Cat Scratch Reader: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Around SBN: Ole Miss-Alabama: "Let's Go Eat.Wait. What Happened?"

Carolina Panthers’ Monday Morning Optimist 10/26/09

Jake Delhomme lays crumpled after a second half sack in Buffalo's 20-9 win in an NFL football game in Charlotte, N.C., Sunday, Oct. 25, 2009. (AP Photo/Rick Havner)

More photos » Rick Havner - AP

Jake Delhomme lays crumpled after a second half sack in Buffalo's 20-9 win in an NFL football game in Charlotte, N.C., Sunday, Oct. 25, 2009. (AP Photo/Rick Havner)

 

Good morning Panther faithful and welcome to what bodes to be a rather somber optimist. As most of you know each and every week I hope against hope that diminished areas of our team will perform, and those areas of strength become galvanized with a week of practice and preparation. Sunday didn't go how it should have, and didn't go according to plan. If you told me before the game that at the end the Panthers would have amassed 425 yards of offense, allowing only 167 and didn't tell me the score I would have predicted a 35-0 rout... and it should have been. I don't believe in taking anything away from the Bills necessarily, but we handed them that win on a platter and there was no excuse to explain why we lost that game.

You know how the drill goes. I give my little take then jump into analysis of some key elements of the Panthers saying whether I'm optimistic for their future with the team, or pessimistic. This week, it doesn't take Johnny Carson wearing a turban to guess where I'm going with my ‘pessimistic' rant, so I decided to pull Jake Delhomme from that section of the article, and talk about him in depth now.

Star-divide

In 2009 I've been trying to see what has been going on with Jake Delhomme. I think most people agree that he hasn't been himself. I know a lot of folks want to go back to the Arizona playoff game, but personally, I think that game was a failure on so many levels I want to take it out of the discussion for 2009.

At first I thought the problem was a lack of confidence on Delhomme's part. He wasn't showing that moxie, that grit that we'd seen in the past. It was like a switch in his brain was turned on after the Philadelphia game that told him single coverage on Steve Smith was too much, where in the past he'd try for that throw any way. However, after watching yesterday's game I don't think it's his spirit that's broken, I think that it's his arm.

The irony of this is that Jake's arm appears to be stronger than it's even been; herein lies the problem. Tommy John surgery is very, very uncommon in the NFL. It is incredibly prevalent in Major League Baseball, particularly in pitchers who have overused an arm and ever more commonly in pitchers who overused an arm with bad mechanics. Without going into great detail, the surgery involves taking a tendon from somewhere else in the body and replacing the tendon in the elbow. The result is (hopefully) renewed arm strength and a second lease on a career. The big question was:

"Will Jake Delhomme lose arm strength?"

I believe the opposite has occurred.

Jake is being forced to alter his mechanics, in my mind. On plays where he's under throwing he's really overcompensating for the additional strength, and the numerous plays where he's vastly over throwing receivers he's simply throwing it like he's used to. I think the elbow was only at 85% in 2008, which is why the problem isn't as pronounced as it is now. The result is the same; however, Jake Delhomme may be finished.

I'm sure the next week will be littered with people offering their opinion on who should start vs. Arizona. I personally believe it's now time to hand Matt Moore the ball and give him ten starts so we can evaluate the position. I know we're not mathematically eliminated, but I think we're logically eliminated from the playoffs. The Saints look stronger every week, the Falcons are extremely talented despite a loss and it looks like it will take an 11-5 or 12-4 record to secure the wild card in the NFC. Starting A.J Feeley is a major, major mistake in my mind. While he may be better right now, he's a 32 year old QB who we can't seriously rely on to be the future of the franchise. Meanwhile, Moore is 25 and has that opportunity. If we start Moore at least we'll know what we have going into April, and it can dictate whether we take a QB in the 2nd round, or get one in the 4th, possibly addressing WR with the 2nd round pick. For the long term future of the team we have to get Matt Moore some snaps.

