Carolina Panthers’ Monday Morning Optimist- 12/28/2009
Good morning Panther faithful! Other than the playoffs my Panthers gave me an excellent belated Christmas present on Sunday by dismantling the New York Giants and burying the G-Men's playoff hopes deeper than Jimmy Hoffa at the Meadowlands. Carolina displayed an utterly dominant performance in all phases of the game, but in particular the offense turned up to play on Sunday with Matt Moore throwing three touchdowns without blemish, and Jonathan Stewart breaking the franchise record for rushing yards with 206 on the day.
As I sit here a Monday Morning Optimist I'm not sure whether this victory is wholly sweet, or heart-wrenchingly bitter sweet as my dreams were dominated both with joyous beatdowns of both Minnesota and New York as well as drastic let downs... now more than ever I'm haunted by the loss to Buffalo. Regardless, there's much to rejoice in.
So please, join me as I break down the performances from the Panthers dominant Sunday win:
After the jump...
The 2009 season has proven to be the most fascinating of John Fox's tenure in Carolina. Since benching Rodney Peete for Jake Delhomme in game one of 2003 the Panthers have not had a quarterback controversy grace their team while many others have been in a state of flux; we now have the controversy, and the battle to come will be interesting. Meanwhile, few thought that our true position of strength (the running game) would ever become a point of contention; however, with four effective running backs our strength is almost proving too strong. We are now seeing a fan base entertaining the idea of breaking up double-trouble to fill other needs, and to prevent an impending contractual headache down the road. Couple this with an unavoidable Julius Peppers melodrama and the 2009-10 offseason proves to be almost as exciting as the regular season for the Carolina Panthers.
Since it's on the lips of many Panther fans I thought I would briefly address my feelings on both Delhomme's situation, and also the RB situation now, if merely to draw a line in the sand so I can return to this moment and either pat myself on the back, or slap myself in the face.
The Delhomme saga: I love Jake Delhomme. I love his grit, his tenacity, the kind of man he is and what he has done for this franchise. That being said, I think his days as a starter in Carolina are done. Matt Moore (as I will explore later) may not be the bonafide answer, but he's at least ‘showing his work' as we get closer to a final solution.
I have an old school mindset. In short, you don't dick your veterans around and screw them over merely because their recent play has been bad. Delhomme never held out, he never caused problems, he restructured his contract to back load a new deal so the Panthers would gain back some cap flexibility they lost by franchising Julius Peppers. You don't outright cut a guy like that... you just don't. Circumventing common decency simply because the lack of a CBA allows it isn't what you do to a guy who could have put the Panthers through the ringer following 2005, but instead gave the franchise a sweetheart deal.
So, consider this my line in the sand. Keep Jake the backup, sign Moore to a low guaranteed money/ high incentive 3 year deal and select a QB in the draft to sit 3rd and be a project. This covers you bases short, and long term. Even if Moore is the absolute answer, who better to be a veteran mentor than Delhomme? If injury should befall Moore, he's also a viable option in a pinch.
The RB situation: D-Will or J-Stew, J-Stew or D-Will... it's been the question of the last 15 hrs. Exacerbated by a franchise shattering performance yesterday the question is starting to creep into people's minds. There is a contractual nightmare on the horizon. The Panthers can either make the smart move and deal an RB now, or wait until the nightmare begins and get diminished value. The Chargers couldn't afford to keep Tomlinson and Michael Turner (who at the time rushed for 1,257 yards in 4 years as a Charger) what makes us think we can keep two 1,000 yard backs? Jonathan Stewart alone has now rushed for 1,844 in 2 seasons.
It pains me, but I think we need to keep Jonathan Stewart. Stewart can put the entire game on his back and carry it when everything else is going wrong. We have seen Stewart step in a carry the running game for Williams more often than vice-versa. With Mike Goodson and Sutton on the roster the Panthers have potential speed and elusiveness, but they don't have power without J-Stew. DeAngelo's stock is sky high right now... he would command a lot in a potential trade. Either a bonafide star and a 2nd or 3rd round pick, or a 1st round pick and a solid starter... he's worth that much. The Lions have said Calvin Johnson isn't untouchable... so if the Lions come knocking and offer Johnson and a 4th I would pull the trigger in a split second.
That's enough about the future 2010 and beyond. Let's talk a little more about the G-Men win before we break down the individual performances.
What is up with the Carolina Panthers' offense? It isn't solely that players are executing. There has been a distinct paradigm shift on offense. I don't think we, as fans, will ever truly know what was going on but it seems like someone has completely changed the playbook around. Is it Fox returning to a true ‘run first' system? Is he calling the plays? Perhaps the opposite, maybe Foxy has a guarantee he'll return in 2010 and has given Davidson free reign to open up the offense. I'm not sure what it is, but what I do know is that the Panthers look dominant on the offense side of the ball. They have been as dominant offensively as the Panthers were defensively in the latter part of the season and I haven't seen a Panthers offensive firing on all cylinders like this since 2004.
If we have that Buffalo win back I think we're going deep in the playoffs. The Saints are reeling, we are surging and I think the NFC would be scared of seeing the Panthers in the playoffs. That being said, now that Steve Smith is out who knows what our decimated passing attack would look like.
OPTIMISTIC
Matt Moore- Extremely Optimistic: Moore is now 2-2 in my book, 2 amazing starts, 2 mediocre ones, but I put much more stock in recent history, so I'm a happy man. I really want to believe his first two starts were just shaking off rust and getting his legs back.
Right now Moore isn't being asked to do too much on offense. Just take care of the ball and take the shots when they're there. That's all a Carolina QB needs to do, and he's following it to a ‘T'. I know its early days, and he only has 4 games worth of stats, but as we sit now Moore is ranked T-7 with Ben Roethlisberger for QB rating (98.9). Despite the small sampling, it shows that he is a good decision maker. Let's hope this trend continues.
Jonathan Stewart- Extremely Optimistic: This is J-Stew's world he's rushing in... we're all just here to bear witness. Stewart has been a man possessed recently taking the opportunity to start and turning it into his opus. What biased commentators are calling ‘poor tackling' I call ‘Same ol' J-Stew'. His career thus far has been characterized by needing gang tackles to bring him down, and God help a DB who is the last line of defense, because you're going to get trucked over... it's inevitable.
Offensive Line- Extremely Optimistic: I lumped them together because they're all dynamite right now. It will be very tough to justify pulling Geoff Schwartz off the O-line based on recent performance. They're all executing, and better than the 1st team was able to as a whole... it's dramatic and I didn't think it possible.
Secondary- Extremely Optimistic: Where do you begin here? Like the O-line I can't pick just one guy, nor can I prattle on about all of them. CSR's Chris Harris... amazing. Richard Marshall... incendiary. Ron Meeks has his team running on all cylinders and it's a sight to behold.
Jon Beason- Extremely Optimistic: Beason is the same he always is... week in, week out; reliable as the day is long. Beason is 2nd in the NFL in tackles, 13 behind Patrick Willis but for my money there's not even a competition- Beason is the best linebacker in the NFL. He's putting up 3-4 numbers in a 4-3 which normally takes tackles from LBs and gives them to DTs.
Julius Peppers- Extremely Optimistic: I don't want to get snake bit saying we need to keep Pep only to find out this has been his most recent audition for teams' around the league. Pep didn't become ‘dead to me' during last season's drama, but he definitely lost the benefit of the doubt. I just can't help but be wary of his success. That being said, he was amazing yesterday... again.
Steve Smith- Extremely Optimistic: Smitty... you know you broke your arm, right? I have never seen a play with more tenacity than Steve Smith catching the ball over the middle, breaking his arm on the tackle, staying upright and running it into the end zone arm dangling. For that alone I'm optimistic, not for what he will (or wont) do in 2009, but that he still has the fire we've always seen.
Mike Goodson- Somewhat Optimistic: We didn't get to see a lot of Goodson, but what we did see was good. Swing passes and tosses are going to be his bread and butter if he stays in this league. His speed remains blinding and I think the kid shows promise.
PESSIMISTIC
For the second time this season I can't find any... really I can't. Last week people thought Special Teams should be the only blemish, but this week, what can you say? We exceeded our season averages on kick returns, Kasay nailed everything, Lloyd got the TBs needed, and so what else is there?
I guess the only pessimistic element to Sunday's game was that it was too little, too late for the Panthers. It pains me to see a team this good having to spend the rest of the winter at home, because I don't doubt they're better than some of the teams who will be playing in 2 and 3 weeks time.
Overall Analysis
Last week I finished the optimist by saying
"I don't expect the same level of domination as last night I do think this team can chalk up a W"
I have never been more proud to be this wrong. Next week the Panthers take on the Saints in our last game of the season. New Orleans are reeling now and if the Panthers hand them a loss like they to the Vikings and Giants the last 2 weeks, then I expect it to be the death knell for the Saints as they bow out of the 2009 season in the first round.
If Peppers leaves the Panthers will have a lot of spending money for free agents whilst being one of the most attractive spot for players to come. With money and a potential contender I expect Carolina to be one of the primo sites for free agents to arrive, and it's nice being in that position.
Finally, let me end while being a little crass. Kiss my ass San Francisco 49er fans. Not all of you, just those wishing our failure for your draft pick because as it stands right now you're getting a no.15... not the top 10 you were hoping for.
90% Optimistic about the future as we face the New Orleans Saints
219 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
It would have taken more than the win over Buffalo
nice read James. We certainly have a lot to be optimistic about for 2010…just too bad we have to wait so long!
I want to send the Saints into the playoffs on a 3 game losing streak!
I blog the Carolina Panthers at www.catscratchreader.com
Double-Trouble
I still dont buy into the trade talk… what we need to do is get rid of the old baggage… I agree partly with the Delhomme thing, but I believe he’s expendable, and Peppers NEEDS to sign long term and restructure his $ or get rid of him, same with Jake- re-structure again as possible #2 QB or free up money for performing players. Love Muhammed, but same deal, get younger, with better contract numbers, and you have a shot at keeping both DeAngelo and Jonathan for some time. They appear to be very team conscious, and I dont think they will get stars in their eyes and dollar signs in their heads to the degree that they handcuff the team unlike Julius.
dedication to MP from Peter King
Offensive Player of the Week
Matt Moore, QB, Carolina.
This could easily have gone to Jonathan Stewart (28 carries, a franchise-record 206 rushing yards), but I’ve got to hand it to Moore, for a simple reason: He’s a career benchwarmer, and in the past eight days he’s beaten Super Bowl champions Brett Favre and Eli Manning by a combined 67-16, and he’s done it by completing 68 percent of his throws (36 of 53) for 470 yards, with six touchdowns and no interceptions. "Some guys just need a chance,‘’ Steve Smith told me, "and this is Matt’s.’’ The only question is, what took John Fox so long to yank Jake Delhomme in the midst of the worst year of his life and play this wunderkind?
