Jets Ground the Panthers 17-6
This story line is getting old: The Panther defense plays well enough for the win but the offense turns the ball over repeatedly and can't finish drives when they do manage to get in the red zone. The Panthers tried a new wrinkle this week as they opened the game using the no huddle. It makes me wonder if they Panther brass has been reading this blog as many here have been asking for that. Of course if that were true Jake wouldn't be the starter week to week. Yet rather than create an edge for the offense it created confusion, last minute play changes and sloppy play.
So here's the Good, the Bad and the Ugly.
The Good
The good was the defense holing the Jets offense to 10 points for the game. Though they were constantly being put back on the field due to turnovers they limited the Jets to 154 yards passing and created 3 turnovers. Chris Gamble had a very nice INT and Julius Peppers and Chris Harris forced fumbles. Though the rush defense was not spectacular giving up 138 yards on the ground they played well enough, giving up a long run of 16 yards to the #2 rushing offense in the league.
The Bad
The bad has to go to the Panthers offense line, where Double Trouble managed only 75 yards between the two of them. They also allowed three sacks and let defenders get penetration all day. I'm sure part of the blame falls with the offensive game plan but in the end simply running the ball would not have been enough today. The Jets played fast on defense and seemed to always have the underneath routes well covered. In spite of the absence of Kris Jenkins the Panthers still could not manage much running off the guards.
The Ugly
The ugly is obvious and that is the QB play of Jake Delhomme. The Panthers again chose to let Jake heave it long and every time he did it got picked as the ball was under thrown. Sure the first one, a pick 6 was a fluke bounce, but the point is it was a busted route due to play change at the LOS. What aggravated me most was the Chinese fire drill at the LOS constantly which in the end didn't seem to fool the Jets at all.
So the Panthers season is all but dead at 4-7 and playing like total crap on offense. It is time for the Panthers to look inward and start planning for the future. Once this last disappointment is digested the Panthers will have some tough decisions to make on both sides of the ball. The first has got to be who starts under center because this is getting too painful to watch, but of course I will watch it anyway.
Honorable Mention
Captain Munnerlyn had a very nice punt return of 37 yards as special teams played well on returns and coverage outside of one kick off return for 38 yards. A better day for special teams.
DE Tyler Brayton had one of his best days as a Panther with 7 tackles and 1.5 sacks.
So what else does Panther Nation have to say about this latest defeat?
146 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Now ...
will Moore start just to see if he is worth keeping around next year or will Fox remain stubborn and not make any changes.
My guess is stubborn
Fox needs to get at least 7 or 8 wins to justify keeping him around during his exit interview. Whether he’s correct or not he still believes Jake gives him the best chance of winning.
Don’t expect to see Moore unless we get those 7 or 8 wins. If we do, then I think we’ll see Moore around week 14.
Cat Scratch Reader's resident optimist.
I don't think 7-8 wins is possible
We have lost to the Bills, Dolphins and Jets. No way we pull out 1-2 wins against NE, MIN and NO. Maybe NYG and TB, but even TB looks tough now. I say 6-10 is the best case scenario.
on behalf of tha dirty south: soul food, carolina blue, southern hospitality, and tha queen city
My condolences
Jets fans have had many games where our team played like that this year so we can definitely empathize. Good game, and here’s to a better 2010 for both squads.
Editor-In-Chief
Gang Green Nation
SB Nation's Jets Blog
http://www.ganggreennation.com
Thanks John B
That CB Revis is a stud. Nice drafting by the Jets to trade up in the draft to get him. Good luck with the rest of the season.
I blog the Carolina Panthers at www.catscratchreader.com
The season's over - Jake needs to be on the bench
I’ve made all the excuses I’m gonna make for him — this one’s on him. Too many wounded ducks thrown up for grabs, too many missed receivers when they do get open, too many times with the same snap count on two — he’s done.
+1
I have to agree.
We have been patient and given him, literally, every chance we possibly could to lead us to a surprise play off appearance. It’s just not happening.
I’ll still support the Panthers week in, week out, but we need to see what other options we have to better understand our team when we hit the off season.
Double Trouble; we've got the best running backs in the NFL that never see the ball!
It's garbage time anyways
Too late to rally. Might as well see if Moore has anything in the tank. For that matter, might as well give Goodson more time as well… If he can prove himself, then he might be good trade bait.
on behalf of tha dirty south: soul food, carolina blue, southern hospitality, and tha queen city
Per charlotteobserver.com
Fox said he considered switching to Matt Moore during the game, but decided against it.
"There was discussion about it," said Fox. "But overall, we felt like Jake was the best guy to be in there for what we were doing in this game, and that’s what we did."
Asked if he thought the Panthers’ reluctance to turn to Moore reflected a lack of confidence in the third-year quarterback, Fox said, "I don’t think that’s accurate."
NOT ACCURATE
Well, what the crap is it… after 3 picks in a doomed game of a doomed season you dont have the balls to put in a new QB? Try something called coaching? How about just give us a break? It’s time for Fox to man-up and coach the damn team. Make changes, make adjustments- that’s what all good NFL coaches do.
Oh..TOO Funny! ... I have to agree though....
“…we felt like Jake was the best guy to be in there for what we were doing in this game…”
Absolutely! What we were doing was stinking it up, playing crappy ball, and giving the game away. And for that, yes, Jake is the best option!
