Cat Scratch Reader: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Sports blogs for fans, by fans.
Around SBN: Follow the @sbnation NFL Twitter List

Panthers Offensive Flame Out Has ‘Layers' of Blame

Brad Thomas over at Scout.com put forth a nice analogy that I'm going to run with. Though I'm tempted to just cut and paste Brad's entire post I won't since it's a pay-for site. Thomas says the blame for the Panthers loss can be peeled back, let's say ‘like an onion' to borrow a Shrek analogy. I'm going to turn it around though.

On the surface of this loss was Jake's six, yes I can't believe six turnovers.

The quick and the dirty of it is that everyone wants to blame Jake Delhomme for the game. True, Jake did have six turnovers in the game ... wait ... did i just write six turnovers? How is any team going to compete committing six turnovers ... and how does one man get the opportunity to commit six? What is the benching threshold?

Benching threshold indeed. There isn't one for John Fox. We all knew there was no way that Fox would bench Delhomme no matter how bad he was playing. I like Thomas' reasoning for a benching though.

Just like Delhomme replaced a wildly ineffective Rodney Peete in the 2003 season opener against Jacksonville, it was time for Delhomme to be benched for someone else to have a shot. That is what this team deserved on Saturday night. They didn't deserve to have their fate decided by a QB who had an off night. They have two other QBs that deserved a shot at winning a game. They are paid too, and are on the team for a reason.

 

 

Star-divide

My theory is Delhomme has gotten lazy. He settled too often for just chunking the ballup to smith and smith rewarded him with catches. He doesn't avoid pressure at all and holds the ball too long. So that's the first layer of the onion but that layer is severely affected by the layer underneath. The second layer lies with the offensive coaching staff, namely QB coach Mike McCoy:

You can see a huge difference in the Delhomme of 2003 and the Delhomme of today, and perhaps that is a result of the coaching he's received in Carolina. The Delhomme of 2003 would fire passes to receivers and hit them in stride. He'd hit the open man. We haven't seen that in Carolina in at least a few years. Can we really blame the QBs here? They all have the same symptoms: locking in on receivers, having poor judgment, holding onto the ball too long. Is this really a staff that we can trust to develop young talent?

Now that is the question for everyone that wants to draft a QB to ask. McCoy has to be accountable for Jake's bad habits. Thomas doesn't appear to be a fan of McCoy's:

You've got his position coach, Mike McCoy, who masquerades as a QB coach and passing game coordinator for the most non-imaginative offense of the last decade. A QB coach with no pedigree, no major experience and who had his tutelage under a coach -- Dan Henning -- who despite having Barry Sanders and three top notch receivers in the 90's couldn't compete on a regular basis and ruined more quarterbacks with promise than he ever developed.

I was recently contacted by the 49ers blogger for some insight on McCoy because he is apparently a candidate for some position there. I know nothing about this guy except for this excerpt so if anyone else has some info I'd love to hear it.

Finally the third layer, OC Jeff Davidson.

Davidson is a relative newcomer to Carolina, and although he's called a few good games this season, the game plan that unfolded against the Cardinals was mind-blowing. The Panthers have the most explosive running back tandem in the NFL, and yet there are no creative ways to get them the ball. No screens, no direct snaps, no double backfield of Double Trouble.

Thomas hit the nail on the head here. Though I will still support Davidson going forward this is a huge concern. A lack of offensive imagination has been a problem in Carolina since Dan Henning' tenure and it still carries over to this day.

That was the problem Saturday night. The Cardinals knew where Delhomme was going to throw, and they knew how to bait him into throwing it where they wanted him to throw it. That's a symptom of a QB locking in on targets and an unimaginative offense.

You are preaching to the choir brother Brad. So now that we've peeled back the onion we are all crying and lamenting the end of what was such a promising season. Will the Panther coaching staff learn from this failure? Will JR give each of them a chance. The Panther brass are taking this week off but will regroup next week to start the evaluation process. If this off-season goes anything like last year, we won't have to wait for long for their first moves. They made some good moves and some bad last season but overall improved the team. They will find it harder this time around but we can only hope they learn from this season's failures.