+100000000000
Friggin A man friggin A
What have you done for me lately?
by Steve785 on Dec 28, 2009 11:51 AM EST via mobile up reply actions
nice
on behalf of tha dirty south: soul food, carolina blue, southern hospitality, and tha queen city
by southtunnel on Dec 28, 2009 10:23 PM EST up reply actions
question to be asked for generations...
“The only question is, what took John Fox so long to yank Jake Delhomme in the midst of the worst year of his life and play this wunderkind?”
We’ll be scratching our heads and wonderin’ how 2009 would’ve turned out, if change would’ve come sooner….
I heard Calvin MIGHT be available too
However, do you really think they him and a draft pick would be offered for Williams? A team that (if they move CJ) would only want to move him only to help reload for the future of their team. I don’t know if Williams would constitute the future for that team or would still be in his prime when (if) the Lions are finally good. I want Calvin as much as the next person, BUT I think the only way we could land him this offseason would be through a 3-team trade. Maybe a team like the Texans would be possible third party who would be interested in D-Will.
The Texans would definately be interested in D-Will
Their RB situation has been a carousel like no other this season. SO many fumbles. Kubiak wants a guy who can take care of the ball… enter D-Will. However, they may not be able to afford what it will take to get him. It is likely a trade to Houston would see us targeting Andre Johnson, and I just don’t think the Texans would be willing to part with him. I could see a straight up trade of Megatron for D-Will happening without a draft pick attached… and I would take that trade in a heartbeat. Can you imagine having Steve Smith and Megatron on the field together??? Hol-y Crap.
3 way trade sounds interesting
i’d rather have andre johnson than megatron, but houston will never part with him…
also, i don’t believe Detroit would ever do a straight up trade of megatron for D-will… the team that has to unload a guy (in our case, to maximize trade potential) will never have the upper hand.
Disagree
I actually think a trade between Calvin Johnson and D-Will would be fair given the fact that running backs are exponentially more important to the long term success of a team than wide receivers. And I, like many NFL analysists, consider D-Will to be one of the best running backs in the league today.
not fair to D-Will either...
for the guy to be sent to Detroit…I’m just hoping we can find a way to feasibly keep both
by John Chilton on Dec 28, 2009 10:26 PM EST up reply actions
Nice article as usual James
And I agree… a big middle finger to the 49er fans. Go back to your coffee shops.
We did have a muffed punt return by Captain on special teams… he did recover it however. Leaving them off the list was the right call. Not optimistic or pessimistic. I dream of a day where I can consider a Panther return-man as a legitimate threat on kicks.
49ers
Do y’all think the 49ers will want 2 first round picks? Thats a lot of $$$ to be paid out. They will trade down on one of them to any team wanting it to get a 2011 pick or a couple of 2010 2nd rounders.
by Indian Panther on Dec 28, 2009 12:05 PM EST up reply actions
I think if I HAD to choose between Willy and Stewie
I would choose J-Stew as well — he’s got power and good enough speed to be a true #1
I would hate to see D-Will go though … it would be nice if they could keep them both, but I have been informed by our resident einstein (MP) that because of a salary cap we couldn’t possibly pay both of them.
if theres no salary cap in 2010...
Then we don’t have to worry about it because there won’t be a cap for a long time. We NEED both. Bottom line. A D can’t be confident when either walks onto the field. That’s huge. And when the 2 can spell each other, that has got to be sooo hard for a D to take that full throttle punishment because of their fresh legs. If we trade 1 it will bite us in the ass. I hope to god they don’t read this blog. We need to stop discussing it before harris tells them.
We need to draft a qb with that first pick and groom him. Jake has to stay. He is the best back up qb in the league. He knows that. When has he ever acted like he is a starting qb you know? He always has looked like he’s just filling in. He’s never had that confidence that you see in a franchise qb. But he’s a great leader and I thnk he will be a great mentor. He will have no problem accepting his new role.
We need to pick up one of these big WR in FA. The rest of the draft picks. Can be used on filling the cracks. Oh and sign peppers long term. Sign moore to a deal just like james said low guarantee high incentive. Fire jeff davidson cuz he’s a moron and hire weis. And we are champs. ;)
What have you done for me lately?
by Steve785 on Dec 28, 2009 12:15 PM EST via mobile up reply actions
we need to stop discussing it before harris tells them...
LOL, that’s funny.
I don’t think we need to use our first pick on a QB. I think we need to go WR first, then get a QB in the later rounds (there are a lot of good QB’s in the draft this year).
a lot of QBs and few WRs
We don’t need to gamble on a 5th round QB. We should take the 1st rounder that slid to the 2nd because there’s so many and so few teams that need 1.
If we draft a WR I will throw my tv out the window. We just don’t do well in that area. Just sign a proven or a dependable FA and that’s that. No worries no learning curve no bs this year.
And I’m serious about the not discussing tradeing 34 or 28. If I was one of them I would be heart broken/pissed to see my fans discussing this. Especially if I’m D-Will. He is a high character guy. He always throws his gloves to fans gives them the ball talks to people so on and so forth. He doesn’t have to do any of that. And if he heard the fanbase is entertaing the idea of trading him I think he would be affected by it. I think his approach to the gvame will change and his performance will suffer. So can we please just stop while we are ahead please?
What have you done for me lately?
by Steve785 on Dec 28, 2009 12:36 PM EST via mobile up reply actions
I agree on the 'take a sliding QB' approach.
I think we can look for one in the 3rd though.
Worst case scenario you get a coveted player that you can flip for a 1st or 2nd rounder down the line (see Matt Shaub- 5th round pick by Atlanta traded for a 2nd to Houston).
Cat Scratch Reader's resident optimist.
so what would you take with the second rnd pick?
What have you done for me lately?
by Steve785 on Dec 28, 2009 4:02 PM EST via mobile up reply actions
I know you said you have the idea of WR... but WR.
I know we’ve wiffed on a couple, but this is the game GM who got us Steve Smith. Perhaps Davidson (with some time under his belt) can accurately help is scouting someone as he was only with the team a brief period before we drafted Jarrett.
If we get a WR in free agency, then I think we need to go DT. Forget Kemo, Damione Lewis is 31 now. Even if Corey Irvin comes back strong we need to be deep at the position.
This is provided alot of different things happen though. Should the stars align and Sam Bradford magically falls into the second we would be stupid not to take him.
Cat Scratch Reader's resident optimist.
amen brotha
The ‘trade d-will/stew’ talks are complete crap. I couldn’t believe my eyes as I was reading this sort of bs through people’s responses to the blogs. Seriously? Some of you are entertaining this idiocy? We finally get the rushing attack that we were looking for (the 2-headed monster known affectionately as double trouble) and all of a sudden people want to trade 1 of them for a WR? Are you retarded??? (Note: no offense to those that are of an IQ of <70)
by boywonderncsu on Dec 28, 2009 3:12 PM EST up reply actions
I don't think they're retarded..
Only have differing opinions… Not sure difference of opinion is a classification of retardation. Otherwise, I think I deserve a monthly check. (By the way, I don’t support trading either but if someone else does, their entitled to what they believe best for the team)
Helpful reminder for James at seasons end: 2nd Rnd CSR Fan Draft Pick.
haha
@ the monthly check part. Well played sir, well played.
by boywonderncsu on Dec 28, 2009 3:43 PM EST up reply actions
The thing about wanting to keep both of them...
It works great in Madden… but harder to do in real life.
If someone can find me a team with two backs like DeAngelo and Stewart who have survived keeping them intact passed their rookie contract I’d love to see it, because right now there’s no evidence it can be done.
Cat Scratch Reader's resident optimist.
oh we need a sam
And for those of you that don’t know what that is its a strong side line backer. Id love to get witherspoon back…but we need a young fast hard hitting sam.
What have you done for me lately?
by Steve785 on Dec 28, 2009 12:22 PM EST via mobile up reply actions
well we dont need one
but we certainly arent getting any younger at that position with diggs (even though since coming to carolina he has been very solid)…but hey when you have Jon Beason and Thomas Davis as your Mike and Will backers it doesnt matter who we put there, hes got it made.
by carolinabrave89 on Dec 28, 2009 8:24 PM EST up reply actions
2010
Anyone see the pumped up Peppers on the sidelines welcoming Matt Moore? I think Peppers is a happy camper and we may see him finally sign the long term contract and stay. If he does not want to stay, Osi and Seymor may both be potential DEs in the market next year.
Both the Raiders and Giants need a franchise RB.
I agree that we may not see Smash and dash next year. Both of them are legit starting RBs and both will want top $$$. They deserve it. But I will go with J Stew and trade D Will (I shed tears as I say this – I’ll miss their dance).
I still believe given his opputunity Matt will continue to grow into a legit franchise QB.
WR—Stevie needs help, and we shld find him one. In 2010, if we do not need to draft a QB or DE, we have many options to either draft a WR or get one in the off-season.
Guys..I am all pumped up for a great 2010 season
by Indian Panther on Dec 28, 2009 12:01 PM EST reply actions
all good suggestions
but I really think we need to keep Peppers, and he’s looking happier these days, so I think its realistic to expect him to sign long term…
if we don’t, I don’t like the FA pool for DE’s… Osi is completely one-dimensional (he can only pass rush) and I just have a bad feeling about Seymour as he goes into his 30’s….
i will be extremely happy if we sign peppers to a long term deal
i question though once he gets his contract does he fall off? oh and i hope we go ahead and get everything done this offseason without any negativity, it just seemed like all of last season was doom and gloom and you see how this year turned out. Whereas in 2008 the entire offseason was positive leading to a 12-4 season.
by carolinabrave89 on Dec 28, 2009 8:28 PM EST up reply actions
It's not about the $ with him.
He could have had all he could want last year — he thought he wanted out — now he wants to stay. He wants a championship.
+1
Personally, getting paid what they get paid, I wouldn’t exactly be aching over the fact I’m only getting 10 million instead of 12 (random example).. I’d be looking to leave a legacy and the best way to do that? You nailed it: win it all. To win it all? You might have to give up a couple million or few on that contract to allow the team to upgrade.. At least, that’s how I’d see it if I was a pro. I know some people are all about the Benjamin’s.
As much as I doubt he will, if Peppers does demand another insane amount of money, we’ll have to start calling him Julius Benjamin Peppers.
Helpful reminder for James at seasons end: 2nd Rnd CSR Fan Draft Pick.
Beef Stew is AWESOME!
However, his running style means he will take many big hits. (as well as hand them out) He has never been completely healthy since being here. He could also be benefitting from teams game planning for D-Will. Try to tackle Beef like you would D-Will and he will run you over. Try to tackle D-Will like you would Beef and he will run by you. Beef does create alot of plays on his own and is young enough maybe he can handle a beating for a while. That being said, if we could get C. Johnson for D-Will I would be OK with that.