It saddens me to have to look to the future in this way. Despite Delhomme's poor performance in 2009 I have all the respect in the world for him as a player, and I think we all should. He now holds every QB record for the Panthers, is the most winning QB in the history of the team, and a stand up guy. In an era where players are constantly looking to blame others, hold out and pass the buck Jake took the entire weight of the team on his shoulders. If he made a good play he'd credit his receiver, if his receiver messed up, he'd take the blame. He knows what it is to be a true leader, and I think a lot of the fan base started to believe Jake's comments every week, and believe that he was the sole problem in every loss. It got to the point where every good play was assumed to be on a receiver or the o-line, not on Jake and every mistake was always our QB's. I choose to remember Jake for the QB he was in 2003, and the QB he showed he was becoming in 2007, before the injury. Hats off to Jake Delhomme, because even if we've seen his last snap as a starter there's no denying it would be a hard fought battle arguing who's been the best QB in Panther history, Jake or Steve Beuerlein.

Now, on to the typical analysis:

 

Optimistic

Ron Meeks- Extremely Optimistic: He's been in the optimist column for 4 weeks now. Are people starting to believe? I was chided for his inclusion in those early days, but now the Panthers' defense is looking absolutely rock solid. Their performance yesterday was inspired. Yes, we only got two sacks, but players were flying around the field, making tackles, stopping the run, defending passes. It's a scheme that makes players play better than they are, turning mediocre players into decent ones and turning good players into superstars. We tore apart Buffalo's offense without Thomas Davis on the field, that says a lot.

 

Hollis Thomas- Extremely Optimistic: Did we rob the Rams of a DT again? Our loquacious run stuffer and self proclaimed ‘fat man' is proving to be a difference maker on the defensive line.

 

DeAngelo Williams- Extremely Optimistic: D-Will, what can't you do? 139 total yards yesterday, including a blistering, dynamite touchdown run. He's starting to turn on the jets and truly get going, and he looks like the old DeAngelo from 2008; it's nice to see.

 

Steve Smith- Extremely Optimistic: Smitty, it's nice to have you back... but I think you never left us. 99 yards receiving including a fantastic 48 yard gain in traffic, great stuff to see.

 

Julius Peppers- Extremely Optimistic: Pep, thanks for playing hard... that's all we ever wanted.

 

Gary Barnidge- Somewhat Optimistic: It looks like Barnidge is getting some more opportunities, and he made the best with the opportunities he got.

 

Pessimistic

Jeff Davidson- Extremely Pessimistic: WTF JEFF! Seriously? Really? I don't care if we're down by 8 or 18... when the running game is averaging 4.5 ypc against the 32nd ranked rush defense in the NFL why are you running the ball 25 times and passing 44? He could be the stupidest co-coordinator in the NFL, and I mean it. Jake Delhomme executed the only TD drive of the game calling his own plays on a hurry up, and it was the only time in the game where the offense looked dynamic whatsoever. He stands on the sideline holding a clipboard looking more and more lost every week. The worst part, he still thinks he's doing the right thing.

 

Danny Crossman and Special Teams- Extremely pessimistic: Was there any bright spot on ST? Any? I can't find one! Rhys Lloyd isn't hitting the end zone, John Kasay shanked two field goals, Captain Munnerlyn looks like a deer in headlights on PRs, we can't cover kickoffs, we can't block on kick returns... and what was the thinking behind ‘trying out' Kenny Moore on the most important PR of the game? He wasn't warmed up, he wasn't ready to do it and this was following a dangerous fumble in the end zone by Goodson on a kickoff that game from ‘trying it out'. Kenny Moore was crushed on the sidelines, but he will not be called out individually as he never should have been in that position in the first place.

 

Overall Outlook

We have a defense and running backs to be proud of. Other than that, we can only look forward to change. We are now entering the bad part of our schedule with our opponent's combined record an obscene 44-21 (0.676) it doesn't look very good for the Panthers.

I'd like to hold out hope and magically believe something will happen, but it would take Matt Moore to become a lights out QB, and Drew Brees and Matty Ice to experience catastrophic injuries for that to happen. We could win against Arizona next week and get some measured revenge, but coming off a big win against the Giants it seems unlikely our secondary can stop Fitzgerald, Boldin and Breaston... even with Ron Meeks' defense.

 

20% Optimistic Heading into Arizona.