0 recs  |  Comment 24 comments |

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

Good points

I really like the benching analogy, right on. But it probably just shows Fox didn’t much care for Peete.

The second biggest point is the locking onto one receiver. I think the biggest reason to have another QB next year could very well be just to spread the ball around. That’s also why bringing another WR isn’t a great idea. Until our QB will actually move throw around, we will not find our 2nd/3rd WR (not taking anything away from Moose, I’m glad he’s back).

by LittleKing on Jan 13, 2009 9:20 AM EST reply actions   0 recs

What's worse is Jake stares at them.

That’s the big thing that irritated me. The interception in the endzone where Jake was trying to throw the ball to Steve Smith. He stood back in the pocket and watched Steve Smith. He watched him. Right when the ball was snapped he turned to Smitty and kept his eyes on him through the entire play, like other people can’t read his eyes and know what he’s going to do once he throws back that arm and dedicates himself to the throw.

Makes me sick just thinking about it.

"Once again the trowsers of evil are yanked down by the mocking hands of justice!"-Revshawn

by Revshawn on Jan 13, 2009 12:15 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

There is one underlining factor in all this!

And its JOHN FOX!

Henning was vanilla when here but now is creative in Miami? Davidson was a creative before coming here but now is vanilla? Who is really controlling things? Davidson wanted more zone blocking and passing to TE. But this year has seen neither… it’s ONLY been Fox ball. Power running then chuck it down field.

It’s time for BILL COWHER!!! Has that ship sailed yet?

on behalf of tha dirty south: soul food, carolina blue, southern hospitality, and tha queen city

by southtunnel on Jan 13, 2009 9:08 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Was Cowher known for being creative?

Or are just looking for a change.

I blog the Carolina Panthers at www.catscratchreader.com

by Jaxon on Jan 14, 2009 8:24 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

having options and using them

Thomas is spot-on in his analysis. It’s not just having a 2nd and 3rd receiver, it’s USING them. I’ve always wondered why the TE position is so under-utilized by the Panthers. Thomas answers my question.

by kilgore_trout on Jan 13, 2009 9:52 AM EST reply actions   0 recs

Jake or Coaches

I completely agree, the ball has to be spread around more than Jake does. But does it go back to Jake or the coaching staff, I don’t know.

by LittleKing on Jan 13, 2009 12:35 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Disheartening

      So let me get this straight. We have an ineffective QB because the QB coach is ineffective at coaching, we have an offensive coordinator that is unimaginative, we have backup QB’s on the roster just in case the starter is injured and can’t go, and we have a coach who is unwilling to change offensively or defensively despite the numerous flaws in the play calling and is loyal to players even when they need to benched due to poor performance. The QB position is the most important position on the offense and it looks like one of our weakest links. Doesn’t provide much hope for the upcoming season now does it? Nice find Jaxon.

by Davejinxer on Jan 13, 2009 10:05 AM EST reply actions   0 recs

lots of blame

There is so much more to think about that maybe we can’t see from our seats. I remember when Peyton Manning threw TD #49 to Brandon Stokely a few years ago on a double move. Stokely cut to the outside and Manning threw the ball to the end zone. Then as the DBs were converging on Stokely, he cut again. The ball had already been in the air for a couple seconds. It hit Stokely in the chest at the goal line a second after he turned to look for it. That year, Stokely was third on the team in receptions, yards and TDs (over 1000 yards and 10 TDs). In Carolina, if you are the third receiver, are you really going to complete your double move route? YOu know you could walk off the field and Jake wouldn’t notice. If Smitty waited until the last second to throw the ball, it would be too late for him to stop and jump as high as he can to catch it. The point is that the coaches can do whatever they want, but if Jake throws up punts disguised as passes, it doesn’t matter. I mean, none of Jake’s friends asked him over the last few years why he throws the ball so high? No one asked him why he stares down receivers? The truth is that we’re discussing this now, but these habits are not new to Jake. What is new is throwing the ball more than twice the number of times he hands off to two 1st round draft pick running backs. The coaches are horrible not just in play calling, but player development. Why did Moose have to come back before Jarrett learned how to run routes? Do we have a receivers coach? Was he busy that day? Maybe he was asking the QB coach to ask Jake to throw the ball to the receivers in stride. Either way, only 15 runs is ridiculous, and giving up 33 points is absurd. When Jake commits a turnover, could the defense at least force one or two for us…or how about maybe a QB pressure just for the fun of it.

by usana_gaines on Jan 13, 2009 3:21 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

"punts disguised as passes"

lol…that’s good stuff.