(pardon me, but I want to see something better)
by 12th_Man_Fan on Nov 30, 2009 8:22 AM EST up reply actions
Once again, more calls being called that make you scratch your head and say “what the F***??” Throwing on 3rd and 2 after we marched down the field converting THREE 3rd and longs in the opening drive is beyond me. This was another case of Davidson’s sabotage; I’m not convinced he wasn’t hired by a competitor to deftly destroy us from the inside.
I'll wait to see the PFF breakdown before I make my gameball pick...
Double Trouble; we've got the best running backs in the NFL that never see the ball!
I'm the guy who voted for Brayton
Sure not his fault we lost. Guy put out a good effort. Not many did.
I think that’s been overlooked in all the finger pointing we’ve been doing this year: Effort. Last year, for whatever reason, this team was highly motivated(outside of some crappy games). Hell, beat writers were commenting on how that training camp was the best they’d ever seen.
This year, outside of the Arizona game, it seems like the team is just going through the motions. What the reason is, I can’t hazard a guess.
by SlayerGhaleon on Nov 29, 2009 5:55 PM EST up reply actions
This was a winnable game against a very subpar opponent.
Even Jake can see that he’s not capable of leading us to a win any more. I’d expect he’ll go to Fox and bench himself.
We’re not a good team, but we should still be 7-4 instead of 4-7.
This game could very well have been 13-10, Panthers (the fluke bounce off Smith’s shoe just HAS to go right to the hands of defender who was out of the play, doesn’t it? And the TD pass to Smith just HAS to be challenged and reviewed, doesn’t it? Ah, well.
Yes Jaxon..
I’m with you, its time for the change at QB. You have to give Moore a look if for no other reason than to help plan for next year. I’ll be interesting to see if Davidson strips down the game plan with a back up QB, which also could prove beneficial. Kudos to Munnerlyn for a good return today, but I hope the Panthers can add a bona-fide return threat in the off season, A special teams threat would certainly add a much need dimension to this team
Moore throws crisper passes than Jake does.
Give him a shot next week in the only winnable game we’ve got left, and see what he can do. At a minimum, it’ll give him some confidence, playing against the Bucs at home. If they wait any longer, then they’re just throwing him to the wolves, with the poor pass blocking we’re now seeing.
Absolutely, the timing is perfect. I didn’t want to see Moore before simply because the competition was so stiff. Tampa is the perfect team for him to debut against.
Though, if the way they played ATL today is any indication, we’re not exactly going to roll over them. They only lost in the final seconds via a major screw-job. (ATL got 8 chances @ goal at the end of the game, including a fumble the refs called a dead ball)
Double Trouble; we've got the best running backs in the NFL that never see the ball!
I have to agree....
Waiting until after the TB game is like throwing him to the wolves. Keeping Jake in, just to give him a game where he has hisbest remaining opportunity to salvage his “mojo” would be doing a dis-service to the remaining 52(?) man roster.
I hope the QB coach spends some time with Moore, though. One “rookie” characteristic I do see in him is that he can tend to stare down his receivers. This can, and should, be coached OUT of him. His arm is crisp, ad passes are solid. He’s shown good decision making at the helm, and might just be te breath of fresh air this offense needs to salvage any sense of optimism in their identity.
by 12th_Man_Fan on Nov 30, 2009 8:34 AM EST up reply actions
Bucs might pack it in after that heart-breaker
They’ve got nothing to play for either, except as a spoiler (and we’re already spoiled!)
They are playing fo rthat high draft pick...
I’m torn…lose out and make that 2nd round pick higher…or win as many as possible to make the 49er pick less valuable.
I blog the Carolina Panthers at www.catscratchreader.com
I'm rooting for them to win as many as possible
while taking some looks at young players. Winning breeds more wins, losing breeds more losses and 2nd round draft picks are 2nd round draft picks.
(and besides you know…if we can win out, go 9-7 and then………uh, on 2nd thought, for the sake of my credibility I’ll keep that thought to myself.)
Moore needs to play against Tampa Bay.
Man we are really bad from the offensive side the ball that is. Once again the defense looked good and without a bunch of key playmakers. It is hard to admit that your team is no good and I am like all the rest of you but man we are just not that good this year and it stinks. Now with said and the year is officially over we need to make some changes to see what we have in rookies/backups/etc…
Offense:
Cannot get much worse than it is right now; Answer is simple get Delhomme the hell out of the game; I mean please Moore or Feeley can throw four picks in a game and look like an idiot. I love the fact that Foxy is going to review the entire offense to see what the problem is. HEY FOX IT IS SIMPLE, wake up and admit that you don’t trust Delhomme as your starting QB anymore and the Moose is no longer a valid #2 receiver anymore.
Answer: Bench Delhomme for Moore and Feeley will have to stay the third QB; Dress Goodson as well as giving more snaps to Dwayne Jarrett, (nice catch today on a crappy Jake throw) and of course allow Barnidge to start at TE over King and Rosario to gain experience.
Defense: Not too much more is needed with what we have left that isn’t injuried for the season. Diggs made so nice plays today as did James Anderson and Tyler Brayton; However I am encouraged to see Fox finally putting E. Brown on the field and he had what .5 sack and two QB hurries today so at-least Fox has aloud Meeks to do that.
The rumor is that Fox is just not willing to change his gameplan and neither is Davidson; Do I blame davidson just as much as Fox b/c both are simply not willing to change and Davidson has said that on many occasions.
