed out of the league pretty quick.

Chris Harris for a 5th (Zackary Bowman, 1 career game before hitting IR, likely ticketed for the PS this year.)

The missteps: Rod Garner for a 6th (Kedrick Golston, 44/25 over 3 years), with guys like Antoine Bethea, Cortland Finnegan, and Zack Streif picked between that and our next pick.

Kris Jenkins for only a 3+5. That brought Gary Barnidge, who hasn’t really shown much so far, and Charles Godfrey, who could turn into an above-average starting safety. With the way Jenks turned around the NYJ run defense, it sure makes you wish we had held out for more.

by MichaelProcton on May 27, 2009 2:46 PM EDT up reply actions  

Yeah, I loves me some extra draft picks

but you don’t trade with division rivals. Now, sending The Nail to Denver or Detroit or some such LB-starved place would make some sense, but you’re really only looking at a 4 in return. He’s going to be 31 years old this season, he’s not got the kind of trade value teams look for. And I’d rather have The Nail this season (and next?) than a 4th rounder.

The problem, as I see it, is that we don’t have a lot of excess parts. We don’t have the levels of depth at most positions that we’d prefer. We’ve got who we’ve got, and we need them all to play. Our depth on the O-line is barely adequate. Depth at receiver and running back is the same. We might not have enough CBs for our own needs, and there’s no extra safeties. We don’t have extra D Tackles, we might have an extra DE, but that’s making assumptions about Peppers that we can’t make right now.

Linebacker is the only place where we’re legitimately over-stocked and could possibly make some moves. Beason and Conner are keepers, Landon has no real trade value, and James Anderson has very little since he’s in the last year of his contract and has yet to challenge for a starting spot.

Now, where I could see getting real value would be in Thomas Davis. He’s 26, he’s finally starting to feel his oats, and there are a bunch of teams who’d love to have him. But he’s a first-rounder, and we’re not going to get a first round pick for him. We could almost certainly get a 2, but I think you’ve got to look at that trade as a net loss for us. But if picks are the goal, trading Thomas Davis for a 2 and a 4, or a pair of 3s, with New England or Denver or Detroit (that’s just mean) would be interesting.

by r3 on May 27, 2009 12:26 PM EDT reply actions  

Davis is a good idea

I’m sure he has some trade value and I’m thinking Davis is going to be a Mike Minter type of player. I good starter but never a Pro Bowler. I’d rather try and get Dan Conner in the line-up if I could get a 2-3rd rounder for Davis. This doesn’t seem to have a high reality factor though.

I blog the Carolina Panthers at www.catscratchreader.com

by Jaxon on May 27, 2009 12:42 PM EDT up reply actions  

Huh!

There maybe other factors into why he won’t make the Pro Bowl, like a. the Panthers are in a small media market, b. tackles are limited with Beason next to him, c. the scheme doesn’t let him get the sacks of other OLB’s like Ware, Meriman, Harrison. I think he will be a very solid guy who we can’t afford to lose. Start Connor at strongside when Diggs leaves, that is a better fit for him I think.

by Flowing Willow on May 30, 2009 6:23 AM EDT up reply actions  

But...

He’s in the last year of his deal…I doubt people will want to give much up when they’ll likely have a chance at him on the open market. Also, though, I wonder what it says about him that we haven’t locked him up before now. It may just be that they didn’t want to raise a low cap number (just over $2 mil), but he really showed some development last year at the Will, and we usually get those “core” players locked up..

by MichaelProcton on May 27, 2009 2:49 PM EDT up reply actions  

It’s actually Coy Wire, and they had no problem letting him start four games last year. Further, they have Stephen Nicolas, who they like and will let compete.

Diggs won’t garner a fifth if we try to trade him, much less a third. He’s the 3rd-best LB on any good team, and the Cowboys aren’t going to get anything for Greg Ellis, who has 20.5 sacks in the last two seasons. The one thing he has going for him is that he’s cheap (under $1 mil the next two seasons), but that’s a boon to us with our current cap situation. Don’t know why you’d let go of a starting-caliber player (if an average one) who’s that affordable.