As for Pep, maybe he is realizing what that C on his chest means. He seems to be having fun, and if he really cared about the TEAM he could sign a deal that would allow us more flexibility. Meeks has the D playing lights out! And I do think we would be very good without Pep. But imagine how dominant we could be with him, and Thomas Davis back. (pleathora of good linebackers to trade?) Be an example Pep! Or hit the road.
At least we won’t have to draft another tight end. The young secondary is coming around. Special teams and line depth may be the biggest concerns in the offseason. No new coach yet, we are poised to make a great run in 2010!
J. Sullivan
by pantherpackcaniac on Dec 28, 2009 12:08 PM EST reply actions
CJ has way too much of an attitude.
One of South Africa's only Carolina Panthers and fans.
by chinchillas sword on Dec 28, 2009 1:50 PM EST up reply actions
Calvin Johnson
As a Wolfpack fan I’ve seen Calvin Johnson tear up the ACC. I am sure he doesn’t get the opportunity in the NFL like he deserves. He is a beast!!!
No way would I trade D-Will for Chris Johnson. Although I was a little dissapointed when we passed on him in the draft….
J. Sullivan
by pantherpackcaniac on Dec 29, 2009 3:58 PM EST up reply actions
C(alvin) Johnson or C(hris) Johnson? If the latter, I’d never take Chris Johnson.. not even for a 7th round pick. He’s an over-rated a$$hole that will never accomplish more than Williams. I’ll certainly be following him to see if he can become a 5 Star Rusher and make me eat my words, but I just don’t see it. More concerned with breaking records than helping his team win.
Helpful reminder for James at seasons end: 2nd Rnd CSR Fan Draft Pick.
Every coaches dream?
I think not.
The early bird catches the worm, but the second mouse gets the cheese.
by Flowing Willow on Dec 29, 2009 3:56 AM EST up reply actions
Chris Johnson MVP
I’ve heard people mention that, but they didn’t win a single game until Young became the QB. He may rush for 2,000, but he’s not even that team’s MVP.
by usana_gaines on Dec 29, 2009 6:30 AM EST up reply actions
Why do you think "Matt Moore may not be the bonafide answer"?
It think we are holding him to unfair expectations. But why? Because he didn’t beat every playoff team he’s played? Because he didn’t play lights out his first 2 games off the bench as a starter this year? Because even though he beat MIN, he had 2 slow quarters?
Let’s assume instead of an UDFA he was a 1st round pick. And his 1st 2 games were slow, but he continually improved every game, did exactly what he was supposed to do, and after 4 games had a 7/2 TD/TO ratio, and a 98.9 QB rating… We’d have no doubt that he was the future!
The guy has earned the right to be the bonafide starter, until he proves that he can’t do it over the course of a season.
on behalf of tha dirty south: soul food, carolina blue, southern hospitality, and tha queen city
+1
Exactly — he’s earned the chance to prove that over the course of a season he can be a starting QB and the future of the franchise. He isn’t there yet, but he has proven that he at least deserves a chance to be the franchise QB.
There really shouldn’t be a debate on this — Moore is good enough to get the chance to prove his worth next year. If he’s as good as we think he is based on the last 2 games, then we have our answer. If he’s not, then we at least know, instead of having to play “what could have been”.
I think it because it's stupid to annoint any QB who's started only 7 games in their pro career as 'the answer' to a franchise's future issues at the position.
I never said he didn’t earn the right to be the starter, I said that (in my mind) he hasn’t earnt the lofty title of ‘future of the QB position’ not yet… it takes time.
Cat Scratch Reader's resident optimist.
Tell us how much time you think it takes...
…and how many 3TD, 0 INT games, against quality teams, it takes?
Just asking.
I think it takes a full season as a starter.
I think it takes a full season of experiencing the ups and the downs. Not just stepping in when a season is over and being able to play with nothing weighing on your mind.
It takes games where you must win by marching your team down in the 4th quarter
It takes games where you play horribly and show you can bounce back the next week.
It takes playing enough so other teams have tape on you so when they try and counter your strengths you can adjust to what a defense is bringing.
It takes time… more than Moore has under his belt right now, but he’s on the way.
Cat Scratch Reader's resident optimist.
Okay
I hope your healthy skepticism is overcome by future success under Moore’s leadership.
For I know if he does do it, you’ll be man enough to give him the credit, when you think he’s due it.
I think I've already been giving him credit. I just need to see more.
He’s been at the top of the ‘optimistic’ list two weeks running. I just don’t want to annoint anyone as ‘the answer’ until I have time.
It wasn’t until midway through 2004 that I bought Jake could be the long term solution for Carolina because I wanted to wait to see how he would perform when teams were scouting to stop him. He did so admirably and made the pro-bowl.
On the flipside you have Vince Young, who’s proven he can do everything great when things are going his way, but falls apart mentally when his back is against the wall. That’s the kind of gut check i’d love to see Matt Moore strive through.
Cat Scratch Reader's resident optimist.
to be fair
a skeptic is always happy to be proven wrong… that means good things have happened
james the aussie
i don’t think james is being skeptical or negative. he’s saying matt moore is doing well, but let’s not just assume he’s the starter for the next 10 years and then fail to address the position like we’ve done for awhile with jake. look at matt cassel. he played very well last year, but at the end of this season, not everyone is convinced. there is really only one thing to do, and we’re doing it…watch the games and enjoy watching matt moore carve up the defense. i look at the pack as an example. after a great season from aaron rodgers, they still drafted matt flynn and brian brohm. rodgers is still the starter and has since proven he is the real deal, but if he fell apart, the pack weren’t gonna be caught looking around confused or wishing they had another qb.
by usana_gaines on Dec 28, 2009 2:51 PM EST up reply actions
Im not buying it...
Moore has played against quality competition, all playoff bound teams and all division leaders with the exception of the Giants who was considered one of the best teams in football through Week 5 when they started to implode. Romo didnt have a full season as starter and everyone was annointing him. Hell, even Jake was installed as the official leader by week 3 of the 2003 campaign. Sounds like you need a moment…like a come from behind win to develop a man crush on Moore…
No doubt Jake was the leader by week 3 of 2003... but I'm a harder sell.
I’ve seen this team go through Reich to Collins to Beuerlein to Weinke to Peete to Delhomme to Moore (now).
That’s a big list… and only two guys I can say I was sold on Steve Beurlein and Jake Delhomme. I hold QBs to a very high standard when they start, but the flipside is I’ll stick with them a little than alot of people who jump off the train sooner.
Cat Scratch Reader's resident optimist.
You should totally be on board with Moore then!
Weinke lost 6 of his first 7 starts and turned the ball over 13 times. Collins had 15 TOs his first 7 starts. Jake’s TD/TO ratio was 5/4 his first 7 games, Beuerlein 10/5… still 2 TOs more than Moore. And Moore averaged a better QB rating then all of them.
Comparatively speaking this guys is having a great start to his career. He should have as much opportunity to be the starter as any young QB in this league.
on behalf of tha dirty south: soul food, carolina blue, southern hospitality, and tha queen city
What am I saying that is making you think I'm not on board with Matt Moore?
I’m just a hard sell that he’s the long term answer at the quarterback position for this franchise.
Cat Scratch Reader's resident optimist.
It's my mission in life to convince you
That Matt Moore and Raymond Felton are legit long term starters. And that Jake and Augustin are not. ;)
on behalf of tha dirty south: soul food, carolina blue, southern hospitality, and tha queen city
lol
I don’t think I’ve said recently that Jake is the long term answer… but the Felton/Augustin we’ll have to save for another day and another blog.
Cat Scratch Reader's resident optimist.
You haven't, but I couldn't think of another argue point
Maybe Larry Brown vs Fox/Cowher :)
on behalf of tha dirty south: soul food, carolina blue, southern hospitality, and tha queen city
The fans that jump on board..
quickly are typically the ones that jump ship just as quickly when things go south. Patience is key.
Helpful reminder for James at seasons end: 2nd Rnd CSR Fan Draft Pick.
2 of the starting QBs in our division were declare "the future" having proved less than Moore
Freeman and Ryan took their first pro snaps, with the assumption that they’d be there long term. The only difference in them and Moore is that they were drafted and Moore wasn’t. AND through their 1st 7 games as a starter Moore has out performed both…
Moore 96.7 (QB Rating) 10/3 (TD/TO)
Ryan 89.5 7/5
Freeman 65.4 9/16
I think it is really just about not being drafted.
on behalf of tha dirty south: soul food, carolina blue, southern hospitality, and tha queen city
Moore hasn't really faced any adversity
Freeman has, heck his team had no wins when he started. Ryan struggled week 3 or 4, don’t remember, against Tampa Bay, he threw a couple picks in the first half. He bounced back. Moore hasn’t bounced back yet, I haven’t seen him under any kind of duress recently.
The early bird catches the worm, but the second mouse gets the cheese.
by Flowing Willow on Dec 29, 2009 4:00 AM EST up reply actions
Maybe because the team plays more efficiently, and with more confidence, with him.
It’s not because he’s been out there against weak teams. Or against teams that had nothing to play for.
If you agreed with the notion that MP espoused, that Minnesota had nothing to play for, that theory evaporated watching them scramble last night against the Bears.
His ability to avoid the rush (partly because of the designed rollouts, partly because he scrambles with more mobility than others) makes it look like he’s not facing any ‘adversity’ — as far as not having to come back from a huge decifit — another kind of ‘adversity’ — maybe that’s because he’s helping to score more points than the opposition, and because our defense plays better to prevent scores, knowing he’s not gonna turn it over right away when they get off the field.
Just a surmise.
Ryan and Freeman were handed the team before taking a single pro snap
And your adversity reference just means they struggled. Where as Moore was pressured heavily Sun and still made plays. Why would you hold that against him.
In 07 he was thrown in impossible games after Carr stunk it up, and Moore threw his share of INTs trying to pull us back… That didn’t phase him at all.
on behalf of tha dirty south: soul food, carolina blue, southern hospitality, and tha queen city
by southtunnel on Dec 29, 2009 11:23 AM EST up reply actions
Right now everything has gone Carolina's way
The defense has played lights out, but a day will come when they won’t. Our run game has dominated everyone, but a day will come when someone shuts it down. Moore has gotten nice protection, and scrambled away from some sacks, but a day wil come when he won’t be able to. I want to see how he reacts and plays in that situation before I anoint him the savior. I’m all for starting him next season, unless Delhomme soundly outperforms him, but I want to see him bring us back from behind, as we can’t dominate every team like we have Minnesota and New York.
