Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Knicks Beat Lakers With Familiar Strategy

Panthers Article Round-up

Here are some choice links to articles around the web on the Panthers loss to the Falcons:

The MVP of the game for the Falcons was easily Harry Douglas.

Early in the game, with the Falcons in an empty backfield set, Douglas took a handoff from a slot receiver position and scored against the surprised Panthers defense. Then in the third quarter, Douglas snagged a short pass, dodged a defensive back and went 69 yards to set up Turner's third touchdown. And to put the game away, Douglas returned the Panthers' punt 61 yards for another touchdown. Three plays, a massive impact and no way that the Panthers saw it coming.

I certainly never saw it coming. Maybe the Panthers should spend a 3rd round pick on a return guy next year?

==========

John Fox is back to his ‘protect the players at all costs' mode

We're ready to play," Fox replied when asked about the slow starts. "Have we been more ready to play in the eight wins and less ready to play in the three losses? I don't know. I can't answer that. I'm just glad it isn't the other way around."

He always plays the positive spin after a big loss. You know, "never let your highs get too high, or your lows too low". Here's another classic Fox rebuttal to a probably negative question:

"I'm sure glad we were more emotionally and technically right in eight of them than the other three," Fox said, dismissing another question. "The other team practices, too, and it's hard to win all of them."

All I can say is let's see how they respond in Green Bay. Later on in this post I found something surprising:

Offensively, Delhomme recovered from a gash to his right elbow that had to be stitched up at halftime to throw for 295 yards, Williams had his fourth straight 100-yard rushing game and Steve Smith had 168 yards receiving. But the sluggish starts and key penalties remain a concern. "I felt like I threw better after the hit, so I think it might have helped," Delhomme said.

Jake had a gash on his elbow that got stitched at halftime? I never saw that. Weird that he actually thought it helped. Anyone else see it?

==========

 

Star-divide

Fox on the offensive line play:

On all five offensive-line starters playing an entire game as a unit for the first time this season: I thought (they played) good in spots. I thought we miscommunicated a couple of protections, which is par for the course -- even in games we win. They haven't played together in a long time, and I think there is some continuity there that we have to get back and I expect us to.

I have yet to do my film review but it was my impression after the game that DT Grady Jackson manhandled C Ryan Kalil up front. I'm not saying for sure but it seemed the front of the pocket collapsed a lot.

==========

Apparently even after 10 previous games the Falcons were still able to unveil some new wrinkles on offense. I've already mentioned the empty backfield run by Douglas for a TD. Now other wrinkles are being exposed:

The Falcons' no-huddle offense really seemed to give the Panthers fits.

"They had a lot of different personnel groupings and did a good job hiding their substitutions," coach John Fox said. "It caused us to be a little bit behind on defense."

I did feel like we got out-coached in this one. Maybe this had something to do with it. If your defense is making their calls late it has to affect response time.

 

==========

Is there something to the fact LB Landon Johnson was inactive for the game?

• LB Landon Johnson was inactive Sunday. It's fairly obvious by now the Panthers have soured on Johnson, who received a three-year contract worth $10 million in the off-season but was never able to unseat Na'il Diggs for a starting job during training camp. He has just six tackles this season. This was the first time he's been inactive.

I was thinking Johnson has played well on special team coverage but have searched everywhere and I can't find the stats for ‘special team' tackles. It's in the gamebooks but I'm not in the mood to add them all up. Would Johnson have prevented the Douglas PR TD? Probably not but you never know. Maybe we should have traded this guy before the trade deadline.

Comment 6 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

I saw the gash....

He did get it pretty good. He got it sometime in the 2nd half when he started getting emotional and fussing at his O-line. I’m pretty sure I remember that they wrapped it on the sidelines. Camera gave a short view of him while the defense was busy showing us how much they stink.