I wish I could get the aerial photos the teams get during the game. I’d like to see if other receivers are open while Jake is trying to force the ball into Smitty.

The first INT was on 2nd and 9 at the Cards 14 yard line. Why are we throwing the ball there when we just scored from the 9 running it? Run the damn ball. I agree with Thomas in that throughout the season we ran the same running plays over and over. A-gap up the middle, off-tackle kick-out or the outside stretch play. That’s it.

I blog the Carolina Panthers at www.catscratchreader.com

by Jaxon on Jan 13, 2009 4:41 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

I have no problem

with the Panthers running similar running plays over and over because running plays can still work even if run over and over but the passing game is what I am worried about. Jake does stare his receivers down. Maybe Fox did not yank Delhomme because he did not want to Jake to lose confidence or the confidence of his teammates, but if this is true, how low is the confidence level in Jake already if they thought that would ruin him. This also does not show much confidence in McCown.

I dislike it when people say the running game opens things up for Steve Smith because it makes the team’s success completely dependent on running the ball and if the Panthers get behind, then mayhem will ensue. We lost the game to TB, Minn, and Arizona because we can not pass the ball when play action is not utilitzed. The offense’s problem is that if we can’t run the ball, we can’t pass the ball either and that is not the case for every team in the NFL and that is a huge problem. A team should be able to come back if it has to pass the ball and the Panthers can’t do it because the play action does not work. I don’t want the running game to open the game up for Smith, I would like for the passing game to have some success even without the running game being at a high level all the time. It scares no one when the Panthers to go to a 4/5 wide receiver set and Jeff King/Dante Rosario are out there. First off, we rarely ever get more than 3 receivers on the field and when we do the defense can still shadow Steve Smith because they only have to play a linebacker on King/Rosario. There are fundamental flaws in the passing game that need to be addressed.

by bengoodfella on Jan 13, 2009 5:11 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Good points. The Panthers rarely threw to the TE this season

I blog the Carolina Panthers at www.catscratchreader.com

by Jaxon on Jan 14, 2009 8:27 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Delhomme 2003 to now

Anyone remember in 2003 that there was all this talk about Henning keeping Jake on a short leash? I think there was a good reason for it. He had the most success when he was limited. Jake’s not the kind of QB you want making difficult decisions…calling plays at the line of scrimmage, etc. He’s a gunslinger. It needs to be “look to A, check to B, or throw it away”

Henning is certainly not as vanilla as we thought based on what I’ve seen from Miami. Methinks he might have been using the talent he had.

Davidson has proven that he’s capable of building a solid system. IMO, he needs to reign Jake in or bring someone else in. (Is Weinke still available?)

by panthers22 on Jan 13, 2009 5:23 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

I completely agree with you

I was saying the same thing the other day, about how Jake used to be a game manager and somewhere along the line he became a guy who tried to make plays happen. I don’t think we should simplify the offense or anything like that but from the Super Bowl until now, it seems as if Jake has been given more freedom than he knows what to do with. We have an offense built completely along the lines of taking care of the ball and a QB that makes mistakes when he has to make difficult plays.

I don’t think Jake is that bad, I just think he is trying way too hard to make a play.

by bengoodfella on Jan 13, 2009 5:27 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Bill Cowher anyone???

You didn’t really say Stinky Weinke did you?

But we ran Henning out of town! And because he kept playing the same vanilla plays over and over? How many times did Smitty get thrown a screen pass per game? How many times did we run up the middle on 3rd and long? And now in Miami he is a creative genius?

What/Who is the underlining factor in all this??? John Fox! Maybe its time to see if the Bill Cowher bus is still interested inmaking a stop in Charlotte.

on behalf of tha dirty south: soul food, carolina blue, southern hospitality, and tha queen city

by southtunnel on Jan 13, 2009 9:04 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I forgot Henning went to Miami.