Poll
Has Jake Delhomme made his last start for the Carolina Panthers?
Yes
318 votes
No
211 votes

529 votes | Poll has closed

0 recs  |  Comment 46 comments |

Story-email Email Printer Print

More from Cat Scratch Reader

Keep or Cut: QB Josh McCown

Feb 2010 by Jaxon - 14 comments

Panther Paw Prints: Pro Bowl Edition

Jan 2010 by Jaxon - 27 comments

Panther Paw Prints - Monday Edition

Jan 2010 by Jaxon - 4 comments

Comments

Display:

Agreed

I feel that because Jake is the stand up man he is not many people see the fact that the OC if hammering a stake into the heart of a playoff caliber team. This team wins in heavy run and fantastic pass plays. Both of which are spotty, but the lack of explosive pass plays has me scratching my head. Now im no expert by far but for as long back as i can remember two smash mouth runs followed by a exciting “how did he make that throw/catch” was the way Carolina played football. Yes this seems elementary and never seemed successful but if we are talking wins I vote that jake stays and Fox opens the 2003-2007 plays that worked and just roll with the punches.

However I do agree Moore needs to seen and yes most people want to see him play to see if he is the future. John Fox is a very good head coach and if he feels that Moore isnt the answer from practice that is enough for me to believe jake still has the edge over Moore

by panthersfan5526 on Oct 26, 2009 11:52 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Why just Jake?

Why are so many hammering Jake and Fox, when the real problem, and getting a free ride, is Hurney? What has he NOT screwed up? Dump him and keep the other two.

by 41Loyalist on Oct 26, 2009 2:54 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Everything that is good with the team right now is directly because of Marty Hurney.

What he has not screwed up:
- Since becoming GM following the 2001 season he has been the general manager of a team recording 68 wins, 6th most in the NFL.
- 3 playoff appearances, 2 NFC south titles, 1 NFC championship, 1 SB appearance.
- Quarterbacking one of the most successful 1st round drafts of any NFL team (based on number of 1st round picks becoming Pro-Bowlers)
- Before Hurney: 20-44
- After Hurney: 68-52

I think it pretty much speaks for itself.

Cat Scratch Reader's resident optimist.

by James The Aussie on Oct 26, 2009 3:04 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Not to mention he just turned around our DT position with a couple of cheap yet excellent pick ups during the season.

by SlayerGhaleon on Oct 26, 2009 3:13 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Agree 100%

This mess is certainly not Hurney’s fault in any way (unless he hires the ass’t coaches)

by bigdavis on Oct 26, 2009 5:10 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

+1

For a while there, I was thinking that Meeks was a complete diot, and the defense was going to be terrible, but a couple of inspired DT pickups, and life is good on that front.

by panthersnbraves on Oct 27, 2009 5:03 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Well said. It’s nice to see someone advocating the QB change in a mature and intelligent manner. Despite his poor play lately, Jake really deserves all the respect in the world.

by SlayerGhaleon on Oct 26, 2009 10:40 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Agree

I find myself defending Jake more because people can’t even discuss this rationally. If you want Jake to be benched, then so be it. But I think the case can easily be made without resorting to name-calling or cursing out players/coaches of the Panthers.

by R-F on Oct 26, 2009 11:17 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Got an idea...

Fire Davidson, start Moore, and have Jake call the plays.

-oh and also fire Crossman.

by Scrantsj on Oct 26, 2009 12:14 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

good post

As for Jake, I’m not even worried about it anymore. We’ll see what happens. For the record, as much as I hated on Jake, I hoped I was wrong, and I wanted him to turn it around and play some monster football. We’ll see. If you’re right about his arm strength (which I disagree with), then his career is not finished. Being able to adjust to more arm strength is a problem he should be able to deal with, but under the radar. In the meantime, Moore is gonna show us if we need to trade up to the 1st rd to get a QB.

I’m also not concerned about Davidson. When Fox goes, he will go, too. I think Cowher will be our coach next season.

