Could trading Steve Smith be the answer?
As I was driving home from work today much of the conversation on WFNZ centered on the Panthers yesterday. The host's prevailing wisdom isn't unlike a lot of Panther fans today, essentially 'The team struggled with two of the dogs of the NFL, how can they hope to make a go of it with this schedule?'.
When Mark Packer first suggested trading Steve Smith I thought it was insane. Then I thought about it more, and now I'm on the fence. I know this is hard for Panther fans to think about, but look my scenario after the jump and think about it, for the future of the franchise.
The Scenario: The Panthers are approached at the trade deadline by the San Francisco 49ers who want to trade for Steve Smith. They think Smith could be the answer to their passing game and turn them into a playoff threat.
They offer the following: 2010 1st round pick (acquired from Carolina), 2010 3rd round pick, WR Brandon Jones, QB Alex Smith.
What do we get from the deal?
- Jake's safety net is taken away. He will be forced to make progressions to other receivers, and if not, he will be replaced.
- Our 1st round pick in one of the deepest drafts in memory.
- An additional 3rd round pick in a deep draft.
- An underutilized WR who could push Moore and Jarrett to prove who deserves to start across from Moose.
- A young QB who could be a total bust, but could push Jake and give us a better idea of our situation in the offseason.
I know the emotional response is to dismiss it immediately. But, if you think about it and digest it, then you might see it could really benefit the team in the long term.
For the record: I am not advocating this idea, just kicking around some idea for the long term future of the franchise.
The content of these posts are those of the person/idiot making the post only
0 recs |
53 comments
Comments
Steve's response
There is nothing that says that Steve will go along with this idea. I think he put things into perspectiive a year or so ago and took some steps that involve his family and their place in our little community where they live. I feel Steve’s family will come first and he might just drop out of football if traded away from the Panthers. He doesn’t need the money, his family is well taken care of and they just moved into a fantastic house. Good luck on a trade that he would have to approve of before it could happen. I for one would hate to see his family have to move out of our little community that he puts so much into. For all of the bad press he has gotten over a couple altercations he is a very nice guy, good family man and good neighbor.
by Cwilly1 on Oct 19, 2009 7:26 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
This reminds me of when some people here in Pittsburgh were kicking around the idea of trading Sidney Crosby last year when he in was the middle of a small slump. My response is largely the same. You do not trade away players of that caliber, and you especially don’t do it for a group of never was’s. Period.
by SlayerGhaleon on Oct 19, 2009 8:11 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
It has nothing to do with Smith being in a slump. It has to do with maximizing his value on the open market.
As for the ‘never was’ comment, I think most teams in the league would value a 1st and 3rd round draft pick. Smith and Jones are merely the frosting on the cake
Cat Scratch Reader's resident optimist.
by James The Aussie on Oct 19, 2009 8:19 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
It has nothing to do with Smith being in a slump.
Sure it does. Talk like this always comes up when a star player is in a small slump. Case in point: Before Washington, all of us here were talking about trading Julius Peppers. Why? He was in a slump. Now that he’s producing, nobody’s talking about it anymore.
by SlayerGhaleon on Oct 19, 2009 9:22 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
The discussion on WFNZ came because the TEAM is in a slump… not Smitty. Their point of view was exactly what D-Ranged1 said below… they argued essentially that it’s wasted potential and the time it would take to get a new QB, have him learn the system and be ready to start would be longer than Smith’s shelf life.
They also argued that Smith has lost a step, but that’s a separate argument, and one I don’t agree with.
Peppers is a rarified situation because realistically trading him is impossible. He would have to guarantee a team he would resign long term with them, accept the city and accept the trade. Too much power in Julius’ hands.
Cat Scratch Reader's resident optimist.
by James The Aussie on Oct 19, 2009 9:25 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
It’s pretty much the same idea. Player/team is in a slump, trade said player. It’s nonsense that largely doesn’t take into consideration the details that go into trades like that.
In this particular case, I think Revshawn has it in one. You’re going to trade away our one threat at WR for two unknown quantities and two never was players? I think not.
And honestly, i think Smith will still be productive when we get another QB in here and have him adjusted to the system. It will certainly help a QB to actually have someone to throw to, wouldn’t you agree?
by SlayerGhaleon on Oct 19, 2009 9:49 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I absolutely agree.