"Once again the trowsers of evil are yanked down by the mocking hands of justice!"-Revshawn

by Revshawn on Nov 25, 2008 4:03 PM EST reply actions  

It would seem both lines had a bad day

The o-line couldn’t adequately open holes for the running game nor protect Jake long enough on key passes. The d-line couldn;t stop the run either

I blog the Carolina Panthers at www.catscratchreader.com

by Jaxon on Nov 25, 2008 4:09 PM EST up reply actions  

OL & DL

You’re right Jaxon, both the OL & DL played poorly, their not going to win many games against good teams when their lines played like they did against the Falcons. It all starts in the trenches. Also, I thought they should have left Hangartner in rather than bring Kalil back in. Kalil never seems to get any push on opposing DLs, plus he was burned for a sack to boot. If Hangartner was playing, who knows, Stewart might have been able to punch it in when they were at the Falcon 1 yard line, instead of getting “no gain” because the OL couldn’t get any kind of push. I’m not impressed with Kalil at all, not his playing or his durability. His size was a concern in the beginning, now it definitely is.

by meanoreno on Nov 26, 2008 1:47 AM EST reply actions  

11-5 not good enough

At the beginning of the season, I predicted we’d go 12-4 or 13-3. I still hold on to that prediction, but there’s a twist. Looking at the current standings, we could possibly go 11-5 and not make the playoffs. The Panthers need to realize that our playoffs need to start now. Lose and go home. After the 4 division winners (TB for the south at the moment), there are half a dozen teams with 3-5 losses.

by usana_gaines on Nov 26, 2008 4:46 AM EST reply actions  

I think a 10-6 team might not make the playoffs in the NFC

similar to Cleveland last year. But 11 wins would almost certainly get in. You’re saying the Bucs (or even Falcons if they finish 4-1) would win at least 11 but then for the Panthers to not get in both the three of these team would have to win out or only sustain one loss: Redskins, Cowboys, Packers and Vikings. I don;t see that happening.

All the Panthers need to worry about is winning three more games. The most likely three based on record would be the Packers, Broncos and Saints. I also think the Panthers can and will beat the Bucs at home on Monday night. That only leaves the Giants game and seeing as they may have home field wrapped up by then we might see some starters sitting. There’s no reason this team can’t get to 11 wins and a playoff berth.

I blog the Carolina Panthers at www.catscratchreader.com

by Jaxon on Nov 26, 2008 10:51 AM EST up reply actions  

10-6 record might not make it

I agree with you Jaxon in that a 10-6 record might not make it, but an 11-5 should do it. I think that if the Panthers could pull out 3 wins out of their next five games, then the most likely ones would be against the Packers, Bucs, and Broncos. I think the Saints are playing too good in their house for the Panthers to pull out a victory there. The Saints are averaging 34 points at home so far this season with two home games left to play, 34 points is too much for the Panthers to overcome.

The Packers are averaging 27 points at home, still a high number, but a TD less than the Saints. This is why I believe this weeks game against the Packers is so important. If the Panthers beat the Packers I believe they could go 11-5, if they lose to the Packers, I don’t think they could go 11-5, and would most likely miss the playoffs. I don’t think they could beat the Giants or Saints at their house, and they would have to beat one of them if they lost to the Packers.

by meanoreno on Nov 27, 2008 1:54 AM EST up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Listen to Cat Scratch Radio Tuesdays 10pm EST

Media Requests email: CatScratchReader89@yahoo.com

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Desmond_pics467_small
The Carolina Panthers: One Fan's Journey
Gunnyhartman_small
CSR OT Open Thread, Vol. 8
Sir_purr_small
Decisions Galore for Panthers Front Office
Desmond_pics467_small
Why Not The Panthers?
Gunnyhartman_small
CSR OT Open Thread, Vol. 7

Recent FanPosts

Small
2012 Draft's 10 Most Overated Players
Small
Updated Draft Board with Interesting Article
Desmond_pics467_small
Hips Don't Lie: A Complicated Tale Of Verticals, Forties, And Other Fascinating Numbers
Small
A Possible New Free Agent DT Target?
1285514838068_small
Newton change to #2?
Small
Another Possibility for Cam’s Backup
Cam_smith_small
How Injury Has Plagued Our Draft Board
Small
Second Attempt at the 2012 Offseason and Draft
Small
Average Draft Position, Top 15 Picks, From 6 Top Mock Drafts

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Managers

Catscratchreader_m_small Jaxon

091311101554_small James Dator

Editors

N1523447507_30151367_6579_small Cyberjag

Img_0764_small LittleKing

Gunnyhartman_small BW Smith

Authors

Unnamed_small Revshawn

Mphg_small Rick Bates

Img_0050_small BrandonBecker

Social Media

Small TLong