The early bird catches the worm, but the second mouse gets the cheese.
by Flowing Willow on Dec 30, 2009 5:13 AM EST up reply actions
Please don't annoint him the savior
Just be happy with him not leading the league in turn overs. If “that day” comes, and he throws 5 INTs in back to back games… THEN we can talk about giving Delhomme another shot.
on behalf of tha dirty south: soul food, carolina blue, southern hospitality, and tha queen city
by southtunnel on Dec 30, 2009 10:31 PM EST up reply actions
Smash mouth football
At this point right now we only need a few players on offense. The only thing is how to pay for them. If we give Peppers too much money and gut the system again we can’t invest in anyone that can help us or for that matter keep who we have. So anything with Peppers has to be modest. I think it would be better to trade Goodson or Sutton all though we will not receive as much for them, than to break up a record setting tandem as William and Stewart. If we could get Peppers on a reasonable contract if not let him walk, keep Williams and Stewart, sign Moore to an extension as starter and Delhomme as back up and find a number two receiver we should be fine. I think Moore is showing that he can compete in this league and for the way we have our running game setup we don’t need a Rivers or Romo. Then we can do something with Sutton or Goodson who do have value and I think Sutton is going to be big in this league somewhere. We now have two top notch backups for the O-line so we should be OK there. The defense seems to be in another world of their own right now, so keep it intact. Also a change in coaches right now might do more damage than good. From what we have seen in the last four weeks we have something coming together that might go far next year so let’s not rip it apart. They are playing in harmony and the music sounds so good and is fun watching them play it. One last thing, I wish the main stream media would give us our dues and stop saying that the other teams were playing poorly. We gave them a butt whooping and they know it.
Buck
He did finally give Moore some props at the end but you’re right they hate to give it up. It’s pissing me off that no one wants to give credit where credit is due, not even John Fox. If the man steps up and plays an excellent game don’t say that he did pretty well.
the giants didn't come to play
we are the luckiest team in the world. according to the experts, all these teams keep showing up against us flat and unmotivated. wow!!! maybe if they all came to play, we wouldn’t have any wins. in fact, the giants planned all along to give up 200 yards to j-stew and blow their shot at the playoffs. who pays these lousy experts anyway? the truth is that our defense is killing fools, and matt moore is making great throws.
by usana_gaines on Dec 28, 2009 2:54 PM EST up reply actions
2010 Season: Extremely Optimistic
Ultimately, i want to bring back Fox as the head coach because the overall team depth and talent level is too high. Given the track record of up & down seasons i would not be surprised in the least to see the Panthers win the franchise’s first Super Bowl next season!
The future
I used to think we definitely needed a QB before Moore stepped up. His confidence and precise ball placement warrants a chance to develop into a true number 1. I like Fox as well and my only out with him is his adamant refusal to bench Delhomme. It’s like he was putting his loyalty to him before the needs of the team. I think keeping Peppers and double trouble plus getting a new, good WR is somewhat unrealistic. I would be willing to give up Williams for someone like Johnson. With Matt throwing like he is to two major targets the offence would be a true force. There are so many slices to the pie so someones got to either get a smallers slice or get up from the table.
Correct Statement
I think keeping Peppers and double trouble plus getting a new, good WR is somewhat unrealistic.
I would love to see the FO keep all the above mentioned pieces together. However, if that is not possible it comes down to the question of which piece is most easily replaced? That is why most, i think, are advocating a trade of one of the RB’s. It takes multiple backs to have an effective running game in today’s NFL. But replacing Williams or Stewart with another good RB seems easier than replacing Julius Peppers or acquiring/developing another star WR to play beside Steve Smith.
i can understand replacing a RB might be the easiest piece to replace
But we cab keep all of them…double troubles contracts aren’t up so take a chill pill people. Peppers will decide if he want to sign or not. If he wants to stay he will be reasonable about the money. And the FO needs to just worry about picking up that big name WR in FA. That’s all and that’s not hard or complicated. I think you guys are getting way too far ahead of yourselves.
What have you done for me lately?
by Steve785 on Dec 28, 2009 1:32 PM EST via mobile up reply actions
I agree that we're getting ahead of ourselves... but better 2 years ahead than 1 behind.
Williams’ contract is up after the 2010 season. That gives us 1 more season before needing to franchise him.
Trying to deal a player while they’re franchised is a very difficult prospect. Much harder than trading them early. Stewart’s isn’t up until 2012, so no rush there… but in one year’s time the Panthers will have to settle for their long term answer. If they give Williams a giant extension then kiss Stewart goodbye in 2012… there just wont be enough cap room.
Cat Scratch Reader's resident optimist.
i dont see why not
Jake will have to restructure. Peppers will make a decent deal or walk. Td resigns. Think man we got a lot of guys in their final and heaviest year on the cap. After we resign all these guys we will have room.
What have you done for me lately?
by Steve785 on Dec 28, 2009 1:50 PM EST via mobile up reply actions
Look at Steven Jackson and Michael Turner as the benchmarks for what it will cost.
Jackson: 6 years, $44.4 million
Turner: 6 years, $34.5 million
Right now DeAngelo Williams is only on a 5 year, $14.5 million rookie deal. Stewart on a 5 year, $14 million rookie deal… you’re talking about easily doubling both of their salaries.
No doubt we can do it, but what will it means for other positions?
Cat Scratch Reader's resident optimist.
so how much will go against the cap in 2010?
Backload it up keep everybody
What have you done for me lately?
by Steve785 on Dec 28, 2009 2:52 PM EST via mobile up reply actions
There's no cap in 2010... it's 2011 you need to worry about
and backloading is easier said than done. It requires convincing a player that they should (potentially) give up earnings for the betterment of the team.
Alot of guys wont play ball when another team is offering the same deal, or more with money up front.
Cat Scratch Reader's resident optimist.
if theres no cap in 2010 then there wont be a cap for a very long time
Maybe not ever again. And we have a bunch of high character team players I would expect a couple of them to step up and do what’s better for the organization.
What have you done for me lately?
by Steve785 on Dec 28, 2009 4:16 PM EST via mobile up reply actions
We have high character guys, no doubt…. but I do think you’re overestimating the lack of a CBA.
It’ll be back in place 2011, mark my words.
Cat Scratch Reader's resident optimist.
That would make no sense. Ok how about this…why is there going to be no cap in 2010?
What have you done for me lately?
by Steve785 on Dec 28, 2009 4:44 PM EST via mobile up reply actions
and if thats the case
Then just throw a huige first year bonus to every1 we want. They will figure it out. We aren’t losing anyone…maybe peppers but that’s up to him. I think he will come back though.
What have you done for me lately?
by Steve785 on Dec 28, 2009 4:48 PM EST via mobile up reply actions
There is no CBA in place... they couldn't agree upon one during the owner's meetings last offseason.
The union, the players associated, the owners, the league all want a CBA in effect. It’ll get re-upped during the 2010 owners meeting.
As for the bonuses, yeah that’s a possibility…. but how deep are the big cat’s pockets?
Cat Scratch Reader's resident optimist.
deep enough
So there’s no cap because all these guys couldn’t agree? I would think there’s another agenda behind it. and anyways the cap will be raised up high because they can’t put teams in the situation that they will have to cut people to start the season.
What have you done for me lately?
by Steve785 on Dec 28, 2009 5:08 PM EST via mobile up reply actions
Not for 2010 I don't think so
Resigning Williams won’t be a huge cap hit (if there is a cap) the first year, they are usually back loaded. Stewart is still on his rookie contract. Peppers will take a chunk if he signs long-term but I still think its doable. We paid him $16M this season so even $10M per season is saving big money. We could still get a good FA WR I think
I blog the Carolina Panthers at www.catscratchreader.com
Essier to replace Peppers, production-wise, than eother of those two.
I like Pep, and think he’ll sign a L/T reasonable contract — but when it comes down to it, hoe many FDs does he gain on the ground, how many TDs does he score? C’mon. No choice.
If it’s necessary (and I’m not willing to concede it is) that one of those go, for cap reasons, it’s got to be Julius. Those 2 RBs feed off each other — they’re Double Trouble, a team within a team — you think the guy who stayed would like it, being broken up. I don’t hear any greedy contract renegotiation talk from either one of them. They’re making history here this year — you think they want to break that up?
BigD i hope you are correct
If these two backs can be humble enough to want to stay together and not want to be “the one” it would say a lot about their character — maybe even say that they would be willing to not demand outrageous price tags for the benefit of the team.
I don't know for sure, of course...
I’m just going by an observation that prima donnas show their greed, and their egos, early on. These guys haven’t. (But certainly there’s the greedy agent factor to consider, as happened with Peppers last year.)
Careful choice
I want to add one more thing. At the end of the game Stewart broke out on a long run and he couldn’t complete it, he ran out of steam and just slowed down. he does not have the endurance that Williams has. They at this time they are a team within themselves and they need to stay that way for a while longer. They also support each other like on other combo in the league does and that counts keeps them going.
I think it was because he saw the flag fly and knew it was holding...
he did run out of gas but still, how can you dog him for that? It takes a lot of energy not just run but carry people with you as well
I blog the Carolina Panthers at www.catscratchreader.com
"A team within themselves"
Hadn’t seen that when I posted the same thing above you. Nice.
We don't actually know that..
We have never seen Williams break 200 yards… the most was 186 against the Buc’s last year I believe.
Helpful reminder for James at seasons end: 2nd Rnd CSR Fan Draft Pick.
Williams is the better back...
He’s faster, can handle more carries, has a little bit of power too and is widely regarded as a top 3 running back in the league (Peterson, C. Johnson). Trading Williams would be like the Titans trading C. Johnson because Lendale White ran for 300 yards in the last two games of the year….cmon guys…
Big difference
Jonathan Stewart has 1,844 yards in 2 seasons, and a YPC of 4.7
LenDale White has 2,384 yards in 4 seasons, and a YPC of 3.7
Forget ballpark, that isn’t even the same sport.
On the flipside look at San Diego… do you think if they had a do-over they would trade Tomlinson when his value was high and keep Michael Turner? I sure do.
Cat Scratch Reader's resident optimist.
I didnt mean statistically...
I meant that it doesnt make sense to trade players with a short term memory aiding your decision. Who do you think will have the greater pro career, Williams or Stewart? Williams has a gift that few have. Stewart just runs hard. There is a big difference in talent and they would probably tell you that themselves….I personally would keep them both but if I had to choose, its Williams without question..
I think Stewart will have the better pro-career.
I don’t see the big drop off in talent that you do. I see one guy who gets more carries, and one guy who gets less, nothing more, nothing less.
Traditionally elusive backs don’t have the same long term career as North-South runners.
Cat Scratch Reader's resident optimist.
But Stewart already has a history of injuries...
hell we drafted him while he was nursing an injury…D Will has been pretty strong throughout…here’s my point…how many times have you said “Oh my god, I cant believe that!” watching Williams run the ball, and Stewart? Granted they both have had moments, but Williams is the one that people will buy jerseys of, pay tickets to watch and will make pro bowl first. Maybe Im biased because I remember Williams in his first yr behind Foster, and then the drastic jump in performance. I’ve watched Williams completely embarrass teams…but now that I think about it…you cant really separate the two of them anyway, it’d be like separating Chip and Dale! LOL…
How many games has Stewart missed due to injury?