Matt Moore should start next week in Tampa Bay for the reason of just seeing what we have in him. I would go as far as to say that Fox could be looking for a job before the year is over which would be nice for this franchise and it may come this week. FANS ARE SICK AND TIRED OF THIS CRAP.
Fox, Hurney, Crossman, and Davidson need to go this off season, I love the idea of retaining Meeks however b/c no matter who the Defense losses they still put up great efforts every week and it is wasted by crappy offense.
This game was given to the Jets hmm…. THANK YOU DELHOMME AND FOX ~
by Holty_Panthers_Fan on Nov 29, 2009 6:19 PM EST reply actions
Should we really bench Rosario for Barnidge after he lead our receivers today? If anything, I’d say we should start evaluating him in the slot.
Double Trouble; we've got the best running backs in the NFL that never see the ball!
Can't bench Rosario
…but Barnidge should get more of a chance than he has so far. Jeff King hasn’t been very effective of late. Or they could play 3 TE’s and put one of them in motion on every play. Give Moore a big body in the slot to go to.
King must average at least one false start a game
I blog the Carolina Panthers at www.catscratchreader.com
LOL. King another Fox favorite.
I just wonder if John Fox has become the Bobby Cox of NFL. Oh wait bobby cox has won a championship so I guess that is not a accurate comparison after all.
by Holty_Panthers_Fan on Nov 29, 2009 9:56 PM EST up reply actions
Neither Rosario nor Barnidge can block as good as King. That’s why Fox keeps him around.
by SlayerGhaleon on Nov 29, 2009 9:59 PM EST up reply actions
Didn't mean it that way.
I just thought that we need to see what we have in Barnidge b/c if he sucks he needs to be gone as well after the season is over. King definately needs to be let go and I would like to have that W. Saunders kid out of South Carolina. He can catch, block and isn’t suppose to attract alot of attention on draft day so he could be a great fit with our limited number of picks.
by Holty_Panthers_Fan on Nov 29, 2009 9:58 PM EST up reply actions
We can’t really just… drop… every player that doesn’t immediately perform, or perform up to par every week.
If we drop King, our blocking suffers. If Delhomme can’t get time now, lets see it when our best blocking TE is gone.
I agree we need to see what Barnidge has but saying we need to drop him if he “sucks” doesn’t make much sense. He might need a year or two to grow into his prime. I suppose the Bears thought Thomas Jones and Cedric Benson “sucked” and dropped them but they went on to have great careers.
Double Trouble; we've got the best running backs in the NFL that never see the ball!
Just because a player isn't a star or an excellent starter doesn't mean they suck
King, excellent blocker, Moose, excellent blocker, Brayton, solid run defense, Hayden, nice project at UT. Every team has stars, playmakers, then there are the role players.
by Flowing Willow on Nov 30, 2009 1:59 AM EST up reply actions
We're really missing on the stars though.
Most successful teams have a star QB or defense that just destroys everyone. We’ve got neither.
And for all the excellent blockers, it’d be nice if someone could catch the ball every once in a while.
True Blue Jazz
I'm on Twitter
RIP Nick Adenhart. 4/9/09
Daunte Rosario, 4 catches, 62 yards in an otherwise anemic passing game.
We would have a beast of a defense if our offense gave them a chance to rest,
Double Trouble; we've got the best running backs in the NFL that never see the ball!
Yeah, but he can't block...
so if you put Rosario out, chances are it’s a pass.
Defense’s will key in on that.
True Blue Jazz
I'm on Twitter
RIP Nick Adenhart. 4/9/09
I think Rosario should be WR3
instead of TE — that way he won’t be a dead give-away that we’re going to pass if he’s in the game. Put him in the slot and let him run a TE route down the seam.
“And for all the excellent blockers, it’d be nice if someone could catch the ball every once in a while.”
I may have misunderstood. I at first thought you were referring to a tight end that could catch, though perhaps you were meaning a TE that could both catch and block?
In that case, I think working Barnidge in a bit more to see what he can do would be the best bet.
Double Trouble; we've got the best running backs in the NFL that never see the ball!
Yeah, sorry... I wasn't very clear
I was hoping for one that could do both, though that might be hard to find unless you spend a 1st-round pick on one.
True Blue Jazz
I'm on Twitter
RIP Nick Adenhart. 4/9/09
Always thought Rosario lined up as a WR or in 3 WR sets more than TE b/c fox doesn't like his blocking ability.
Another Fox needs to go, he is way to conservative and Jeff Davidson is just as bad; we only have one good coach and it is R. Meeks. Crossman, Davidson, Fox need to be gone. An really sooner the better in my book.
by Holty_Panthers_Fan on Nov 29, 2009 9:59 PM EST up reply actions
They need to start Moore against TB
So that his first start in 2 years won’t have to be against NE or MIN! Getting him in now, is the best thing you can do for the guy.
on behalf of tha dirty south: soul food, carolina blue, southern hospitality, and tha queen city
I'm watching Favre tear the Bears apart...
…and thinking how a good QB makes his receivers look better. Sidney Rive did nothing, nor did Sciancoe — until Favre showed up, and started getting the ball to them — now all of a sudden they look like superstars. It’s because they’ve got a QB who puts the ball where’s it’s supposed to be, not overthrown, not underthrown, not behind them.
What I’m trying to say is that Smith, Moose, Jarrett (maybe especially Jarrett) don’t have the chance to show their talents when the ball’s not where it should be.