Getting the QB should be priority number one… and I’ve voiced my opinions on who we should aim for.
Just to clarify, I’m still on the fence with this idea. I can see pros and cons from both angles. I love Smitty, always have, always will…. he’s the epitome of a Carolina Panther.
But, sometime you make tough decisions for the betterment of a franchise. I don’t know if this could be one of those moments.
The situation I gave was highly hypothetical, but if a team offered us two 1st rounders… would you listen? Given all of your fervor against the deal, what would it take to tip your hand?
Cat Scratch Reader's resident optimist.
by James The Aussie on Oct 19, 2009 10:01 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
It would take us having depth at the wide receiver position for me to even consider it. We need someone who can come in immediately and fill in even competently so there’s little drop off, and we don’t have that right now.
That said, I wouldn’t do it even then. Smith isn’t just a star player, he’s the best player in franchise history, bar none. Nobody else even comes close. Maybe I’m just being stubborn, but I firmly believe you don’t trade a player like that away unless under incredibly mitigating circumstances.
by SlayerGhaleon on Oct 19, 2009 10:13 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
So instead of waiting on a new QB to "learn the system"
Bench Delhomme and put in Matt Moore. Problem solved. Jake Delhomme is the problem, not Steve Smith!
This is an utterly absurd fanpost…..
by dudemanhey on Oct 20, 2009 12:25 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
who?
Who is sydney crosby, and how in the world do you compare him to steve smith? just curious.
by usana_gaines on Oct 20, 2009 7:49 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Dude
I know hockey is a forgotten sport, but Crosby is the Manning of hockey.
by Flowing Willow on Oct 20, 2009 8:29 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
+1
Yeah, Sidney Crosby is amazing… simple as that.
Even if I did yell ‘F#@*ING CINDY!’ at my TV during the ECF last season.
Cat Scratch Reader's resident optimist.
by James The Aussie on Oct 20, 2009 9:08 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
No way. Not on your life.
Not only would a Steve Smith trade kill the morale for the season, but it would wipe out really the only wide receiver threat that the Panthers have on our team. Moose is aging and probably will retire either this season or the next, but Steve Smith can keep on going deep into his 30’s if he has a decent QB to give him the ball.
If the main deal here is to get a first round pick and get a QB, why not just trade the first rounder for next year and grab a rookie in the middle picks of the first round? The team has shown no problem doing that in the past
Plus, we have several key FA going out on the market in 2010, including both our backup QB’s, Richard Marshall, Thomas Davis, Keydrick Vincent, Jeff King, Julius Peppers, Tyler Brayton, and those are just the starters. What kind of message would it send it we took Steve Smith and sent him to another team? A lot of these players are looking for a Super Bowl Caliber team, and they will want the Panthers to overpay them if they wish them to stay on the team.
No, I think the harm here would outweigh the good by far. I want a franchise QB, but not that much.
"Once again the trousers of evil are yanked down by the mocking hands of justice!"-Revshawn
by Revshawn on Oct 19, 2009 8:19 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Good points Rev
Cat Scratch Reader's resident optimist.
by James The Aussie on Oct 19, 2009 8:20 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I can see both sides of the argument. It’s not quite so much a stretch as would immediately seem. Sure, Smith is a game changer and pretty much the only receiving threat we have but how much of a threat is someone that can’t even get the ball in their vicinity to have a chance of catching? He’s wasted potential right now. I love Smith, don’t get me wrong, he has long been one of my favorite Panthers. His ability with and without the ball is amazing, from breaking and evading tackles to blocking in the secondary, the little guy does everything and does it darn well.
BUT, when the guy isn’t getting the ball, he’s just wasting away. We have two options here and I can’t say if either would be the wrong one. I guess the best question to ask right now would be:
How important is our current season? We’ve already lost three. We have a long road ahead and even with acquisitions such as those stated, we’d still have a hard time making the play-offs. Even then, honest to God, I just don’t see us topping the Saints this year barring an injury to Bree’s (which, of course, I would never wish for).
Is salvaging this season worth losing Steve Smith? As wonderful as all of those additions would seem with th e potential they bring, I think the better option is the hold onto Smith until this season ends, get a QB that can make those passes and utilize him to his potential next season.