Either way, we still have a lot of talent and a lot of football left to be played. Suppose Moore plays only slightly better than Jake, that should be enough to get us some more wins and maybe to 8-8, cuz the rest of the team is beginning to really play well.

by usana_gaines on Oct 26, 2009 10:40 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

play calling

You said it, kind of. Everytime we’re in a no-huddle, Jake leads us to a TD. Not a FG or a decent looking drive that ends in a punt, but a TD. When you’re 2-4, what is more radical, benching Jake, or letting Jake start against the Cards and running a no huddle. We’ve seen what the Cards defense can do against a run first team that doesn’t throw too much. They beat the Giants. But if we run a no huddle for almost the whole game, we could beat them with Jake cuz Jake turns no huddles into TDs. But if Davidson calls plays Jake can’t execute, then we lose.

And beleive me, Jake knows we’re a running team, so he’s not gonna throw the ball 45 times if he’s the one calling plays.

by usana_gaines on Oct 26, 2009 10:47 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

When Jake retires we should totally make him the OC.

by SlayerGhaleon on Oct 26, 2009 10:49 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

jake knows

jake knows what plays he can run and what he’s comfortable with. it’s better if he calls the plays instead of davidson, but right now, i bet davidson calls some plays and jake is in the huddle thinking, “man, i hate that play, i’d rather run a screen or a quick slant” I have no idea how my psychic mind figured that out, but it just did. then again, a new OC and QB would be better.

by usana_gaines on Oct 26, 2009 3:27 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Hate to agree with you

Jake is done. And I think Jeff Davidson is a real part of it. For whatever reason, the two of them together is one huge clash. In Jake you have a QB who’s entire career has been defined by mediocre play in the first three quarters and another level in the fourth. He always had that confidence and leadership you could count on, and if you kept him close until late he would come through for you more often than not. He’s also never, ever, ever been someone who succeeded when you threw for 30+ times.

I’ll start back in last year’s playoff game. We threw how many times? Even when the game was in reach, it was like Davidson just went into panic mode and relied on Jake’s arm from the middle of the first half on. That set the stage for the Philadelphia game, where we did much the same thing. And again against Dallas. In the past two weeks we seemed to get it together and start running the ball again, although Jake was still throwing long picks.

I’m a random fan on the internet. I’m not blessed with great football insight or knowledge, but even I can see that Jake has been flat out bad throwing the ball deep all year. So last night the first passing play was a short slant to Smitty. That made me happy. He called a lot of short passes, which made me happy. Jake was rolling, we hadn’t scored but we were starting to move the ball well. Then he dials up a deep ball down the middle, against one of the best passing defenses in the NFL, and not even to our star but to our third string tight end. Interception, and a great return.

Why make that call? It was just the first play on our third possession, and on our second we had actually started to move the ball on the ground. Why the change?

And why pass so often? You’re done one touchdown, just one. Then you’re not even down by that much? Why aren’t you pounding the ball into the Buffalo line and tiring them out like you did to Tampa Bay? Our defense is playing great, why can’t you rely on them and settle for body blows for a while? That’s been Panther football since Fox got here, did you forget to read the memo?

So we have a quarterback who holds every franchise record, and who clearly has a live arm, and who has the respect of his teammates, but who has NO touch on his long passes at all, and who’s starting to get shaky on the short ones. And then we end up with a plan that puts the entire game on that guy.

I think Delhomme could have several productive years left. But if he does, they won’t be in Carolina. Davidson made sure of that.

And it’s a damned shame.

by Cyberjag on Oct 26, 2009 11:24 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Excellent post...

It’s time for Matt Moore to get the starting job. We have 10 games to see what he’s got, and most of our remaining schedule is against the upper echelon of the league.

One of two things will happen if we put Moore in.

1. He leads us to the playoffs, going 10-0 and sending Jake back to Louisiana to play with his horses. The Panthers use their 2nd round pick on a WR and pick a QB in the 4th-7th round. (Remember, nobody thought Tom Brady would be any good when he replaced Bledsoe — I’m not saying Moore is the next Tom Brady, but he could be and we will never know until Fox puts him in.)

2. He sucks just as much (or worse) than Jake has and we finish 4-12. The Panthers use their 2nd round pick on a QB for the future and begin rebuilding mode.

The bottom line is — it’s time to find out what we’ve got with Moore. Is he a career backup or the next great QB of the NFL?

