Comparing '08 Stats to '09 Stats
08 09
Jake Delhomme:
Five Touchdowns Four Touchdowns
Three Interceptions Ten Interceptions
1096 Yards 847 Yards
60.5 Completion Percentage 56.8 Completion Percentage
DeAngelo Williams
74 Attempts 89 Attempts
321 Yards 372 Yards
4.33 Average 4.2 Average
2 Touchdowns 4 Touchdowns
Jonathan Stewart
65 Carries 50 Carries
272 Yards 248 Yards
4.18 Average 5.0 Average
4 Touchdowns 2 Touchdowns
114 Points 85 Points
70 Points Allowed 125 Points
San Diego Philadelphia
Chicago Atlanta
Minnesota Dallas
Atlanta Washington
Kansas City Tampa Bay
4-1 2-3
It is the Same Jake, and same Rushing Game.. just a tougher schedule
The content of these posts are those of the person/idiot making the post only
0 recs |
7 comments
Comments
It's the same Jake alright, if we conveniently ignore the 10 interceptions.
Also, San Diego and Chicago were tough matchups last year as well. The Panthers were just tougher, and Jake Delhomme pulled off a magnificent last drive to help us beat the Chargers.
Now that I’m taking a second glance at it, we actually had a tougher schedule last year than we did this year. Amazing….wow.
"Once again the trousers of evil are yanked down by the mocking hands of justice!"-Revshawn
by Revshawn on Oct 25, 2009 12:22 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
I completely agree
The first three games last year were tough – San DIego and Minnesota were away games. We should have beaten Atlanta and Dallas this year.
by pieterzen on Oct 25, 2009 1:25 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Pretty identical rushing stats
139 total rushes by Double Trouble, scoring 6 TD’s between them. Slightly more yds gained on those same 139 rushes.
Remember how a game ago, there was much talk about our running game troubles? Things have a way of evening out over time.
Let’s hope they do for Jake, too.
by bigdavis on Oct 25, 2009 3:17 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
I admire your attempt but......
Jake’s touchdowns are down 20%, interceptions up 333%, and passing yards down ~22%.
Deangelo’s rushing attempts up 20% as well as rushing yards. Touchdowns up 100%.
You know where i am going with this. Numbers can be massaged anyway you want to look at it. Jake production has been total devastating to the current record, irrespective of the strength of schedule. Jake’s lack of production and increase in turnovers resulted in a shift in focus in offense. More is demanded of Deangelo, and he remains consistent in his playing.
The biggest and most important factor remains in filling in the void of a number 2 and a number 3 receiver. It is not Moose, and no one else can step up. We have a franchise and soon to be hall of fame #1 receiver, in Steve Smith, and a handful of number 4 receivers. That is why we cannot help out Jake, and his production will continue to suffer as well as the team’s point production and winning percentage.
I don’t blame Fox at this point. However, if they do not address the future of the quarterback situation through trades or drafts in the off season, then I blame everyone from Hurney on down the food chain. Our return on Jake is so poor, we do not need that much cap hit for this kind play.
by univonc on Oct 25, 2009 9:05 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Completely Agree with Three Recievers Point
Back in 2003:
Player Rec Yds Yds/Rec Long TD
Steve Smith 88 1,110 12.6 67 7
Muhsin Muhammad 54 837 15.5 60 3
Ricky Proehl 27 389 14.4 66 4
DeShaun Foster 26 207 8.0 47 2
Kris Mangum 17 199 11.7 34 0
In 2006:
Catches Yards AVG LONG TD
Steve Smith 103 1,563 15.2 80 12
DeShaun Foster 34 372 10.9 47 1
Keary Colbert 25 282 11.3 42 2
Ricky Proehl 25 441 17.6 69 4
Kris Mangum 23 202 8.8 24 2
So Far in 2009
Player Rec Yds Yds/Rec Long TD
Muhsin Muhammad 22 205 9.3 19 0
Steve Smith 21 259 12.3 28 0
DeAngelo Williams 13 123 9.5 20 0
Jeff King 9 95 10.6 32 2
Dante Rosario 8 117 14.6 25 2
Notice the difference in Avg Yards Recieving per Catch..
by stevesmith on Oct 25, 2009 11:39 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Nice stats SS
It’s hard not to pin it on Delhomme versus the schedule. The 10 INT’s is what stands out as the big difference. If 7 of those were instead completions maybe the panthers are instead 3-2 or even 4-1. We then wouldn’t be talking about Delhomme’s poor start.
I blog the Carolina Panthers at www.catscratchreader.com
by Jaxon on Oct 25, 2009 12:08 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
as a team we have turned the ball over more than last season already
that is the biggest difference
by carolinabrave89 on Oct 25, 2009 7:37 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs

by 