So he is responsible for the Wildcat coming back in ’08? Geeez, think the Panthers would ever revitalize a trend?

I blog the Carolina Panthers at www.catscratchreader.com

by Jaxon on Jan 14, 2009 8:28 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

My how you change your opinions so quickly

That was one game. Yeah it was awful, inexplicably horrible, but that happens, in every sport it happens.

Your sources who lay into the guys aren’t 100% convincing either. Bear in mind that sports writers have to write something, the more conclusive it sounds the more interesting it is, therefore you have to take the work of journalists with a pinch of salt. You win – you’re the best thing ever, you lose – they saw it coming and there are flaws in your organisation sucking any potential to succeed out.

NOT TRUE. Either way. The Panthers aren’t the best team in the NFL, I’m not shattering anyone’s illusion with that statement. Areas to improve our the D-Line (particular interior depth, they could do with a play making DT and don’t let Pep walk!) and potentially the secondary. Real competition for QB would be better and you have to wonder what Jake would have to do to get benched (murder someone?).

But the Panthers ARE one of the best teams in the NFL at present, they’re a better team than the Cardinals IMO, they just played cack. They went 12-4 in the regular season with all the catastrophic flaws that you’ve all underlined. With only one competition to win (unlike our UK sports where there are multiple cups alongside leagues) only 1 team ends up with the prize and I bet every single team except them has fans assassinate them on message boards and in bars etc.

Perspective is what you need here.

The Panthers had WAY more right than wrong this year. It went south in one game. So what? Yeah it sucks, but I’m still really glad I followed them from over here and all the joy I got out of it. And sure there are areas to improve, but if I met anyone involved with the Panthers this year, Mike McCoy included, I’d congratulate them on their work, cos frankly it was pretty good.

by JIMcK on Jan 13, 2009 6:33 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

I've certainly turned on Jake quickly

It was such a poor performance I question whether he has what it takes to get back to the SB. Hopefully he’ll use that as motivation to do what it takes in the off-season to get back to the basics. I have no other problems with the offense, just needs a couple tweaks.

I think the defense needs more work. You make good points JIMcK and I’m sure we will all cool down a little and show more perspective once the entire season is over. The Panthers do have an NFC South crown and for that I am very happy.

I blog the Carolina Panthers at www.catscratchreader.com

by Jaxon on Jan 14, 2009 8:33 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

well...

for how long are we going to keep going with Jake? Until he’s Vinny’s age? We need a viable backup (sorry I really don’t think Matt Moore is the guy) so when next season begins and Jake isn’t doing good, we can do like in 2003 and throw in the backup and pray for some magic. Thats why I feel its important to do some dealing for a 1st round pick to get a good QB…Bradford would be a great pick. Think about it…this team has never had a truly GREAT QB who can hit the receivers with peyton like accuracy. Imagine if we had that kind of QB with our running game and O-line, and if we can find a 3rd receiver or see if Jason Carter or Ryne Robinson can do something, we could be great. Thats something Brady and Manning never had, a great running game. We have that. We need a good QB, Jake is not that…its time to start looking.

And, its time to fix up the defense. The D-Line and CBs need work. linebackers and safeties are fine. and a new defensive coordinator is a must.

my 2 cents

by rkpanthers on Jan 13, 2009 7:07 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

I am with you in the defense completely

but I disagree the team should spend a 1st round pick on a quarterback at this point. I am not going to argue on this point but Manning has had James and Addai, he has had a running game. There have been maybe 10 QBs in the history of the NFL who can hit receivers like Manning, I would not hold my breath trying to find one. I am not counting on Ryne Robinson or Jason Carter to do anything special either, though I am interested to see what happens since Mark Jones was a bright spot this year. No offense, but I don’t know if getting a viable back up, throwing in the backup and praying for magic is the best option. I would love to get a great QB but with Peppers and Gross free agents I think we should not drop large amounts of money trying to get a 1st round QB. I would prefer to draft a QB later and give Jake another year at the helm, unless a better option presents itself.