On a side note, I totally agree with you on the defense. Meeks’ system has kicked in and the defense is flying around and finding the ball — and finally making tackles. Hollis Thomas is a godsend — imagine what we would have if Kemo wouldn’t have been hurt.

by bwsmith25 on Oct 26, 2009 11:28 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

On a side note, I totally agree with you on the defense. Meeks’ system has kicked in and the defense is flying around and finding the ball — and finally making tackles. Hollis Thomas is a godsend — imagine what we would have if Kemo wouldn’t have been hurt.



Amen to that! I was skeptical of Meeks’ system…but it looks like we’re pulling it together. If only our D didn’t have to constantly defend such a short field due to turnovers.

by boywonderncsu on Oct 26, 2009 1:56 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Here's something to be optimistic about

If we should get a QB in the game that doesn’t throw it away we have the running game and D to still win games.

I blog the Carolina Panthers at www.catscratchreader.com

by Jaxon on Oct 26, 2009 11:46 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

+1

Yeah, that’s kind what I was thinking. Even with Matt Moore not turning the ball over, throwing 2:1 isn’t going to get it done against anyone but the 32nd ranked run defense.

Cat Scratch Reader's resident optimist.

by James The Aussie on Oct 26, 2009 12:34 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

+1

I was telling people that over lunch. If we had a QB that wasn’t just giving the ball away constantly – we’d probably have a few of those losses back. I don’t have the stats in front of me – but, in our eyes, how many points have we just flat out given away due to either pick 6’s or giving the ball to an opponent on our side of the 50?

by boywonderncsu on Oct 26, 2009 1:52 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

during the game, after the first interception i believe, they showed a graphic that said we’ve given somewhere around 67 points in turnovers this season.. I’m guessing that number is 74 now, just 20 points shy of the total points we’ve made for ourselves.. we’re giving away almost 6 (5.5) points to every 7 we make.

by EyeSack on Oct 26, 2009 2:28 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Excellent post James

I’ve become a big fan of “The Monday Morning Optimist.”
(I still can’t believe we lost that friggin game yesterday.)

by paydirt16 on Oct 26, 2009 1:05 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

I appreciate it, and I’ll keep writing it for you.

Cat Scratch Reader's resident optimist.

by James The Aussie on Oct 26, 2009 1:46 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

James I strongly agree

The Tommy List of football players receiving the surgery

    * Jake Delhomme
    * Craig Erickson
    * Chris Hunter
    * Sebastian Janikowski (did not affect his career as a placekicker)
    * Rob Johnson
    * Deion Sanders (a cornerback, wide receiver, and return specialist in football; an outfielder in baseball)

by univonc on Oct 26, 2009 1:24 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

It would be interesting to stack that up against rotator cuff surgery for QBs

I bet rotator cuff beats it 20 to 1 or more.

Cat Scratch Reader's resident optimist.

by James The Aussie on Oct 26, 2009 1:46 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I too have become a fan of "The Monday Morning Optimist"

I look forward to reading it. The comment section is not necessarily a breeding ground of intelligent and unbiased opinions on the different facets of the Carolina Panthers respective games. (I myself am guilty of getting over emotional and just straight up yelling in the comment section, see the open game day thread for examples)

I’d like to add a note: Moore was shoved into PR duty on that final punt because Captain was on the sidelines fighting leg cramps. I do not agree with putting Moore in, we should have put Smitty in to receive that kick. But that is the reason for the sudden switch.

I also think our entire defensive front seven earns an “extremely optimistic.” Even without Thomas Davis on the field, we made a bad offense look even worse, showing the depth we have at LB. We also stuffed the run inside, owing to the organizations smart buys at DT. Even Tank Tyler got a couple reps and showed good promise. Everette Brown also showed why we moved up to draft him, he laid a NASTY hit on Fitzpatrick in the 4th. Combine all this with Ron Meeks creativity and ability to make good players great… and I am very very happy to see the defensive woes from last year, despite injuries, have been taken care of.

by Tater596 on Oct 26, 2009 2:23 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Nice info on why Moore was in… I was wondering that.

On a sidenote, what the hell was going on then? Both Captain Munnerlyn and DeAngelo Williams were forced to the sidelines with cramps. That typically falls on the trainers not monitoring the hydration of the players correctly.

I agree with the statement on our front seven… they are beastly at the moment.