I’m not saying Matt Moore’s the answer to all this (I HOPE he is), but i think I’ve seen him throw some pretty good passes in the past. And if he gets the chance to be the starter, next week, vs an opponent who’s only won 1 game all year, it may just jump start his career.
For surely Fox has come as close as he’s gonna come, the day of a game, to admitting he’s pulling Jake.
Is the NFL trying to orchetraste the final stretch of the season?
I just watched Jacksonville’s Garrad take TWO illegal hits (late hit, horse collar) and the 49ers dont get called for either, however on the same play, Jacksonville gets a holding penalty.
That’s two blatant blown calls today that the officials weren’t even bothered to review.
Double Trouble; we've got the best running backs in the NFL that never see the ball!
Man, I don't know about that,,,
but I gotta add the Eagles really benefited from several calls & non-calls in the 4th quarter of their close win versus the Skins today.
It would seem the “good” teams are getting “favorable” calls to increase their chance of winning to keep the play-off race hot. If a contender gets beat by Tampa, the Skins, or just a bad team, they don’t seem nearly as fearsome, taking the edge off some match-ups that the NFL could otherwise play up as a heated battle.
I think it’s in the interest of ratings, NFL trying to keep the winning teams with good records to make more interesting match ups.
Kind of like how UFC employs fighters with good records (few to no losses) to hype fights.
Double Trouble; we've got the best running backs in the NFL that never see the ball!
Also.. considering the talk of getting rid of Fox..
Just a question that comes to mind.. This isn’t the first time the Panthers have had a bad, or terrible, season. What makes this one so different that Fox would lose his job? I really don’t see it.
Double Trouble; we've got the best running backs in the NFL that never see the ball!
MAYBE...
His insistence on not making changes, sticking with things that aren’t working. He’s the HC for goodness sakes, take the reigns, quit the cliches’… I’m tired of “he gives us the best chance to win”… where…on paper? well paper ain’t winning your games and neither are your pet students…
A good HC evaluates in game, makes the adjustments, and makes sure its implemented….
I like Fox, but his stubborness to flex with what’s going on in the game is going to be his downfall.
I’m tired of "he gives us the best chance to win"… where…on paper?
Fox sees Moore every day in practice. He probably knows more about Matt’s acumen as a QB than we do.
by SlayerGhaleon on Nov 29, 2009 7:12 PM EST up reply actions
He's been seeing Moore in practice for years...
the team should’ve known to go get a better back-up in the off-season if they weren’t satisfied with Moore.
You can’t play the whole season hoping your QB stays healthy (see Redman stepping up for the Falcons today, for example. Or Fitzpatrick for the Bills.)
True Blue Jazz
I'm on Twitter
RIP Nick Adenhart. 4/9/09
He wasn’t the primary backup, he was the third string QB. It’s not exactly expected for something to happen to both your primary QB and backup QB.
I imagine they kept him around so long hoping he would turn eventually turn the corner. Apparently he hasn’t.
by SlayerGhaleon on Nov 29, 2009 9:33 PM EST up reply actions
Ordinarily I would agree with you, but...
..Fox has shown a propensity to be stubborn and actually RESIST “change” (i.e. adjusments). He’s clearly conveyed a blind allegience to Delhomme, to the detriment of the rest of the team. He continues to orchestrate the second half gameplan around him.
For Fox to say “he gives us the best chance to win” then becomes suspect. If what we’re seeing on Sunday’s is the “best chance to win”, I would consider that an insult to Feely & Moore.
I think it’s a convenient statement from a stubborn man. If it were any other coach, who has demonstrated a willingness to bench a player for poor performance\hindrance to the game, he would have credibility here. But given the “all-in-all”, I consider it suspect, and as such, do not believe him. I think it’s a loyalty thing.
by 12th_Man_Fan on Nov 30, 2009 8:57 AM EST up reply actions
AGREED...BUT
That’s all skewed- it’s not a game time situation where heart and desire and adrenaline come into play.
When a starting pitcher doesn’t have his stuff early on in a game, the coach pulls him and goes to the bullpen early, try to control the damage, to give your team a shot.
How many int’s and bad reads, terrible passes, do you need to see you need to change something up. If it doesn’t work, you can at least say you tried to find an answer!
Look at coach Williams with UNC- if his starting five aren’t getting it done, he’ll sub the whole team and keep moving guys in and out until something starts to work. I know football is a little more difficult, but come on, give the hungry guys a chance, see if they step up, certainly can’t be any worse than what you are already seeing.
Because those other years he had an excuse
His only excuse this year is being too loyal with Delhomme, which further hurts his case. Can’t blame it on injuries either, since we sucked before most of the keys ones occurred.
on behalf of tha dirty south: soul food, carolina blue, southern hospitality, and tha queen city
Wasn't Kemo out before the season even began?
I can’t buy that reason yet. We could come up with just as many excuses this year. In the end, excuses are excuses – the only thing that stuck was the record and some were just as bad as this one is going to be.
If he puts Moore in and he does no better, how can we even say he was “too loyal”? That will play a major role in the final decision. If Moore can’t out perform Delhomme (as easy as it seems it may be to do) then Fox was, actually, right.
I’m just not seeing enough difference to believe that Richardson would fire Fox.
Double Trouble; we've got the best running backs in the NFL that never see the ball!
Fox's questionable loyalty to Delhomme goes back to last year.
Everyone thought Delhomme should have been benched halftime in the ARZ playoff game. And in the off season everyone accept Fox/Hurney thought we should bring another QB in to at least compete with Jake. Instead they give him a new contract and don’t bring in anybody in… That’s Fox taking care of his friend, has nothing to do with winning.