I wouldn’t mind seeing a similar trade for Peppers though. I don’t know how franchise tags work but if possible, I’d love such a trade, minus the QB. He’s playing well, but I think we can get by without him once our offense begins to work with the defense and not against. Especially if we are able to get something similar to what you suggested for Smith. I’m not too informed of how a players trade value is determined but I assume they would be somewhat similar?
Conclusion: keep smith, try to dump some one else.
by D-Ranged1 on Oct 19, 2009 8:46 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Trading Peppers is very, very difficult.
He holds all the power in a trade. It would have to be predicated on him being willing to sign long term with a partner. He would need to accept the trade, accept the new city and be willing to sign an extension with the new team.
Cat Scratch Reader's resident optimist.
by James The Aussie on Oct 19, 2009 9:26 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Feed the stud
Don’t trade him — get him the ball!
by bigdavis on Oct 19, 2009 10:48 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
bottom line
you’re right. it’s real simple, give smitty the ball. when the bucs defense catches two jake passes, one for a TD, and smitty only catches one, there’s a problem. maybe we should bring in jim zorn…as a qb coach, and nothing else. he’ll be unemployed soon.
by usana_gaines on Oct 20, 2009 7:50 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Steve Smith, and the market value he holds
James, i totally see where you and the guys on the radio are coming from, and I don’t think the idea of trading Smith is a bad one. The logistics, as stated earlier (team morale, and Smitty’s acceptance of the trade) seem to be the difficult part.
As stated, we clearly have no passing game this season. Smitty is being wasted game by game. He is seeing constant double coverage, and when he does get a little separation, Delhomme misses him. Smitty is currently 30 years old. He has been a Panther for 9 seasons as a 3rd round pick, and has above average “mileage” for a player his age. He certainly has 2 or 3 years of peak production left in him, but can we expect to be able to tap that potential in those 2 or 3 years? (including this year) Even if we manage to get our hands on the real deal “QB of the future” in this draft, you have to assume he wont be another Matt Ryan or Joe Flacco, and it will take at least 2 years for him to flourish. By the time he matures, Smith will have lost the value he has right now in 2009, and we miss out on getting nice return on investment for him.
SO here are your Pros and Cons of a Smith trade with anyone right now:
PROS
- Very High market value right now as multiple teams are seeking help at WR
- Skills have not diminished
- Significant compensation can be expected in the way of draft picks or personnel
- Our passing game is crippled with or without him, we might as well look to the future
CONS
- Smith is a fan favorite, this move will be unpopular unless the draft choices and player acquisitions pay dividends
- We essentially are putting our passing game completely out to pasture barring a significant personnel acquisition beyond draft picks.
- We risk alienating him even if we do not trade him should Rumors begin to fly
The San Francisco Treat (errr… Trade)
Right now, the 49ers have 3 real receivers of note that have trade value (leaving out Isaac Bruce because he is to old to be of use to us) Michael Crabtree, Josh Morgan, Brandon Jones. Alex Smith probably isn’t going to find any career revelations in Charlotte that he didn’t find in San Francisco, so i say we leave the QB talk out of this trade. Our target of these three receivers, in my opinion, should be Josh Morgan. He is a 2nd year WR with starting experience who would definately become the odd man out should San Francisco suddenly have Smith and Crabtree on the roster. He is younger than Jones by a fairly wide margin, and has already proven he can be a factor in an offense with a bad passing game but an exceptional running game. I think we nix Alex Smith, and pursue reacquiring our traded 1st rounder, and a brand new 2nd rounder instead of 3rd rounder, and WR Josh Morgan.
So, if this deal causes what is left of our season to implode, we likely end up with a top 10 or even top 5 pick that we just received. We use that on either a star QB of the future, or a stud WR . In the 2nd round, we take the position we didnt take in the first. I say we actually go WR then QB, because the QB talent pool is just crazy deep, WR is not nearly as deep. On top of this, we get a young WR who has shown he can play football regardless of our draft.
Other teams of note looking for a stud veteran WR:
Baltimore, Miami, Chicago, St. Louis, Dallas? but lets face it, just about anyone is going to be interested in Steve Smith.