As for Connor vs. Johnson: Johnson has been a successful starter at all three LB positions. It might not be time to give up on him yet. I honestly wouldn’t feel bad about either one replacing Diggs before Week 1.

As for legit trade possibilities, I just don’t see that many options. NFL trades just very rarely happen, and it’s even more rare for it to happen for spare parts. Perhaps we could get something out of our WR glut at the bottom of the chart, but that’s probably something along the lines of a 7th-rounder. I suppose a guy like Brayton could get traded too, if they decide the combo of Johnson and Brown will get it done across from Peppers and they don’t need him on the inside.

by MichaelProcton on May 27, 2009 12:50 PM EDT reply actions  

I don’t like the idea of trading Diggs, and I hate the thought of trading him to the Falcons. We shouldn’t trade a guy to a team we play twice a year, who could give the Falcons some insider info on some plays or tendencies of our players. I don’t see us making a trade unless we run into some unforeseen circumstance similar to the Chris Harris deal.

by zrjohnso on May 27, 2009 2:21 PM EDT reply actions  

NO WAY!

I would NOT trade anyone to Atlanta! Especially since they are in our Division! Well, maybe Delhomme for Ryan? Huh???

by PANTHERSRULE on May 27, 2009 5:24 PM EDT reply actions  

Non-trades that result in draft picks

I expect that the (non-trade) movement of unrestricted free agents Geoff Hangartner (Bills) and Frank Omyale (Bears) will generate compensatory picks for the Panthers in next year’s draft. These could be pretty good draft picks awarded by the league if they both manage to start for the entire year.

by GKB on May 27, 2009 7:32 PM EDT reply actions  

And...

Signing no FAs ourselves will help, too. I frankly doubt Omiyale or Hang garner us high picks, because neither got paid big money, but they should qualify for picks, as should Lucas. Add in a shot that Mark Jones or Jeremy Bridges could qualify, and we’re looking at a minimum of three extra seventh-rounders.

by MichaelProcton on May 27, 2009 11:55 PM EDT up reply actions  

Hang got starter's money in Buffalo

Low-end, unproven starter’s money (2.5mil/year), but he’ll start at center next season for the Bills. And Omiyale signed for 3.4mil/year deal. Between the two of them, we should get a 5th and 6th. Lucas only signed a one year deal for 2.3mil, so he’ll count for less than Geoff. If we get a 5, 6 and 7, I’ll be happy.

by r3 on May 28, 2009 1:42 AM EDT up reply actions  

Released players don't qualify for compensatory picks

Neither Bridges nor Lucas will get the Panthers anything since they were released and not signed away due to their contract being up.

by GKB on May 28, 2009 10:14 AM EDT up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Listen to Cat Scratch Radio Tuesdays 10pm EST

Media Requests email: CatScratchReader89@yahoo.com

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Gunnyhartman_small
CSR OT Open Thread, Vol. 7
Gunnyhartman_small
CSR OT Open Thread, Vol. 6

Recent FanPosts

Cam_smith_small
Some Mock Drafts based off our front runners
Small
2012 Mock Offseason and Draft
Small
Cam Newton Wins AP Offensive Rookie of the Year!!
Small
Carolina Panthers 7 Round Mock Draft
Small
What We Will Probley Do this Offseason
Panthers_small
My second look at the way the Panthers might draft post Senior and Shrine Bowls.
Panthers_small
The logic of drafting David DeCastro
Desmond_pics467_small
Who Would You Draft If Given These Choices? The Finals
Small
Nation Wide Mock Draft
Desmond_pics467_small
Who Would You Draft If Given These Choices? Part III

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Managers

Catscratchreader_m_small Jaxon

091311101554_small James Dator

Editors

N1523447507_30151367_6579_small Cyberjag

Img_0764_small LittleKing

Gunnyhartman_small BW Smith

Authors

Unnamed_small Revshawn

Mphg_small Rick Bates

Img_0050_small BrandonBecker

Social Media

Small TLong