Now how many has DeAngelo missed?
I’m certaintly not saying Williams is injury prone, but I think it comes out in the wash. I don’t want to seperate the two of them, I just don’t know how we can keep them both in 2 years time.
Cat Scratch Reader's resident optimist.
So is this debate about what to do in 2 years time?
Hell, we could all be dead by then.
I can’t see why it’s so all-fired important (unless this is just idle chatter, when there’s nothing better to talk about) to part ways with either one next year. They’re both still under contract; why mess with a great thing we’ve got going, that no other team has?? Let them kick ass next year, then see where we stand. What if one of them gets a serious injury next year? If we’ve still got both, then we’ve got our #1 guy (they’re #1 and #1A now; no need to say which is which) — but if we’ve traded one, and the one we keep is the one who’s injured? Oops.
This could be our Super Bowl Year. Yes, I really believe that. I see this team as very close to having an unstoppable run, if only we get a quality #2WR and a kick returner, and a ST coach who can motivate and teach his guys to be more effective in the basics of blocking and tackling.
KR, WR (and maybe a QB all) rolled into one!
Appalachian State QB Armanti Edwards could be that spark on ST that has been lacking of late. Potentially one that doesn’t cost very much either. I hope that the Panthers will be the the NFL team that gives my alma maters’ Star QB a chance!
How Moore stacks up against other QBs over the past 4 games...
Against newbie QBs (QB Rating … TD/INT):
Moore …… 104.6 … 7/1
Flacco …… 91.7 …. 4/4
Ryan ……… 86.5 …. 4/0
Henne …… 76.0 …. 4/6
Sanchez … 73.3 …. 2/3
Freeman .. 53.1 …. 2/11
There is no reason to think drafting a rookie QB would beat out Moore in his 1st or 2nd year.
Against elite QBs (QB Rating):
Rivers …………….. 113.9
Matt Moore!……… 104.5
Brees ……………… 102.5
Brady ………………. 95.9
Roethlisberger .. 98.9
McNabb ………….. 97.2
Manning ………….. 97.8
Warner ……………. 89.0
I don’t think he would stay this high over an entire season. However, over his 4 games he has proven that he has the potential to be among the best. And there is no reason to think a FA could come in and play better.
on behalf of tha dirty south: soul food, carolina blue, southern hospitality, and tha queen city
Who are you arguing with ST?
It seems you’re going on a pro-Moore rant when nobody is arguing the opposite. If it’s directed at me then it’s falling on deaf ears. I already said:
Keep Jake the backup, sign Moore to a low guaranteed money/ high incentive 3 year deal and select a QB in the draft to sit 3rd and be a project. This covers you bases short, and long term. Even if Moore is the absolute answer, who better to be a veteran mentor than Delhomme? If injury should befall Moore, he’s also a viable option in a pinch.
Cat Scratch Reader's resident optimist.
I sense some serious skepticism, which has already been alluded to
My point is just that other QBs are signed to fat contracts and handed the keys without having proven anything. Moore on the other is where he’s at by playing pro football! He should be given as much opportunity as any of them.
If he starts next year with 5 INTs in back to back games and looks to continue that pace, like Jake did, then I think we should yank him… like we should have Jake. Like any QB should be.
on behalf of tha dirty south: soul food, carolina blue, southern hospitality, and tha queen city
Which QB has been given a 'fat contract' without proving anything?
Rookies don’t, nor should they count.
The only one I can think of recently is Matt Cassel… and despite that he still played 15 1/2 games, and was a top 10 QB in every statistic… a far cry from Matt Moore’s 4 starts.
It’s shortsighted to anoint Moore ‘good to go’ and give him a giant deal, lest it blow up in out faces and be stuck with a big contract. Moore has been lights out his last two games, and I’m not skeptical, just cautious- hence the 3 year, incentive based deal that ensures Moore makes his money while allowing the team to take a low hit if he doesn’t pan out.
Cat Scratch Reader's resident optimist.
With you on that idea
Hell, I’m the biggest supporter he’s got on this blog, and I think the earliest. But I’ve never said anything like “give him a giant deal.” Your incentive laden contract is an excellent idea. I only wish every player in the league were signed to those kind of terms.
I have to admit...
I’m officially on the Moore bandwagon now. I was always in favor of giving him a shot, but now I see it as he is the answer. His past two games against Minny and New York have convinced me to drink the kool-aid. So Big-D, I’m with ya!
James, your incentive laden contract is an excellent idea. It is the best way to lock him up for the next few years, and I can’t think of any Panther fan that wouldn’t want him to earn that huge incentive payday (well, other than 1 that comes to mind, but that’s another story) .
My point was that rookies do count
They have proven nothing, often don’t develop, yet still get fat contracts… and are handed a team. Yet a guy plays great his first 7 game, and we still need to see more?
I don’t want to pay him any more than we have to. But I think he should get as fair a shot at leading this team, as any unproven rookie in the league.
on behalf of tha dirty south: soul food, carolina blue, southern hospitality, and tha queen city
And how many of those rookies are busts?
When you say ‘fat contract’ for a QB my mind jumps to Eli Manning and Phillip River’s deals last season. Those are guys that proved something… not Matt Moore.
Just because Jamarcus Russell robbed the Raiders blind doesn’t mean we should repeat the same mistake. Rookie QBs are making insane amounts of money, which is one of the sticking points in the negotiations of a new CBA.
Yes, we’ve seen more play well for 7 games… well as an average. He’s had two lights out stellar games, the last two. People are remembering his 2007- 3 TD, 5 INT, 67 rating season a little too fondly.
I like the kid, he should have his shot to lead this team into 2010… but I don’t want to lock him up to guaranteed money through 2015… not yet.
Cat Scratch Reader's resident optimist.
In 2007 as a starter
His QB rating was 86, 3 TDs, 2 INTs. Of course if you want to deflate his numbers you’ll include the 2 games he was thrown in late in the 4th after Carr stunk it up. Now why would you want to do that James?
on behalf of tha dirty south: soul food, carolina blue, southern hospitality, and tha queen city
To be perfectly honest..
I’m not sure what you guys are talking about… or more so, what you are disagreeing about… I think ST is saying Moore should be a starter.. and James is saying Moore should be a starter but he’s going to withhold his opinion of him until he sees more footage. Am I right? If that is the case, isn’t the fact that he should start a common theme here? lol
Helpful reminder for James at seasons end: 2nd Rnd CSR Fan Draft Pick.
You are right... BUT!!!
James hurt my feelings calling Raymond Felton bad Felton
on behalf of tha dirty south: soul food, carolina blue, southern hospitality, and tha queen city
Oooh
So this is a personal issue ;) lol
Helpful reminder for James at seasons end: 2nd Rnd CSR Fan Draft Pick.
Actually let me translate your numbers
If we are down 2 TDs with 3 minutes left, or 3 TDs with 10 minutes left, then rookie Matt Moore probably cannot bring us back… and might even throw INTs desperately trying. But as a starter???
on behalf of tha dirty south: soul food, carolina blue, southern hospitality, and tha queen city
Ok, maybe I am taking your skepticism too far
I agree with your plan… though I’m not convinced keeping Jake is best. But I just don’t want us jumping on his back the first time he struggles. The guy deserves as much a opportunity as any young QB.
on behalf of tha dirty south: soul food, carolina blue, southern hospitality, and tha queen city
next year is all Moore bro
I don’t want a FA to be our QB. Matt has proven that he is at least serviceable. We need to bring in the rookie competition factor. That’s a back up plan. What if we draft the next peyton manning and he gets to mature on the bench then what? But moore can start next year because he gives us the best chance to win.
What have you done for me lately?
by Steve785 on Dec 28, 2009 1:40 PM EST via mobile up reply actions
I would like to see Moore be the favorite, but I also won’t doubt there may be a better QB available. Remember any QB at this point who can complete a pass is going to impress Panthers fans, mostly because Jake struggled this year (regardless of whose fault it was, when he was in the game, he threw INTs). I want to see some competition brought in as well, I just don’t know from whom yet.
by bengoodfella on Dec 28, 2009 2:32 PM EST up reply actions
what FA can come in and perform as well as moore?
Don’t say jason campbell…all the good QBs in this league currently have a job. We need matt to manage this offense untill he becomes a star or untill the QB we draft this year develops into a star. He knows the offense let him manage it for now.
What have you done for me lately?
by Steve785 on Dec 28, 2009 4:23 PM EST via mobile up reply actions
Why can't we say Jason Campbell?
Helpful reminder for James at seasons end: 2nd Rnd CSR Fan Draft Pick.
you got to be kidding
JASON CAMPBELL SUCKS !!!!!!!!!!!
We may be able to do this and that but he sucks…I feel much safer with moore. Look at the game jc had in his house against the giants just last week. It was on tv I’m sure you saw it. He sucks real bad real real bad. He won’t have a job in washington after this year because he sucks. He might not start in this league again. He really really sucks
What have you done for me lately?
by Steve785 on Dec 28, 2009 4:36 PM EST via mobile up reply actions
Washington sucks. No run game, one decent receiver, one over the hill receiver, and some nobody receivers. Campbell is only a reflection of the talent that surrounds him and the coaching staff. He has a 81.8 QB rating for this horrible Washington season. Delhomme averages 82.1 for his career, including two seasons with 110+ when he only played a combined 7 games, starting 3.
As soon as Campbell gets out of hell-hole Washington, he’s going to transform into a great QB.
Helpful reminder for James at seasons end: 2nd Rnd CSR Fan Draft Pick.
+1
I don’t think Campbell sucks… but I’ve definitely cooled on the idea since Moore caught fire.
Moore/Jake/Rook… that’s my 2010 QB depth chart. Adding Campbell to the mix makes it too crazy. Watch a team like St. Louis or Oakland sign Campbell.
Cat Scratch Reader's resident optimist.
What if the rookie looks good in preseason/camp?
Would we want him stuck at #3? I can’t see Jake at #3. Then Jake would be competing with a rookie for the backup job. That sounds more degrading then cutting him.
on behalf of tha dirty south: soul food, carolina blue, southern hospitality, and tha queen city
We cross that bridge when we get to it.
If we find ourselves in a position where a newly drafted rookie is competing with Jake in pre-season, I think we made a good pick.
Helpful reminder for James at seasons end: 2nd Rnd CSR Fan Draft Pick.
+1
Furney are friggin genius’ if a 3rd rounder competes with Jake for the backup spot. You wont normally find an NFL ready QB in the 3rd round or later.
Let’s not forget, Stafford only just beat out Culpepper to start in Detroit this season and Culpepper did nothing the previous 3 seasons and Stafford was the #1 overall pick.
Cat Scratch Reader's resident optimist.