This is all hypothetical of course… but just some food for thought. We should not rule out anything at this point.
by Tater596 on Oct 20, 2009 12:40 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
I have to come back here as this theory here just won’t leave me be. The more I think about it, the more I begin to argue with myself. I really DON’T see this happening, as loyal as Fox is to a suffering Delhomme, I just don’t see him offering up Smitty anytime soon. Now, onto another theory.
I find myself wondering if the Carolina Panthers offense we have came to love and support is over? It has changed over the years but certain things have remained in tact. Delhomme has been there. Steve Smith has been there. Williams hasn’t been here quite as long but we have always had a decent enough running back (Foster being the only reason I have to say decent). Of course credit goes to the O-line and everyone else involved, but when speaking of the Panthers in the past it has most typically involved Delhomme, Smith, and Davis/Foster/Williams. It has been a nice run… but is it over?
Delhomme just isn’t cutting it (to be stated for the 3897834758937598347539864th time, like anyone doesn’t already know), Smith isn’t getting the ball (yeah, again), and Williams can’t win a SuperBowl by himself nor with the help of Stewart.
Obviously, I’m not stating anything new here but my feelings on this subject seem to be changing ever so rapidly as I realize this team just isn’t what we have been. We are not feared. We are known to have a nice run game but then they just laugh and state that with no passing game, we’re helpless.
I think I think we’re done… Perhaps I won’t feel as so after a nights rest but, for now, I really do feel that way. This era is either going to come to an end gracefully or prolong until we do lose to the Skins and Buc’s (or whatever team takes their place in the future).
Note: Please realize I truly do hate typing this, so I’m not trying to jump on any wagons here, and I would absolutely love to be wrong.
So this is my (second) theory:
Smith needs to go for something similar to what has already been suggested here. Absolutely nothing less than what he is worth, though, as there are too many options for getting rid of him. No multi-season draft picks either… We (at least, I) want players out of THIS draft, not one here and one the next.
I agree with Tater, Morgan would be a nice prospect opposite Moore. I also agree with taking a WR over a QB. Next year would see Morgan, Moore, and our draft WR on field as Moose will probably be retiring. Jake would be gone one way or another (any suggestions what we could possibly get for him in the way of trades?) and Moore would start at QB (just to please the Jake-haters) until giving way to our draft QB whenever the coaches feel is appropriate.
Williams and Stewart will still be our work horses at RB, meanwhile Goodson will have a year of experience under his belt to cut down on that fumble problem. I hope to see him worked in as a receiving back. Sutton will probably be gone by way of trade, although I hope we get to see what he can do first.
Everette Brown takes Peppers spot, opposite Johnson. I’d also like to see another DE drafted if possible.
Assuming we can bring back most of our players in their final year (at least the ones worth bringing back) we should at that time have the building blocks to put together a solid team. Our offense would look similar…
Moore, Draft QB
Morgan, Moore, Draft WR
Williams, Stewart
At our current rate, our defense should excel next year.
I loved and supported them as long as I could, and I will continue to do so for however long they keep this going, but I think the Panthers are en-route to a new era.
I will now go attempt this on Madden 10 because everyone knows if it happens in Madden, it will happen in real life. I just don’t understand why our CB’s and safeties haven’t learned how to warp 5 yards horizontally without moving their legs to make an impossible block yet!!!
by D-Ranged1 on Oct 20, 2009 3:39 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Smith honestly is the only thing that keeps our passing game from....
being the worst in the league. We are pretty bad, Smith keeps us from sucking even worse. Not to mention trading Smith would just be like saying, “Season’s over, lets spend Peppers 20 million on a guy who MIGHT help us out in a few years.” We can be back in contention next year, the optimist in me says this year, but realistically I see a 7-9 season. Campbell will be available, there is a great QB class in the draft, and some very decent talent at WR in the free agent pool. Our D-line has actually been improved by Kemoeatu’s injury, the DB’s are solid, if unspectacular, we have good linebackers, good O-line, good runners.
by Flowing Willow on Oct 20, 2009 7:25 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Just wanted to jump back in to say this.
Look at the poll: Less than 50% of respondants are completely against trading Smith. 54% would consider it, trade him outright.
That’s alot more than I expected, and pretty intes
Cat Scratch Reader's resident optimist.
by James The Aussie on Oct 20, 2009 9:11 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
wow… cut off.