Cat Scratch Reader's resident optimist.

by James The Aussie on Oct 26, 2009 2:43 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Cramps

Could have been hydration, that is the most likely scenario. Improper stretching can be pretty much ruled out in the 4th quarter.

Or maybe it was the very hand of god, smiting us for our bad playcalling.

by Tater596 on Oct 27, 2009 8:44 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Great post James. Interesting spin on Delhomme and the Tommy John. Never thought about that in that way. Still, if that is the problem that is killing us, he still needs to be benched.

I would like to see Moore start, but it won’t matter in terms of trying to win this season. This team won’t finish any better than 5-11. Sad thing is we won’t even have a draft pick to show for it.

Member of Canes Country and the Cat Scratch Reader

by Ivan459 on Oct 26, 2009 3:54 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Great post James!

I’m absolutely speachless myself. I just finished watching the game again via DVR, and I saw plenty of things I did not see during the game. This team has to be one of the most talented, but poorly coached teams in the league. 12 men on the field the play before we made a safety, multiple false start penalties. Two muffs on special teams.

Too many bad plays to count.

"Once again the trousers of evil are yanked down by the mocking hands of justice!"-Revshawn

by Revshawn on Oct 26, 2009 4:03 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

If Jake gets benched...

He will still be the classy guy we love and hate to hate. I see him being a good mentor for whomever takes his place (Matt Moore please) and continue to lead in the class room and with the clip board on Sunday. Jake has always been team first through good and bad.

James your optimism is impressive. You really conjured up some good vibes after a rough outing yesterday. Nice job pulling this one from down deep.

by Spanglerb on Oct 26, 2009 4:24 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

ture

This might be the best article i have every read you hit home on everything. Im not as sold on the d as you are last 3 oppents were sub-par but i do like them. N Jeff D is horrible i mean we got him from cle before there 2007 playoff run im from cle where a bottom 5 team every year. I didnt like that from the being he doesnt move smith around enough get d-will the ball in space. Were just falling apart

by paineville on Oct 26, 2009 4:59 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

James, add me to the long list of admirees for your MMO writeup.

When this season began, I think most of us (I for sure) was more worried about the performance of the Defense than about the Offense. I went on record as expecting us to score an average of 30 PPG, noting the talent we had on that side of the line, and the fact that so many were returning.

It is mind-boggling to me to see the Panthers struggling so, just to score ANY TD’s now. I’ve been an apologist for many of Jake’s statistical errors, but it’s now gotten to the point that I, too, see this season as a failure. With Atlanta’s loss yesterday, and their visiting N.O. next Monday, I visualized a real possibility that we could have been tied with them at 4-2 after next week, still alive for a wild card, if all went right. In no way did I see us falling to the Bills!

So now after the smoke has cleared, I try to see why we did. How we did.

I agree with the many posters who can’t abide the play-calling of Davidson, and feel that that’s the basic reason that all has gone awry, for Jake and for the offense in general.

I know the powers-that-be are mulling over the changes they know they have to make now. I hope they’re strongly considering Davidson being replaced — even before Jake. It is obvious that Jake, for all his mechanical faults, has his best moments when plays aren’t being sent in, in the hurry-up offensive mode we so often see ourselves in now. He threw — aside from the 3 picks and a few other overthrown balls that just went incomplete — a lot of good passes yesterday. But, especially in light of all the pressure he’s under, he should never have been put in the spot of having the game depend on his arm again. We ALL knew that before the game, all of us yelling Run The Ball and run it again!

Yet even before the score got out of hand, we again essentially abandoned the run, despite the well-known fact that a defense (especially a porous one like theirs) that’s on the field as long as they were in the first half, will wear out if the rush pressure’s kept on them in the 4th quarter. WTF!

Can Davidson and let Jake run his own offense in Arizona — give him one last chance to redeem himself. That’s my suggestion. If he throws another bad pick, then give the ball to Moore and see if he’s got what it takes.

by bigdavis on Oct 26, 2009 5:31 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Nice work James

I too think Smith should atleast get some looks in returning kicks, but I don’t know about punts.

by SmithnCompany on Oct 26, 2009 7:25 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Honestly, I don’t want him doing either because a stupid injury on special teams is too likely with the pathetic blocking we have.