All starting rookies this year did better than Jake
Granted they were 1st rounders. But I don’t think it would be such a huge accomplishment to beat out a guy who has the 2nd worse QB rating among qualified QBs and who is 4th in INTs even having missed 4 games. The bars not set real high.
Jake might become the Chris Weinke of backups… Serviceable for a quarter if needed. But wreck your season if having to start.
on behalf of tha dirty south: soul food, carolina blue, southern hospitality, and tha queen city
That's true
But also assuming that Jake doesn’t bounce back next season. Stranger things have happened.
Helpful reminder for James at seasons end: 2nd Rnd CSR Fan Draft Pick.
Yes that would be in the strange category
on behalf of tha dirty south: soul food, carolina blue, southern hospitality, and tha queen city
guy they have a whole bunch of talent
If he can’t make it work then he sucks. People said the same thing about carr and guess what he sucks. If jc is on this team…I will be extremely dissappointed. The guy sucks really bad. Don’t give a shit what his rating is its irrelavant.
What have you done for me lately?
by Steve785 on Dec 28, 2009 4:56 PM EST via mobile up reply actions
how is it irrelevant, exactly?
QB rating is one of the best ways to determine if a QB is any good or not
Campbell doesn’t suck — the Redskins suck
If you put Jason Campbell on a team with a decent line and a good RB/WR, he would be an upgrade to a lot of teams at the QB position.
ok think what you want
But he sucks. He has had talent and he can’t get it done. Clinton portis is an exceptional talent. Santana moss is a talent chris cooley etc. Etc. The redskins suck and so does he. You put peyton manning on that team and watch them be 14-1 right now pal.
What have you done for me lately?
by Steve785 on Dec 28, 2009 5:16 PM EST via mobile up reply actions
Really?
Considering a QB rating is a direct reflection of a QB’s performance (skewed only when odd things such as a QB completing 1 of 1 for a game happen, none of which have applied to Campbell) how is irrelevent? Or is it only irrelevant because it goes against your opinion? It’s so much easier to “not give a shit” and call things irrelevant than consider alternatives, isn’t it?
By the way, which players are talented? Antwaan Randle El is the only Washington receiver ProFootballFocus.com ranks as not being terrible (They break games down play and play and assign every player at every position a rating).
Randle El has caught 75% of the passes thrown his way, meanwhile the other three receivers have caught 59%. If Campbell is so bad, why can one receiver catch a majority of balls thrown his way while the other three struggle to catch over half? In fact, to my surprise, Santana Moss is ranked as the worst of the receivers. Bryant Johnson (DET) and Heyward-Bey (OAK) are the only two receivers in the NFL ranked worse than Moss receiving at least 25% of total snaps.
Smith, Muhammad, and Jarrett have dropped 6 passes this year… Moss, Thomas, and Randle El have dropped 18.
Ladell Betts & Clinton Portis are ranked 31st and 44th in rushing of 60 running backs receiving more than 25% of snaps. Portis averages the most of the two at 4yd/c.
Their tackles are ranked in the bottom 10 of the NFL overall, their center is ranked in the bottom 10, their tight ends rank lowly, their FB is ranked in the bottom 10. Their defense is the only part about them that is half decent, and even then, Doughty is the only guy in the secondary ranked above average.
Despite, Campbell is ranked 21st among QB’s, from the top. I’m not a Washington fan but it’s hard to overcome that situation.
Helpful reminder for James at seasons end: 2nd Rnd CSR Fan Draft Pick.
Add in the dropped passes..
And Campbell has completed 70-75% of his passes this season.
Helpful reminder for James at seasons end: 2nd Rnd CSR Fan Draft Pick.
yeah i hear your stats
But I’ve seen him play nemerous games and he sucks imo. Maybe not as bad as delhomme this year but he sucks. And a whole bunch of those passes that are dropped are campbells fault. Like I said if peyton was there is wouldn’t be like that.
What have you done for me lately?
by Steve785 on Dec 28, 2009 5:26 PM EST via mobile up reply actions
Wait – how are dropped passes his fault? Dropped passes aren’t bad throws, they’re passes that the receiver catches and proceeds to drop before the play ends. It is completely out of Campbell’s hands at that point..
Of course it would be a different team with Peyton, look how the Colts performed without him.
I’ve seen Campbell play quite a bit this season and I’ve often thought he does a pretty good job with what he has to work with. He has even won me a few fantasy games this year.
Helpful reminder for James at seasons end: 2nd Rnd CSR Fan Draft Pick.
hes not awesome soo yeah thats my point he sucks
What have you done for me lately?
by Steve785 on Dec 28, 2009 5:36 PM EST via mobile up reply actions
Peyton makes ANY team better
so that’s unfair comparison. They have had a ton of injuries, and a coach who doesn’t get to be the coach. The whole franchise is in disarray, from top down, and I was long time REDSKIN fan, till the Panther Pride hit!
hes not a peyton
Or that caliber nor will he ever be. I don’t want a mediocre QB that just doesn’t suck everyweek. I want a elite QB that teams fear and respect. That if our run isn’t working and let’s say we have fumbled a couple for tds and we r down big we need a guy who can carry us down the field and win. We need to be able to put this kind of faith in our QB. And he’s not that guy
What have you done for me lately?
by Steve785 on Dec 28, 2009 5:40 PM EST via mobile up reply actions
I assume there is someone that fits that description available to us? Otherwise it’s just like wishing for a million dollars. Or is Moore going to be that guy?
Helpful reminder for James at seasons end: 2nd Rnd CSR Fan Draft Pick.
moore might be that guy 1 day
The rookie we draft might be that guy 1 day. But no one that will be a FA. This year will be
What have you done for me lately?
by Steve785 on Dec 28, 2009 8:37 PM EST via mobile up reply actions
your argument makes no sense
I hear your stats but he sucks? What are you drinking, and please send me some of it … that has to be the worst counter-argument I’ve ever seen.
Dude — Jason Campbell does not suck. Would Washington be better if they had Peyton Manning? Of course — but name 1 team that wouldn’t be better with Peyton Manning.
The facts show that Campbell is an above average QB on a terrible team. If he were on a decent football team he would be even better.
I’m sure that Oakland, Cleveland, St. Louis, and Buffalo would be glad to take him — he would certainly be better than what those teams currently have, and there are other teams like Seattle, Kansas City, and Jacksonville that would probably take him too.
i say that cuz the stats r bs
He actually sucks. You can look at numbers all u want but I’ve seen the kid suck everytime I watch him. So let some team take him and ride him to the super bowl. Jason campbell mvp baby yeaaahhhh
What have you done for me lately?
by Steve785 on Dec 28, 2009 8:41 PM EST via mobile up reply actions
I guess you're entitled to your opinion...
but I just can’t fathom how you can justify saying he sucks. If he played for any other team he would have better results in the win column, but to each his own, I guess.
Cambell doesn't suck
Washington’s 1000 offensive coordinator and coaching changes suck. He’s had to learn upteen million new offenses since he has been there, and still plays ok. They are trying to run a modified west coast, and he’s just not a west coast qb. He’s mobile with an extremely strong arm, he actually brings similar intangibles to Matt Moore. He would fit a strong run scheme with down field shots, like what we have, and say san diego would be a good fit, if they didn’t already have Rivers. But really- we need to keep Moore, and continue to let him get experience, He has done a great job, as I knew he would.
Agree with you on the similarities
Before Moore showed us what he’s got (which is plenty!) I thought going after Campbell would be an upgrade, and that in our system, he’d do a lot better than in Washington.
Now I don’t see us needing him — Moore has answered the bell, and twice knocked out the opposition.
I don't think Campbell will wan't to be a backup
on behalf of tha dirty south: soul food, carolina blue, southern hospitality, and tha queen city
I don’t know what FA can come in and perform as well as Moore. That’s why I say keep Moore around and draft a rookie or find a quarterback who can compete with Moore, if there’s one available.
I just think we have a low standard for QB’s right now. I never said there would be a QB who could do better than Moore, I just said I didn’t doubt it could happen.
by bengoodfella on Dec 28, 2009 5:05 PM EST up reply actions
these no drew brees in the FA
Just a bunch of bums…we draft 1 keep delhomme resign moore and hope for the best.
What have you done for me lately?
by Steve785 on Dec 28, 2009 5:18 PM EST via mobile up reply actions
There's never an elite QB in free agency
Teams aren’t that dumb. There’s always just career backups, semi-promising youngsters, and guys who have been hurt or fallen on hard times.
The early bird catches the worm, but the second mouse gets the cheese.
by Flowing Willow on Dec 29, 2009 4:12 AM EST up reply actions
Either way we need a solid backup
Someone who we feel confident can play well if Moore is inured, or if heaven forbid he looks like Jake did. But I think the pressure is off to have to make that our top priority. We can focus on drafting a rook or signing a FA WR or d-linemen first.
on behalf of tha dirty south: soul food, carolina blue, southern hospitality, and tha queen city
But what happens if Moore is out for multiple games?
I’d love for Jake to come in and redeem himself… But recent history says otherwise. I just think it’s best to start anew.
on behalf of tha dirty south: soul food, carolina blue, southern hospitality, and tha queen city
+1
I like Cantwell. Despite the fact that his name will implore all kinds of haters… I can hear it now.. “Cantthrowell” “Cantwellpass” “Cantwellead” “Cantwin”.
I petition that we officially change his name to Canwell.
Helpful reminder for James at seasons end: 2nd Rnd CSR Fan Draft Pick.
If Cantwell is the #3 then we have to keep Jake
on behalf of tha dirty south: soul food, carolina blue, southern hospitality, and tha queen city
BigDavis' theory was..
Trading McCown if Jake stays… so.. yeah, Jake would still be here.
Helpful reminder for James at seasons end: 2nd Rnd CSR Fan Draft Pick.
Ugh... I want to get rid of McCown more than Jake
Could he really have trade value?
on behalf of tha dirty south: soul food, carolina blue, southern hospitality, and tha queen city
Agreed. I feel good about Moore as a backup at the very least at this point. Who knows what will happen this offseason? I hate QB controversies but it worked out last time when we brought in Jake, Weinke and Peete to training camp I guess. I think we need a receiver beyond very badly.
by bengoodfella on Dec 28, 2009 8:08 PM EST up reply actions
"complete a pass"?????
Who do you know in the draft, or who do you know in the NFL right now, who’d be available to us, who’s thrown 3 TDs and 0 INTs, in back-to-back games, vs quality opponents (or any opponents)?
I’d say he’s done a bit more than “complete a pass.”
So say you’re a salesman, and you surpass all expectations, and exceed all goals set for you this year — and your boss says to you, “You did okay, but we need to see more — we’re bringing in another guy or two to split your territory and see who does better next year.” How’d that suit you?
I believe we should do whatever we can...
To keep our offense intact. We haven’t had a lot of it this year and it’s looking like that can pretty much all be laid at Mr. Delhomme’s feet.