Anyway, last sentence should read:
That’s alot more than I expected, and pretty interesting given how important Smitty has been over the years.
Honestly, it would be a snowball’s chance he’s traded before 4 p.m. today, but I really think it could be a possiblity in the offseason if we don’t drastically improve this year (which I still hope happens)
Cat Scratch Reader's resident optimist.
by James The Aussie on Oct 20, 2009 9:12 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
It would be giving up on this season
something I don’t see Furney doing since their job is on the line. It should be discussed again in the off-season though.
I blog the Carolina Panthers at www.catscratchreader.com
by Jaxon on Oct 20, 2009 9:25 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
A couple thoughts...
- Trading Smith is giving up on the season
- You don’t trade stars unless there’s an irreconcilable rift between them and the coaching staff
- You had Alex Smith a couple years ago in David Carr’s uniform (but Smith has smaller hands)
- Think our passing game is bad now? Wait until the other team doesn’t have to double one player every down
- There have been “deep” draft classes before, and they’ve been full of busts. Take QB for example, that class is deep because of stats, but they all play in spread offenses which make Colt Brennan look like Peyton Manning. Just because a draft class is deep it doesn’t mean you’re getting a guaranteed star.
- The Panthers need help at WR and QB in the draft now. Those positions are boom or bust no matter where you get the players.
- Most importantly, I can’t think of any way to get fans to be less interested in the Panthers than to trade away their best player for a bunch of scrubs and a future hopeful.
by Cyberjag on Oct 20, 2009 10:14 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Tell ya what, ATL will give you Marty Booker, John Parker Wilson, and a 3rd rounder next year for Steve Smith
Any takers?
I have six locks on my door all in a row. When I go out, I only lock every other one. I figure no matter how long somebody stands there picking the locks, they are always locking three.
Elayne Boosler
by NaGaNole on Oct 20, 2009 10:44 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Thanks for the generous offer NaGaNole...
Let me counter:
- Steve Smith, Jake Delhomme and Julius Peppers
for
- Matt Ryan, Roddy White and John Abraham
Heck, we’ll even throw in a 2nd round pick.
Cat Scratch Reader's resident optimist.
by James The Aussie on Oct 20, 2009 11:53 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Uwww...I like that one James
I blog the Carolina Panthers at www.catscratchreader.com
by Jaxon on Oct 20, 2009 1:55 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
That's a great idea...
Heck, you could even leave Abraham out of it — I would give up those three to get Matty Ice and White.
by bwsmith25 on Oct 20, 2009 2:35 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
youd have no defense then my friend
by carolinabrave89 on Oct 20, 2009 5:27 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Based on the way Peppers has played thus far...
I don’t think he would be missed.
by bwsmith25 on Oct 21, 2009 1:11 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
No defense?
The way Charles Johnson and Everette Brown have been playing I like our odds.
Cat Scratch Reader's resident optimist.
by James The Aussie on Oct 21, 2009 2:03 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
If we were to trade, it should be with a better offer than San Fran.
FIrst round pick makes me happy. But if we don’t plan to get a QB, this trade is a waste of time.
Makes me wonder why we didn’t try to get Orton from Chicago last year.
Orton was just my opinion…..
I don’t want to see Steve Smith in another teams jersey… The thought makes me sick!!
by tarheelfan on Oct 20, 2009 11:47 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
I don't know how much of it is Orton in 2009
and how much is Josh McDaniels. The pure fact is McDaniels is proving to be a dynamite head coach, and even though people had big doubts about him at first he has that team rolling.
Each week he is tailoring a gameplan to play to Orton’s strengths and away from his weaknesses, and it’s showing. McDaniels isn’t diluded to think he has an amazing, record breaking QB, but the way that offense is being run makes him look like a probowler.
Cat Scratch Reader's resident optimist.
by James The Aussie on Oct 20, 2009 11:52 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
No James! Don't say it!
I’m still in denial about the Broncos being 6-0. Carson Palmer had an off day in week one. Bill let his student beat him in Week 5 as a gesture of good will. It’s impossible. There is no way that the Broncos can be this good with a defense that did as horrible as they did last year.
No way.