And please, Kemo? Losing one average DT is not an excuse for going 4-7.
on behalf of tha dirty south: soul food, carolina blue, southern hospitality, and tha queen city
And please, Kemo? Losing one average DT is not an excuse for going 4-7.
No, but it did heavily contribute to our defense playing horribly the first handful of games, and so did the injuries to Corey Irvin, Chris Harris, Louis Leonard, and Thomas Davis(the first injury).
Kinda hard to learn a whole new defensive scheme when you’re missing several starters. Hell, Hurney had to work some magic to make our defensive line respectable again.
by SlayerGhaleon on Nov 29, 2009 8:58 PM EST up reply actions
If you look at the losses you can probably only blame the D on one
the other losses are due to the offense giving the ball back and not capitaling in the red zone
I blog the Carolina Panthers at www.catscratchreader.com
22nd in scoring now...18 points a game
We ended 2008 7th in scoring at 25.9 pts per game…that’s a TD less.
On defense we finished 12th in scoring at 20.6. In 2009 we are 24th at 23.3…
I blog the Carolina Panthers at www.catscratchreader.com
Oh, I don’t know. The D totally collapsing in the second half at Dallas did nothing to help us in that game.
by SlayerGhaleon on Nov 29, 2009 9:40 PM EST up reply actions
If Jake had 1/3 less INTs, and could complete atleast 60% of his passes
Then we’d still be in contention right now. He’s the reason we have no shot right now. Has nothing to do with the defense.
on behalf of tha dirty south: soul food, carolina blue, southern hospitality, and tha queen city
by southtunnel on Nov 29, 2009 10:47 PM EST up reply actions
And 12 INTs and 60% is not asking for much.
on behalf of tha dirty south: soul food, carolina blue, southern hospitality, and tha queen city
by southtunnel on Nov 29, 2009 10:48 PM EST up reply actions
Here’s what I said:
No, but it did heavily contribute to our defense playing horribly the first handful of games, and so did the injuries to Corey Irvin, Chris Harris, Louis Leonard, and Thomas Davis(the first injury).
So I actually agreed with you that that injury(and the others) isn’t a panacea for going 4-7, I just pointed out that it certainly had an impact on the first handful of games.
by SlayerGhaleon on Nov 29, 2009 11:03 PM EST up reply actions
Oh, well in that case
Right!
on behalf of tha dirty south: soul food, carolina blue, southern hospitality, and tha queen city
by southtunnel on Nov 30, 2009 12:44 AM EST up reply actions
It was rather dumb to not bring in any competition at all to challenge delhomme. Now with no 1st rounder, it make me wonder if we will even take a QB with our second, unless we mortgage the future once again. Fox and Hurney don’t like taking QB’s high in the draft, so they might just wait to get somebody in the fourth or fifth round.
It is sad, but I think these issues will continue for several more years. There is no quick fix to it, at least not without getting rid of certain people on this team.
Member of Canes Country and the Cat Scratch Reader
Fox’s questionable loyalty to Delhomme goes back to last year.
That’s why Jake has started 90 of 91 games in his time as a Panther, despite performing marginal (84.9 avg over 7 seasons, counting his 3 game 111.8 rating season – Jason Campbell has averaged 80.7 over his last 4 seasons) quite often during that time, because Fox’s loyalty dates back to last year.
Double Trouble; we've got the best running backs in the NFL that never see the ball!
He turns the ball over 6 times in the playoffs
You say that was a fluke, won’t happen again, sign him to a new contract and bring in nobody behind him… to help secure his spot. That is questionable loyalty.
This is about Delhomme’s history/friendship with Fox. Going with Jake has nothing to do with winning. It is just Fox propping up his guy.
on behalf of tha dirty south: soul food, carolina blue, southern hospitality, and tha queen city
by southtunnel on Nov 29, 2009 10:56 PM EST up reply actions
He may have been average
BUt he was the only true NT on the roster. Many level headed fans thought before the season that Jake would turn it around, we needed a backup sure, but we had other, more pressing needs.
by Flowing Willow on Nov 30, 2009 2:03 AM EST up reply actions
Those fans were the minority
Most fans wanted Jake out long ago… Or at least to have someone quality behind him, so they’d be ready when this inevitable day came. I was in the minority for having supported him up until ARZ playoffs last year!
on behalf of tha dirty south: soul food, carolina blue, southern hospitality, and tha queen city
6 turnovers in one game
It had to be a fluke, especially the way Jake had played the year before, solid, and good enough to win. We had McCown and Moore, I thought that was enough, a solid vet and a promising youngster. We had depth, and honestly I didn’t think we’d have to use it. I thought this day would come in a few seasons, definitely not this year.
by Flowing Willow on Dec 1, 2009 2:55 AM EST up reply actions
Just watching the NFL network discussing the Panthers...
they were saying Fox has little choice but to bench Jake at this point since he is unwilling or unable to “contain his offensive coordinator” from calling 30+ pass plays per game.
The commentators were in agreement that the Panthers had the talent of a playoff caliber team if they had a QB that could protect the ball. They discussed the possibility of Cowher coming in but thought it was more likely that there would be a QB & OC change in the offseason.
oh and to add...
they also brought up Dante Culpepper as a potential veteran free agent that could be signed this off season that could protect the football and help a team like the Panthers who “already have most of the pieces in place.”