I’ve never been a Jake basher, but I have bashed Jeff Davidson plenty and I honestly am starting to regret it.
Looking at the season there really wasn’t any way to open up the playbook on account of our inability to threaten deep. Everything had to be designed to reduce turnover potential.
Now with a QB that has only turned it over once in 4 starts this season our coaching staff seems to have the confidence to take some chances.
Getting to the point. Now that we see our offense can work with the players we have, why would we want to get rid of any of them?
We’ve proven we can succeed on defense with just about anybody in the lineup. It’s the scheme. If we have to start trading people I’d rather it was someone on the defense.
Frankly I don’t know if Stewart would be this good late in the season if he had taken all the reps from the onset, and would be more comfortable keeping both him and D-Will. If we have to cut or restructure lets cut and restructure defense.
I do agree completely with the approach to the qb situation and love the San Francisco jab. I know they’ve got some classy fans but some of them have just been downright obnoxious :-)
some unproductive offense could go...
specifically Jarrett, and maybe goodson, unless you can keep him on PS for another season, work on the early fumble issues. Sutton looked more reliable. Looks like we’ll have some available d-line, and possible LB’s that could be used to get a little value. Keeping double-trouble should not be impossible. I think they complement each other- they are team players, and sounds like they are best friends. I wouldn’t break them up next season, although Stewarts performance may lend itself to more carries next season. IMO the piece we are still in desperate need of is the solid #2 WR. Moose or Kenny Moore could be solid 3-4 receivers.
Jarrett could go.
It seems kind of bizarre that we aren’t giving him a shot now that Moore is out there getting it done. I was kind of hoping that maybe they had worked up some chemistry taking those second team reps. I’d think if they want to increase his trade value we’d be playing him. Maybe he’ll get a chance now that Smitty is out. Not a lot of time to prove anything though.
If we’re lucky Goodson might work out as a slot receiver if he can’t get it going as a running back. As you say Sutton looks more reliable as our 3rd RB and if Goodson can be the man in the slot it would be easier to concentrate on that number 2 WR in the offseason.
And yeah, I might be sick if we broke up Double Trouble. They’re both just too good to let go.
by GuyIncognito on Dec 28, 2009 2:34 PM EST up reply actions
Kenny Moore and Martin
those guys should get more looks than Jarrett- I think Moore has good hands, and made some nice catches in what little time he’s been in. I’d like to see more of those guys, and just call the jarrett experiment failed and over.
"there really wasn’t any way to open up the playbook on account of our inability to threaten deep."
I agree. With that in mind, instead of “dumbing down” the play-calling for Moore, I think Davidson dumbed it down for Delhomme, and is opening it up for Moore, now that he sees what he’s capable of.
It was Moose who said he’s done everything the coaches asked of him, throwing the deep ball and the crossing routes. Jake was underthrowing the deep ones, and throwing the crosses behind the receivers. Look how the WRs production has improved.
I'm with you.
WR production is much improved. Makes a world of difference when you’re going up after a catchable ball :-)
Hope this kool-aid isn’t too poisonous but I remember Delhomme was having a great season in 2007 before his elbow blew up. 8 TDs to one INT in the first three games.
That was during Davidson’s first season. I hated the playcalling almost this entire year but in light of the last four games maybe we don’t need to clean as much shop as previously thought…
by GuyIncognito on Dec 28, 2009 2:38 PM EST up reply actions
OK. We all agree Moore should start next year, but what will bull headed, stubborn Fox do?? Swallow his pride and bench Pick6 or allow him to continue to bring the team down as a starter with his interceptions? IMO, Fox should be fired for sitting Moore on the bench this long and saying Pick6 gives the team the best chance to win. Obviously, he his HORRIBLE at evaluating talent and has loyalties to an extreme fault.
"it's a bad day to have a bad day"
I wouldn’t say Fox is horrible at evaluating talent, though I would give you he is probably just gives too much deference to veterans. Moore is doing exactly what a QB for the Panthers needs to do. He is forcing teams to not just stick 8 men in the box because we can throw the ball. It’s actually really simple and it’s great to see a QB on the roster who is able to do that this year.
I hate QB controversies, but I think regardless of what happens in the offseason Moore, Delhomme, and another QB to be named later will be on the roster battling it out in training camp. If Fox does decide to start Delhomme again, hopefully it will be on merit.
by bengoodfella on Dec 28, 2009 2:30 PM EST up reply actions
SF fans:
Their own pick will be Top10 but not ours!
I blog the Carolina Panthers at www.catscratchreader.com
Nice work again James and good thought provoking stuff....
on the Delhomme saga and RB situation. Consider me in your bunker on Delhomme and the QB situation. I think you’ve laid out the best approach to maximize our current potential while prepaing for the future.
I disagree on the RB’s though. IMO our RB tandem gives us such a unique advantage. Most NFL offenses have been trending to predominantly pass oriented schemes and hence defenses are being built to primarily stop the pass.
I think we have a legitimate window of opportunity here and just need to tweak what we have. I would definitely look to add a return specialist in the draft and add a WR via FA if we can’t resign Peppers.
I don’t want to see any coaching changes so this team can hit camp already running without having to learn new schemes, systems, terminologies, etc.
Before you deal DeAngelo a Williams.......
I understand the juggling act coming in free agency….However, if you like this team the way it is and remember you still have guys like Thomas Davis, who should be amazing next season, and then there are the other backups and potential starters like Louis Leonard, Tank Tyler and the old 350 pounder, Ma’ake Kemoeatu who will all be within shouting distance, when mini camp starts. Then you have guys like James Anderson and even Hollis Thomas and others who are now regular contributors on defense. Hey maybe some of these guys are assets and could be used as trade bait.
Before you jettison Williams to keep Stewart and grab a wideout you may want to think. “Can Stewart take a 16 game schedule and run 25 times per week and last an entire season?” That is a tall order for a guy who misses 80 percent of all practices and then complains each week of achilles pain and remains questionable until gameday.
We know they (double trouble) platoon well and even almost made it an entire season without missing multiple games (Delo’s last two weeks)….I think Fox has not forgotten the hell that was the 2005 Seahawk game and will not let it happen again (I just hope he does not think Sutton is not the answer).
So, you then have the Peppers question. Do you pay him 20 mil? Sure, if he plays like he did the past two games. But, if he plays like he did for most if the season, NO! With him gone there is plenty of money to grab a pass rushing defensive end and have money left over.
As far as Jake goes….as far as my money goes, there is a already a new " Young Jake…circa 2003" in town. His name is Matt Moore. Moore should have been installed after the 3rd game but Fox had an investment he had to protect and try and make perform and unfortunately for the team and fans, that investment was made in the form of Delhomme and it was wasted money and even worse it looks like a stubborn coach cost this team a shot at a wildcard but not admitting he had messed up by pulling his old friend sooner. Fox should probably have been fired for not playing Moore earlier, but that is water under the bridge with the new revelation that the Richardsons are keeping Fox (they could have waited until after the Saints game to release that info…just in case the team was really playing to save their beloved coach’s job).
So, what do you do? Well, the team needs a bona fide deep threat. A Devery Henderson type of player will do. Will there be one available in the second round? As long as he is not scouted by the same clown who picked Jarrett, the Panthers may just find one (I lobbied all along for the Panthers to chose USC’s Steve Smith instead of Jarrett, just to confuse the second tier Fox annoucers, but the Panthers would not buy it).
Now that we know Fox will be back. Watch for Jake to be back. But if Fox is truly smart he will bring Jake back only with the understanding that he will be the backup and mentor to Moore…If Jake does not like it, well he can go and lose games as a Raider for a year then retire.
Again, you do not trade Williams until you have to and right now, you do not have to. A wide receiver can be gotten. The defense will be fine, it just took 7 games for the team to figure out what Meeks wanted them to do. It is the cover two and it works, with guys who buy into it. Over the past two weeks this team has embarrassed some “high octane” offenses…(AP and the Giants tandem)…They made Farve and Manning look like rookies. So, I believe the defense is just fine.
i'm not saying we must trade Williams
but if we were going to, now is the best time to do so – his stock is very high and we are not concerned with a extension; Williams is a class act but if he wanted a lot of money (which he deserves), he could hold out for more money like Peppers
“That is a tall order for a guy who misses 80 percent of all practices and then complains each week of achilles pain and remains questionable until gameday. "
Sure he misses practice on Wednesday (not sure how one day of the week equals 80% but I’ll go with it), it has been the norm this season. I believe that’s more on Fox and the training staff then Stewart. I don’t think Stewart is in charge of how he is listed either.
My real question, when has Stewart ever verbally complained of his pain? More so, when does he do it week in, week out? I’ve missed that part.
Helpful reminder for James at seasons end: 2nd Rnd CSR Fan Draft Pick.
2010
Double Trouble should be kept intact. The running game is going to go over 2400 yds for the second straight year! Matt Moore looks like he is ready to be the opening day starter next year. The panthers have enough high caliber players that they don’t need an elite QB. Matt Moore is young and should be given the opportunity to start next season. If Fox isn’t willing to end the Delhomme era then he should be fired. Otherwise Fox should be kept because i’m not sure the panthers can get anyone better. Also the fact that the players didn’t quit on the coaches shows something. I like the idea of keeping Jake as a back up because he is a good guy but only if he is willing to restructure his contract. He just isn’t worth the money. Beason needs to be given a contract extension. He has the chance to be one of the best LB’s ever. He has been dominant since he came into the league. He plays with intensity every snap, every game. Peppers is a baller and has been one since college. People who say he doesn’t play hard are fools. That being said the panthers shouldn’t risk franchising him again. The same thing will happen; he will be imposible to trade and the panthers will have to pay him 20 million which could hurt other areas of the team. Either sign him to a long term contract or let him go in free agency. Not splurging on Peppers could enable the panthers to get someone like Anquan Bolden. Wide receiver should be addressed via free agency or a trade. As mentioned above that is one area the panthers don’t have luck drafting, outside of Steve Smith, who was drafted as a kick returner; which the panthers need. The panthers could use a big DT as well. Heres to a hopefully productive offseason.
Keep both RB's...
Both are on rookie contracts. I guarantee you that they will extend D-Will in the offseason this year to avoid having to tag him. He’ll get around 35-40 mil for 6 yrs. Williams is the best RB on the roster, it amazes me how many of our fans have short term memories. Stewart is good too, but if I was starting a franchise, Williams is the franchise RB. He has deceptive power, quickness, speed, good hands, and a good work ethic. Stewart has been injured ever since he got here…nagging foot injuries. Now they could attempt to keep Stewart also but he wouldnt get starter money. If he’s happy with that fine. If not, weve shown that we can get RB in the draft. Theoretically they could keep both if Pep signs to a long term deal, Delhomme restructures his contract and they are front loaded with no salary cap….our running game is what it is because of BOTH backs, not just one.