I just hope we have Jason Baker booming 200 punts a day at someone and making sure they can catch the ball, even if it’s just a fair catch.

Cat Scratch Reader's resident optimist.

by James The Aussie on Oct 26, 2009 9:37 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Why isn’t Goodson not getting more looks in both returns? It seems like Captain and Kenny have gotten the majority.

by SmithnCompany on Oct 27, 2009 5:07 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Goodson got one shot last game and he fumbled the kickoff in the endzone, almost out of bounds.

I suspect the coaches want to work on his ability to hold onto the football before they throw him out there. But, I do think he’s the future on KR.

Cat Scratch Reader's resident optimist.

by James The Aussie on Oct 27, 2009 7:34 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

What's really ticking me off

Is we have so much talent at RB for the Wildcat, yet we can’t execute. Every time we run the Wildcat it’s just the Jet Sweep play up the middle, no fakes, no outside, they know what’s coming every time.

Also, what the heck happened to using Goodson as a wideout?

by Flowing Willow on Oct 28, 2009 7:40 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

+1 that was one of the selling points for Goodson.

I wish I had a link to an article I read on SI.com a few days ago, but basically what it inferred was that there are three versions of the wildcat:

Version 1: Very Simplistic- Essentially what the Panthers are doing. Easy to stop, doesn’t utilize WRs, no fakes.

Version 2: Moderate- Utilizes end arounds, WRs in motion, fakes, multiple backs

Version 3: Utilized only by the Dolphins. Adds a passing threat from the Wildcat and uses everything from 1 and 2.

Cat Scratch Reader's resident optimist.

by James The Aussie on Oct 28, 2009 7:13 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

It doesn't matter

Whatever’s wrong… be it Jake’s arm or the mechanics or whatever… he’s losing us the games by giving the ball to the other team.

There’s something wrong in Jake’s head and he’s thinking too much about it. His mechanics are completely screwed up and he can’t throw the ball. either way, there’s no redemption here. He had a good run but he needs to be benched.

The season’s over and we might as well see what Matt Moore can do.

by scorpion12 on Oct 27, 2009 8:23 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

First off I LOVED the article

It would inspire hope in even the most diehard hater. Just a couple of notes, Captain Munnerlynn was eaten alive on punts, maybe that explains his deer in the headlights look. He had no blocking and was KILLED all day, I thought Buffalo had said to themselves, “Hey, lets get these guys before we end up like that Bucs guy!” I also think Delhomme starts, but if he can’t exorcise his demons, then Matt Moore gets his shot. It’s a shame that Delhomme’s career might end this way, if any Panther deserves a Super Bowl ring it’s Delhomme. Easily my favorite Panther of all time. Ring of Honor for Delhomme, retire #17?

by Flowing Willow on Oct 27, 2009 2:43 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the SB Nation blog focused on the NFL's Carolina Panthers.

Site Code of Conduct

Start posting about the Panthers »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

Small
Peppers Interview on WFNZ Tomorrow AM at 07:00
Terminatorstewart_small
Hey, Peter King, this dog knows more about football than you!
Small
Are we only as good as the Browns going forward?
Small
Really?!
Small
UPDATE: Rae Carruth
Chris_harris_headshot_2_small
Super Bowl Sunday Should Be a Fun One! - @ChrisHarrisNFL
Steve_smith_2_small
Should the Panthers pursue Torry Holt?
Chris_harris_headshot_2_small
@ChrisHarrisNFL 's Pick to Win Super Bowl XLIV Is...
Chris_harris_headshot_2_small
(FUNNY VIDEO) Soul Train Line Dance to Earth Wind & Fire's 'Mighty Mighty'
131_small
Big Shoes to Fill

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Latest NFL Headlines from SB Nation

Daily Norseman
Success Depends On Your Definition
Mocking The Draft
Arrelious Benn NFL Draft scouting report
Niners Nation
Super Bowl XLIV reportedly most watched TV program ever

Managers

Catscratchreader_m_small Jaxon

Editors

N1523447507_30151367_6579_small Cyberjag

Img_0764_small LittleKing

Currentflag_small James The Aussie

Authors

Dbc92c5112a9b23c_small Revshawn

Myspace_small Ryan Basen