I am not of the opinion we should franchise Peppers and I don’t think the Panthers will do that. I know I am going to get yelled at for saying this but I am not sure he is worth what is going to want. I have never seen him as a consistent game changing DE. He’s a freak of nature but I don’t think he shows up every game.

by bengoodfella on Jan 13, 2009 7:49 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I'd keep Gross over Peppers if the money

and salary cap prevents signing both. The thought of trading Pep for draft picks is intriguing but then the Panthers would have to turn around and find another DE. Where you going to find one as good as Pep?

I blog the Carolina Panthers at www.catscratchreader.com

by Jaxon on Jan 14, 2009 8:37 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Well

you’re not going to. That’s the problem.

by bengoodfella on Jan 14, 2009 8:58 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I wish

we we had not signed Gamble and then maybe signing Gross and Peppers would seem possible. We can’t find a DE in the draft/free agency as good as Peppers, unless we traded for one and that seems kind of pointless since we could just keep Peppers.

by bengoodfella on Jan 14, 2009 9:00 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Someone help me with this...

Change my fellow fans is a MUST! I hate to pile it on Jake but, his inconsistantcy, low pocket awareness, slow reads and progressions, and lack of emotional composure can no longer be ignored. It wasnt just the cardnals game but 5 or 6 others this season. Truth.. its not all jakes fault, John Fox’s philosophy has become too obvious, with his run first game plan (which is fine; until it fails) not enough attention and scheme is applied to the passing game. I dont know if its the routes or just bad play designs; but it looks premative compared to what other teams execute. I hold my breath every 3rd down Passing situation!
   On defense, front 4 good, linebackers better, secondary AWFUL. Our saftey plays is kinda ok but the CBs have been getting OWNed all year. I love Peppers but in this economy, if you can clear cap room and sure up 2 or 3 defensive positions, thanks for the memories Pep. Special teams are solid with Kasey, Lloyd, and M. Jones.
   Here are the Facts, this may be the last year as the panthers we know. Jake is on the down slide, Give jake his last year but get a promising QB now, Brian Johnson looks very good from Utah and is under the radar. Coaching has to evolve beyond the run focused offense, and defense needs personel upgrades, coordinator & CBs. People most of the pieces are there, this is a good team on the verge of greatness. John Fox needs to stop being stubborn and change a little, it seems like he coaches for a close game every game. We changed O coordinators this year and the passing game didnt change which means its either Jake or John Fox’s philosophy.

BALANCE, BALANCE, BALANCE is only a QB (or massive improvement) and play call away! - rookies can make differences and quick study systems.

Agree or disagree, help me with this…

by ePanther on Jan 17, 2009 9:57 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the SB Nation blog focused on the NFL's Carolina Panthers.

Site Code of Conduct

Open Thread 3pm EST 11/08 Panthers @ Saints
Start posting about the Panthers »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Andrew602_avatar_small
Ask Revenge of the Birds

Recent FanPosts

Funny-hilarious-kid-child-pics-162_small
Fullback quandry
3792654100_3c18c5287e_small
Panthers RB Analysis: Double Trouble 2008 vs. 2009
Small
John Kasay injured?
3792654100_3c18c5287e_small
Panthers Secondary and Double Trouble
Funny-hilarious-kid-child-pics-162_small
Should the Panthers run the Wildcat?
Funny-hilarious-kid-child-pics-162_small
From Realfootball365...
Small
Fire fox, cut jake, draft edwards, blah blah blah...bring on the aints.
Jake-delhomme_small
Would a 3 RB Offense work for the panthers???
Smitty_small
Chargers release WR Chris Chambers
Small
Armanti Edwards update

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Latest NFL Headlines from SB Nation

Arrowhead Pride
Friday Night Open Thread
Mobile Live
Fantasy Football Friday: Giants vs. Chargers Preview
Big Cat Country
Sandra has some ideas for the Jaguars

Editors

N1523447507_30151367_6579_small Cyberjag

Img_0764_small LittleKing

Currentflag_small James The Aussie

Authors

Dbc92c5112a9b23c_small Revshawn

Myspace_small Ryan Basen