As for Double Trouble...
Williams has been on record saying he doesnt want a large contract, or he would have re upped after last year….
Did he say why? Got a link?
on behalf of tha dirty south: soul food, carolina blue, southern hospitality, and tha queen city
Short term memories?
What are we forgetting, then? We know how good Williams is. We also know how good Stewart is. Despite nagging injuries, Stewart has never missed a game, so they’re pretty irrelevant.
No one has argued that either back lacks talent but that Stewart would potentially give us a brighter future and handle a heavier load better than Williams would. Stewart is also two years fresher.
Helpful reminder for James at seasons end: 2nd Rnd CSR Fan Draft Pick.
wha????
Why would Stewart give us a brighter future? Because he ran for 200 yards yesterday? Williams would have been flirting with AP’s record yesterday if healthy through that swiss cheese defense the Giants were playing. Stewart has missed some games, early last year if im not mistaken, and he’s had an achillies injury all season. Williams has already been running the ball anywhere from 9-20 carries a game. Stewart, less than that. I love em both, but I just dont see what Stewart has done so far in his career that would warrent him being kept over Williams at this point…..
I'm pretty sure those games were pre-season games. He played in 16 last season..
Yesterdays performance has nothing to do with my consideration of his talent. Williams benefits from breaking off long runs in between decent gains. Stewart more so plows over guys on every play. Loses and no gainers happen to every back and generally are at the fault of the o-line and not the runner, so I really don’t consider them unless they start becoming abundant. It’s what a player does when he gets out there and has to rely on himself.
If each back were to receive equal carries, I think Stewart would end up with more touchdowns and possibly more yards. As is, Stewart only needs 109 yards against the Saints to surpass Williams yards this season. He will probably end up with slightly more carries, though (Williams has 216 on the season, Stewart is currently at 205).
It’s just my personal preference really, neither guy is that much more dominant than the other.
By the way, the Giants are ranked 15th against the rush after getting destroyed by Stewart.. I wouldn’t call them swiss cheese. That’s about as much discredit to Stewart as the announcers have been giving the team as a whole saying teams came out “flat” against them.
Helpful reminder for James at seasons end: 2nd Rnd CSR Fan Draft Pick.
Just so we're all on the same page about the 'injury' myth.
DeAngelo Williams has played in 58 of 63 potential regular season games (92%)
Jonathan Stewart has played in 31 of 31 potential regular season games (100%)
Preseason games should never be brought into the equation. Teams will hold out guys because of bunyons because it’s not worth having them miss any real time.
Cat Scratch Reader's resident optimist.
It concerns me when a player has a history of sitting out practice, but never misses a game
For all we know Stewart could have been holding himself out. Want to relive that whole preseason debate? :)
on behalf of tha dirty south: soul food, carolina blue, southern hospitality, and tha queen city
Not really, because people were proved wrong.
A 1,000 yard season by a backup RB doesn’t sound like the hallmarks of a guy who enjoys ‘dogging it’.
Cat Scratch Reader's resident optimist.
It's ok, you can say "I" was proved wrong
Because I hope I was. But his running out of gas this week was another sign… granted he ran 28 times! Ouch! But I don’t see the same work ethic we saw in DWill… or the same passion we see in Smitty. Kinda reminds me a bit more of Peppers.
And please understand I am playing Devil’s advocate a bit… I also think he could be a star.
on behalf of tha dirty south: soul food, carolina blue, southern hospitality, and tha queen city
You make a good argument
The Giants did look like they were much more focused on the pass. It looked like of a lot of blitzing, which probably led to some longer runs, and short passes for a lot of yardage. And Stewart wasn’t splitting carries. DeAngelo averages 17.5 attempts as a starter this year. Stewart as a starter has averaged 27!
It’s also worth while to mention that DeAngelo averages .3 more ypc.
on behalf of tha dirty south: soul food, carolina blue, southern hospitality, and tha queen city
And most of DeAngelo's starts this year were with an inept passing game
on behalf of tha dirty south: soul food, carolina blue, southern hospitality, and tha queen city
And the 1st team O-line...
just saying.
2 backups on the offensive line mean far more to a runner than the success of the passing game.
Cat Scratch Reader's resident optimist.
Honestly..
I feel like Stewart opened it up for Moore, not Moore opened it up for Stewart.
In two extremities, Williams is the type of guy that breaks a 60 yard run for a TD and changes the momentum of a game. Stewart is the type of guy that gets hit in the backfield, picks up two yards, gets hit again, goes another two yards, and gets hit by two more guys, and falls forward for another yard or two.
That’s why our combination works so well.. They’re two completely different backs and yet they also share a lot of attributes.
Helpful reminder for James at seasons end: 2nd Rnd CSR Fan Draft Pick.
I agree with your RB analysis, but not your 1st statement
Moore got 3 of his TDs and like 5 3rd down conversions in the first half. Where as more of Stewart’s production opened it up in the 2nd half. I think they planned to bumrush Moore, and when it didn’t work it confused the crap out of them… taking focus completely off our running game.
But they both played well the entire game, which made the offense practically unstoppable. A QB who can protect the ball and complete 3rd downs is such a foreign concept to this team.
on behalf of tha dirty south: soul food, carolina blue, southern hospitality, and tha queen city
And take a 3rd and five, and rush up the middle for 6 and a FD, too.
That’s the play that Smitty took out a LB with a vicious comeback block. Set the stage for a TD.
I was waiting for a "Whoa Nelly" from Mixon on that one
on behalf of tha dirty south: soul food, carolina blue, southern hospitality, and tha queen city
QBs, money, and such
First and foremost great read James and great job Panthers on two great weeks!
Although, I kinda see the QB evaulatoin issue differently then you James, I think you’re on the money about Moore. I think it is impossible to have a wait and see approach to the QB position. QBs that can have a horrible week and bounce back know that the coaching staff and team stand behind them 100%. Being mentally tough is one part coaching commitment and one part player makeup. Otherwise you get into situations like Cleveland where the coach will pull you on a whim and the QB never has time to develop mentally because they are always playing for their job. QB is the one position on the field where absolute loyalty is paramount to the success of the player.
That said Moore has earned the front-runner spot for QB. There has not been a 4 game period in this season where Delhomme has been as good as Moore. 2 weak starts or not, one of those ended with a “W”, Delhomme couldn’t beat 3 of 4 teams even horrible teams cough Bills cough. As of now I don’t believe the Panthers have a better QB, given a training camp and season as the starter I think Moore would be exactly what Fox looks for in a QB: able to make the big throws to keep defenses honest and savvy enough not to give the ball away.
On to the money…..
The Panthers have a large number of FAs in 2010: Dante Wesley, Keydrick Vincent, Quinton Teal, Richard Marshall, Thomas Davis, Tyler Brayton, Nick Hayden ERFA, Rhys Lloyd, Kenneth Moore ERFA, Matt Moore RFA, and Muhsin Muhammad. Some of these guys need major contracts, others simple extensions, the rest will walk. And then there is the “RB controversy” of keeping both Wiliams and Stewart Peppers and signing a #1/2 receiver.
If there is an uncapped season the Panthers would be able to do this easily. Sign Williams to a 6 year deal front loaded with big money in the uncapped year and the two years afterwords. Then when Stewart’s deal is up in 2013 Williams would be hitting the lower end of his contract when Stewart is getting his own 6 year big money deal. The lower pay would coincide with the expected decline in Williams’ production keeping him from getting cut or have a new deal forced on him. The same can be done with Peppers, Davis, and Marshall big money in the 2010 uncapped year with cap friendly money for the remaining duration of their contracts.
Sorry for the great wall of text that was a lot longer then I intended.
Long, but plenty of meat on that bone!
Thanks for the info — good post.
We need
for the sake of this offense to keep double trouble and put Moore in as QB. He is playing as a level that probably 80% of any team out there would take him as their starter. One other positive for him (if it matters) he has Peter King on his side. I think he is the only player on the Panthers that King likes.
Interesting quote from Peppers
“"I’m proud of how we’re playing," Peppers said. "We’ve been getting better. I think we’ve been playing well the whole season really, but these last two weeks we’ve really been effective. That speaks for the job the coaches are doing getting us prepared, as well as the players executing the game plan we’re told to do."’
http://www.heraldonline.com/247/story/1831929.html
How many guys wanting to play on another team next year would be saying, “we, we, we” ? — they’d be saying I more than twice (we/us was used 6 times, plus he compliments the coaches, which may show even more about his attitude towards staying a Panther.)
He has seemed much more vocal lately
I mean that relative to typical Peppers. Maybe Beason’s heart to heart really worked.
on behalf of tha dirty south: soul food, carolina blue, southern hospitality, and tha queen city
by southtunnel on Dec 28, 2009 10:24 PM EST up reply actions
I agree bigdavis... he has been more vocal lately.
But, to play devil’s advocate what better way to pitch yourself after the debacle last season than put forth the persona that you’re the ultimate team player. He needs to do alot of PR to sell himself to the league, especially considering how well respected the Big Cat is around the NFL.
Not saying that’s the case… just playing Devil’s Advocate
Cat Scratch Reader's resident optimist.
by James Dator on Dec 29, 2009 12:11 AM EST up reply actions
Do we need another "advocate" on here?
Just kidding.
I don’t see Peppers as being, shall we call it, subtle, as to consider working on his image. I think more what you see is what you get.
But we’re all speculating — it’ll work itself out in the months ahead.
i disagree with dealing d.w he paid his dues then why not keep both by letin jake go.. am sure he would b reasonable cause its his team..how often u get a r.b. that good,we have2 i say give it a shot b4 talking trade. i would trade gamble b4 d. w stew known 2loose the ball and his running style is injury friendly..so we gotta have both..com on man..i say pep would stay wich would free some cash..we can do it next year would b our year
Matt Moore's take on Double Trouble
Quarterback Matt Moore noted how it lifts the team to have Williams and Stewart push each other during practice. “People see what they do on Sundays, but I think it’s what they do during the week that flies under the radar,” he said.
You have to consider that having them both, pushing and challenging each other during the week makes them even greater talents than they may be singularly.
Was it by chance...
That we were able to pick up two running backs with so much class and so team oriented?
Helpful reminder for James at seasons end: 2nd Rnd CSR Fan Draft Pick.
Smitty said it himself....
that he could never be as good as those two combined….I mean we should really appreciate these guys for what they are doing. Seeing both go for over 1000yds in a single season is something special. That, the two beat-downs issued in the past two weeks, and the payback game in AZ will make this a memorable season for me.
by John Chilton on Dec 29, 2009 5:55 PM EST up reply actions
Those are exactly what I call..
diamonds buried in horse manure. Just because everything around it stinks doesn’t make it any less valuable.
Helpful reminder for James at seasons end: 2nd Rnd CSR Fan Draft Pick.

by 


