"Once again the trousers of evil are yanked down by the mocking hands of justice!"-Revshawn
by Revshawn on Oct 21, 2009 12:28 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Well, adding Brian Dawkins and having Elvis Dumervil play out of his mind definitely help their cause.
Cat Scratch Reader's resident optimist.
by James The Aussie on Oct 21, 2009 7:03 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
NaGaNole
NO…………………no Booker, and certainly not Wilson……………..
Thanks for the offer.
by tarheelfan on Oct 20, 2009 11:49 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
I just don't see trading Smith improving our passing game.
The way I see it wee need a QB, bottom line. If the front office doesn’t see that this absolutely must be addressed in the off season then it won’t matter much what else we do to the passing game.
If we had a Ryan or a Flacco, Jarrett or Moore would look more like #2 wr’s, and Smith would be putting up numbers.
by JC_GSO on Oct 20, 2009 6:19 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Trading Smith would not make our team better in the short-term
And to be quite honest, just does not make any sense. Unless we had someone capable of half his abilities waiting in the wings (which we don’t), then I don’t see the logic behind a Smith trade.
Not only that, but this is nothing like the Jenkins situation. He was making himself a distraction to the team and in that instance we had a suitable replacement in Kemo.
by RaffyGonzo on Oct 21, 2009 8:07 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
It's not Smith, It's Delhomme
Am I the only person who realizes that Delhomme is the problem. All I ever hear is this is a running football team as if our opponents don’t eat that information up as much as the media. I love watching the Panthers rock-pounding phylosophy in action, but when we are playing from behind or in a definite passing situation, I cringe at the thought of Delhomme attempting a pass. He has a second-string QB rating in my book.
Smith, despite his lack of receptions, is immensely motivated to being a great wide receiver. Every play he is running his route as if it were his last. I see a lot of plays where Delhomme has thrown to someone else when Smith has had two or three steps on a defender. He is doubled all the time due to the fact that he is our greatest threat in the passing game.
The problem is that Delhomme isn’t that great of a QB. He can’t “thread the needle” and his pocket presence is horrible. One of his worst attributes is being able to step up in the pocket. If you look at his fumbles, you will see how most of them could have been avoided by him simply stepping up at the right time. Peyton Manning controls how the pocket develops with his dropback. I know Delhomme isn’t Manning but his pocket presence and delivery can be greatly improved if he were able to dropback and stepup into the pocket a little more fluently.
It’s not impossible to get the ball to Steve Smith. I just see that Delhomme can’t do it. And with the lack in quality QB depth behide him, there isn’t any pressure for him to do better.
by unc_mark5 on Oct 21, 2009 8:47 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
everyone realizes Delhomme is the problem
The point of this “theory” was to imagine a scenario where we can trade Steve Smith for his current value which is very high and receive a nice return in the way of personnel and draft picks.
The biggest point being made here is that with Jake Failhomme we are wasting away Smitty’s remaining peak years, and even once Jake is replaced we will probably have some rough QB play for 1-2 years more. By the time the new QB is ready, Smitty will be 33 and past his prime most likely.
This thread is largely irrelevant now that the trade deadline has passed, and is just food for thought.
by Tater596 on Oct 21, 2009 11:32 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
You can never tell when a guy will go past his prime
Example: Joey Galloway. This finally is his last year, but for the past few years he still had his speed and was still producing at a high level. Randy Moss is what, 34, and he can still produce. Marvin Harrison was playing well until he hit 34, 35, I forget. And lets not forget Jerry Rice.
by Flowing Willow on Oct 22, 2009 7:50 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
right
You cant know for sure, but general wisdom says mid 30’s. Smith is currently 30, and if we were to trade him now we would still be guaranteed to get full value for him.
by Tater596 on Oct 22, 2009 10:31 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Trading him would be giving up on our immediate future
Smith has been what the rest of the league knows us by for a long time. Replacing him would be incredibly hard if not downright near impossible. It would tank this season, the next season while we search for more threats at the receiver position, and probably the season after that. While at the same time we are searching for a franchise QB as well. It’s basically saying, “This team sucks, lets rebuild.” We have a load of talent on this team, lets not give it up.