I’d take Culpepper in a heartbeat. Although, he may not be any better in Carolina until our o-line tightens up.
According to PFF, this year Culpepper has done pretty well when under no pressure, or when expecting the blitz, however not so well when pressured unexpectedly (not surprisingly).
Giving him Double Trouble, Smith, Rosario, and whatever other receiver decides to step it up, I think he’d do great.
I still want a rookie, though, and I don’t see Carolina holding that many QB’s.
Double Trouble; we've got the best running backs in the NFL that never see the ball!
Care to elaborate?
Double Trouble; we've got the best running backs in the NFL that never see the ball!
Culpepper
there is no way in the world he’s the guy we should turn to.
I’d rather see us like to a younger guy (Tarvaris Jackson? Alex Smith? draft-pick?) or someone like Donovan McNabb. Nothing against Culpepper, but he’s done.
True Blue Jazz
I'm on Twitter
RIP Nick Adenhart. 4/9/09
I’d agree, he’s definitely done so long as he stays in Detroit. Given some talent, there’s no telling what he may do, though. Brett Favre has been “done” many over.
I agree, I’d rather get T.J. over Culpepper, and I’d take a rookie over Culpepper if it were a choice between the two. I don’t see Alex Smith going anywhere after some of the performances he has had.
My only assertion was that he’d be a better option than Delhomme and do better with Carolina’s offense versus Detroit’s.
Double Trouble; we've got the best running backs in the NFL that never see the ball!
Unless they bring him in for a year while we groom a draft pick???
on behalf of tha dirty south: soul food, carolina blue, southern hospitality, and tha queen city
Maybe
I’d rather see McNabb for a couple of years or something. I just don’t see Culpepper doing much of anything here
True Blue Jazz
I'm on Twitter
RIP Nick Adenhart. 4/9/09
If we could get him, that’d be great. Is Philly going to let him go, though?
Double Trouble; we've got the best running backs in the NFL that never see the ball!
Oops.. Didn't mean to post that yet.. Wanted to add..
I also believe McNabb is a much bigger name than Culpepper, so much that I don’t know we would take him. Are we (read: coaching staff) ready to bench Delhomme? If not, McNabb won’t come to us for back-up money – Culpepper just might but, even then, if Delhomme isn’t taking the bench, I’d rather just go ahead and take the rookie and groom him.
Basically, I don’t see another vet coming in alongside Delhomme – sadly.
Double Trouble; we've got the best running backs in the NFL that never see the ball!
Yeah, no idea.
I’m hoping.
If Philly decides to go with Kolb, McNabb is probably gone. Or if Reid leaves/is fired, maybe then? I’m not certain.
And agreed re: vet alongside Delhomme.
True Blue Jazz
I'm on Twitter
RIP Nick Adenhart. 4/9/09
So you think next year absolutely nothing changes?
We do this whole Jake-Fox pony show again? No way Richardson goes for it. Jake is done.
on behalf of tha dirty south: soul food, carolina blue, southern hospitality, and tha queen city
by southtunnel on Nov 29, 2009 10:59 PM EST up reply actions
No, you missed my point.
I’m saying I don’t see us holding Delhomme and another old vet like Culpepper or McNabb on the same roster. If Delhomme stays, it’s just a rookie we pick up. If Delhomme goes, it’s a vet and a rookie.
Double Trouble; we've got the best running backs in the NFL that never see the ball!
SURE
If jake can’t get away from pressure, how is a less mobile Culpepper going to fare with our offensive line. Now we have huge issues on offensive front and defensive front. WR is also a big problem. We have a lot of offseason holes to fix, and will probably have little money once again… so yeah- an aging quarterback is not the answer. Some of this is going to lag into next season, as Offensive line depth is still going to be a big problem. We can pray for health and no injuries, but this is the NFL, injuries will happen.
I never thought about Culpepper
but it wouldn’t be a bad idea to bring him in and draft a QB to sit for 2-3 years and take over
How about Charlie?
Weis is all but out at Notre Dame, and he and Fox are friends. If I remember correctly, Fox tried to get Weis to come here before he took the ND job.
Supposedly
he’s already been contacted by a couple of NFL teams
True Blue Jazz
I'm on Twitter
RIP Nick Adenhart. 4/9/09
I don’t understand the big deal about the guy. Perhaps someone can enlighten me on why?
Member of Canes Country and the Cat Scratch Reader
"Big" deal? ;)
I kid…
I think it has to do with his success in the NFL as the OC for the Patriots. He’s not cut out for recruiting/coaching in college, but I guess teams are hoping he can still lead an NFL offense.
True Blue Jazz
I'm on Twitter
RIP Nick Adenhart. 4/9/09
Nice work Jaxon
I can’t give my “run the damn ball” spiel this week — there was nothing we could do about our O-Line not blocking for Double Trouble.
Jake lost this game for us though, with his whopping 12.7 passer rating and 4 picks.
Even if Double Trouble don’t perform up to standard, we still have a shot to win if Jake doesn’t throw those picks.
Moore has to be the guy for next week at least, if not the rest of the year. And, then we have to look at a free agent and the draft for next season because we can’t go with Delhomme any more. Our team has gone as far as Delhomme can carry us, and to keep going forward we have to hitch our wagon to another horse.
Whether it be Jason Campbell, Dante Culpepper, Tavaris Jackson, or the corpse of Vinny Testaverde — we have to get someone other than Jake under center next season.
We don’t have to replace Fox, per se — just get a new OC.
lol!
on behalf of tha dirty south: soul food, carolina blue, southern hospitality, and tha queen city
I mean
other than he “learned” under Kyle Boller for the first couple of his NFL years…
True Blue Jazz
I'm on Twitter
RIP Nick Adenhart. 4/9/09
It is sad to see this team just utterly self destruct after such a good year last year. I honestly don’t know the answer. Thanks to hurney and his brilliant idea to trade away our first rounder (which will easily be a top ten pick), we won’t be able to draft a QB (if we even elect to do so) until the second round. Granted the draft is deep in QB’s, but we will not be able to draft top tier talent at that position. All we can hope for is a gem to fall to us in the second round.
I have the funny feeling we will be stuck with delhomme until his contract is up, and that we will have these issues for a few more seasons.
Member of Canes Country and the Cat Scratch Reader
I can’t say anything bad of Hurney and his trade. It was a great idea at the time and only looks bad in hindsight because of Delhomme’s horrible performance. Was one bad game enough to predict that an atrocious season would follow? Hardly. It wasn’t his first bad performance, and we didn’t expect it to be the last, but we couldn’t have predicted the entire following season would reflect such.
I absolutely believe we can get a QB in the second round. There are only 32 teams in the NFL, plenty of them already have franchise QB’s and will be looking to fill other needs. Some will need a QB but wait until the latter rounds. It’s not out of the question to believe we will have plenty available – but will we take one when the opportunity arises? That’s the question I worry about.
Double Trouble; we've got the best running backs in the NFL that never see the ball!
Good points. I still think it was blind arrogance for the front office to just think it was one bad game for Delhomme. His play had been trailing off in the latter half of the season, and it came to a head against Arizona. The front office should have done something to at least challenge Delhomme and make sure that Delhomme wasn’t as bad as he really is.
I am also fearful that somebody will come up with the bright idea to draft a RB or something instead. Still didn’t like the trade for Brown though. The guy wasn’t worth the pick. However if he pans out, I’ll eat my words. If not, I’ll know I was right about him.
Member of Canes Country and the Cat Scratch Reader
For those who've been around since '95
Does anyone remember the hamstringing we got just prior to Polian’s departure?
Salary cap screwed by signing mediocre players to long term\High dollar deals…
Draft picks traded away for medoicre players…
It took us a few years to recover from that damage\sabotaging. It feels eerily similiar. (Not saying anyone is departing, just can’t help but see the similiarities in the situation.)
I’m hoping someone at the top remembers the difficulties we had to suffer through in order to “right the ship”, and is keeping a closer eye on the authority over the club, and it’s decision making as it pertains to our long term health.
Just my cautious thoughts…..
by 12th_Man_Fan on Nov 30, 2009 9:12 AM EST up reply actions
That's where we are now... (kinda)
but waiting on the draft won’t work because it’s becoming more and more expensive to sign the rookies. The team needs to find a “steal” on the FA market or something… a young guy who could develop (with coaching or whatever) and comes relatively cheap.
True Blue Jazz
I'm on Twitter
RIP Nick Adenhart. 4/9/09
Face it.
We are going to sign a QB via free agency if Fox is here b/c we have no picks that would yield us a Franchise QB. However I am for most nfldraft rumor sites predicting that we will take Tony Pike out of Cincy in the second round (our first pick of the draft).
Hurney please don’t mortage future first rounders b/c we could have been in great shape to take a QB very high if we still had our 1st round pick.
E. Brown is going to be a good player but never as good as Peppers so that trade has burned us alittle or okay maybe alot going into this years coming draft.
by Holty_Panthers_Fan on Nov 29, 2009 10:04 PM EST reply actions
E. Brown is going to be a good player but never as good as Peppers so that trade has burned us alittle or okay maybe alot going into this years coming draft.
How do you predict what a player will do? I need to know that formula.
Double Trouble; we've got the best running backs in the NFL that never see the ball!
Easy!
You look at an undersized rookie who has struggled a bit… Then you use normal logic to deduct that he will most likely not be a multi-Probowl, DE beast, who even has hall-of-fame potential.
on behalf of tha dirty south: soul food, carolina blue, southern hospitality, and tha queen city
by southtunnel on Nov 30, 2009 10:08 AM EST up reply actions
Why do you think we have no picks that would yield us a franchise QB?
I think there are at least 5 potential franchise QB’s in the 2010 draft.
Bear in mind I use the term ‘potential’ some of these guys will need the right NFL system:
- Sam Bradford
- Colt McCoy
- Jake Locker
- Jimmy Clausen
- Tony Pike
I also have several ‘X-factor’ QBs who could very well develop into franchise players
- Ryan Mallett
- Tim Tebow
- Max Hall
- Jevan Snead
Cat Scratch Reader's resident optimist.
by James Dator on Nov 29, 2009 11:36 PM EST up reply actions
As I see it...
all biases aside, I still don’t see Hall or Tebow developing into much.
All the guys, (X-factor or "potential franchise guys) have huge ? … more so than QBs in other years too, it seems.
If we don’t need a starter next year, I’d look at Dan LeFevour or Rusty Smith.
Of the guys you mentioned, I’d put them at (in regards to our chances at landing them)…
1- Tony Pike
2- Colt McCoy (unlikely to make it to our pick)
3- Jake Locker (won’t make it to our pick)
4- Ryan Mallet (a late round pick at best)
I’m not really impressed with the QBs this year in general… I might be in favor of going with a “ball-control” vet.