Another point, do you think having Smith hurts a QB’s growth or helps it, that hasn’t been factored in properly in this discussion.
by Flowing Willow on Oct 23, 2009 7:54 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
In my mind, Steve Smith is a double edged sword
On the one hand, he’s the perfect player to have as a target for a young QB. So, for the future of the position in Carolina, he helps it.
However, for Jake’s play, by in large, he’s hurting it right now. That’s not Smitty’s fault, it’es Jake’s. Jake too often zones in on Smith and forgets the rest of the recievers… in this aspect he hurts it.
Cat Scratch Reader's resident optimist.
by James The Aussie on Oct 23, 2009 9:55 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Caveat
While yes, I think certainly having Smith around would help a QBs growth, let us assume for a minute in the deal we get a first and second round pick. In the upcoming draft that could net us top prospects at both QB and WR. Let’s say for example we select Golden Tate in the first round then Colt McCoy in the second. Talk about fostering a relationship, two rookies that will begin their bond at the beginning of each of their careers. While niether may start as a rookie, that means they will get extended practice time together on the 2nd team.
I tend to be looking toward the future already. I am aware the season is young, but the way the Panthers have looked so far, I just don’t see playoffs on the horizon. It is to late anyway, the trade deadline is come and gone, so we know Smitty will be ours through season end.
by Tater596 on Oct 23, 2009 4:47 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Point taken, I'll drop the trade talk
However we are not yet eliminated. The rest of our schedule:
vs Buffalo (likely win)
at Arizona (could be a win, 50/50)
at New Orleans (probable loss but it’s the NFC South)
vs Atlanta (Revenge should be ours, I call win, but like the Arizona game)
vs Miami (Definitely could be a win, with our new blitzing defense, but also a possible loss)
at New York Jets (Could be a win, the Jets don’t look so fearsome anymore)
vs Tampa Bay (Can you say 400 yards on the ground. : ) )
at New England (I can see a win, but more likely it’s a loss)
vs Minnesota (Same as New England, but if Favre has his meltdown, it’s like playing Jake Delhomme. : D)
at New York Giants (If injuries pile up, we could win, otherwise it’s a loss)
vs New Orleans (At home, tough game either way, but more likely to be a win than earlier in the season)
So our record could be anywhere from 3-13 to 13-3, but more likely it’s going to be from 8-8 to 10-6. Either we are going to narrowly miss, or nail a wildcard spot in Cardiac Cat fashion. All hope is not lost people!!!!!!! : )
by Flowing Willow on Oct 24, 2009 6:28 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Wins over 2 of the worst teams in the NFL and suddenly the Panthers are back?
I’m not trying to be mean, but BUF beats CAR at home by 10….
I have six locks on my door all in a row. When I go out, I only lock every other one. I figure no matter how long somebody stands there picking the locks, they are always locking three.
Elayne Boosler
by NaGaNole on Oct 24, 2009 10:14 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Nah, saying the Panthers are “back” is saying we’re only going to lose one more game this season, or less.
Saying we have a chance at a wild card spot because we’ve seen sparks of last years Panthers on both sides of the ball, regardless of who our opponent was, seems to be more along the lines of what I understand.
So, if we go .500 this week, are we in contention for being “back” or will we never achieve that goal simply because we’re the always underestimated Panthers?
by D-Ranged1 on Oct 24, 2009 2:26 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
You can't win in the NFL with bad QB play.
Even with that great running game, you have to be able to throw the ball in certain situations. Even Fox doesn’t trust Delhomme any more. Doesn’t matter what he says, the playcalling says it all…
I have six locks on my door all in a row. When I go out, I only lock every other one. I figure no matter how long somebody stands there picking the locks, they are always locking three.
Elayne Boosler
by NaGaNole on Oct 24, 2009 5:13 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
We play down or up to our opponents
You will see less than inspired play against weaker opponents, but when our backs are against the wall and no one gives us a fighting chance watch us scratch and claw our way back to respectability.
Where we promptly slip back down the slope. : (
by Flowing Willow on Oct 25, 2009 4:04 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
You think Smith is motivated today?
Here’s what he said to Darin Gantt, per Rock Hill Herald:
“come out on Sunday and line up, and see how well you do against the little punk."
by bigdavis on Oct 25, 2009 12:08 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs

by 
