True Blue Jazz
I'm on Twitter
RIP Nick Adenhart. 4/9/09
A lot of the mocks I see have McCoy as a late 2nd early 3rd rounder, regardless, he’s not a good fit for Carolina.
Pike is the obvious choice for the Panthers, also don’t count out Pat Devlin out of Delaware. Lightning could strike twice from the tiny state and most analysts believe he’s more polished at this point than Joe Flacco was.
Cat Scratch Reader's resident optimist.
by James Dator on Nov 30, 2009 12:02 AM EST up reply actions
How does McCoy not fit in with Carolina?
He’s got a very accurate arm, brings very good speed, and it just so happens that he is a winner that will always put the team first.
And please don’t just say, “well he did come from a spread based offense and we all know how well they succeed in the NFL”……….
by SmithnCompany on Nov 30, 2009 1:24 AM EST up reply actions
We say that because it's a legit point
McCoy runs a zone read scheme, he goes to his first read, if it isn’t open he runs. He doesn’t go through his progressions at all, therefore I question his ability to run an NFL scheme. His arm is not very strong at all though.
by Flowing Willow on Nov 30, 2009 2:12 AM EST up reply actions
The strong arm thing
I’ve noticed & read about in many places.
He can connect on the short routes, but I wouldn’t want him looking long very often. Seems like the anti-Jason Campbell..
True Blue Jazz
I'm on Twitter
RIP Nick Adenhart. 4/9/09
Well, don't expect much more from Cowher
if they decide to fire Fox and hire Cowher (like a lot of people hope they do)
Cowher hasn’t been known for having franchise QB’s either
Neil O’Donnell
Kordell Stewart
Tommy Maddox
Ben Roethlisberger
The only one that sticks out is Roethlisberger, and he was a surprise success.
If we get Cowher to coach this team, don’t expect him to trade up and draft Colt McCoy or any other high profile QB. He may not stick with Jake, but he will get someone like Culpepper to hold down the fort or will stick Moore in.
I'm kinda down on the Cowher thing
because I see him bringing in the 3-4, which I don’t see the Panthers fitting to well (especially Beason, who’s too small for a 3-4 ILB).
And Cowher’s not going to come to a “rebuilding project,” so as bwsmith said, we’re probably not going to draft a QB. At least not this season… unless it’s someone we’re going to stick behind a vet for a season or more.
True Blue Jazz
I'm on Twitter
RIP Nick Adenhart. 4/9/09
I hope we do draft a QB
I would like to see us get Pike from Cincy.
Sign Dante Culpepper for 2 years and groom Pike for 2012.
Culpepper may not be the same as he was back when he had Randy Moss, but he could be good enough to lead us to 10-6 or 11-5 seasons and playoff runs with Double Trouble and Smitty in his arsenal.
You can’t base your opinion on Culpepper on what he’s doing now, because he’s serving time in Purgatory Detroit.
Does Culpepper have 5 more years of gunslinging football left in him? Probably not. But, he should be good enough to get us by for 2 years while Pike learns the offense and prepares for his role as QB of the future.
The only way we get Cowher
is if we sell him hard on the total control aspect — coaches love that shit, being able to have ultimate say-so in personnel, etc.
Plus the hometown hero tactic might work too, considering both he and his wife are NC State alumni and wouldn’t have to move from home since they live in the Raleigh area.
Those of us in Raleigh...
could always hold candle light vigils outside his house…if that would help me coach Carolina ;) haha…i kid…i kid…I don’t really want to see a 3-4 defense here. We have GREAT personnel now for Meeks’ defense. The only problem is offensive playcalling…and the inability to adjust the gameplan. That falls on the HC and OC.
by boywonderncsu on Nov 30, 2009 1:09 PM EST up reply actions
Agreed on Meeks
his D is working well.
We might need to adjust some personnel this off-season… that’ll fall on the guys above him (HurFox) listening when he tells them what players out there fit his system.
True Blue Jazz
I'm on Twitter
RIP Nick Adenhart. 4/9/09
Goodnight fellow Panther fans...
Been a pleasure discussing the future of our disaster of an offense with you guys. Look forward to picking it up again tomorrow.
Double Trouble; we've got the best running backs in the NFL that never see the ball!
What do the Panthers not need right now?
I’m not trying to be a downer here, but why must the coaching staff (particularly the coach and the oc) continue to be so freaking ignorant each week. Did Delhomme struggle badly today? Oh yeah….But did the o-line struggle just as badly? oh you bet….However the quarterback (I’m sick of saying his name) has been the problem before, but what did the coaching staff do about it earlier in the season? Oh just swept his sloppyness under the rug (you could say) and hope (pray is more like it) that he would look like the quarterback they saw a few seasons ago before he went down with that funny injury.
It is time for entirely new look with the coaching staff (except for meeks) and for a new quarterback to take over the reins behind center. Now I don’t care how we get that new qb, whether it be through a trade, free agency or in the draft. As long as he isn’t like the one I saw today and over the last year or so.
ok, I’m done for now =)
Just share the thoughts of John above, we have most definitely been bitten by the turnover bugs several times this season, so understand how frustrated you guys must be. Anyway best of luck the rest of the campaign and good luck next year.
Writer/Assistant editor
Eternal optimist
New York Jets
Gang Green Nation
www.ganggreennation.com

by 





















